Transcripts For BBCNEWS BBC 20240703

Card image cap



in the gaza strip. the un says gaza "is on the brink", with more than 100 trucks needed every day, to support some two million palestinians. meanwhile, both sides continue to exchange fire. the israeli defence minister has told his troops they will soon see gaza "from the inside." and israel now says there are 203 hostages being held in gaza — higher than previously reported. in just the last few hours, the pentagon said a us navy ship on thursday shot down missiles and drones that had been fired by iran—backed houthi rebels in yemen, possibly at israel. and tonight's speech also comes as the chaos on capitol hill continues. the house of representatives has been without a leader for more than two weeks. republicanjim jordan has tried and failed twice this week to win the gavel. there may be another vote on friday morning. in just a matter of minutes, president biden is expected to make his case tonight for more aid to israel and for the ongoing war in ukraine in his oval office address. earlier today, ukrainian president volodymyr zelensky spoke with mr biden to thank him for the us support and discuss future needs. and let's bring in our guests tonight. khaled elgindy is the director of the middle east institute's program on palestine and palestinian—israeli affairs. sabrina siddiqui, white house reporter for the wall streetjournal. with me is elise labott, founder of zivvy media. great to have you all with us. sabrina, you are covering president biden's trip. if i can ask first, what exactly are you expecting the president to say? i what exactly are you expecting the president to say?— president to say? i think this seech president to say? i think this speech is _ president to say? i think this speech is critical _ president to say? i think this speech is critical for - president to say? i think this speech is critical for the - speech is critical for the president, as he is seeking a significant aid package from congress, as you mentioned, north of $100 billion to cover a number of foreign policy challenges. of course the most pressing in the eyes of the administration being aid to both israel and ukraine, as they each deal with their independent conflicts, and then this aid package will also cover taiwan and the us border with mexico. i think the border with mexico. i think the border piece of it being something to try and earn some republican support. it really, what the speech is also about is trying to make the case to the american public, which has grown increasingly sceptical of us involvement in conflicts overseas, that supporting israel and continuing to support ukraine is in the country's national security interests, remember this is also coming at a time when the president didn'tjust travel to tel coming at a time when the president didn't just travel to tel aviv to make his support, the support of his administration for israel clear, but also as his administration faces a lot of pressure for its response to the crisis in gaza and the death toll when it comes to palestinian civilians. so really an evening to try and persuade the public as well as lawmakers in both parties on capitol hill. as lawmakers in both parties on capitol hill-— as lawmakers in both parties on capitol hill. and we are going to talk more about _ capitol hill. and we are going to talk more about that _ capitol hill. and we are going to talk more about that pressure, l talk more about that pressure, elise, what do you expect to see? well, i think basically, the president is saying he has a bunch of different constituencies right now _ of different constituencies right now he — of different constituencies right now. he certainly, he has that american _ now. he certainly, he has that american public, trying to show them i two were _ american public, trying to show them i two wars have a world away is important — i two wars have a world away is important to the us but he also has the arab _ important to the us but he also has the arab world. you see these pictures— the arab world. you see these pictures of the palestinian casualties, the civilians, the growing _ casualties, the civilians, the growing humanitarian crisis, and they— growing humanitarian crisis, and they really— growing humanitarian crisis, and they really think that the us is giving — they really think that the us is giving israel the green light. then you also_ giving israel the green light. then you also have on capitol hill, democrats, the progressive wing is more _ democrats, the progressive wing is more pro—palestinian right now, they want to— more pro—palestinian right now, they want to see _ more pro—palestinian right now, they want to see a ceasefire, he is addressing them and he is also addressing them and he is also addressing republicans who have been wary of— addressing republicans who have been wary of sending the aid. and he is trying _ wary of sending the aid. and he is trying to— wary of sending the aid. and he is trying to reinforce his role as comforter— trying to reinforce his role as comforter on de bod in chief, as he has been _ comforter on de bod in chief, as he has been called. there is a lot of anxiety— has been called. there is a lot of anxiety in — has been called. there is a lot of anxiety in this nation from jewish americans— anxiety in this nation from jewish americans who are facing a lot of anti—semitic attacks, pro—hamas rallies— anti—semitic attacks, pro—hamas rallies across the country, muslim americans— rallies across the country, muslim americans who are feeling a lot of islamophobia, there was a devastating murder of a six—year—old muslim _ devastating murder of a six—year—old muslim american boy by his landlord because _ muslim american boy by his landlord because the landlord was seeing all this stuft— because the landlord was seeing all this stuff on tv. sol because the landlord was seeing all this stuff on tv. so i think he's going _ this stuff on tv. so i think he's going to — this stuff on tv. so i think he's going to talk to this nation, yes, there _ going to talk to this nation, yes, there is— going to talk to this nation, yes, there is a — going to talk to this nation, yes, there is a lot of shock in israel, then— there is a lot of shock in israel, then this — there is a lot of shock in israel, then this is, _ there is a lot of shock in israel, then this is, and we've been comparing this to a 9/11 moment not 'ust comparing this to a 9/11 moment not just for— comparing this to a 9/11 moment not just for israel but i think this is a 9/11— just for israel but i think this is a 9/11 bummer for the world has been shocked _ a 9/11 bummer for the world has been shocked so— a 9/11 bummer for the world has been shocked so i— a 9/11 bummer for the world has been shocked so i think he will speak to that _ shocked so i think he will speak to that -- _ shocked so i think he will speak to that -- a — shocked so i think he will speak to that. -- a 9/11 shocked so i think he will speak to that. —— a 9/11 moment for the world — that. —— a 9/11 moment for the world it — that. —— a 9/11 moment for the world. it goes back to his original cornerstone of his foreign policy, which _ cornerstone of his foreign policy, which is — cornerstone of his foreign policy, which is democracy versus autocracy in russia _ which is democracy versus autocracy in russia hut— which is democracy versus autocracy in russia but also defeating terrorists wherever they are. so he has a _ terrorists wherever they are. so he has a lot _ terrorists wherever they are. so he has a lot of— terrorists wherever they are. so he has a lot of constituencies here and it's good _ has a lot of constituencies here and it's good to — has a lot of constituencies here and it's good to be very complex for him to weave _ it's good to be very complex for him to weave att— it's good to be very complex for him to weave all these narratives together. stay with israel, stay with the — together. stay with israel, stay with the united states, found this at a time — with the united states, found this at a time when the economy is bad. he has— at a time when the economy is bad. he has a _ at a time when the economy is bad. he has a lot — at a time when the economy is bad. he has a lot of work.— he has a lot of work. want to bring in one of the _ he has a lot of work. want to bring in one of the voices _ he has a lot of work. want to bring in one of the voices we _ he has a lot of work. want to bring in one of the voices we have - he has a lot of work. want to bring in one of the voices we have who i he has a lot of work. want to bring l in one of the voices we have who has been particularly critical of the president. what would you like to see from the president in his address? , ., see from the president in his address?— see from the president in his address? , ., ., ,, ., address? yes, fori address that, the previous _ address? yes, fori address that, the previous guest _ address? yes, fori address that, the previous guest said _ address? yes, for i address that, l the previous guest said something and i_ the previous guest said something and i hope — the previous guest said something and i hope is — the previous guest said something and i hope is heard, _ the previous guest said something and i hope is heard, but— the previous guest said something and i hope is heard, but it - the previous guest said somethingl and i hope is heard, but it sounded like she _ and i hope is heard, but it sounded like she said — and i hope is heard, but it sounded like she said that— and i hope is heard, but it sounded like she said that there _ and i hope is heard, but it sounded like she said that there were - like she said that there were pro-hamas _ like she said that there were pro—hamas rallies— like she said that there were pro—hamas rallies around i like she said that there werel pro—hamas rallies around the countrv _ pro—hamas rallies around the country. that's _ pro—hamas rallies around the country. that's a _ pro—hamas rallies around the country. that's a bizarre - pro—hamas rallies around the - country. that's a bizarre statement, think— country. that's a bizarre statement, think and _ country. that's a bizarre statement, think and it — country. that's a bizarre statement, think and it needs _ country. that's a bizarre statement, think and it needs to _ country. that's a bizarre statement, think and it needs to be _ country. that's a bizarre statement, think and it needs to be pointed - think and it needs to be pointed out, _ think and it needs to be pointed out, that— think and it needs to be pointed out, that sort— think and it needs to be pointed out, that sort of... _ think and it needs to be pointed out, that sort of... there - think and it needs to be pointed out, that sort of... there are i out, that sort of... there are protests _ out, that sort of... there are protests att _ out, that sort of... there are protests all over _ out, that sort of... there are protests all over the - out, that sort of... there are protests all over the countryl out, that sort of... there are i protests all over the country in support— protests all over the country in support and _ protests all over the country in support and solidarity- protests all over the country in support and solidarity with - support and solidarity with palestinians _ support and solidarity with palestinians were - support and solidarity with palestinians were dying. . support and solidarity with - palestinians were dying. some pundits — palestinians were dying. some pundits cynically— palestinians were dying. some pundits cynically are _ palestinians were dying. some pundits cynically are calling. palestinians were dying. some . pundits cynically are calling them pro-hamas — pundits cynically are calling them pro—hamas rallies. _ pundits cynically are calling them pro—hamas rallies. but _ pundits cynically are calling them pro—hamas rallies. but it- pundits cynically are calling them pro—hamas rallies. but it is- pundits cynically are calling them i pro—hamas rallies. but it is highly inaccurate — pro—hamas rallies. but it is highly inaccurate and _ pro—hamas rallies. but it is highly inaccurate and even _ pro—hamas rallies. but it is highly inaccurate and even inflammatoryj pro—hamas rallies. but it is highlyl inaccurate and even inflammatory i think— inaccurate and even inflammatory i think to _ inaccurate and even inflammatory i think to make _ inaccurate and even inflammatory i think to make that _ inaccurate and even inflammatory i think to make that charge. - inaccurate and even inflammatory i think to make that charge. as - inaccurate and even inflammatory i think to make that charge. as far. inaccurate and even inflammatory ll think to make that charge. as far as what _ think to make that charge. as far as what i _ think to make that charge. as far as what i think— think to make that charge. as far as what i think we _ think to make that charge. as far as what i think we should _ think to make that charge. as far as what i think we should hear- think to make that charge. as far as what i think we should hear from i think to make that charge. as far asi what i think we should hear from the president. _ what i think we should hear from the president. so— what i think we should hear from the president, so far— what i think we should hear from the president, so far we _ what i think we should hear from the president, so far we haven't - what i think we should hear from the president, so far we haven't seen . president, so far we haven't seen any real— president, so far we haven't seen any real red — president, so far we haven't seen any real red lines— president, so far we haven't seen any real red lines from _ president, so far we haven't seen any real red lines from the - any real red lines from the president _ any real red lines from the president on _ any real red lines from the president on israel's - any real red lines from the president on israel's war. any real red lines from the| president on israel's war in any real red lines from the - president on israel's war in gaza. i don't _ president on israel's war in gaza. i don't think— president on israel's war in gaza. i don't think it — president on israel's war in gaza. i don't think it is — president on israel's war in gaza. i don't think it is only— president on israel's war in gaza. i don't think it is only the _ president on israel's war in gaza. i don't think it is only the arab - don't think it is only the arab world — don't think it is only the arab world that _ don't think it is only the arab world that sees _ don't think it is only the arab world that sees it _ don't think it is only the arab world that sees it as - don't think it is only the arab world that sees it as a - don't think it is only the arab world that sees it as a green| don't think it is only the arab - world that sees it as a green light, ithink— world that sees it as a green light, i think everyone _ world that sees it as a green light, i think everyone sees _ world that sees it as a green light, i think everyone sees it— world that sees it as a green light, i think everyone sees it as - world that sees it as a green light, i think everyone sees it as a - world that sees it as a green light, i think everyone sees it as a greenj i think everyone sees it as a green light _ i think everyone sees it as a green light israet— i think everyone sees it as a green light. israel has _ i think everyone sees it as a green light. israel has essentially- i think everyone sees it as a green light. israel has essentially a - light. israel has essentially a blank— light. israel has essentially a blank cheque _ light. israel has essentially a blank cheque to _ light. israel has essentially a blank cheque to carry- light. israel has essentially a blank cheque to carry out. light. israel has essentially a| blank cheque to carry out the light. israel has essentially a - blank cheque to carry out the war in whichever— blank cheque to carry out the war in whichever wav — blank cheque to carry out the war in whichever way it _ blank cheque to carry out the war in whichever way it pleases. _ blank cheque to carry out the war in whichever way it pleases. even - blank cheque to carry out the war in whichever way it pleases. even to l whichever way it pleases. even to the extent — whichever way it pleases. even to the extent of— whichever way it pleases. even to the extent of cutting _ whichever way it pleases. even to the extent of cutting off - whichever way it pleases. even to the extent of cutting off all - whichever way it pleases. even to| the extent of cutting off all water, food, _ the extent of cutting off all water, food, medicine, _ the extent of cutting off all water, food, medicine, fuel— the extent of cutting off all water, food, medicine, fuelto_ the extent of cutting off all water, food, medicine, fuel to an- the extent of cutting off all water, food, medicine, fuel to an entire i food, medicine, fuel to an entire population— food, medicine, fuel to an entire population of— food, medicine, fuel to an entire population of 2.2 _ food, medicine, fuel to an entire population of 2.2 million - food, medicine, fuel to an entirej population of 2.2 million people. that in— population of 2.2 million people. that in the, _ population of 2.2 million people. that in the, in— population of 2.2 million people. that in the, in any— population of 2.2 million people. that in the, in any other- population of 2.2 million people. that in the, in any other contextl that in the, in any other context and in _ that in the, in any other context and in fact— that in the, in any other context and in fact has— that in the, in any other context and in fact has been— that in the, in any other context and in fact has been referred - that in the, in any other context and in fact has been referred toi that in the, in any other context i and in fact has been referred to in the russian — and in fact has been referred to in the russian context _ and in fact has been referred to in the russian context is— and in fact has been referred to in the russian context is a _ and in fact has been referred to in the russian context is a war- and in fact has been referred to ml the russian context is a war crime. and that's — the russian context is a war crime. and that's clearly _ the russian context is a war crime. and that's clearly what _ the russian context is a war crime. and that's clearly what it _ the russian context is a war crime. and that's clearly what it is - the russian context is a war crime. and that's clearly what it is here i and that's clearly what it is here to stop — and that's clearly what it is here to stop so — and that's clearly what it is here to stop so i _ and that's clearly what it is here to stop so i think— and that's clearly what it is here to stop so i think what _ and that's clearly what it is here to stop so i think what we - and that's clearly what it is here to stop so i think what we needl and that's clearly what it is here i to stop so i think what we need to see from — to stop so i think what we need to see from the _ to stop so i think what we need to see from the biden _ to stop so i think what we need toj see from the biden administration to stop so i think what we need to i see from the biden administration is maybe _ see from the biden administration is maybe a _ see from the biden administration is maybe a sense — see from the biden administration is maybe a sense that _ see from the biden administration is maybe a sense that he _ see from the biden administration is maybe a sense that he can - see from the biden administration is maybe a sense that he can also - maybe a sense that he can also empathise _ maybe a sense that he can also empathise with— maybe a sense that he can also empathise with another- maybe a sense that he can also empathise with another group i maybe a sense that he can alsol empathise with another group of human— empathise with another group of human heings— empathise with another group of human beings who _ empathise with another group of human beings who are _ empathise with another group of| human beings who are suffering. empathise with another group of. human beings who are suffering. i 'ust human beings who are suffering. just wanted to give elise a human beings who are suffering.” just wanted to give elise a chance to respond, i think you wanted to respond to his comments? it is true that not all — respond to his comments? it is true that not all of— respond