Page 30 - Website Designer News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Compelled to express a message. >> reporter: and so what this lawyer is arguing and what several of the conservative leaning justices seem to be gleaning on to is the fact this is an artist, a website designer is an artist. it is compelled speech if she were forced to endorse messages that she doesn't believe in. so a very lylely argument. we're about one hour into it, kate. and we'll see. the court won't decide this case until next year at some point likely in the spring or summer. kate. >> grease to have you there. thank you so much. joining me now, the republican governor of new hampshire...

Baker case four years ago, the supreme court in this case did side with the baker saying that he doesn't need to make the cake for same-sex couples but that was decided on very narrow grounds. this case is much broader. this case involving that colorado website designer who said that she wants to post a message on ore website saying that she will not do any work for same-sex couples and they're wedding website specifically because she said that that messaging conflicts with her religious views and wants the supreme court to say that a colorado anti-discrimination law that said can you not disc...

Should be able to choose the messages she promotes. an argument some conservative justices seem to side with. >> so the question isn't who, it's what. >> always. >> why are you right about how you characterize website designers? why are they different from, say, restaurants? >> because they're creating speech. in those other examples, speech is not at issue. >> reporter: the supreme court sidestepped this same issue four years ago ruling in favor of a colorado baker who refused to make wedding cakes for same-sex couples. but on very narrow grounds that only applied to that case. now the stakes...

Asking whether a photographer can say only white kids can sit on santa's lap or asking about physically disabled couples being turned away. >> there is no line on race, there is no line on disability, ethnicity, none of the protected categories in a public accommodation law. >> the first amendment is broad enough to cover the lesbian website designer and the catholic calligrapher. the line is that no one on any side of any debate has to be compelled to express a message that violates their core convictions. >> reporter: justice samuel alito took that argument even further. >> so if there is a ...

Arguments between the latest fight between relg use conservatives and those with lbgtq plus rights and now at the highest court, the case is about a colorado web designer's refusal to work on wedding sites for same-sex couples. so here's what went down. you had the conservative justices, who seemed sympathetic, and justice sotomayor seemed more align with the state. listen. >> what's the limiting line of yours? justice kagan asked you about another website designer, but how about people who don't believe in interracial marriage? or about people who don't believe that disabled people should get...