Wasnt Invoking News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

No -- >> the meaning of the statute, chris, is clear on its own terms. if you don't like the statute or members of congress don't -- chris: would you agree the answer is, no, there hasn't been a single -- >> the premise of your question is false because congress has appropriated money for construction of border barriers consistently. this is part of a national security -- chris: but they've never done this under a national emergency -- >> but we've declared national emergencies to promote democracy in belarus, to promote democracy in zimbabwe -- chris: taking into effect money that congress re...

>> the meaning of the statute, chris, is clear on its own terms. if you don't like the statute or members of congress don't -- chris: would you agree the answer is, no, there hasn't been a single -- >> the premise of your question is false because congress has appropriated money for construction of border barriers consistently. this is part of a national security -- chris: but they've never done this under a national emergency -- >> but we've declared national emergencies to promote democracy in belarus, to promote democracy in zimbabwe -- chris: taking into effect money that congress refused ...

>> the meaning of the statute, chris, is clear on its own terms. if you don't like the statute or members of congress don't -- chris: would you agree the answer is, no, there hasn't been a single -- >> the premise of your question is false because congress has appropriated money for construction of border barriers consistently. this is part of a national security -- chris: but they've never done this under a national emergency -- >> but we've declared national emergencies to promote democracy in belarus, to promote democracy in zimbabwe -- chris: taking into effect money that congress refused ...

He said under oath today i have no idea how the president viewed that. we all know just from what's in the public domain how the president viewed it. so there are real questions why he's there, why he didn't recuse himself. so as a consequence, we really don't know what actions he's taken in his capacity as acting attorney general. he refused to answer many questions and suggested somehow that although he wasn't invoking executive privilege, he had decided not to answer them pursuant to some doj policy. so we're committed to getting those questions answered because the american people have a r...

Himself. so as a consequence, we really don't know what actions he's taken in his capacity as acting attorney general. he refused to answer many questions and suggested somehow that although he wasn't invoking executive privilege, he had decided not to answer them pursuant to some doj policy. so we're committed to getting those questions answered because the american people have a right to know that he didn't do anything improper, interfering in any way or sharing with the president and his legal team any of the information he received from the special counsel. >> it is, you know, it defies be...