it s all rather depressing. onto the death of james lovelock it s all rather depressing. onto the death of james lovelock on - it s all rather depressing. onto the death of james lovelock on his - it s all rather depressing. onto the l death of james lovelock on his 103rd death of james lovelock on his 103rd birthday, stephen sackur how to talk with him, he was an extraordinary unorthodox scientist who never went along with the orthodoxy of the scientific world which made him so brilliant. did you read that book you did on the gaia theory of the universe, and just how pressing it he was about these things? of course backin he was about these things? of course back in the 19605 and he was about these things? of course back in the 19605 and 705, itju5t didn t seem as relevant as it is today. leie i didn t read the book but i ve been reading about him, such an interesting character. for such an interesting character. far ahead of his time in the 1960s and 705. ahead of his t
for everybody nowadays, even scientists, saying things that go against the grain, having uncomfortable theories and hypotheses that you re prepared to test in a scientific way has become more and more difficult. and he is such a symbol of independent thought, that we should really be celebrating. thought, that we should really be celebrating- thought, that we should really be celebrating. james lovelock, who died on his celebrating. james lovelock, who died on his 103rd celebrating. james lovelock, who died on his 103rd birthday - celebrating. james lovelock, who died on his 103rd birthdayjust - celebrating. james lovelock, who died on his 103rd birthdayjust a l died on his 103rd birthdayjust a few days ago. shelby and with the voice? i don t know how often both of you read it the voice. do you read the voice? i’m but i was looking at the front cover, 40 but i was looking at the front cover, 40 years! but i was looking at the front cover, 40 years! interesting also, wh it cov