பொடெந்ஶியல் மோசடிகள் பயன்படுத்தி மெய்நிகர் நாணய News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Origins of Cryptocurrency Prohibition
Introduction
This is Part II of a series of articles that addresses the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)’s suppression of cryptocurrency, or what we call private digital money (“PDM”).
1  Part I introduced the SEC’s sleight of hand in its anti-cryptocurrency efforts and sources the Agency uses to claim jurisdiction over cryptocurrencies.  In Part II, we discuss specific parts of the SEC’s history of suppressing PDM.
As we noted in Part I, the SEC’s program has ignored the jurisdictional limitation imposed on the agency, which is that the SEC can become involved only when a security is sold or transferred; if what is sold is not a security or related to one, then the SEC lacks authority to regulate it. PDM is not a security and, unless the entire conception of security is stretched beyond recognition, it never will be a security. But an agency’s exerted administrative power can obviously exceed its ....

Lester Coleman , Trendont Shavers , Federal Reserve Bank , Division Of Corporation , Deposit Insurance Corporation , Securities Investor Protection Corporation , Ripple Labs Inc , Division Of Enforcement , Federal Reserve , Exchange Commission , Autonomous Organization , Bitcoin Savings , Securities Exchange , Pirate Bank Trust Company , Office Of Investor Education Advocacy , Corporation Finance , Link Bitcoin , Trust Company , Potential Scams Using Virtual Currency , Investor Alert , Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation , Decentralized Autonomous Organization , Securities Act , Between Shavers , Securities Exchange Act , Ripple Labs ,