to his comments? it is true that not all of the _ respond to his comments? it is true that not all of the rallies _ respond to his comments? it is true that not all of the rallies were - that not all of the rallies were pro—hamas are legitimately there is a lot of— pro—hamas are legitimately there is a lot of concern about the palestinians. i think there has been. — palestinians. i think there has been. in — palestinians. i think there has been, in this country, notjust from the left _ been, in this country, notjust from the left but — been, in this country, notjust from the left but also from all corners of america, people are identifying with the _ of america, people are identifying with the palestinian cause. there has been — with the palestinian cause. there has been a — with the palestinian cause. there has been a growing sense of support for the _ has been a growing sense of support for the palestinians and the need to avoid _ for the palestinians and the need to avoid civilian casualties, but i will say— avoid civilian casualties, but i will say that there have been rallies— will say that there have been rallies where they are saying, hamas did a good _ rallies where they are saying, hamas did a good thing. there was one, can't _ did a good thing. there was one, can't remember exact what the school was, but _ can't remember exact what the school was, but the _ can't remember exact what the school was, but the flyer was identifying the logo— was, but the flyer was identifying the logo of those paragliders coming in. i the logo of those paragliders coming in ithink— the logo of those paragliders coming in. i thinkjewish americans in this in. ithinkjewish americans in this country— in. i thinkjewish americans in this country are — in. i thinkjewish americans in this country are very scared. it has been a lot— country are very scared. it has been a lot of— country are very scared. it has been a lot of anti—semitism, they are saving _ a lot of anti—semitism, they are saying that this was an eye for an eye and _ saying that this was an eye for an eye and i— saying that this was an eye for an eye and i think we can both agree that when— eye and i think we can both agree that when we see, whether it is the pictures— that when we see, whether it is the pictures of— that when we see, whether it is the pictures of the israeli children of the israelis that have been murdered or the _ the israelis that have been murdered or the panel —— the israelis that have been murdered orthe panel —— but the israelis that have been murdered or the panel —— but the palestinians that are _ or the panel —— but the palestinians that are the — or the panel —— but the palestinians that are the victims of israeli air strikes — that are the victims of israeli air strikes in — that are the victims of israeli air strikes in this herbal carnage that's— strikes in this herbal carnage that's going on in gaza, i think all loss of— that's going on in gaza, i think all loss of life — that's going on in gaza, i think all loss of life is really terrible. this — loss of life is really terrible. this terrible carnage. i think both sides— this terrible carnage. i think both sides there is a lot of, you know, hatred _ sides there is a lot of, you know, hatred of— sides there is a lot of, you know, hatred of the other right now instead — hatred of the other right now instead of saying that this is a joint _ instead of saying that this is a joint humanity.— instead of saying that this is a joint humanity. that's true. there is uuite a joint humanity. that's true. there is quite a lot _ joint humanity. that's true. there is quite a lot of— joint humanity. that's true. there is quite a lot of hatred _ is quite a lot of hatred particularly— is quite a lot of hatred particularly prevalentl is quite a lot of hatred i particularly prevalent on is quite a lot of hatred - particularly prevalent on social media — particularly prevalent on social media but _ particularly prevalent on social media. but the _ particularly prevalent on social media. but the problem - particularly prevalent on social media. but the problem with i particularly prevalent on social. media. but the problem with your characterisation— media. but the problem with your characterisation was— media. but the problem with your characterisation was that - media. but the problem with your characterisation was that even - media. but the problem with your| characterisation was that even the characterised _ characterisation was that even the characterised one _ characterisation was that even the characterised one side _ characterisation was that even the characterised one side as - characterisation was that even the i characterised one side as having... excuse _ characterised one side as having... excuse me. — characterised one side as having... excuse me, think— characterised one side as having... excuse me, think that _ characterised one side as having... excuse me, think that was - characterised one side as having... excuse me, think that was what . characterised one side as having... i excuse me, think that was what was most _ excuse me, think that was what was most egregious. i wouldn't take issue _ most egregious. i wouldn't take issue with — most egregious. i wouldn't take issue with a rally supporting a ceasefire _ issue with a rally supporting a ceasefire. but we have a lot to talk about _ ceasefire. but we have a lot to talk about. ., .. , ceasefire. but we have a lot to talk about. ., , | ceasefire. but we have a lot to talk about— liust - about. you generically... i 'ust want tojumpi about. you generically... i 'ust want to jump in. i about. you generically... i 'ust want to jump in. we're i about. you generically... ijust want to jump in. we're going i about. you generically... ijust| want to jump in. we're going to want tojump in. we're going to continue this discussion but our forecast has joined us. continue this discussion but our forecast hasjoined us. —— our fourth guests. you get tojump right in now into this ongoing discussion while we're waiting for the president to begin his speech. we've been talking about what we expect to see from president biden so i ask you same question. i see from president biden so i ask you same question.— see from president biden so i ask you same question. i think it's good to be an effort _ you same question. i think it's good to be an effort to _ you same question. i think it's good to be an effort to emphasise - you same question. i think it's good to be an effort to emphasise the - to be an effort to emphasise the need to have us involvement in weather that is with respect to support for israel or more specifically on the funding piece, think that will be interesting. there have been several analyses of the degree to which the president will link funding for ukraine with funding for what's happening in the middle east and that takes a topic where there probably is a pretty strong consensus in terms of the need for american involvement. it puts together with one where i would say the majority both parties probably still support ukraine but it's a bit of a closer call. so the politics of the president putting them together is interesting. sabrina, if i can bring you back in, you have been writing about the disappointment among muslims, progressives and arab americans in the us at the biden administration's response at not pushing israel war on civilians in gaza. how difficult a line do you think this has been to walk for the administration and for the president as he was travelling to israel? ”5 the president as he was travelling to israel? , . ., , ., the president as he was travelling to israel? ,. . , ., ., . to israel? is certainly a balancing act but i to israel? is certainly a balancing act but | think— to israel? is certainly a balancing act but | think this _ to israel? is certainly a balancingj act but i think this administration and the president have been very clear that they stand squarely with israel in this conflict, and that has frustrated and angry muslim americans, arab americans and progressives outside and inside the administration because when we talk about the humanitarian crisis, when the president was in tel aviv it was the president was in tel aviv it was the first time he clearly spoke to the first time he clearly spoke to the suffering of the palestinian people in gaza, the loss of civilian life rather than just placing the blame on hamas. actually publicly urging israel to show restraint, evenif urging israel to show restraint, even if he didn't use those words, by recalling their reaction to 9/11 has suggested that the us did overreact and essentially sent to his room to allow itself to be consumed by rage. but a lot of people think that was too little too late because when he delivered those remarks, the death toll in gaza was already in their thousands, more than 1000 children had already been killed in gaza, 600,000 people have already fled their homes, where the bulk of the bombardment has been and of course you have this total siege where food, water, electricity and critical medical supplies have been cut off. the united nations and humanitarian groups on the ground have said the total siege by the israeli government has brought gaza and its health care system to the brink of collapse. so i think there was an expectation the president would speak more clearly to that. now his administration is putting more emphasis on the humanitarian crisis in gaza. we will see her but she delves into the tissue tonight, but that is certainly something i think there is continued frustration over as israel prepares for a ground invasion so it's going to become a much bigger problem and challenge for this administration to thread that. ~ ., for this administration to thread that. ~ . , . , that. we are expecting the president to beain his that. we are expecting the president to begin his address _ that. we are expecting the president to begin his address very _ that. we are expecting the president to begin his address very soon. - to begin his address very soon. khaled, your response and what we have been discussing? yes. khaled, your response and what we have been discussing?— have been discussing? yes, i think what which — have been discussing? yes, i think what which is _ have been discussing? yes, i think what which is described _ have been discussing? yes, i think what which is described perfectly i what which is described perfectly sums— what which is described perfectly sums up— what which is described perfectly sums up exactly— what which is described perfectly sums up exactly what _ what which is described perfectly sums up exactly what the - what which is described perfectly. sums up exactly what the problem what which is described perfectly - sums up exactly what the problem is. that is, _ sums up exactly what the problem is. that is, israel— sums up exactly what the problem is. that is, israel is— sums up exactly what the problem is. that is, israel is already _ sums up exactly what the problem is. that is, israel is already acting - that is, israel is already acting out of— that is, israel is already acting out of rage. _ that is, israel is already acting out of rage, and _ that is, israel is already acting out of rage, and they- that is, israel is already acting out of rage, and they have - that is, israel is already acting - out of rage, and they have already said that _ out of rage, and they have already said that this — out of rage, and they have already said that this is _ out of rage, and they have already said that this is a _ out of rage, and they have already said that this is a war— out of rage, and they have already said that this is a war of _ out of rage, and they have already said that this is a war of revenge, i said that this is a war of revenge, they have — said that this is a war of revenge, they have used words _ said that this is a war of revenge, they have used words like - said that this is a war of revenge, - they have used words like vengeance, they have used words like vengeance, they speak— they have used words like vengeance, they speak in — they have used words like vengeance, they speak in horrifying, _ they speak in horrifying, frightening _ they speak in horrifying, frightening and - they speak in horrifying, . frightening and apocalyptic they speak in horrifying, - frightening and apocalyptic terms about— frightening and apocalyptic terms about turning _ frightening and apocalyptic terms about turning gaza _ frightening and apocalyptic terms about turning gaza into _ frightening and apocalyptic terms about turning gaza into a - frightening and apocalyptic terms i about turning gaza into a deserted island _ about turning gaza into a deserted island we — about turning gaza into a deserted island. we have _ about turning gaza into a deserted island. we have essentially- about turning gaza into a deserted island. we have essentially given. about turning gaza into a deserted| island. we have essentially given a blank— island. we have essentially given a blank cheque — island. we have essentially given a blank cheque to _ island. we have essentially given a blank cheque to a _ island. we have essentially given a blank cheque to a government - island. we have essentially given a blank cheque to a government that has been _ blank cheque to a government that has been operating _ blank cheque to a government that has been operating under- blank cheque to a government that has been operating under a - has been operating under a combination— has been operating under a combination of— has been operating under a combination of rage, - has been operating under a - combination of rage, humiliation, trauma _ combination of rage, humiliation, trauma and — combination of rage, humiliation, trauma and a _ combination of rage, humiliation, trauma and a stated _ combination of rage, humiliation, trauma and a stated desire - combination of rage, humiliation, trauma and a stated desire for. trauma and a stated desire for revenge — trauma and a stated desire for revenue. ., trauma and a stated desire for revenue. . , , revenge. can i 'ust 'ump in there and ask you... b revenge. can ijustjump in there and ask you... hold _ revenge. can ijustjump in there and ask you... hold on. - revenge. can ijustjump in there and ask you... hold on. too - revenge. can i justjump in there - and ask you... hold on. too imagine that they would _ and ask you... hold on. too imagine that they would somehow _ and ask you... hold on. too imagine that they would somehow restrain i that they would somehow restrain themselves— that they would somehow restrain themselves is— that they would somehow restrain themselves is nonsense. - that they would somehow restrain themselves is nonsense. and - that they would somehow restrain themselves is nonsense. and we. that they would somehow restrain . themselves is nonsense. and we are seeing _ themselves is nonsense. and we are seeing the _ themselves is nonsense. and we are seeing the results _ themselves is nonsense. and we are seeing the results of _ themselves is nonsense. and we are seeing the results of that _ themselves is nonsense. and we are seeing the results of that now. - themselves is nonsense. and we are seeing the results of that now. we i seeing the results of that now. we are seeing — seeing the results of that now. we are seeing a — seeing the results of that now. we are seeing a massive _ seeing the results of that now. we are seeing a massive case - seeing the results of that now. we are seeing a massive case of- are seeing a massive case of collective _ are seeing a massive case of collective punishment- are seeing a massive case of collective punishment on - are seeing a massive case ofj collective punishment on 2.2 are seeing a massive case of- collective punishment on 2.2 million human— collective punishment on 2.2 million human beings — collective punishment on 2.2 million human beings l— collective punishment on 2.2 million human beings-— human beings. i 'ust want to ask a ruestion human beings. i 'ust want to ask a question and — human beings. i just want to ask a question and that... _ human beings. i just want to ask a question and that... no _ human beings. i just want to ask a question and that... no electricity| question and that... no electricity or medicine- _ question and that... no electricity or medicine. and _ question and that... no electricity or medicine. and telling _ question and that... no electricity or medicine. and telling hospitals| or medicine. and telling hospitals to evacuate _ or medicine. and telling hospitals to evacuate-— or medicine. and telling hospitals to evacuate. ~ . , ., to evacuate. what response do you think would — to evacuate. what response do you think would have _ to evacuate. what response do you think would have been _ to evacuate. what response do you think would have been the - to evacuate. what response do you think would have been the right - think would have been the right response to the attack saw from hamas? ~ , ., response to the attack saw from hamas? ~ i. .. �* response to the attack saw from hamas? ~ �* ., hamas? well, you can't say what dad-mac our— hamas? well, you can't say what dad-mac our about _ hamas? well, you can't say what dad-mac our about something i hamas? well, you can't say what i dad-mac our about something that hamas? well, you can't say what - dad-mac our about something that is dad—mac our about something that is more _ dad—mac our about something that is more measured, _ dad—mac our about something that is more measured, more— dad—mac our about something that is more measured, more targeted, - dad—mac our about something that isj more measured, more targeted, that is actually— more measured, more targeted, that is actually directed _ more measured, more targeted, that is actually directed at _ more measured, more targeted, that is actually directed at hamas - more measured, more targeted, that is actually directed at hamas and - is actually directed at hamas and the people — is actually directed at hamas and the people who _ is actually directed at hamas and the people who carried _ is actually directed at hamas and the people who carried out - is actually directed at hamas and the people who carried out the l the people who carried out the atrocity— the people who carried out the atrocity on _ the people who carried out the atrocity on october— the people who carried out the atrocity on october the - the people who carried out the atrocity on october the 7th - the people who carried out the - atrocity on october the 7th instead of a blanket— atrocity on october the 7th instead of a blanket punishment _ atrocity on october the 7th instead of a blanket punishment of- atrocity on october the 7th instead of a blanket punishment of 2.2 - of a blanket punishment of 2.2 million — of a blanket punishment of 2.2 million people _ of a blanket punishment of 2.2 million people that _ of a blanket punishment of 2.2 million people that should - of a blanket punishment of 2.2 million people that should be i million people that should be obvious, _ million people that should be obvious, that _ million people that should be obvious, that there _ million people that should be obvious, that there are - million people that should bei obvious, that there are many, million people that should be - obvious, that there are many, many, many. _ obvious, that there are many, many, many. many— obvious, that there are many, many, many, many different _ obvious, that there are many, many, many, many different options - obvious, that there are many, many, many, many different options belowl many, many different options below committing — many, many different options below committing war _ many, many different options below committing war crimes— many, many different options below committing war crimes on _ many, many different options below committing war crimes on a - many, many different options below| committing war crimes on a massive scale, _ committing war crimes on a massive scale. they— committing war crimes on a massive scale. they should _ committing war crimes on a massive scale, they should be _ committing war crimes on a massive scale, they should be available. - committing war crimes on a massive scale, they should be available. i- scale, they should be available. i 'ust scale, they should be available. just want to bring in a lease to that. ., just want to bring in a lease to that. . . ., just want to bring in a lease to that. . _, . ,, ., that. khaled, we will come back to ou. he that. khaled, we will come back to you- he is — that. khaled, we will come back to you- he is right. — that. khaled, we will come back to you. he is right, the _ that. khaled, we will come back to you. he is right, the language - that. khaled, we will come back to you. he is right, the language of. you. he is right, the language of the israelis have used has been really— the israelis have used has been really dehumanising. they are saying that it's _ really dehumanising. they are saying that it's about hamas but really the way they— that it's about hamas but really the way they are talking about all palestinians, they are feeling dehumanised. we palestinians, they are feeling dehumanised.