Page 8 - Written Document News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Correspondent kylie atwood joins us from the state department. the white house made it clear that both nato's response and the white house's response were on the same page. and you hear from russian officials and they call the u.s. response the gold standard, so much in terms of what they were hearing from nato. i thought that was interesting. >> the state department has heard what russia has been saying over the last 36, 48 hours, after they received this written document from the united states, with these proposals, with these ideas. obviously meant to de-escalate the situation with ukraine....

County is looking at it criminally, my guess would be that he's been prosecuted criminally. if you read these audacious they are misdemeanor assault allegations, and the statute of limitation is a year, many are outside the statue of limitation, many are out somewhere in, and i would think that a career prosecutor with the kind of crime that they have in albany would focus on the race, murders and arsenal leave the despise of the disgraced governor to the entire democratic party. >> when you look again at that rebuttal, it was parked politics part legal, you can make that argument, i'm interes...

Testimony suddenly get believed? >> so -- so absolutely. gordon sondland, to remind your viewers, also said there was a quid pro quo, as it related to the meeting in the white house. but i thought the wording of this is really important. so the president, in his six-page letter, never said something that he has repeatedly said in other context. which is that there was no quid pro quo. and there, the question is, why is that not in a letter that went to congress? and i think the answer to that is it is a crime. it is a federal crime to submit a written document, knowingly, that contains a false...

Other tools to figure out what happened here at omg? >> well, i think one of the most important things is they got their hands on apportionments. when you freeze funds in this manner, there is a written document that you have to sign. it is signed by a specific person on a specific date. and it explains why the funding is basically being held up. and what we have seen from the recently released depositions is that the house has their hands on the documents. they tell a damning story. in late july, mark signed off on a brief two-week or so delay. after that he was pushed aside. and future delay...

Verbal comment or a written document. and here the defendant wanted to submit a written statement saying he wasn't properly read his miranda rights. he didn't understand them. and he didn't knowingly wave them. the judge said sorry, you can't do that because it is hearsay. and the spirit of the hearsay doctrine is you have got to be subjected to cross-examination. if you just let him submit a written affidavit, he can't be cross-examined. so the judge made the right ruling. ainsley: what is going to happen with this case because it's got to be infuriating with her family. they want closure. th...