What Kavanagh News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

I don't know if he intended to say that but he said it. even as he repeatedly defended the judge tonight who faces three on the record female accusers and two additional allegations. they are anonymous. it's hard to put weight on those the same way, but we'll talk about that. one of them is from 1985, one is from 1998. that makes it a little more interesting. still, anonymous. now, the latest two claims being that way, you know, you just have to look at them as not carrying that much weight, at least not now until there is more to them. but they were enough for the senate judiciary committee...

Lying to them. so now the judge has to own all of it. and if it's all true, fine. if you take the three named accusers at the absolute minimum value, okay, what do we know? someone was not in church all the time. someone was seen drunk a lot for a guy who denies any excess and may have been present for far worse than just drinking. it does not make him a rapist. don't say it does. it's not fair to the process. but these accounts if true in any way, a minimum standard, they mean something you may hear a lot about tomorrow. brett kavanaugh was not telling the truth about himself. so what? at tri...

Have it with me. the idea of what was done to her, she said she was incapacitated at the time. she certainly couldn't form consent. she says. but she does not identify kavanagh as her attacker, that's what i'm saying, and she's not saying she ever saw kavanagh attack anyone else. i'm asking you what do you think she could say if she were given the chance that should mean the most to senators? that's my question. >> but, chris, she does say she witnessed kavanagh conduct himself inappropriately and verbally and physically abuse women in a sexual manner. i think that's early on in the declaratio...

Change a life just through an accusation, can you? >> i don't agree with his premise at all. first of all, this is not a trial. we are not trying to convict anyone. there is not a standard of innocent until proven guilty. miss blasey ford does not have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. we're not sending someone to jail here. we are trying to assess the credibility of judge kavanagh and whether he has the integrity, whether he has the honesty, whether he's trustworthy enough to be a supreme court justice, and to have a lifetime appointment. and so my job and the job of other senators -- and i...

Professionally, of knowing how to ask questions and have everybody in one place with what they say about everything that matters, and then the senate could proceed. but they're deciding not to do that. so, thank you for giving us this opportunity at least to look at julie swetnick and what she offers and what the challenges are. so, the idea of what would happen if she were to be asked about this stuff, one of the things that came up in assessing this and looking at it is there's an age difference with swetnick and kavanagh and the other ones. she's a couple years older than they. i think ka...