— palestinians, they are feeling dehumanised. ., ., , dehumanised. we are now seeing the president. more than 1300 people slaughtered in israel _ more than 1300 people slaughtered in israel. including _ more than 1300 people slaughtered in israel. including at _ more than 1300 people slaughtered in israel. including at least _ more than 1300 people slaughtered in israel. including at least 32 _ israel. including at least 32 american _ israel. including at least 32 american citizens. - israel. including at least 32 american citizens. scores i israel. including at least 32| american citizens. scores of innocent _ american citizens. scores of innocent games— american citizens. scores of innocent games for- american citizens. scores of. innocent games for everyone american citizens. scores of - innocent games for everyone from infants— innocent games for everyone from infants to — innocent games for everyone from infants to elderly _ innocent games for everyone from infants to elderly grandparents. i infants to elderly grandparents. israelis — infants to elderly grandparents. israelis and _ infants to elderly grandparents. israelis and americans - infants to elderly grandparents. israelis and americans taken i israelis and americans taken hostages _ israelis and americans taken hostages i_ israelis and americans taken hostages. i told _ israelis and americans taken hostages. i told them - israelis and americans taken hostages. i told them we - israelis and americans taken| hostages. i told them we are pursuing _ hostages. i told them we are pursuing every— hostages. i told them we are pursuing every avenue - hostages. i told them we are pursuing every avenue to - hostages. i told them we are i pursuing every avenue to bring hostages. i told them we are - pursuing every avenue to bring their loved _ pursuing every avenue to bring their loved ones — pursuing every avenue to bring their loved ones home. _ pursuing every avenue to bring their loved ones home. the _ pursuing every avenue to bring their loved ones home. the terrorist - pursuing every avenue to bring their. loved ones home. the terrorist group hamas— loved ones home. the terrorist group hamas unleashed _ loved ones home. the terrorist group hamas unleashed pure _ loved ones home. the terrorist group hamas unleashed pure unadulterated evil in— hamas unleashed pure unadulterated evil in the _ hamas unleashed pure unadulterated evil in the world _ hamas unleashed pure unadulterated evil in the world but _ hamas unleashed pure unadulterated evil in the world but sadly— hamas unleashed pure unadulterated evil in the world but sadly the - evil in the world but sadly the jewish— evil in the world but sadly the jewish people _ evil in the world but sadly the jewish people know— evil in the world but sadly the jewish people know perhaps i evil in the world but sadly the - jewish people know perhaps better than anyone — jewish people know perhaps better than anyone that _ jewish people know perhaps better than anyone that there _ jewish people know perhaps better than anyone that there is - jewish people know perhaps better than anyone that there is no - jewish people know perhaps better than anyone that there is no limit i than anyone that there is no limit to the _ than anyone that there is no limit to the depravity— than anyone that there is no limit to the depravity of— than anyone that there is no limit to the depravity of people - than anyone that there is no limit to the depravity of people when i than anyone that there is no limit. to the depravity of people when they want to _ to the depravity of people when they want to inflict — to the depravity of people when they want to inflict pain _ to the depravity of people when they want to inflict pain on _ to the depravity of people when they want to inflict pain on others. - to the depravity of people when they want to inflict pain on others. and i want to inflict pain on others. and in israel— want to inflict pain on others. and in israel i — want to inflict pain on others. and in israel i saw— want to inflict pain on others. and in israel i saw people _ want to inflict pain on others. and in israel i saw people who - want to inflict pain on others. and in israel i saw people who were i in israel i saw people who were strong — in israel i saw people who were strong and _ in israel i saw people who were strong and resilient _ in israel i saw people who were strong and resilient at - in israel i saw people who were strong and resilient at all - in israel i saw people who were strong and resilient at all so i in israel i saw people who were i strong and resilient at all so angry and in _ strong and resilient at all so angry and in deep — strong and resilient at all so angry and in deep pain _ strong and resilient at all so angry and in deep pain. i— strong and resilient at all so angry and in deep pain. i also _ strong and resilient at all so angry and in deep pain. i also spoke - strong and resilient at all so angry| and in deep pain. i also spoke with the president _ and in deep pain. i also spoke with the president of— and in deep pain. i also spoke with the president of the _ and in deep pain. i also spoke with the president of the palestinian i the president of the palestinian authority— the president of the palestinian authority and _ the president of the palestinian authority and reiterated - the president of the palestinian authority and reiterated that. the president of the palestinian| authority and reiterated that the united _ authority and reiterated that the united states _ authority and reiterated that the united states remains— authority and reiterated that the i united states remains committed authority and reiterated that the - united states remains committed to the right— united states remains committed to the right of— united states remains committed to the right of the _ united states remains committed to the right of the palestinian - united states remains committed to the right of the palestinian people . the right of the palestinian people to dignity— the right of the palestinian people to dignity and _ the right of the palestinian people to dignity and self—determination. the actions — to dignity and self—determination. the actions of _ to dignity and self—determination. the actions of hamas _ to dignity and self—determination. the actions of hamas do - to dignity and self—determination. the actions of hamas do not - to dignity and self—determination. the actions of hamas do not take i the actions of hamas do not take that right — the actions of hamas do not take that right away _ the actions of hamas do not take that right away i— the actions of hamas do not take that right away. i am _ the actions of hamas do not take i that right away. i am heartbroken the actions of hamas do not take i that right away. i am heartbroken by the tragic— that right away. i am heartbroken by the tragic toss — that right away. i am heartbroken by the tragic loss of— that right away. i am heartbroken by the tragic loss of palestinian - that right away. i am heartbroken by the tragic loss of palestinian life - the tragic loss of palestinian life including — the tragic loss of palestinian life including the _ the tragic loss of palestinian life including the explosion - the tragic loss of palestinian life including the explosion at - the tragic loss of palestinian life including the explosion at the i including the explosion at the hospital— including the explosion at the hospital in— including the explosion at the hospital in gaza _ including the explosion at the hospital in gaza which - including the explosion at the hospital in gaza which was . including the explosion at the | hospital in gaza which was not including the explosion at the - hospital in gaza which was not born -- done _ hospital in gaza which was not born -- done by— hospital in gaza which was not born -- done try the _ hospital in gaza which was not born —— done by the israelis. _ hospital in gaza which was not born —— done by the israelis. we - hospital in gaza which was not born —— done by the israelis. we mournl —— done by the israelis. we mourn every— —— done by the israelis. we mourn every innocent _ —— done by the israelis. we mourn every innocent life _ —— done by the israelis. we mourn every innocent life loss. _ —— done by the israelis. we mourn every innocent life loss. we - —— done by the israelis. we mourn| every innocent life loss. we cannot ignore _ every innocent life loss. we cannot ignore the — every innocent life loss. we cannot ignore the humanity _ every innocent life loss. we cannot ignore the humanity of _ every innocent life loss. we cannot ignore the humanity of innocent. ignore the humanity of innocent patestinians— ignore the humanity of innocent palestinians who _ ignore the humanity of innocent palestinians who only— ignore the humanity of innocent palestinians who only want - ignore the humanity of innocent palestinians who only want to l ignore the humanity of innocent i palestinians who only want to live in peace _ palestinians who only want to live in peace and _ palestinians who only want to live in peace and have _ palestinians who only want to live in peace and have an— palestinians who only want to livei in peace and have an opportunity. nearly— in peace and have an opportunity. nearly 20 — in peace and have an opportunity. nearly 20 months _ in peace and have an opportunity. nearly 20 months of— in peace and have an opportunity. nearly 20 months of war, - in peace and have an opportunity. nearly 20 months of war, tragedy in peace and have an opportunity. - nearly 20 months of war, tragedy and brutaiity— nearly 20 months of war, tragedy and brutality inflicted _ nearly 20 months of war, tragedy and brutality inflicted on _ nearly 20 months of war, tragedy and brutality inflicted on people _ nearly 20 months of war, tragedy and brutality inflicted on people of- nearly 20 months of war, tragedy and brutality inflicted on people of the - brutality inflicted on people of the ukraine, _ brutality inflicted on people of the ukraine. people _ brutality inflicted on people of the ukraine, people that _ brutality inflicted on people of the ukraine, people that were - brutality inflicted on people of the ukraine, people that were very. brutality inflicted on people of the i ukraine, people that were very badly hurt since _ ukraine, people that were very badly hurt since putin— ukraine, people that were very badly hurt since putin launched _ ukraine, people that were very badly hurt since putin launched his- ukraine, people that were very badly hurt since putin launched his wallet i hurt since putin launched his wallet and vision — hurt since putin launched his wallet and vision we _ hurt since putin launched his wallet and vision. we have _ hurt since putin launched his wallet and vision. we have not _ hurt since putin launched his wallet and vision. we have not forgotten i and vision. we have not forgotten the mass — and vision. we have not forgotten the mass graves, _ and vision. we have not forgotten the mass graves, the _ and vision. we have not forgotten the mass graves, the bodies - and vision. we have not forgotteni the mass graves, the bodies found trearing _ the mass graves, the bodies found trearing signs — the mass graves, the bodies found trearing signs of— the mass graves, the bodies found bearing signs of torture. _ the mass graves, the bodies foundi bearing signs of torture. thousands and thousands _ bearing signs of torture. thousands and thousands of— bearing signs of torture. thousands and thousands of ukrainian - bearing signs of torture. thousandsi and thousands of ukrainian children forcibly— and thousands of ukrainian children forcibly taken — and thousands of ukrainian children forcibly taken into _ and thousands of ukrainian children forcibly taken into russia, - and thousands of ukrainian children forcibly taken into russia, stolen. forcibly taken into russia, stolen from _ forcibly taken into russia, stolen from their— forcibly taken into russia, stolen from their parents. _ sick. hamas and putin represent different— sick. hamas and putin represent different threats _ sick. hamas and putin represent different threats but _ sick. hamas and putin represent different threats but we - sick. hamas and putin represent different threats but we share i sick. hamas and putin represent. different threats but we share this in conrnron — different threats but we share this in conrnron they— different threats but we share this in common. they both _ different threats but we share this in common. they both want - different threats but we share this in common. they both want to - in common. they both want to completely— in common. they both want to completely annihilate - in common. they both want to completely annihilate a - in common. they both want to - completely annihilate a neighbouring denrocracy _ completely annihilate a neighbouring democracy. completely— completely annihilate a neighbouring democracy. completely annihilated. i democracy. completely annihilated. hunmuss— democracy. completely annihilated. hummus's stated _ democracy. completely annihilated. hummus's stated purpose - democracy. completely annihilated. hummus's stated purpose for- hummus's stated purpose for existence _ hummus's stated purpose for existence is _ hummus's stated purpose for existence is the _ hummus's stated purpose for existence is the destruction . hummus's stated purpose for| existence is the destruction of israei~ — existence is the destruction of israel. hamas _ existence is the destruction of israel. hamas does _ existence is the destruction of israel. hamas does not - existence is the destruction of. israel. hamas does not represent existence is the destruction of- israel. hamas does not represent the palestinian _ israel. hamas does not represent the palestinian people. _ israel. hamas does not represent the palestinian people. hamas— israel. hamas does not represent the palestinian people. hamas uses- palestinian people. hamas uses paiestinian _ palestinian people. hamas uses palestinian civilians _ palestinian people. hamas uses palestinian civilians as - palestinian people. hamas uses palestinian civilians as human . palestinian civilians as human shietds — palestinian civilians as human shields and _ palestinian civilians as human shields and innocent - palestinian civilians as human i shields and innocent palestinians are suffering _ shields and innocent palestinians are suffering because _ shields and innocent palestinians are suffering because of- shields and innocent palestinians are suffering because of that. - are suffering because of that. meanwhile, _ are suffering because of that. meanwhile, putin _ are suffering because of that. meanwhile, putin denies - are suffering because of that. meanwhile, putin denies that| are suffering because of that. - meanwhile, putin denies that ukraine has or— meanwhile, putin denies that ukraine has or ever— meanwhile, putin denies that ukraine has or ever had — meanwhile, putin denies that ukraine has or ever had real— meanwhile, putin denies that ukraine has or ever had real statehood. - meanwhile, putin denies that ukraine has or ever had real statehood. he i has or ever had real statehood. he calls the _ has or ever had real statehood. he calls the soviet _ and he said that if the us withdraws atties— and he said that if the us withdraws atties witi— and he said that if the us withdraws atties will as — and he said that if the us withdraws allies will as well. _ and he said that if the us withdraws allies will as well. they _ and he said that if the us withdraws allies will as well. they would - and he said that if the us withdraws allies will as well. they would have i allies will as well. they would have one week— allies will as well. they would have one week left — allies will as well. they would have one week left to _ allies will as well. they would have one week left to live _ allies will as well. they would have one week left to live that _ allies will as well. they would have one week left to live that we - allies will as well. they would have one week left to live that we are i one week left to live that we are not withdrawing. _ one week left to live that we are not withdrawing. i— one week left to live that we are not withdrawing. i know - one week left to live that we are not withdrawing. i know these . not withdrawing. i know these confiicts — not withdrawing. i know these conflicts can _ not withdrawing. i know these conflicts can seem _ not withdrawing. i know these conflicts can seem far - not withdrawing. i know these conflicts can seem far away i not withdrawing. i know these i conflicts can seem far away and not withdrawing. i know these . conflicts can seem far away and it is natural— conflicts can seem far away and it is natural to— conflicts can seem far away and it is natural to ask _ conflicts can seem far away and it is natural to ask why— conflicts can seem far away and it is natural to ask why does - conflicts can seem far away and it is natural to ask why does this . is natural to ask why does this ntatter— is natural to ask why does this matter to _ is natural to ask why does this matter to america. _ is natural to ask why does this matter to america. let - is natural to ask why does this matter to america. let me - is natural to ask why does this . matter to america. let me share is natural to ask why does this - matter to america. let me share with you to _ matter to america. let me share with you to make — matter to america. let me share with you to make sure _ matter to america. let me share with you to make sure that _ matter to america. let me share with you to make sure that israel- matter to america. let me share with you to make sure that israel and - you to make sure that israel and ukraine — you to make sure that israel and ukraine succeed _ you to make sure that israel and ukraine succeed is _ you to make sure that israel and ukraine succeed is vital- you to make sure that israel and ukraine succeed is vital to - you to make sure that israel and ukraine succeed is vital to us i ukraine succeed is vital to us security _ ukraine succeed is vital to us security. history— ukraine succeed is vital to us security. history told - ukraine succeed is vital to us security. history told us - ukraine succeed is vital to us| security. history told us when history— security. history told us when history that _ security. history told us when history that meant _ security. history told us when history that meant when - security. history told us when - history that meant when terrorists do not _ history that meant when terrorists do not pay — history that meant when terrorists do not pay a — history that meant when terrorists do not pay a price. _ history that meant when terrorists do not pay a price, when- history that meant when terrorists do not pay a price, when dictators| do not pay a price, when dictators do not pay a price, when dictators do not _ do not pay a price, when dictators do not pay— do not pay a price, when dictators do not pay a — do not pay a price, when dictators do not pay a price _ do not pay a price, when dictators do not pay a price they— do not pay a price, when dictators do not pay a price they cause - do not pay a price, when dictators| do not pay a price they cause more chaos— do not pay a price they cause more chaos and — do not pay a price they cause more chaos and death _ do not pay a price they cause more chaos and death and _ do not pay a price they cause more chaos and death and destruction. i chaos and death and destruction. they— chaos and death and destruction. they keep — chaos and death and destruction. they keep going _ chaos and death and destruction. they keep going and _ chaos and death and destruction. they keep going and the - chaos and death and destruction. they keep going and the cost - chaos and death and destruction. i they keep going and the cost and chaos and death and destruction. - they keep going and the cost and the threat _ they keep going and the cost and the threat to— they keep going and the cost and the threat to america _ they keep going and the cost and the threat to america and _ they keep going and the cost and the threat to america and the _ they keep going and the cost and the threat to america and the world - they keep going and the cost and the threat to america and the world keep rising~ _ threat to america and the world keep rising~ so _ threat to america and the world keep rising~ so if— threat to america and the world keep rising~ so if we — threat to america and the world keep rising. so if we do _ threat to america and the world keep rising. so if we do not _ threat to america and the world keep rising. so if we do not stop— threat to america and the world keep rising. so if we do not stop putin's i rising. so if we do not stop putin's appetite _ rising. so if we do not stop putin's appetite for— rising. so if we do not stop putin's appetite for power— rising. so if we do not stop putin's appetite for power and _ rising. so if we do not stop putin's appetite for power and control - rising. so if we do not stop putin's appetite for power and control in i appetite for power and control in ukraine — appetite for power and control in ukraine he — appetite for power and control in ukraine he will— appetite for power and control in ukraine he will not _ appetite for power and control in ukraine he will not limit- appetite for power and control in ukraine he will not limit himself| appetite for power and control in l ukraine he will not limit himself to only ukraine~ — ukraine he will not limit himself to only ukraine. he _ ukraine he will not limit himself to only ukraine. he has _ ukraine he will not limit himself to only ukraine. he has already- only ukraine. he has already threatened _ only ukraine. he has already threatened to— only ukraine. he has already threatened to remind, - only ukraine. he has alreadyl threatened to remind, quote, only ukraine. he has already- threatened to remind, quote, remind potand _ threatened to remind, quote, remind potand that _ threatened to remind, quote, remind poland that their— threatened to remind, quote, remind poland that their land _ threatened to remind, quote, remind poland that their land was _ threatened to remind, quote, remind poland that their land was a - threatened to remind, quote, remind poland that their land was a gift - poland that their land was a gift from _ poland that their land was a gift from russia _ poland that their land was a gift from russia. 