Page 3 - Windsor Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

No evidence of a quid pro quo. republicans need to be careful not to overstate the case. it reminds us that clintons are complicated. they tend to make mistakes. >> it will be interesting to see how much more of this happens before democrats go as public as they did when i was talking to them last night. when we come back on this wee my cut hurts. mine hurt more. mine stopped hurting faster! neosporin plus pain relief starts relieving pain faster and kills more types of infectious bacteria. neosporin plus pain relief kills the germs. fights the pain.

Custom we make the determination about collateral damage or the killing of innocents. in in case that turned out to be wrong. the standard that the president put in place is very high near certainty that there won't be death to civilians. >> this didn't meet those standards. >> the protocols were followed the standard whether or not this was a military facility where al qaeda operated out of and was a threat to our forces was accurate. but hostages were held against one of the facilities we took into action. what the president said here is we should take another look because it was a tragic ac...

The earlier cases that we cited in our briefs, there's five votes including justice kennedy justice ginsberg and justice justice once the case was finally decided because of the inherent rights of individuals, we can count the justices that already decided the defensive marriage case and their explanation why they decided that. >> does it matter if it's 5-4 or 6-3? does it have a different impact? >> i think civil rights cases ought to be decided 9-0, 8-1 the way the civil rights decisions were largely made. it sends a message this country doesn't tolerate discrimination. i think the more just...

Now, there may have been a policy reason to reenforce that, which was to let the progress develop a little bit further. we had less than half the country with marriage equality. overwhelmingly, it's taken over the country. just in the last couple of years you've seen a tremendous movement that i think makes it easier now for the supreme court to make that total decision. >> is it possible the supreme court could basically, i hate to use this phrase but split the baby and say that states have to recognize, all 50 states have to recognize same-sex marriages but individual states cannot issue lic...

Policy reason to reenforce that, which was to let the progress develop a little bit further. we had less than half the country with marriage equality. overwhelmingly, it's taken over the country. just in the last couple of years you've seen a tremendous movement that i think makes it easier now for the supreme court to make that total decision. >> is it possible the supreme court could basically, i hate to use this phrase but split the baby and say that states have to recognize, all 50 states have to recognize same-sex marriages but individual states cannot issue licensees? >> i don't believe ...