Whitaker Guy News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

And he has raised all these questions about decisions he's going to review. what is he even talking about? i mean, i think this is just a very serious matter that, you know, some grown-up is going to have to clean up soon. >> what about bill barr? is he the grown-up? >> well, yes. i mean, barr, you know, showed during his confirmation hearing that this is a serious person with serious understanding of the law. and at least for the good of the country, it seemed like he can only be confirmed, you know, sooner rather than later because this whitaker guy, i mean, i have no idea what he's doing th...

Constitutional nobody. >> i think matthew whitaker's appointment is unconstitutional, illegal, and plain wrong. >> i do not see any legal opinion that i can take seriously that counters this. >> the office of legal counsel, they are paid to look at these kind of -- it's 30 pages long. people may disagree with it. i think it happens to be correct. this isn't whether it was wise to appoint mr. whitaker, was it wasn't lawful books make under a specific statute passed by congress to permits the president what he did. >> laura: judge napolitano was saying about this very issue and the olc's ruling ...

Court. you just want to hold them off? >> it's terrible. it really is. i agree fully with andy. there is no foreseeable threat. there just isn't. i understand that -- wait, who is this mr. whitaker guy and what did he say as a cnn commentator, but he's now an attorney general of the united states. its regular order. as you well know, lara, their processes within the justice department so he'll be consulting on these kinds of actions that can affect the investigation. he's not a solo performer. >> laura: i want to talk about what's going on with the whitaker appointment, and you have kellyanne ...

Appellate courts judges, district court judges, military court. you just want to hold them off? >> it's terrible. it really is. i agree fully with andy. there is no foreseeable threat. there just isn't. # i understand that -- wait, who is this mr. whitaker guy and what did he say as a cnn commentator, but he's now an attorney general of the united states. so it's regular order. as you well know, laura, there are processes within the justice department. so he'll be consulting on these kinds of actions that can be affecting the investigation. he's not a solo performer. >> laura: i want to talk a...

Appointment was constitutional, illegal and just plain wrong. >> i do not see any legal opinion that i can take seriously that counters this. >> laura: judge? >> the office of legal counsel, is the set of constitutional lawyers. they are paid to look at these kinds of issues and they concluded in a very careful many random that's 30 pages long. people may disagree with it. i think it happens to be correct. this isn't whether it was wise to appoint mr. whitaker, was it lawful? i think it clearly was under a specific statute passed by congress that permits the president to do exactly what he did...