0ne _ poland that their land was a gift from russia. one of— poland that their land was a gift from russia. one of his - poland that their land was a gift from russia. one of his top - from russia. one of his top advisers. _ from russia. one of his top advisers. a _ from russia. one of his top advisers, a former- from russia. one of his topi advisers, a former pressure from russia. one of his top - advisers, a former pressure that meant _ advisers, a former pressure that meant president— advisers, a former pressure that meant president of— advisers, a former pressure that meant president of russia - advisers, a former pressure that meant president of russia has . advisers, a former pressure that - meant president of russia has called latvia _ meant president of russia has called latvia lithuanian _ meant president of russia has called latvia lithuanian the _ meant president of russia has called latvia lithuanian the russian - latvia lithuanian the russian provinces— latvia lithuanian the russian provinces on _ latvia lithuanian the russian provinces on the _ latvia lithuanian the russian provinces on the baltic. - latvia lithuanian the russian provinces on the baltic. 475. latvia lithuanian the russian - provinces on the baltic. 475 years tater— provinces on the baltic. 475 years tater was— provinces on the baltic. 475 years tater was kept— provinces on the baltic. 475 years later was kept peace _ provinces on the baltic. 475 years later was kept peace in _ provinces on the baltic. 475 years later was kept peace in europe i provinces on the baltic. 475 years. later was kept peace in europe and has been _ later was kept peace in europe and has been the — later was kept peace in europe and has been the cornerstone - later was kept peace in europe and has been the cornerstone of- later was kept peace in europe and i has been the cornerstone of american security~ _ has been the cornerstone of american security~ with— has been the cornerstone of american security. with putin _ has been the cornerstone of american security. with putin attacks _ has been the cornerstone of american security. with putin attacks on - has been the cornerstone of american security. with putin attacks on nato . security. with putin attacks on nato ally security. with putin attacks on nato atiy we _ security. with putin attacks on nato atiy we witt— security. with putin attacks on nato ally we will defend _ security. with putin attacks on nato ally we will defend every _ security. with putin attacks on nato ally we will defend every inch - security. with putin attacks on nato ally we will defend every inch it - ally we will defend every inch it calls _ ally we will defend every inch it calls for — ally we will defend every inch it calls for we _ ally we will defend every inch it calls for. we will _ ally we will defend every inch it calls for. we will have - ally we will defend every inch it l calls for. we will have something ally we will defend every inch it - calls for. we will have something we do, calls for. we will have something we do. iet's_ calls for. we will have something we do. let's make — calls for. we will have something we do, let's make it— calls for. we will have something we do, let's make it clear, _ calls for. we will have something we do, let's make it clear, we _ calls for. we will have something we do, let's make it clear, we do - calls for. we will have something we do, let's make it clear, we do not. do, let's make it clear, we do not seek_ do, let's make it clear, we do not seek to _ do, let's make it clear, we do not seek to have _ do, let's make it clear, we do not seek to have american _ do, let's make it clear, we do not seek to have american troops - seek to have american troops fighting — seek to have american troops fighting in— seek to have american troops fighting in russia, _ seek to have american troops fighting in russia, fighting. seek to have american troops - fighting in russia, fighting against russia _ fighting in russia, fighting against russia beyond _ fighting in russia, fighting against russia. beyond europe _ fighting in russia, fighting against russia. beyond europe we - fighting in russia, fighting against russia. beyond europe we know. fighting in russia, fighting against. russia. beyond europe we know that our allies— russia. beyond europe we know that our allies and — russia. beyond europe we know that our allies and our— russia. beyond europe we know that our allies and our adverse _ russia. beyond europe we know that our allies and our adverse areas - russia. beyond europe we know that our allies and our adverse areas and | our allies and our adverse areas and competitors — our allies and our adverse areas and competitors are _ our allies and our adverse areas and competitors are watching. _ our allies and our adverse areas and competitors are watching. they - our allies and our adverse areas and i competitors are watching. they watch our response — competitors are watching. they watch our response in— competitors are watching. they watch our response in ukraine _ competitors are watching. they watch our response in ukraine as— competitors are watching. they watch our response in ukraine as well. - competitors are watching. they watch our response in ukraine as well. andi our response in ukraine as well. and if we _ our response in ukraine as well. and if we walk_ our response in ukraine as well. and if we walk away _ our response in ukraine as well. and if we walk away and _ our response in ukraine as well. and if we walk away and let _ our response in ukraine as well. and if we walk away and let putin - our response in ukraine as well. and if we walk away and let putin erase i if we walk away and let putin erase independence _ if we walk away and let putin erase independence of— if we walk away and let putin erase independence of ukraine, - if we walk away and let putin erase independence of ukraine, other. independence of ukraine, other aggressors— independence of ukraine, other aggressors would _ independence of ukraine, other aggressors would be _ independence of ukraine, other. aggressors would be emboldened independence of ukraine, other- aggressors would be emboldened to try the _ aggressors would be emboldened to try the same — aggressors would be emboldened to try the same. the _ aggressors would be emboldened to try the same. the risk— aggressors would be emboldened to try the same. the risk of _ aggressors would be emboldened to try the same. the risk of conflict - try the same. the risk of conflict and chaos— try the same. the risk of conflict and chaos could _ try the same. the risk of conflict and chaos could spread - try the same. the risk of conflict and chaos could spread in - try the same. the risk of conflict and chaos could spread in otheri and chaos could spread in other parts _ and chaos could spread in other parts of— and chaos could spread in other parts of the _ and chaos could spread in other parts of the world, _ and chaos could spread in other parts of the world, in _ and chaos could spread in other parts of the world, in the - and chaos could spread in other parts of the world, in the indo i parts of the world, in the indo pacific. — parts of the world, in the indo pacific. the _ parts of the world, in the indo pacific, the middle _ parts of the world, in the indo pacific, the middle east, - parts of the world, in the indo - pacific, the middle east, especially in the _ pacific, the middle east, especially in the middle — pacific, the middle east, especially in the middle east. _ pacific, the middle east, especially in the middle east. iran— pacific, the middle east, especially in the middle east. iran supports. in the middle east. iran supports russia _ in the middle east. iran supports russia in— in the middle east. iran supports russia in ukraine _ in the middle east. iran supports russia in ukraine and _ in the middle east. iran supports russia in ukraine and supports l russia in ukraine and supports hamas. — russia in ukraine and supports hamas. and _ russia in ukraine and supports hamas, and other— russia in ukraine and supports hamas, and other terrorist - russia in ukraine and supports . hamas, and other terrorist groups russia in ukraine and supports - hamas, and other terrorist groups in the region— hamas, and other terrorist groups in the region and — hamas, and other terrorist groups in the region and we _ hamas, and other terrorist groups in the region and we will— hamas, and other terrorist groups in the region and we will hold - hamas, and other terrorist groups in the region and we will hold them - hamas, and other terrorist groups in the region and we will hold them in. the region and we will hold them in countable. — the region and we will hold them in countable. i— the region and we will hold them in countable, i might— the region and we will hold them in countable, i might add. _ the region and we will hold them in countable, i might add. the- the region and we will hold them in countable, i might add. the us- the region and we will hold them ini countable, i might add. the us and our partners — countable, i might add. the us and our partners across _ countable, i might add. the us and our partners across the _ countable, i might add. the us and our partners across the region - countable, i might add. the us and our partners across the region are i our partners across the region are working _ our partners across the region are working to — our partners across the region are working to build _ our partners across the region are working to build a _ our partners across the region are working to build a better- our partners across the region are working to build a better future. i working to build a better future. one where — working to build a better future. one where the _ working to build a better future. one where the middle _ working to build a better future. one where the middle east - working to build a better future. one where the middle east is i working to build a better future. i one where the middle east is more stable, _ one where the middle east is more stable, better _ one where the middle east is more stable, better connected _ one where the middle east is more stable, better connected to - one where the middle east is more stable, better connected to its - stable, better connected to its neighbours _ stable, better connected to its neighbours and _ stable, better connected to its neighbours and through - stable, better connected to its - neighbours and through innovative projects— neighbours and through innovative projects such — neighbours and through innovative projects such as _ neighbours and through innovative projects such as the _ neighbours and through innovative projects such as the rail _ neighbours and through innovative projects such as the rail corridor. projects such as the rail corridor that i_ projects such as the rail corridor that i announced _ projects such as the rail corridor that i announced this— projects such as the rail corridor that i announced this year- projects such as the rail corridor that i announced this year at - projects such as the rail corridor| that i announced this year at the summit— that i announced this year at the summit of— that i announced this year at the summit of the _ that i announced this year at the summit of the world's _ that i announced this year at the summit of the world's biggest. summit of the world's biggest economies, _ summit of the world's biggest economies, more _ summit of the world's biggesti economies, more employment summit of the world's biggest - economies, more employment less grievances. — economies, more employment less grievances. tess— economies, more employment less grievances, less war. _ economies, more employment less grievances, less war. it _ economies, more employment less grievances, less war. it benefits- grievances, less war. it benefits the people. _ grievances, less war. it benefits the people. it _ grievances, less war. it benefits the people, it would _ grievances, less war. it benefits the people, it would benefit - grievances, less war. it benefits the people, it would benefit thej the people, it would benefit the people — the people, it would benefit the people of— the people, it would benefit the peopte of the _ the people, it would benefit the people of the middle _ the people, it would benefit the people of the middle east - the people, it would benefit the people of the middle east and l people of the middle east and benefit — people of the middle east and benefit us~ _ people of the middle east and benefit us. american - people of the middle east and l benefit us. american leadership people of the middle east and - benefit us. american leadership is what _ benefit us. american leadership is what hotds — benefit us. american leadership is what holds the _ benefit us. american leadership is what holds the world _ benefit us. american leadership is what holds the world together. . what holds the world together. american — what holds the world together. american alliances _ what holds the world together. american alliances are - what holds the world together. american alliances are what i what holds the world together. . american alliances are what keep what holds the world together. - american alliances are what keep us, america. _ american alliances are what keep us, america. say~ — american alliances are what keep us, america, say. american— american alliances are what keep us, america, say. american values - american alliances are what keep us, america, say. american values make| america, say. american values make us a nation _ america, say. american values make us a nation others _ america, say. american values make us a nation others want _ america, say. american values make us a nation others want to _ america, say. american values make us a nation others want to work- us a nation others want to work with _ us a nation others want to work with to— us a nation others want to work with to put— us a nation others want to work with. to put att— us a nation others want to work with. to put all that _ us a nation others want to work with. to put all that at - us a nation others want to work with. to put all that at risk - us a nation others want to work with. to put all that at risk if i us a nation others want to work| with. to put all that at risk if we walk— with. to put all that at risk if we walk away— with. to put all that at risk if we walk away from _ with. to put all that at risk if we walk away from ukraine - with. to put all that at risk if we walk away from ukraine and - with. to put all that at risk if we | walk away from ukraine and turn with. to put all that at risk if we - walk away from ukraine and turn our backs _ walk away from ukraine and turn our backs on _ walk away from ukraine and turn our backs on israet — walk away from ukraine and turn our backs on israel is _ walk away from ukraine and turn our backs on israel isjust_ walk away from ukraine and turn our backs on israel isjust not— walk away from ukraine and turn our backs on israel is just not worth - backs on israel isjust not worth it. backs on israel isjust not worth it that— backs on israel isjust not worth it that is— backs on israel isjust not worth it that is why— backs on israel isjust not worth it. that is why tomorrow - backs on israel isjust not worth it. that is why tomorrow i - backs on israel isjust not worth it. that is why tomorrow i will l backs on israel is just not worth . it. that is why tomorrow i will send congress _ it. that is why tomorrow i will send congress an— it. that is why tomorrow i will send congress an urgent _ it. that is why tomorrow i will send congress an urgent budget - it. that is why tomorrow i will send congress an urgent budget requestj it. that is why tomorrow i will send . congress an urgent budget request to fund america's — congress an urgent budget request to fund america's national— congress an urgent budget request to fund america's national security, - congress an urgent budget request to fund america's national security, to. fund america's national security, to support— fund america's national security, to support our— fund america's national security, to support our radical— fund america's national security, to support our radical partners - support our radical partners including _ support our radical partners including israel— support our radical partners including israel and - support our radical partnersi including israel and ukraine. support our radical partners i including israeland ukraine. it support our radical partners - including israeland ukraine. it is a smart— including israeland ukraine. it is a smart investment _ including israeland ukraine. it is a smart investment that - including israeland ukraine. it is a smart investment that will- including israeland ukraine. it is a smart investment that will pay| a smart investment that will pay evident — a smart investment that will pay evident for— a smart investment that will pay evident for american _ a smart investment that will pay evident for american security. a smart investment that will pay| evident for american security for generations, _ evident for american security for generations, elbows— evident for american security for generations, elbows keep - evident for american security for. generations, elbows keep american troops _ generations, elbows keep american troops out _ generations, elbows keep american troops out of — generations, elbows keep american troops out of harms _ generations, elbows keep american troops out of harms way, _ generations, elbows keep american troops out of harms way, help - generations, elbows keep american troops out of harms way, help is - troops out of harms way, help is build _ troops