Stay updated with breaking news from Wasnt in control. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
that they weren't followed. the book should stop with the prime minister for what happened in the number ten, his office, if you like, and he clearly wasn't in control. it is quite long for him to hire expensive lawyers and try to hide behind them and then throwjunior staff to the wolves —— quite wrong. sue gray's interim report concluded it was a failure of leadership and judgment, a damning indictment. it is clear to me that if the police say levels of the premise should go. but me that if the police say levels of the premise should go.— the premise should go. but boris johnson himself, _ the premise should go. but boris johnson himself, as _ the premise should go. but boris johnson himself, as far— the premise should go. but boris johnson himself, as far as i the premise should go. but boris johnson himself, as far as far i the premise should go. but boris johnson himself, as far as far as | the premise should go. but boris i johnson himself, as far as far as we understand, hasn't been issued with a fixed penalty notice. i suppose i'm not entirely clear by what we've learnt to date means he should resign. learnt to date means he should resin. ~ ., ., ., resign. well, he told parliament the new rules had _ resign. well, he told parliament the new rules had been _ resign. well, he told parliament the new rules had been broken - resign. well, he told parliament the new rules had been broken and i resign. well, he told parliament the i new rules had been broken and police concluded they were so he clearly lied to parliament. people have got the evidence of at least three parties that he attended. i think it
handle this to the extent that we can. >> so the guy leading the jury and also kind of the judge says he has the same position as the defendant? surely senate majority leader mitch mcconnell spoke, right? wrong. >> exactly how we go forward, i'm going to coordinate with the president's lawyers, so there won't be any difference between us on how to do this. >> that was the second time. he said it again. anyway, to be fair, tom daschle, senate minority leader during the clinton impeachment -- so he wasn't in control, but he was the ranking member of his party. he tells cnn he didn't personally speak to the president during the process, but his team was in constant contact with the white house coordinating the moving parts. what's the difference? one, he wasn't in power of the process, right? he wasn't in control. the idea that, well, they all stink, no, not here. there's a big difference between
he has the same position as the defendant? surely senate majority leader mitch mcconnell spoke, right? wrong. >> exactly how we go forward, i'm going to coordinate with the president's lawyers, so there won't be any difference between us on how to do this. >> that was the second time. he said it again. anyway, to be fair, tom daschle, senate minority leader during the clinton impeachment -- so he wasn't in control, but he was the ranking member of his party. he tells cnn he didn't personally speak to the president during the process, but his team was in constant contact with the white house coordinating the moving parts. what's the difference? one, he wasn't in power of the process, right? he wunts in control. the idea that, well, they all stink, no, not here. there's a big difference between letting the white house know what's going on when you're not even in control and asking the white house what should happen. that's what republicans are doing, and they are continuously subordinating their oath to
those eyes. you could see it, which perhaps led to anger with all the rules and the fact that she wasn't in control. >> either take the rod out of my ass or just stick it on in. >> all right. y'all ready? >> during our stay at tennessee, culbertson's disciplinary write-ups played a major role in her being denied parole. >> recommend she be granted parole at this time would have an adverse effect on the institutional discipline. ms. culbertson, i'm going to recommend you be confined for the balance of your sentence. thank you. you have a good day. >> three days later she received a new disciplinary write-up. >> they charged me with disrespect. i was in church. i had my arm on the chair and a girl touched my arm and it's disrespect. i disrespected the chaplain. she's homophobic so -- >> what's the worst case? >> they're gonna [ bleep ] me. >> what does that mean? >> you see that building right there? i'm going to lockdown. it's a jail within a jail, segregation. this kind of stuff is what took
that he never drank to excess, including a classmate who said he never saw kavanaugh in a state where he wasn't in control. with me cnn law analyst josh campbell, once a special agent for the fbi. back at it again today. we have heard from democrat senator chris coons, from dianne feinstein, both of whom say they do not believe that this fbi report -- they believe it should be kept confidential. no matter the findings at the end of the week, keep it sealed. you disagree with that. >> i do, who heartleheartedly. >> why? >> the intense investigation surrounding this nomination, if these lingering questions aren't answered, not only by politicians, by people who have an ax to grind, some sort of
>> reporter: many described dke as a hard-partying fraternity. most had positive memories of kavanaugh, but not all. one woman called him an aggressive, obnoxious drunk, saying his fraternity was misogynistic. one classmate who was in the same secret society, truth and courage as kavanaugh, say they drank but never saw him in a state where he wasn't in control. a female classmate who knew kavanaugh well found the allegations shocking, saying she remembers kavanaugh as an he n dreamily intelligent and extremely nice and sensitive man. >> i'm just asking for a fair process, where i can be heard and defend my integrity and defend my family's integrity. >> reporter: now, the big question, brooke, is will debby ramirez be allowed to testify before the senate committee? it is not very clear, and
thank god i didn't. >> sandra is a very kind-hearted, wonderful person. >> oh, my. >> a little bit hillbilly-ish, as you know, but hell, we're in tennessee, right? i love her to death. she's a great person. >> but we came to discover that sandra was also the type of inmate who would constantly challenge the correctional staff. >> you know you got two disciplines. you know what's going to happen if you get that third. >> during our stay she would pay some dues for her behavior. >> because everybody, including the staff, knew what she was doing and the same attention that she was getting from the other inmates she was also getting that attention from the staff. >> i ain't gonna play y'all games. >> there was some pain behind those eyes. you could see it, which perhaps led to anger with all the rules and the fact that she wasn't in control. >> either take the rod out of my ass or just stick it on in. >> all right.
control. and neither was brian.@j÷ nichols butoñ jesus was in control and the rest of the night was going to be the waysx!he wanted it to be. >> there wereo ájjt moments as the night went on including a coupz9 tçñ escape. there wasñr' atkud time first where(2-s you, he let you go to the bathr7m0f and what was in the bathroom? >> thei>m >> right. >> so he realizes she's got the weapons now. and instead of grabbing them and turning themgwúç on him, he returned thembçiu when he banged on the door and said give them back. that was effort to build trust or a fear? >> for me just a fear because i never used a gun before. i thought i will if iqázñ pick6r these gunsçy2 i'll probably end up shooting myself. you know? or doing damage to&?çr me. that so that is -- >> another÷ convinced you to help him hide
in that apartment are a man and woman struggling with personal demons and by faith each emerges somehow better for the experience experience. joining me tonemy perkins president of the family research council and still speaks to groups around the country and author of the new book "no fear," stories of a courage new generation standing for truth. the story has to move even non-believers a little to stop and consider what the power of faith in god can do for your life. >> it's a powerful story. as a law enforcement officer i have not seen many cases end like this. it really is the power of redemption as she simply read from "the purposes driven life" and the message of redemption and all of us whether we admit it or not are searching for that
going to be the last time i ever did it and it was going to be the last day of my life and i really believe god was saying do you want to continue living this life or do you want a new one because if you say no, then i'll give you a new life and, you know, to be quite honest, a new life even for five minutes was, you know, that sounded more appealing to me than the way that i had been living. >> you see that now in retrospect. in the moment, were you conscious of that, of the presence? did you feel that presence or did you just feel a strong instinct probably for the first time to say no? >> no, i felt the presence of god telling me, do you know what, this is it. you can choose the old life or you can choose the new life. and i will give it to you. like i said, i didn't know if i was going to make it out of there alive. i didn't know if it was five minutes of a new life or 50 years of a new life. but as soon as i chose not to do those drugs, it was just a sense of freedom for me, you know, physically i was still being held captive, but i realized that ashley smith wasn't in