Where Simpson Testify News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Both from grassley in the same statement. it would taint the investigation for anybody in the public to know what you have told us. also, you should have said it publicly. those are two very contradictory ideas. you can't say that and you should have just said that. well, tonight, the top democrat on that committee, dianne feinstein, her office tells us for the first time that she does support releasing the ten-hour transcript of simpson's testimony. amy klobuchar also is on the committee and she supports releasing the testimony. so, couple questions. question one, why isn't this transcript be...

Other republican committees from releasing transcripts of testimony from erik prince or from carter page. how do you weigh that as a concern? >> i've read that interview, and closely reviewed it and i've also, by the way, read and closely reviewed the transcript of the interview with donald trump jr. and the real unanswered questions and the ones that should be revealed in public are in donald trump jr.'s testimony and there is no way that the system, if released from glenn simpson, would taint or influence or any way distract from the testimony of others before this committee. and i think the...

First committee where simpson testify, the judiciary committee in the senate, he gave his response. and it doesn't make that much sense. chuck grassley is the chairman of the senate judiciary committee. in august, he said he would support releasing the transcript of simpson's testimony. that's what he said in august. today he said no, doesn't support that anymore. citing, quote, investigative factors he must consider to temporarily protect information in the midst of an ongoing inquiry such as this one, like tainting the memory of other witnesses. more importantly, senator grassley provided fu...

Instance, i told you they broke some news. part of the news they broke is that fusion allowed all readers of "the new york times" to know that one of the things they testified to was their belief that congressional investigators could look into the bank records of deutsche bank and other funders that supported trump's businesses. they also told congressional investigators they should consider looking into red flags for money laundering at numerous trump properties. they suggested that the committees heard that testimony, but showed little interest in pursuing those matters. plenty ofer people ...

Come before the committee. what's going on now seems to be part of an effort to distract from the underlying investigation of collusion between the russians and the trump campaign and their interference in our election and possible obstruction of justice. and it is unconscionable that we do not issue subpoenas for donald trump jr. and others who have relevant knowledge about the potential collusion and obstruction of justice. >> senator grassley is newly making this argument that releasing this information, releasing the transcript of these ten hours of testimony might interfere with ongoing i...