out of harms way, help is build a _ troops out of harms way, help is build a world _ troops out of harms way, help is build a world that _ troops out of harms way, help is build a world that is _ troops out of harms way, help is build a world that is safer- troops out of harms way, help is build a world that is safer and i troops out of harms way, help is i build a world that is safer and more peaceful— build a world that is safer and more peaceful and — build a world that is safer and more peaceful and more _ build a world that is safer and more peaceful and more prosperous- build a world that is safer and more peaceful and more prosperous for. build a world that is safer and more . peaceful and more prosperous for our children— peaceful and more prosperous for our children and _ peaceful and more prosperous for our children and grandchildren. _ peaceful and more prosperous for our children and grandchildren. in - children and grandchildren. in israet— children and grandchildren. in israet we _ children and grandchildren. in israel we must _ children and grandchildren. in israel we must make - children and grandchildren. in israel we must make sure - children and grandchildren. in| israel we must make sure that children and grandchildren. in - israel we must make sure that they have what— israel we must make sure that they have what they _ israel we must make sure that they have what they need _ israel we must make sure that they have what they need to _ israel we must make sure that they have what they need to protect - have what they need to protect people — have what they need to protect peopte today _ have what they need to protect peopte today and _ have what they need to protect people today and always. - have what they need to protect people today and always. the i people today and always. the security— people today and always. the security package _ people today and always. the security package i— people today and always. the security package i am - people today and always. the | security package i am sending people today and always. the i security package i am sending to congress — security package i am sending to congress and _ security package i am sending to congress and asking _ security package i am sending to congress and asking congress i security package i am sending to congress and asking congress toj security package i am sending to - congress and asking congress to sign off on— congress and asking congress to sign off on is— congress and asking congress to sign off on is an _ congress and asking congress to sign off on is an unprecedented _ congress and asking congress to sign off on is an unprecedented increase l off on is an unprecedented increase to israet's_ off on is an unprecedented increase to israel's security _ off on is an unprecedented increase to israel's security that _ off on is an unprecedented increase to israel's security that will- to israel's security that will sharpen— to israel's security that will sharpen israel's— to israel's security that will sharpen israel's qualitativej sharpen israel's qualitative military— sharpen israel's qualitative military edge _ sharpen israel's qualitative military edge that - sharpen israel's qualitative military edge that we - sharpen israel's qualitative military edge that we have| sharpen israel's qualitative _ military edge that we have committed to. military edge that we have committed to the _ military edge that we have committed to. the qualitative _ military edge that we have committed to. the qualitative military— military edge that we have committed to. the qualitative military edge. - to. the qualitative military edge. we witt— to. the qualitative military edge. we will make _ to. the qualitative military edge. we will make sure _ to. the qualitative military edge. we will make sure that _ to. the qualitative military edge. we will make sure that iron - to. the qualitative military edge. i we will make sure that iron dome continues— we will make sure that iron dome continues to — we will make sure that iron dome continues to guard _ we will make sure that iron dome continues to guard the _ we will make sure that iron dome continues to guard the skies - we will make sure that iron dome continues to guard the skies over| continues to guard the skies over israet— continues to guard the skies over israet and — continues to guard the skies over israet and we _ continues to guard the skies over israel and we will— continues to guard the skies over israel and we will make - continues to guard the skies over israel and we will make sure - continues to guard the skies overi israel and we will make sure other hostite _ israel and we will make sure other hostite actors _ israel and we will make sure other hostile actors in _ israel and we will make sure other hostile actors in the _ israel and we will make sure other hostile actors in the region - israel and we will make sure other hostile actors in the region will - hostile actors in the region will know— hostile actors in the region will know that _ hostile actors in the region will know that israel— hostile actors in the region will know that israel is _ hostile actors in the region will know that israel is stronger- hostile actors in the region will. know that israel is stronger than ever— know that israel is stronger than ever and — know that israel is stronger than ever and this _ know that israel is stronger than ever and this conflict _ know that israel is stronger than ever and this conflict from - ever and this conflict from spreading _ ever and this conflict from spreading. look, - ever and this conflict from spreading. look, at- ever and this conflict from spreading. look, at the i ever and this conflict from i spreading. look, at the same ever and this conflict from - spreading. look, at the same time president— spreading. look, at the same time president netanyahu _ spreading. look, at the same time president netanyahu and - spreading. look, at the same time president netanyahu and i- spreading. look, at the same time president netanyahu and i again i president netanyahu and i again discussed — president netanyahu and i again discussed yesterday— president netanyahu and i again discussed yesterday the - president netanyahu and i again discussed yesterday the criticali discussed yesterday the critical need _ discussed yesterday the critical need for— discussed yesterday the critical need for israel— discussed yesterday the critical need for israel to _ discussed yesterday the critical need for israel to operate - discussed yesterday the critical need for israel to operate by. discussed yesterday the critical. need for israel to operate by the laws _ need for israel to operate by the laws of— need for israel to operate by the laws of war— need for israel to operate by the laws of war protecting _ need for israel to operate by the laws of war protecting civilians l need for israel to operate by the| laws of war protecting civilians in combat _ laws of war protecting civilians in combat as — laws of war protecting civilians in combat as best _ laws of war protecting civilians in combat as best they— laws of war protecting civilians in combat as best they can. - laws of war protecting civilians in combat as best they can. the - laws of war protecting civilians in - combat as best they can. the people of gaza _ combat as best they can. the people of gaza urgently— combat as best they can. the people of gaza urgently need _ combat as best they can. the people of gaza urgently need food _ combat as best they can. the people of gaza urgently need food water - combat as best they can. the people | of gaza urgently need food water and medicine _ of gaza urgently need food water and medicine. yesterday _ of gaza urgently need food water and medicine. yesterday in _ of gaza urgently need food water and medicine. yesterday in discussions i medicine. yesterday in discussions with the _ medicine. yesterday in discussions with the leaders _ medicine. yesterday in discussions with the leaders of— medicine. yesterday in discussions with the leaders of israel— medicine. yesterday in discussions with the leaders of israel and - medicine. yesterday in discussions| with the leaders of israel and egypt i with the leaders of israel and egypt i secured _ with the leaders of israel and egypt i secured an — with the leaders of israel and egypt i secured an agreement _ with the leaders of israel and egypt i secured an agreement for- with the leaders of israel and egypt i secured an agreement for the - with the leaders of israel and egypt| i secured an agreement for the first shipment _ i secured an agreement for the first shipment of— i secured an agreement for the first shipment of humanitarian _ i secured an agreement for the firstl shipment of humanitarian assistance from the _ shipment of humanitarian assistance from the united _ shipment of humanitarian assistance from the united nations— shipment of humanitarian assistance from the united nations to - from the united nations to palestinian _ from the united nations to palestinian civilians - from the united nations to palestinian civilians in - from the united nations to. palestinian civilians in gaza. from the united nations to - palestinian civilians in gaza. hamas does _ palestinian civilians in gaza. hamas does not _ palestinian civilians in gaza. hamas does not divert _ palestinian civilians in gaza. hamas does not divert or— palestinian civilians in gaza. hamas does not divert or steal— palestinian civilians in gaza. hamas does not divert or steal this - does not divert or steal this shipment _ does not divert or steal this shipment. these _ does not divert or steal thisj shipment. these shipments does not divert or steal this - shipment. these shipments will provide — shipment. these shipments will provide an— shipment. these shipments will provide an opening _ shipment. these shipments will provide an opening to _ shipment. these shipments will provide an opening to sustain . provide an opening to sustain detiverv— provide an opening to sustain delivery of— provide an opening to sustain delivery of life—saving - provide an opening to sustain - delivery of life—saving humanitarian assistance — delivery of life—saving humanitarian assistance for — delivery of life—saving humanitarian assistance for the _ delivery of life—saving humanitarian assistance for the palestinians. - delivery of life—saving humanitarian assistance for the palestinians. asi assistance for the palestinians. as i assistance for the palestinians. as i said _ assistance for the palestinians. as i said in— assistance for the palestinians. as i said in israel, _ assistance for the palestinians. as i said in israel, as _ assistance for the palestinians. as i said in israel, as hard _ assistance for the palestinians. as i said in israel, as hard as- assistance for the palestinians. as i said in israel, as hard as it - assistance for the palestinians. as i said in israel, as hard as it is - i said in israel, as hard as it is we cannot— i said in israel, as hard as it is we cannot give _ i said in israel, as hard as it is we cannot give up— i said in israel, as hard as it is we cannot give up on- i said in israel, as hard as it is we cannot give up on peace. i i said in israel, as hard as it is l we cannot give up on peace. we cannot— we cannot give up on peace. we cannot give — we cannot give up on peace. we cannot give up— we cannot give up on peace. we cannot give up on— we cannot give up on peace. we cannot give up on a _ we cannot give up on peace. we cannot give up on a two- we cannot give up on peace. we cannot give up on a two state i cannot give up on a two state solution. — cannot give up on a two state solution. israel— cannot give up on a two state solution. israel and _ cannot give up on a two state i solution. israeland palestinians solution. israel and palestinians equally— solution. israel and palestinians equally deserve _ solution. israeland palestinians equally deserve to _ solution. israeland palestinians equally deserve to live - solution. israeland palestinians equally deserve to live in - solution. israeland palestinians| equally deserve to live in safety, dignity— equally deserve to live in safety, dignity and — equally deserve to live in safety, dignity and peace. _ equally deserve to live in safety, dignity and peace. here - equally deserve to live in safety, dignity and peace. here at - equally deserve to live in safety, dignity and peace. here at homei equally deserve to live in safety, i dignity and peace. here at home we have to _ dignity and peace. here at home we have to be _ dignity and peace. here at home we have to be honest _ dignity and peace. here at home we have to be honest with _ dignity and peace. here at home we have to be honest with ourselves. . dignity and peace. here at home we| have to be honest with ourselves. in recent _ have to be honest with ourselves. in recent years — have to be honest with ourselves. in recent years too _ have to be honest with ourselves. in recent years too much _ have to be honest with ourselves. in recent years too much hate - have to be honest with ourselves. in recent years too much hate has - have to be honest with ourselves. in| recent years too much hate has been given— recent years too much hate has been given too— recent years too much hate has been given too much— recent years too much hate has been given too much oxygen, _ recent years too much hate has been given too much oxygen, it— recent years too much hate has been given too much oxygen, it fuels - given too much oxygen, it fuels racism — given too much oxygen, it fuels racism elastomer_ given too much oxygen, it fuels racism elastomer that- given too much oxygen, it fuels racism elastomer that make - racism elastomer that make anti—semitism _ racism elastomer that make anti—semitism and - racism elastomer that make - anti—semitism and islamophobia. in the wake _ anti—semitism and islamophobia. in the wake of— anti—semitism and islamophobia. in the wake of recent _ anti—semitism and islamophobia. in the wake of recent events _ anti—semitism and islamophobia. in the wake of recent events that - anti—semitism and islamophobia. in the wake of recent events that led l the wake of recent events that led to horrific — the wake of recent events that led to horrific threats _ the wake of recent events that led to horrific threats and _ the wake of recent events that led to horrific threats and attacks - the wake of recent events that led to horrific threats and attacks thati to horrific threats and attacks that shockers — to horrific threats and attacks that shockers and _ to horrific threats and attacks that shockers and break— to horrific threats and attacks that shockers and break our— to horrific threats and attacks that shockers and break our hearts. i to horrific threats and attacks that| shockers and break our hearts. 0n shockers and break our hearts. on october— shockers and break our hearts. on october seven _ shockers and break our hearts. on october seven terror— shockers and break our hearts. on october seven terror attacks - shockers and break our hearts. on october seven terror attacks have | october seven terror attacks have triggered — october seven terror attacks have triggered deep _ october seven terror attacks have triggered deep scars _ october seven terror attacks have triggered deep scars and - october seven terror attacks have triggered deep scars and terrible l triggered deep scars and terrible memories— triggered deep scars and terrible memories for— triggered deep scars and terrible memories for the _ triggered deep scars and terrible memories for the jewish - triggered deep scars and terrible - memories for the jewish community. today. _ memories for the jewish community. today. jewish — memories for the jewish community. today, jewish families _ memories for the jewish community. today, jewish families worry - memories for the jewish community. today, jewish families worry about . today, jewish families worry about treing _ today, jewish families worry about treing targeted _ today, jewish families worry about being targeted in— today, jewish families worry about being targeted in school, - today, jewish families worry about being targeted in school, wearing i being targeted in school, wearing symbols — being targeted in school, wearing symbols of— being targeted in school, wearing symbols of their _ being targeted in school, wearing symbols of their faith _ being targeted in school, wearing symbols of their faith walking - being targeted in school, wearing i symbols of their faith walking down the street— symbols of their faith walking down the street or— symbols of their faith walking down the street or going _ symbols of their faith walking down the street or going out— symbols of their faith walking down the street or going out about - symbols of their faith walking down the street or going out about theiri the street or going out about their daily lives — the street or going out about their daily lives i— the street or going out about their daily lives. i know— the street or going out about their daily lives. i know many— the street or going out about their daily lives. i know many of- the street or going out about their daily lives. i know many of you - the street or going out about their daily lives. i know many of you ini daily lives. i know many of you in the muslim — daily lives. i know many of you in the muslim american _ daily lives. i know many of you in the muslim american community| daily lives. i know many of you in - the muslim american community and arah-american— the muslim american community and arab—american community, - the muslim american community and arab—american community, the - arab—american community, the palestinian _ arab—american community, the palestinian american _ arab—american community, the i palestinian american community arab—american community, the - palestinian american community art outraged, _ palestinian american community art outraged, saying _ palestinian american community art outraged, saying to— palestinian american community art outraged, saying to yourselves - palestinian american community art outraged, saying to yourselves here we go _ outraged, saying to yourselves here we go again — outraged, saying to yourselves here we go again. islamophobia - outraged, saying to yourselves here we go again. islamophobia and - outraged, saying to yourselves here we go again. islamophobia and the| we go again. islamophobia and the stress _ we go again. islamophobia and the stress we — we go again. islamophobia and the stress we saw— we go again. islamophobia and the stress we saw after _ we go again. islamophobia and the stress we saw after 9/11. _ we go again. islamophobia and the stress we saw after 9/11. just - we go again. islamophobia and the stress we saw after 9/11. just last i stress we saw after 9/11. just last week— stress we saw after 9/11. just last week a _ stress we saw after 9/11. just last week a nrother— stress we saw after 9/11. just last week a mother was _ stress we saw after 9/11. just last week a mother was brutally- stress we saw after 9/11. just last - week a mother was brutally stabbed, a little _ week a mother was brutally stabbed, a little boy— week a mother was brutally stabbed, a little boy here _ week a mother was brutally stabbed, a little boy here in _ week a mother was brutally stabbed, a little boy here in the _ week a mother was brutally stabbed, a little boy here in the united - a little boy here in the united states— a little boy here in the united states a — a little boy here in the united states a little _ a little boy here in the united states a little boy _ a little boy here in the united states a little boy who - a little boy here in the united states a little boy who just i a little boy here in the united - states a little boy who just turned six years — states a little boy who just turned six years old — states a little boy who just turned six years old was _ states a little boy who just turned six years old was murdered - states a little boy who just turned six years old was murdered in - states a little boy who just turned i six years old was murdered in their home _ six years old was murdered in their home outside — six years old was murdered in their home outside chicago. _ six years old was murdered in their home outside chicago. his - six years old was murdered in their home outside chicago. his name . six years old was murdered in their. home outside chicago. his