addition to their primary, specifically so rand paul can be allowed to get around kentucky law so he can run for his senate seat and for president at the same time. which is something that some increasingly outspoken kentucky republicans believe is a bad deal for them. it would risk their losing that u.s. senate seat to the democrats whether or not rand paul wins or loses the republican nomination for president. unless rand paul gets that two-thirds super majority vote tomorrow which would let him run for his senate seat and president at the same time which is what he wants to do, unless he gets that vote tomorrow letting him do that, as of tomorrow he s going to have to pick which of those seats he wants to run for because he won t be able to do both. one or the other. presidential run which he will almost assuredly lose, for senate re-election bid. something he would have a much better chance at even though it wouldn t be guaranteed. which would you pick if you could only pick one? i
could risk their losing that u.s. senate seat to the democrats, whether or not rand paul wins or loses the republican nomination for president. unless rand paul gets that two-thirds super majority vote tomorrow which would let him run for senate seat and president at the same time, which is what he wants to do, unless he gets that vote tomorrow letting him do that, as of tomorrow he s going to have to pick which he wants to run for because he won t be able to do both. one or the other, presidential run, which he will almost assuredly lose, or senate re-election something which he would have a much better chance at even though it wouldn t be guaranteed. which would you pick if you could only pick one? if you had to quit one of those two races, which would you quit? because there s a very good chance that tomorrow rand paul will be told he has to quit one or the other. tick tock, we ll find out tomorrow. everyone expected rick perry to be the first major candidate to quit the presidentia