Live Breaking News & Updates on நீதிபதிகள் வைத்தியநாதன்

Stay updated with breaking news from நீதிபதிகள் வைத்தியநாதன். Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Wife Not Entitled to Insurance Money if Deceased Husband Did Not Contribute to Premium Payment: Madras HC


 0
The Madras High Court (HC) has ruled that the wife is not entitled for a share in the insured money, if her deceased husband did not contribute towards the premium payment.
 
In a recent ruling, Justice S Vaidyanathan passed interim order on a petition from G Asha, wife of Ganesh Raja of Veppampattu in Tiruvallur district. In case the deceased husband had not made any contribution towards premium, there is no justification on the wife’s part to seek her share, Justice  Vaidyanathan said.
 
Justice Vaidyanathan sought to know who had paid the insurance premium in its entirety till the demise of Ganesh Raja,  whether it was his father or he himself has paid or contributed towards the premium payment. ....

Tamil Nadu , Justice Vaidyanathan , Ganesh Raja , Justices Vaidyanathan , Moneylife Digital Team , Life Insurance Corporation Of India , Madras High Court , Wife Not Entitled , Insurance Money , Deceased Husband Did Not Contribute , Premium Payment , Life Insurance Corporation , Mutual Fund Returns , Ank Fixed Deposits , Nvestor Returns , Ortfolio Allocation , தமிழ் நாடு , நீதி வைத்தியநாதன் , நீதிபதிகள் வைத்தியநாதன் , வாழ்க்கை காப்பீடு நிறுவனம் ஆஃப் இந்தியா , மெட்ராஸ் உயர் நீதிமன்றம் , காப்பீடு பணம் , ப்ரீமியம் கட்டணம் , வாழ்க்கை காப்பீடு நிறுவனம் , பரஸ்பர நிதி வருமானம் ,

Marriage is sacramental, a word that has lost its meaning due to recognition of live-in relationships, says Madras HC


Judge laments absence of a law like Domestic Violence Act for men to lodge complaints against wives.
The Madras High Court has observed that the present generation must understand that marriage is not a contract to be broken at the drop of a hat, but a sacramental event in a person’s life. The court also said: “Of course, the word ‘sacrament’ has no meaning after the coming into effect of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act of 2005 that approves live-in relationships.”
Justice S. Vaidyanathan further lamented that “unfortunately,” there was no law such as the Domestic Violence Act for the men to proceed against their wives. The observations were made while quashing the suspension of a government veterinarian on the basis of a complaint lodged by his wife, accusing him of domestic violence, just four days before the couple was granted divorce by a family court. ....

Tamil Nadu , Justices Vaidyanathan , Veterinary Services , Madras High Court , Additional Mahila Court , Family Court , Domestic Violence Act , Animal Husbandry , Justice Vaidyanathan , Marriage And Divorce , Fake Complaints Against Husbands , Crime Against Women , Protection Of Women From Domestic Violence Act 2005 , The Family Court , Sacramental Event , High Court Judge Observation On Marriage , Give And Take Relationships , Tolerance In Matrimonial Relationships , தமிழ் நாடு , நீதிபதிகள் வைத்தியநாதன் , கால்நடை சேவைகள் , மெட்ராஸ் உயர் நீதிமன்றம் , குடும்பம் நீதிமன்றம் , உள்நாட்டு வன்முறை நாடகம் , விலங்கு வளர்ப்பு , நீதி வைத்தியநாதன் ,