name was what dear, _ home outside chicago. his name was what dear, a — home outside chicago. his name was what dear, a proud _ home outside chicago. his name was what dear, a proud american, - home outside chicago. his name was what dear, a proud american, a - home outside chicago. his name wasl what dear, a proud american, a proud patestinian _ what dear, a proud american, a proud palestinian american _ what dear, a proud american, a proud palestinian american family. - what dear, a proud american, a proud palestinian american family. we - palestinian american family. we cannot— palestinian american family. we cannot stand _ palestinian american family. we cannot stand by _ palestinian american family. we cannot stand by and _ palestinian american family. we cannot stand by and stand - palestinian american family. we i cannot stand by and stand silent. palestinian american family. we - cannot stand by and stand silent. we must, _ cannot stand by and stand silent. we must, without— cannot stand by and stand silent. we must, without equivocation, - cannot stand by and stand silent. we must, without equivocation, the - cannot stand by and stand silent. we| must, without equivocation, the nous anti-semitism — must, without equivocation, the nous anti—semitism. and _ must, without equivocation, the nous anti—semitism. and without- anti—semitism. and without equivocation— anti—semitism. and without equivocation we _ anti—semitism. and without equivocation we must - anti—semitism. and without- equivocation we must announce istamophobia _ equivocation we must announce islamophobia and _ equivocation we must announce islamophobia and to _ equivocation we must announce islamophobia and to all - equivocation we must announce islamophobia and to all of - equivocation we must announce islamophobia and to all of you i islamophobia and to all of you hurting — islamophobia and to all of you hurting i— islamophobia and to all of you hurting i want— islamophobia and to all of you hurting i want you _ islamophobia and to all of you hurting i want you to - islamophobia and to all of you hurting i want you to know - islamophobia and to all of you | hurting i want you to know that islamophobia and to all of you . hurting i want you to know that i see you — hurting i want you to know that i see you you _ hurting i want you to know that i see you. you belong _ hurting i want you to know that i see you. you belong and - hurting i want you to know that i see you. you belong and i- hurting i want you to know that i see you. you belong and i wanti hurting i want you to know that i. see you. you belong and i want to say this— see you. you belong and i want to say this to — see you. you belong and i want to say this to you _ see you. you belong and i want to say this to you. you _ see you. you belong and i want to say this to you. you are _ see you. you belong and i want to say this to you. you are all- say this to you. you are all american _ say this to you. you are all american. this _ say this to you. you are all american. this is - say this to you. you are all american. this is a - say this to you. you are all. american. this is a moment, say this to you. you are all- american. this is a moment, in moments — american. this is a moment, in moments tike _ american. this is a moment, in moments like these _ american. this is a moment, in moments like these when - american. this is a moment, in- moments like these when suspicion anger— moments like these when suspicion anger and _ moments like these when suspicion angerand rage— moments like these when suspicion angerand rage run— moments like these when suspicion angerand rage run hard— moments like these when suspicion anger and rage run hard we - moments like these when suspicion anger and rage run hard we have i moments like these when suspicion anger and rage run hard we have to| anger and rage run hard we have to work— anger and rage run hard we have to work harder— anger and rage run hard we have to work harder than— anger and rage run hard we have to work harder than ever— anger and rage run hard we have to work harder than ever to _ anger and rage run hard we have to work harder than ever to hold - anger and rage run hard we have to work harder than ever to hold onto| work harder than ever to hold onto vatues _ work harder than ever to hold onto values that— work harder than ever to hold onto values that make _ work harder than ever to hold onto values that make us _ work harder than ever to hold onto values that make us who _ work harder than ever to hold onto values that make us who we - work harder than ever to hold onto values that make us who we are. l work harder than ever to hold onto. values that make us who we are. we are a _ values that make us who we are. we are a nation— values that make us who we are. we are a nation of— values that make us who we are. we are a nation of religious _ values that make us who we are. we are a nation of religious freedom, i are a nation of religious freedom, freedom — are a nation of religious freedom, freedom of— are a nation of religious freedom, freedom of expression _ are a nation of religious freedom, freedom of expression and - are a nation of religious freedom, freedom of expression and we - are a nation of religious freedom, freedom of expression and we all| freedom of expression and we all have _ freedom of expression and we all have a _ freedom of expression and we all have a right — freedom of expression and we all have a right to _ freedom of expression and we all have a right to debate _ freedom of expression and we all have a right to debate without i freedom of expression and we all. have a right to debate without fear of treing _ have a right to debate without fear of being targeted _ have a right to debate without fear of being targeted in— have a right to debate without fear of being targeted in schools - have a right to debate without fear of being targeted in schools or- of being targeted in schools or workplaces _ of being targeted in schools or workplaces or _ of being targeted in schools or workplaces or our— of being targeted in schools or workplaces or our community. j of being targeted in schools ori workplaces or our community. i of being targeted in schools or- workplaces or our community. i must renounce _ workplaces or our community. i must renounce violence _ workplaces or our community. i must renounce violence and _ workplaces or our community. i must renounce violence and vitriol. - workplaces or our community. i must renounce violence and vitriol. see - renounce violence and vitriol. see each _ renounce violence and vitriol. see each other— renounce violence and vitriol. see each other not _ renounce violence and vitriol. see each other not as _ renounce violence and vitriol. see each other not as enemies - renounce violence and vitriol. see each other not as enemies but - renounce violence and vitriol. see each other not as enemies but as| each other not as enemies but as fettow— each other not as enemies but as fellow americans. _ each other not as enemies but as fellow americans. when - each other not as enemies but as fellow americans. when i - each other not as enemies but as fellow americans. when i was . each other not as enemies but as fellow americans. when i was in| fellow americans. when i was in israet— fellow americans. when i was in israel yesterday— fellow americans. when i was in israel yesterday i _ fellow americans. when i was in israel yesterday i said _ fellow americans. when i was in israel yesterday i said that - fellow americans. when i was in israel yesterday i said that when america — israel yesterday i said that when america experienced _ israel yesterday i said that when america experienced the - israel yesterday i said that when america experienced the hell. israel yesterday i said that when america experienced the hell of| israel yesterday i said that when - america experienced the hell of 9/11 we felt _ america experienced the hell of 9/11 we felt rage — america experienced the hell of 9/11 we felt rage as— america experienced the hell of 9/11 we felt rage as well. _ america experienced the hell of 9/11 we felt rage as well. we _ america experienced the hell of 9/11 we felt rage as well. we made - we felt rage as well. we made mistakes — we felt rage as well. we made mistakes in _ we felt rage as well. we made mistakes in getting _ we felt rage as well. we made mistakes in getting justice - we felt rage as well. we made mistakes in getting justice sol we felt rage as well. we madej mistakes in getting justice so i caution — mistakes in getting justice so i caution the _ mistakes in getting justice so i caution the government - mistakes in getting justice so i caution the government of- mistakes in getting justice so i l caution the government of israel mistakes in getting justice so i - caution the government of israel to not be _ caution the government of israel to not be blinded _ caution the government of israel to not be blinded by— caution the government of israel to not be blinded by rage. _ caution the government of israel to not be blinded by rage. and - caution the government of israel to not be blinded by rage. and here i caution the government of israel to not be blinded by rage. and here in america _ not be blinded by rage. and here in america tet's — not be blinded by rage. and here in america let's not _ not be blinded by rage. and here in america let's not forget _ not be blinded by rage. and here in america let's not forget who - not be blinded by rage. and here in america let's not forget who we - not be blinded by rage. and here ini america let's not forget who we are. we reject— america let's not forget who we are. we reject att— america let's not forget who we are. we reject all forms, _ america let's not forget who we are. we reject all forms, all— america let's not forget who we are. we reject all forms, all forms - america let's not forget who we are. we reject all forms, all forms of- we reject all forms, all forms of hate _ we reject all forms, all forms of hate weather _ we reject all forms, all forms of hate weather against _ we reject all forms, all forms of hate weather against muslims, i we reject all forms, all forms of- hate weather against muslims, jews or anyone _ hate weather against muslims, jews or anyone that _ hate weather against muslims, jews or anyone. that is _ hate weather against muslims, jews or anyone. that is what _ hate weather against muslims, jews or anyone. that is what great - or anyone. that is what great nations— or anyone. that is what great nations do— or anyone. that is what great nations do and _ or anyone. that is what great nations do and we _ or anyone. that is what great nations do and we are - or anyone. that is what great nations do and we are a - or anyone. that is what great| nations do and we are a great nation — nations do and we are a great nation 0n— nations do and we are a great nation. on ukraine _ nations do and we are a great nation. on ukraine i- nations do and we are a great nation. on ukraine i asked i nations do and we are a great - nation. on ukraine i asked congress to make _ nation. on ukraine i asked congress to make sure — nation. on ukraine i asked congress to make sure that _ nation. on ukraine i asked congress to make sure that we _ nation. on ukraine i asked congress to make sure that we can— nation. on ukraine i asked congress to make sure that we can continue l nation. on ukraine i asked congressl to make sure that we can continue to send ukraine— to make sure that we can continue to send ukraine the _ to make sure that we can continue to send ukraine the weapons _ to make sure that we can continue to send ukraine the weapons we - to make sure that we can continue to send ukraine the weapons we need l to make sure that we can continue toi send ukraine the weapons we need —— they need _ send ukraine the weapons we need —— they need to _ send ukraine the weapons we need —— they need to defend _ send ukraine the weapons we need —— they need to defend themselves - they need to defend themselves without— they need to defend themselves without interruption— they need to defend themselves without interruption so - they need to defend themselves without interruption so that - they need to defend themselves . without interruption so that ukraine can stop _ without interruption so that ukraine can stop putin _ without interruption so that ukraine can stop putin. they— without interruption so that ukraine can stop putin. they are _ without interruption so that ukrainel can stop putin. they are succeeding. when _ can stop putin. they are succeeding. when putin— can stop putin. they are succeeding. when putin invaded _ can stop putin. they are succeeding. when putin invaded ukraine - can stop putin. they are succeeding. when putin invaded ukraine he - when putin invaded ukraine he thought— when putin invaded ukraine he thought he _ when putin invaded ukraine he thought he would _ when putin invaded ukraine he thought he would take - when putin invaded ukraine he thought he would take years i when putin invaded ukraine he. thought he would take years and when putin invaded ukraine he - thought he would take years and all of ukraine _ thought he would take years and all of ukraine in— thought he would take years and all of ukraine in a— thought he would take years and all of ukraine in a matter— thought he would take years and all of ukraine in a matter of— thought he would take years and all of ukraine in a matter of days. - thought he would take years and allj of ukraine in a matter of days. over one year— of ukraine in a matter of days. over one year tater — of ukraine in a matter of days. over one year later he _ of ukraine in a matter of days. over one year later he has _ of ukraine in a matter of days. over one year later he has failed - of ukraine in a matter of days. over one year later he has failed and - of ukraine in a matter of days. over one year later he has failed and he i one year later he has failed and he continues— one year later he has failed and he continues to — one year later he has failed and he continues to fail. _ one year later he has failed and he continues to fail. gm _ one year later he has failed and he continues to fail. gm still- one year later he has failed and he continues to fail. gm still stands . continues to fail. gm still stands because — continues to fail. gm still stands because of— continues to fail. gm still stands because of the _ continues to fail. gm still stands because of the bravery- continues to fail. gm still stands because of the bravery of- continues to fail. gm still stands because of the bravery of the . because of the bravery of the ukrainian _ because of the bravery of the ukrainian people. _ because of the bravery of the ukrainian people. —— - because of the bravery of the ukrainian people. —— cave i because of the bravery of the i ukrainian people. —— cave still stands — kyiv still stands. what would happen if we walked — kyiv still stands. what would happen if we walked away? _ kyiv still stands. what would happen if we walked away? we _ kyiv still stands. what would happen if we walked away? we are - kyiv still stands. what would happen if we walked away? we are the - if we walked away? we are the essential— if we walked away? we are the essential nation. _ if we walked away? we are the essential nation. meanwhile, l if we walked away? we are the - essential nation. meanwhile, putin has turned — essential nation. meanwhile, putin has turned to — essential nation. meanwhile, putin has turned to iran _ essential nation. meanwhile, putin has turned to iran and _ essential nation. meanwhile, putin has turned to iran and north - essential nation. meanwhile, putin has turned to iran and north koreaj has turned to iran and north korea to purchase — has turned to iran and north korea to purchase attack _ has turned to iran and north korea to purchase attack drones - has turned to iran and north korea to purchase attack drones and - to purchase attack drones and ammunition _ to purchase attack drones and ammunition to— to purchase attack drones and ammunition to tyrannise - to purchase attack drones and - ammunition to tyrannise ukrainian cities~ _ ammunition to tyrannise ukrainian cities~ from — ammunition to tyrannise ukrainian cities. from the _ ammunition to tyrannise ukrainian cities. from the outset _ ammunition to tyrannise ukrainian cities. from the outset i _ ammunition to tyrannise ukrainian cities. from the outset i have - ammunition to tyrannise ukrainian cities. from the outset i have saidj cities. from the outset i have said iwitt— cities. from the outset i have said iwitt not _ cities. from the outset i have said iwitt not send _ cities. from the outset i have said i will not send american _ cities. from the outset i have said i will not send american troops i cities. from the outset i have said i will not send american troops to| i will not send american troops to fight _ i will not send american troops to fight in _ i will not send american troops to fight in ukraine. _ i will not send american troops to fight in ukraine. all— i will not send american troops to fight in ukraine. all ukraine - i will not send american troops to fight in ukraine. all ukraine is - fight in ukraine. all ukraine is asking— fight in ukraine. all ukraine is asking for— fight in ukraine. all ukraine is asking for his _ fight in ukraine. all ukraine is asking for his help _ fight in ukraine. all ukraine is asking for his help with - fight in ukraine. all ukraine is i asking for his help with weapons, munitions, — asking for his help with weapons, munitions, capability— asking for his help with weapons, munitions, capability and - asking for his help with weapons, | munitions, capability and capacity to push— munitions, capability and capacity to push invading _ munitions, capability and capacity to push invading forces _ munitions, capability and capacity to push invading forces off- munitions, capability and capacity to push invading forces off their. to push invading forces off their land _ to push invading forces off their land their_ to push invading forces off their land. their defence _ to push invading forces off their land. their defence system - to push invading forces off their land. their defence system to l to push invading forces off their- land. their defence system to shoot down _ land. their defence system to shoot down missiles — land. their defence system to shoot down missiles before _ land. their defence system to shoot down missiles before they- land. their defence system to shoot down missiles before they destroy. down missiles before they destroy ukrainian — down missiles before they destroy ukrainian cities. _ down missiles before they destroy ukrainian cities. let— down missiles before they destroy ukrainian cities. let me _ down missiles before they destroy ukrainian cities. let me be - down missiles before they destroy ukrainian cities. let me be clear. ukrainian cities. let me be clear about— ukrainian cities. let me be clear about something. _ ukrainian cities. let me be clear about something. we _ ukrainian cities. let me be clear about something. we send - ukrainian cities. let me be clear- about something. we send ukrainian equipment— about something. we send ukrainian equipment sitting _ about something. we send ukrainian equipment sitting in _ about something. we send ukrainian equipment sitting in our— about something. we send ukrainian equipment sitting in our stockpiles . equipment sitting in our stockpiles and when — equipment sitting in our stockpiles and when we — equipment sitting in our stockpiles and when we use _ equipment sitting in our stockpiles and when we use the _ equipment sitting in our stockpiles and when we use the money- equipment sitting in our stockpiles . and when we use the money allocated by congress _ and when we use the money allocated by congress we — and when we use the money allocated by congress we use _ and when we use the money allocated by congress we use it _ and when we use the money allocated by congress we use it to _ and when we use the money allocated by congress we use it to replenish - by congress we use it to replenish our own— by congress we use it to replenish our own stores _ by congress we use it to replenish our own stores and _ by congress we use it to replenish our own stores and stockpiles - by congress we use it to replenish| our own stores and stockpiles with new equipment _ our own stores and