Page 3 - Which Question News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Dossier -- what would you say, a political document opposition research or legitimate intelligence? >> sir, i would very much like to answer that question. >> okay. >> i have been directed by the fbi that i may not get into that based on operational requirements or equities. >> so here's the issue i think we have. we see the bias that you did. your explanations for why you said what you did really aren't credible. we're trying to get to the genesis of why open up a counter intelligence investigation against the opposing party's campaign? i'm with you about focusing on russia and holding them a...

Question -- >> no. >> you raised the question whether i agreed with the inspector general that i had acted in any way that was biased. >> you had an opportunity to answer that earlier. >> i did not to this congressman. i did not. >> the gentleman from illinois is recognized for five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chair. thank you, mr. strzok. mr. strzok, on july 3rd, your lawyer, mr. goldman, made the following statement to chris cuomo on cnn regarding you, his client. on fox news they talk about him as the center of this anti-trump kabal that was determined to throw the election against trump. no...

Investigating someone, i actually did not. but let's go. let's go. we already passed the who gives an f, one more a.d. versus investigation leading to impeachment. i think we established there is a school of thought you can be impeached if you're not a current office holder. you can be barred from holding office in the future. but you did not engage in any impeachment analysis in your 2016 investigation with secretary clinton. you saved all of that for candidate trump. so, i want to go to another text. you and i both know the odds are nothing. if i thought it was likely, i'd be there, no quest...

I recall the penultimate, the second to last polygraph i had was i was washington field office. 2008, 2011. by out of scope, polygraphs have a five-year span of effectiveness or validity. we had several people we were trying to including me we were trying to get red into an intelligence department. they read some names, me and others were out of scope which happens because polygraphs were -- the line for polygraph -- >> i understand. i'm in the military, mr. strzok. i understand the delays in them. you have a secure job and one that is highly sensitive. so, the question is again, i would assum...

>> i do not. >> what steps were taken to bring you into scope? >> i went and had a polygraph. >> okay. was this after the january 16 letter that you received? >> it would have been afterwards. yes. >> if you were out of scope, when was the last time you accessed classified information? >> last -- night before last preparing for this. >> do you currently -- you currently have what classification? >> i have a top secret clearance with some mesiac compartments. >> during the time you were out of scope, did you have access to sci? >> yes, sir. >> are you aware that it is fbi procedure that a failu...