Technically not something that the department needs to know and prove at any potential criminal trial. it, obviously, is nice to know what someone's motive is. it can provide evidence at trial, but it's unnecessary in this case, and we may never know the answer to that. but i would like to just say something about the court not making a ruling from the bench, that is orally, and reserving to do a written decision. obviously, this is speculation, but informed speculation, i think that is a good sign for the department of justice. it can now go forward with whatever it has been doing, the nation...