stockpiles with new equipment. equipment - our own stores and stockpiles with new equipment. equipment that l new equipment. equipment that defends— new equipment. equipment that defends america _ new equipment. equipment that defends america and _ new equipment. equipment that defends america and is - new equipment. equipment that defends america and is made i new equipment. equipment that defends america and is made in| defends america and is made in america — defends america and is made in america. patriot _ defends america and is made in america. patriot missiles - defends america and is made in america. patriot missiles for. defends america and is made in america. patriot missiles for airi america. patriot missiles for air defence — america. patriot missiles for air defence made _ america. patriot missiles for air defence made in _ america. patriot missiles for air defence made in arizona. - america. patriot missiles for air. defence made in arizona. artillery sheiis _ defence made in arizona. artillery shells manufactured _ defence made in arizona. artillery shells manufactured in _ defence made in arizona. artillery shells manufactured in 12- defence made in arizona. artillery shells manufactured in 12 states l shells manufactured in 12 states across _ shells manufactured in 12 states across the — shells manufactured in 12 states across the country— shells manufactured in 12 states across the country and - shells manufactured in 12 states across the country and so - shells manufactured in 12 states across the country and so much| shells manufactured in 12 states - across the country and so much more. you know. _ across the country and so much more. you know. just — across the country and so much more. you know. just as— across the country and so much more. you know. just as in— across the country and so much more. you know, just as in world _ across the country and so much more. you know, just as in world war- across the country and so much more. you know, just as in world war ii, - you know, just as in world war ii, today, _ you know, just as in world war ii, today. patriotic— you know, just as in world war ii, today, patriotic american - you know, just as in world war ii, today, patriotic american workers| today, patriotic american workers are building — today, patriotic american workers are building the _ today, patriotic american workers are building the arsenal- today, patriotic american workers are building the arsenal of- are building the arsenal of democracy— are building the arsenal of democracy and _ are building the arsenal of democracy and serving - are building the arsenal ofj democracy and serving the are building the arsenal of- democracy and serving the cause of freedom _ democracy and serving the cause of freedom let— democracy and serving the cause of freedom. let me _ democracy and serving the cause of freedom. let me close _ democracy and serving the cause of freedom. let me close with- democracy and serving the cause of freedom. let me close with this. i freedom. let me close with this. eariier— freedom. let me close with this. earlier this — freedom. let me close with this. earlier this year— freedom. let me close with this. earlier this year i _ freedom. let me close with this. earlier this year i boarded - freedom. let me close with this. earlier this year i boarded air- earlier this year i boarded air force — earlier this year i boarded air force one _ earlier this year i boarded air force one for— earlier this year i boarded air force one for a _ earlier this year i boarded air force one for a secret - earlier this year i boarded air force one for a secret flighti earlier this year i boarded air. force one for a secret flight to poland — force one for a secret flight to poland. there _ force one for a secret flight to poland. there i— force one for a secret flight to poland. there i boarded - force one for a secret flight to poland. there i boarded a - force one for a secret flight to| poland. there i boarded a train force one for a secret flight to - poland. there i boarded a train with blacked _ poland. there i boarded a train with blacked out— poland. there i boarded a train with blacked out windows _ poland. there i boarded a train with blacked out windows for _ poland. there i boarded a train with blacked out windows for a _ poland. there i boarded a train with blacked out windows for a ten - poland. there i boarded a train with blacked out windows for a ten houri blacked out windows for a ten hour ride each— blacked out windows for a ten hour ride each way— blacked out windows for a ten hour ride each way to _ blacked out windows for a ten hour ride each way to kyiv— blacked out windows for a ten hour ride each way to kyiv to _ blacked out windows for a ten hour ride each way to kyiv to stand - blacked out windows for a ten hour ride each way to kyiv to stand with| ride each way to kyiv to stand with the people — ride each way to kyiv to stand with the peopie of— ride each way to kyiv to stand with the people of ukraine _ ride each way to kyiv to stand with the people of ukraine ahead - ride each way to kyiv to stand with the people of ukraine ahead of- ride each way to kyiv to stand withj the people of ukraine ahead of the one year— the people of ukraine ahead of the one year anniversary— the people of ukraine ahead of the one year anniversary of _ the people of ukraine ahead of the one year anniversary of their- the people of ukraine ahead of the one year anniversary of their brave fi-ht one year anniversary of their brave fight against — one year anniversary of their brave fight against putin. _ one year anniversary of their brave fight against putin. i— one year anniversary of their brave fight against putin. i am _ one year anniversary of their brave fight against putin. i am told - one year anniversary of their brave fight against putin. i am told i- one year anniversary of their brave fight against putin. i am told i wasj fight against putin. i am told i was the first— fight against putin. i am told i was the first american _ fight against putin. i am told i was the first american president - fight against putin. i am told i was the first american president in - fight against putin. i am told i was the first american president in a l the first american president in a waits _ the first american president in a waits are — the first american president in a waits are not— the first american president in a walls are not controlled - the first american president in a walls are not controlled since i walls are not controlled since president _ walls are not controlled since president lincoln. _ walls are not controlled since president lincoln. with- walls are not controlled since president lincoln. with me . walls are not controlled since . president lincoln. with me was walls are not controlled since - president lincoln. with me was a small— president lincoln. with me was a small group— president lincoln. with me was a small group of— president lincoln. with me was a small group of security _ president lincoln. with me was aj small group of security personnel and a _ small group of security personnel and a few— small group of security personnel and a few advisors. _ small group of security personnel and a few advisors. when - small group of security personnel and a few advisors. when i - small group of security personnel| and a few advisors. when i exited the train — and a few advisors. when i exited the train and _ and a few advisors. when i exited the train and met— and a few advisors. when i exited the train and met president- and a few advisors. when i exited i the train and met president zelensky i did the train and met president zelensky i did not— the train and met president zelensky i did not feel— the train and met president zelensky i did not feel alone. _ the train and met president zelensky i did not feel alone. i— the train and met president zelensky i did not feel alone. i was _ the train and met president zelensky i did not feel alone. i was bringing i i did not feel alone. i was bringing with me _ i did not feel alone. i was bringing with me the — i did not feel alone. i was bringing with me the idea _ i did not feel alone. i was bringing with me the idea of— i did not feel alone. i was bringing with me the idea of america, - i did not feel alone. i was bringing with me the idea of america, the| with me the idea of america, the promise — with me the idea of america, the promise of— with me the idea of america, the promise of america _ with me the idea of america, the promise of america to _ with me the idea of america, the promise of america to the - with me the idea of america, the| promise of america to the people with me the idea of america, the - promise of america to the people who were fighting — promise of america to the people who were fighting for — promise of america to the people who were fighting for the _ promise of america to the people who were fighting for the same _ promise of america to the people who were fighting for the same things- promise of america to the people who were fighting for the same things we i were fighting for the same things we fought— were fighting for the same things we fought for— were fighting for the same things we fought for 250 — were fighting for the same things we fought for 250 years _ were fighting for the same things we fought for 250 years ago. _ were fighting for the same things we fought for 250 years ago. freedom, i fought for 250 years ago. freedom, independence, _ fought for 250 years ago. freedom, independence, self—determination.| independence, self—determination. and as _ independence, self—determination. and as i _ independence, self—determination. and as i walked _ independence, self—determination. and as i walked through _ independence, self—determination. and as i walked through kyiv- independence, self—determination. and as i walked through kyiv with l and as i walked through kyiv with the president _ and as i walked through kyiv with the president zelensky, - and as i walked through kyiv with the president zelensky, with - and as i walked through kyiv with the president zelensky, with air. the president zelensky, with air raid sirens— the president zelensky, with air raid sirens sounding _ the president zelensky, with air raid sirens sounding in- the president zelensky, with air raid sirens sounding in the - the president zelensky, with air- raid sirens sounding in the distance i raid sirens sounding in the distance ifeit _ raid sirens sounding in the distance ifeit something _ raid sirens sounding in the distance i felt something i— raid sirens sounding in the distance i felt something i have _ raid sirens sounding in the distance i felt something i have always - i felt something i have always believed, _ i felt something i have always believed, more _ i felt something i have always believed, more strongly- i felt something i have always believed, more strongly than| i felt something i have always - believed, more strongly than ever before _ believed, more strongly than ever before that — believed, more strongly than ever before. that america _ believed, more strongly than ever before. that america is _ believed, more strongly than ever before. that america is a - believed, more strongly than ever before. that america is a beaconi believed, more strongly than ever. before. that america is a beacon to the world — before. that america is a beacon to the world. still. — before. that america is a beacon to the world. still. still. _ whereas my friend madeleine albright said, whereas my friend madeleine albright said. we _ whereas my friend madeleine albright said. we are _ whereas my friend madeleine albright said. we are the — whereas my friend madeleine albright said, we are the indispensable - said, we are the indispensable nation~ — said, we are the indispensable nation. tonight _ said, we are the indispensable nation. tonight there - said, we are the indispensable nation. tonight there are - said, we are the indispensable - nation. tonight there are innocent people _ nation. tonight there are innocent people ali— nation. tonight there are innocent peopie all over _ nation. tonight there are innocent people all over the _ nation. tonight there are innocent people all over the world - nation. tonight there are innocent people all over the world who - nation. tonight there are innocentl people all over the world who hope because _ people all over the world who hope because of— people all over the world who hope because of us, _ people all over the world who hope because of us, who _ people all over the world who hope because of us, who believe - people all over the world who hope because of us, who believe in - people all over the world who hope because of us, who believe in a - because of us, who believe in a better— because of us, who believe in a better life — because of us, who believe in a better life because _ because of us, who believe in a better life because of— because of us, who believe in a better life because of us, - because of us, who believe in a better life because of us, who i because of us, who believe in a . better life because of us, who are desperate — better life because of us, who are desperate not _ better life because of us, who are desperate not to _ better life because of us, who are desperate not to be _ better life because of us, who are desperate not to be forgotten - better life because of us, who are desperate not to be forgotten byi better life because of us, who are i desperate not to be forgotten by us and are _ desperate not to be forgotten by us and are waiting _ desperate not to be forgotten by us and are waiting for— desperate not to be forgotten by us and are waiting for us. _ desperate not to be forgotten by us and are waiting for us. but- desperate not to be forgotten by us and are waiting for us. but time - desperate not to be forgotten by us and are waiting for us. but time is. and are waiting for us. but time is of the _ and are waiting for us. but time is of the essence. _ and are waiting for us. but time is of the essence. i— and are waiting for us. but time is of the essence. i know— and are waiting for us. but time is of the essence. i know we - and are waiting for us. but time is of the essence. i know we have i and are waiting for us. but time isi of the essence. i know we have our divisions— of the essence. i know we have our divisions at — of the essence. i know we have our divisions at home. _ of the essence. i know we have our divisions at home. we _ of the essence. i know we have our divisions at home. we have - of the essence. i know we have our divisions at home. we have to- of the essence. i know we have our divisions at home. we have to geti divisions at home. we have to get past them — divisions at home. we have to get past them we _ divisions at home. we have to get past them. we can't _ divisions at home. we have to get past them. we can't let _ divisions at home. we have to get past them. we can't let petty- past them. we can't let petty partisan _ past them. we can't let petty partisan angry— past them. we can't let petty partisan angry politics - past them. we can't let petty partisan angry politics get - past them. we can't let petty partisan angry politics get in| past them. we can't let petty. partisan angry politics get in the way of— partisan angry politics get in the way of our— partisan angry politics get in the way of our responsibility- partisan angry politics get in the way of our responsibility is - partisan angry politics get in the way of our responsibility is a - partisan angry politics get in the l way of our responsibility is a great nation _ way of our responsibility is a great nation we — way of our responsibility is a great nation. we cannot _ way of our responsibility is a great nation. we cannot and _ way of our responsibility is a great nation. we cannot and will- way of our responsibility is a great nation. we cannot and will not - way of our responsibility is a great nation. we cannot and will not let| nation. we cannot and will not let terrorists — nation. we cannot and will not let terrorists like _ nation. we cannot and will not let terrorists like hamas _ nation. we cannot and will not let terrorists like hamas and - nation. we cannot and will not let terrorists like hamas and tyrantsi terrorists like hamas and tyrants like putin— terrorists like hamas and tyrants like putin win. _ terrorists like hamas and tyrants like putin win. i— terrorists like hamas and tyrants like putin win. i refuse _ terrorists like hamas and tyrants like putin win. i refuse to- terrorists like hamas and tyrants like putin win. i refuse to let - terrorists like hamas and tyrants| like putin win. i refuse to let that happen — like putin win. i refuse to let that happen in— like putin win. i refuse to let that happen. in moments— like putin win. i refuse to let that happen. in moments like - like putin win. i refuse to let that happen. in moments like these, i like putin win. i refuse to let that. happen. in moments like these, we have to _ happen. in moments like these, we have to remember— happen. in moments like these, we have to remember who— happen. in moments like these, we have to remember who we - happen. in moments like these, we have to remember who we are. - happen. in moments like these, we have to remember who we are. we| happen. in moments like these, we i have to remember who we are. we are the united _ have to remember who we are. we are the united states— have to remember who we are. we are the united states of— have to remember who we are. we are the united states of america. - have to remember who we are. we are the united states of america. the - the united states of america. the united _ the united states of america. the united states— the united states of america. the united states of— the united states of america. the united states of america. - the united states of america. the united states of america. and - the united states of america. the . united states of america. and there is nothing. — united states of america. and there is nothing, nothing _ united states of america. and there is nothing, nothing beyond - united states of america. and there is nothing, nothing beyond our- is nothing, nothing beyond our capacity— is nothing, nothing beyond our capacity if— is nothing, nothing beyond our capacity if we _ is nothing, nothing beyond our capacity if we do _ is nothing, nothing beyond our capacity if we do it _ is nothing, nothing beyond our capacity if we do it together. . is nothing, nothing beyond our. capacity if we do it together. my fellow _ capacity if we do it together. my fellow americans, _ capacity if we do it together. my fellow americans, thank- capacity if we do it together. my fellow americans, thank you - capacity if we do it together. my fellow americans, thank you for| capacity if we do it together. my - fellow americans, thank you for your time _ fellow americans, thank you for your time may— fellow americans, thank you for your time may god — fellow americans, thank you for your time. may god bless _ fellow americans, thank you for your time. may god bless you _ fellow americans, thank you for your time. may god bless you all, - fellow americans, thank you for your time. may god bless you all, may i fellow americans, thank you for your. time. may god bless you all, may god protect— time. may god bless you all, may god protect our— time. may god bless you all, may god protect our troops. _ all right can you have been watching a prime—time address there from presidentjoe biden, speaking about the need to increase funding for israel and the ukraine as well, drawing a broad arc there. i want to bring our guests back in we have been discussing this evening. i want to go right to lonnie chan. i know you have to head out injust to go right to lonnie chan. i know you have to head out in just a few minutes ijust you have to head out in just a few minutes i just want to quickly get your reaction on the president's address. i your reaction on the president's address. ~ ., your reaction on the president's address. ,, ., , . address. i think what we predicted from the president, _ address. i think what we predicted from the president, trying - address. i think what we predicted from the president, trying to - address. i think what we predicted from the president, trying to put l from the president, trying to put together the assistant certainly for israel and ukraine. what wasn't mentioned is that there is several billion dollars in funding for the southern border as well as a for taiwan, so kind of a smorgasbord approach to getting the funding across the finish line. it would be across the finish line. it would be a fine idea were it not for the fact there is no speaker of the house and no possibility this passes the house, unless the republicans in the house, unless the republicans in the house can get their act together. so i think there are some challenges ahead certainly for the concept here, but i think the president's notion is to try and pin things that are explicitly more popular with the american people, like the border funding, like funding for israel, trying to pin that with the things that frankly are a little less popular, and i'm namely talking about funding for ukraine, which has particularly gone south with republicans. so i think the president is doing what he needs to do to actually get the money across the finish line. the main sort of rate—limiting factor is political dysfunction and i don't see that changing anytime soon. i dysfunction and i don't see that changing anytime soon.