Confidence Strzok News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Conducted in this room today. because rather than focusing on urgent issues like family separation, reasonable efforts to reduce gun violence in our communities, considering legislation to reform our broken immigration system, passing legislation to reduce the cost of prescription drugs, addressing the inability of americans who fall behind in their student loans to discharge that debt in bankruptcy, or oversight of the many conflicts of interest and corruption in this administration, we're having yet another hearing on the hillary clinton e-mails. what you should understand, mr. strzok, is th...

Indicted for conspiring with russia to impact the 2016 election? >> none so my knowledge. yet. >> and we'll be happy to get mr. nadler as a witness in next week's hearing if he wants to help you answer that. so, you wanted president trump to resign two months into his presidency. >> no, sir, i think i read that text as a snarky comment about a book being read and a comment made. it is a conversational text exchange. it is not a desire for something to occur. >> maybe i missed it. help me. god, that we should be so lucky. >> yes, sir, skpand i think you would accept as an intelligent man when p...

As you also know during the course of today's hearing, the majority opposed representative swalwell's motion for steve bannon's testimony. on behalf of the government reform committees, i am delivering a letter to chairman goodlatte and chairman gowdy formally invoking our right to call a minority day of hearings so steve bannon may testify. and i ask unanimous consent to insert a copy of that letter to the hearing record. >> without objection. gentleman from georgia is recognized. >> thank you, mr. chairman. mr. strzok, i appreciate you being here. thank you, and, sir, i take this very seriou...

On this is that when you were out of scope -- and this is the answer that came back from the justice department. you should have been read out of sci. my concern is during this time frame, you were involved in two very high profile, what would have been or at least getting ready for sci information which you were not read out of. this is a concern, it's nothing else from that question. i have no further questions. i am finished and i yield back. >> i think you misstated the conclusion there, sir. i think you said -- >> mr. strzok, mr. strzok -- >> failure required read out. >> the gentleman fr...

So in addition to disappointing the hell out of my democrat colleagues that someone who is investigating russian collusion didn't think there was any there there, why would you be concerned? why would you not be ecstatic that there was no collusion? why the word concern? >> sir, i don't know what i meant -- concern to me seems like there is a lot going on and a lot presumptive that there may be something like impeachment. sir, you have to pick, which one do you want? >> i'm either convinced there is impeachment or i'm convinced what you just read, there is no there there. the reality is if you...