- dysfunction and i don't see that changing anytime soon. i want to thank ou changing anytime soon. i want to thank you so _ changing anytime soon. i want to thank you so much _ changing anytime soon. i want to thank you so much for— changing anytime soon. i want to thank you so much for that - changing anytime soon. i want to i thank you so much for that analysis. they know we have to let you go. great to have your on bbc news tonight. i am going to come over to a lease because we were speaking right before the president started his speech and i cut you off so i want to give you the chance to complete your thoughts, on the president's address and what he had to say. he president's address and what he had to sa . ., , .. .. president's address and what he had tosa. ., , .. .. ,, .. to say. he had this twofold mission to say. he had this twofold mission to talk about _ to say. he had this twofold mission to talk about ukraine. _ to say. he had this twofold mission to talk about ukraine. we - to say. he had this twofold mission to talk about ukraine. we are - to say. he had this twofold mission l to talk about ukraine. we are coming on two _ to talk about ukraine. we are coming on two years— to talk about ukraine. we are coming on two years of that war, and so i think— on two years of that war, and so i think when— on two years of that war, and so i think when the american saw these horrible _ think when the american saw these horrible pictures of ukrainians being — horrible pictures of ukrainians being killed, being homeless, refugees, there is a lot of empathy for the _ refugees, there is a lot of empathy for the ukrainians, and refugees, there is a lot of empathy forthe ukrainians, and there refugees, there is a lot of empathy for the ukrainians, and there was a lot of— for the ukrainians, and there was a lot of support for president biden, and this— lot of support for president biden, and this is— lot of support for president biden, and this is not his first speech on ukraine~ — and this is not his first speech on ukraine. and i think that has tapered _ ukraine. and i think that has tapered off, notjust from congress but from _ tapered off, notjust from congress but from the american public. there is understanding that russia is bad, we have _ is understanding that russia is bad, we have to — is understanding that russia is bad, we have to fight, but, like, most americans— we have to fight, but, like, most americans aren't that clear on what the responsibilities of a nato country— the responsibilities of a nato country hour, and so i think that has tapered off, whereas what has happened — has tapered off, whereas what has happened in israel and what is happening in gaza right now with this humanitarian catastrophe, i think— this humanitarian catastrophe, i think that — this humanitarian catastrophe, i think that struck much more of a cord, _ think that struck much more of a cord. not — think that struck much more of a cord, not only because it is more recent— cord, not only because it is more recent but— cord, not only because it is more recent but it _ cord, not only because it is more recent but it is a much more visceral— recent but it is a much more visceral connection between the us and israel— visceral connection between the us and israel and the palestinians, and the issue _ and israel and the palestinians, and the issue is— and israel and the palestinians, and the issue isjust so important. and when _ the issue isjust so important. and when he _ the issue isjust so important. and when he talks about, like we were talking _ when he talks about, like we were talking earlier, he kind of weaved that connection and that visceral connection to what is going on in this country, whether it is islamophobia, whether it is anti—semitism, and trying to bring the nation — anti—semitism, and trying to bring the nation together. i think it wasn't — the nation together. i think it wasn't really a seamless speech. i think— wasn't really a seamless speech. i think he _ wasn't really a seamless speech. i think he had a couple of different points— think he had a couple of different points that he made, but i think one of the _ points that he made, but i think one of the things that he said, which was really— of the things that he said, which was really important, was we can't let petty _ was really important, was we can't let petty partisan politics get in the way — let petty partisan politics get in the way of the responsibilities of a great _ the way of the responsibilities of a great nation, and i think that is going _ great nation, and i think that is going to — great nation, and i think that is going to what lonnie said about the dysfunction. but i do think the promise — dysfunction. but i do think the promise of america, all of that, very— promise of america, all of that, very important, but i think he really— very important, but i think he really needed to speak to the nation in this— really needed to speak to the nation in this time — really needed to speak to the nation in this time of shock and anxiety what _ in this time of shock and anxiety what we — in this time of shock and anxiety what we are seeing going on right there _ what we are seeing going on right there. �* ., what we are seeing going on right there. . ., .. ., .. there. and a time of war. colette, i want to come _ there. and a time of war. colette, i want to come to _ there. and a time of war. colette, i want to come to you _ there. and a time of war. colette, i want to come to you now, - there. and a time of war. colette, i want to come to you now, you - there. and a time of war. colette, i want to come to you now, you are i want to come to you now, you are listening to see what the president might say particularly about this question of whether the us is doing enough to support palestinians, to support civilians in gaza. he did speak directly to this, saying that he is heartbroken for the loss of life and as alleys were saying, talked about islamophobia directly and the us. what did you think of his comments?— and the us. what did you think of his comments? first of all, in terms ofthe his comments? first of all, in terms of the connection _ his comments? first of all, in terms of the connection between - his comments? first of all, in terms of the connection between ukraine i of the connection between ukraine and israel. — of the connection between ukraine and israel. i— of the connection between ukraine and israel, i understand _ of the connection between ukraine and israel, i understand the - of the connection between ukraine and israel, i understand the logic. and israel, i understand the logic behind _ and israel, i understand the logic behind the — and israel, i understand the logic behind the president— and israel, i understand the logic behind the president trying - and israel, i understand the logic behind the president trying to - and israel, i understand the logic. behind the president trying to make that connection, _ behind the president trying to make that connection, it _ behind the president trying to make that connection, it is— behind the president trying to make that connection, it is good - behind the president trying to makej that connection, it is good domestic politics— that connection, it is good domestic politics because _ that connection, it is good domestic politics because support— that connection, it is good domestic politics because support for- that connection, it is good domestic politics because support for ukrainej politics because support for ukraine is quite _ politics because support for ukraine is quite unpopular— politics because support for ukraine is quite unpopular among _ is quite unpopular among republicans, _ is quite unpopular among republicans, and - is quite unpopular among republicans, and support is quite unpopular among . republicans, and support for is quite unpopular among - republicans, and support for israel is quite _ republicans, and support for israel is quite popular— republicans, and support for israel is quite popular with _ republicans, and support for israel is quite popular with both - republicans, and support for israel is quite popular with both parties. i is quite popular with both parties. so trying — is quite popular with both parties. so trying to— is quite popular with both parties. so trying to link— is quite popular with both parties. so trying to link the _ is quite popular with both parties. so trying to link the two _ is quite popular with both parties. so trying to link the two make - is quite popular with both parties. i so trying to link the two make sense from a _ so trying to link the two make sense from a political— so trying to link the two make sense from a political standpoint, - so trying to link the two make sense from a political standpoint, but- from a political standpoint, but from _ from a political standpoint, but from a — from a political standpoint, but from a geopolitical— from a political standpoint, but from a geopolitical standpoint, j from a political standpoint, but. from a geopolitical standpoint, it doesn't _ from a geopolitical standpoint, it doesn't make _ from a geopolitical standpoint, it doesn't make a _ from a geopolitical standpoint, it doesn't make a whole _ from a geopolitical standpoint, it doesn't make a whole lot - from a geopolitical standpoint, it doesn't make a whole lot of - from a geopolitical standpoint, it. doesn't make a whole lot of sense. when _ doesn't make a whole lot of sense. when you _ doesn't make a whole lot of sense. when you think _ doesn't make a whole lot of sense. when you think about _ doesn't make a whole lot of sense. when you think about the - doesn't make a whole lot of sense. when you think about the fact - doesn't make a whole lot of sense. when you think about the fact that| when you think about the fact that russia _ when you think about the fact that russia is— when you think about the fact that russia is an — when you think about the fact that russia is an occupying _ when you think about the fact that russia is an occupying power- when you think about the fact that russia is an occupying power in . when you think about the fact that| russia is an occupying power in the ukraine _ russia is an occupying power in the ukraine. ukraine— russia is an occupying power in the ukraine. ukraine is— russia is an occupying power in the ukraine. ukraine is occupied. - russia is an occupying power in the ukraine. ukraine is occupied. andi ukraine. ukraine is occupied. and israel— ukraine. ukraine is occupied. and israel is _ ukraine. ukraine is occupied. and israel is the — ukraine. ukraine is occupied. and israel is the occupier— ukraine. ukraine is occupied. and israel is the occupier in _ ukraine. ukraine is occupied. and israel is the occupier in this - ukraine. ukraine is occupied. and israel is the occupier in this case, j israel is the occupier in this case, and not _ israel is the occupier in this case, and not the — israel is the occupier in this case, and not the occupied. _ israel is the occupier in this case, and not the occupied. so- israel is the occupier in this case, and not the occupied. so it - israel is the occupier in this case, and not the occupied. so it is - israel is the occupier in this case, j and not the occupied. so it is sort of a role — and not the occupied. so it is sort of a role reversal— and not the occupied. so it is sort of a role reversal there _ and not the occupied. so it is sort of a role reversal there and - and not the occupied. so it is sort. of a role reversal there and doesn't make _ of a role reversal there and doesn't make a _ of a role reversal there and doesn't make a whole — of a role reversal there and doesn't make a whole lot _ of a role reversal there and doesn't make a whole lot of _ of a role reversal there and doesn't make a whole lot of sense, - of a role reversal there and doesn't make a whole lot of sense, except| of a role reversal there and doesn't. make a whole lot of sense, except in kind of— make a whole lot of sense, except in kind of political— make a whole lot of sense, except in kind of political spin _ make a whole lot of sense, except in kind of political spin terms. - make a whole lot of sense, except in kind of political spin terms. as - make a whole lot of sense, except in kind of political spin terms. as far. kind of political spin terms. as far as what— kind of political spin terms. as far as what we — kind of political spin terms. as far as what we heard _ kind of political spin terms. as far as what we heard about _ kind of political spin terms. as far. as what we heard about palestinian civilians. _ as what we heard about palestinian civilians. i— as what we heard about palestinian civilians, i think— as what we heard about palestinian civilians, i think it _ as what we heard about palestinian civilians, i think it was _ as what we heard about palestinian civilians, i think it was the - as what we heard about palestinian civilians, i think it was the bare - civilians, i think it was the bare minimum — civilians, i think it was the bare minimum that— civilians, i think it was the bare minimum that he _ civilians, i think it was the bare minimum that he is— civilians, i think it was the bare | minimum that he is established civilians, i think it was the bare - minimum that he is established now over the _ minimum that he is established now over the past— minimum that he is established now over the past couple _ minimum that he is established now over the past couple of— minimum that he is established now over the past couple of days. - minimum that he is established now over the past couple of days. what i over the past couple of days. what we haven't— over the past couple of days. what we haven't heard, _ over the past couple of days. what we haven't heard, and _ over the past couple of days. what we haven't heard, and what - over the past couple of days. what we haven't heard, and what i - over the past couple of days. what we haven't heard, and what i thinkj we haven't heard, and what i think we haven't heard, and what i think we need _ we haven't heard, and what i think we need to— we haven't heard, and what i think we need to hear— we haven't heard, and what i think we need to hear precisely- we haven't heard, and what i think we need to hear precisely because j we haven't heard, and what i think. we need to hear precisely because of what we _ we need to hear precisely because of what we discussed _ we need to hear precisely because of what we discussed before _ we need to hear precisely because of what we discussed before this - what we discussed before this speech, — what we discussed before this speech. you _ what we discussed before this speech, you know, _ what we discussed before this speech, you know, israel- what we discussed before this speech, you know, israel is. what we discussed before this - speech, you know, israel is acting out of— speech, you know, israel is acting out of rage — speech, you know, israel is acting out of rage. that _ speech, you know, israel is acting out of rage. that much _ speech, you know, israel is acting out of rage. that much is - speech, you know, israel is acting out of rage. that much is clear, i speech, you know, israel is acting i out of rage. that much is clear, and they've _ out of rage. that much is clear, and they've essentially— out of rage. that much is clear, and they've essentially been _ out of rage. that much is clear, and they've essentially been given - out of rage. that much is clear, and they've essentially been given this i they've essentially been given this red light, — they've essentially been given this red light, and _ they've essentially been given this red light, and so— they've essentially been given this red light, and so what— they've essentially been given this red light, and so what we - they've essentially been given this red light, and so what we need - they've essentially been given this red light, and so what we need to| red light, and so what we need to hear— red light, and so what we need to hear is _ red light, and so what we need to hear is something _ red light, and so what we need to hear is something much- red light, and so what we need to hear is something much more - hear is something much more explicit, — hear is something much more explicit, as— hear is something much more explicit, as far— hear is something much more explicit, as far as _ hear is something much more explicit, as far as red - hear is something much more explicit, as far as red lines. . hear is something much more . explicit, as far as red lines. 0k. explicit, as far as red lines. ok. you can't _ explicit, as far as red lines. ok. you can't use — explicit, as far as red lines. ok. you can't use starvation - explicit, as far as red lines. you can't use starvation as a explicit, as far as red lines.“ you can't use starvation as a weapon of war. _ you can't use starvation as a weapon of war. you _ you can't use starvation as a weapon of war. you can't — you can't use starvation as a weapon of war. you can't tell— you can't use starvation as a weapon of war. you can't tell hospitals - of war. you can't tell hospitals that _ of war. you can't tell hospitals that are — of war. you can't tell hospitals that are desperately— of war. you can't tell hospitals that are desperately trying - of war. you can't tell hospitals that are desperately trying to i of war. you can't tell hospitals - that are desperately trying to treat wounded _ that are desperately trying to treat wounded to — that are desperately trying to treat wounded to evacuate _ that are desperately trying to treat wounded to evacuate otherwise . that are desperately trying to treat i wounded to evacuate otherwise they will be _ wounded to evacuate otherwise they will be targeted _ wounded to evacuate otherwise they will be targeted. these _ wounded to evacuate otherwise they will be targeted. these are - will be targeted. these are non—acceptable _ will be targeted. these are non—acceptable forms- will be targeted. these are non—acceptable forms of. will be targeted. these are - non—acceptable forms of warfare. what _ non—acceptable forms of warfare. what did — non—acceptable forms of warfare. what did you _ non—acceptable forms of warfare. what did you think— non—acceptable forms of warfare. what did you think about - non—acceptable forms of warfare. what did you think about the - what did you think about the president said, he repeated what he said in israel, which was advising israel not to act on rage and vengeance is thejuhasz —— is the us had. what did you think of that? that was a line. the reality is they are already — that was a line. the reality is they are already reacting _ that was a line. the reality is they are already reacting out _ that was a line. the reality is they are already reacting out of - that was a line. the reality is they are already reacting out of rage. l that was a line. the reality is theyi are already reacting out of rage. so again— are already reacting out of rage. so again there — are already reacting out of rage. so again there is— are already reacting out of rage. so again there is this _ are already reacting out of rage. so again there is this expectation - are already reacting out of rage. so again there is this expectation that| again there is this expectation that again there is this expectation that a leadership— again there is this expectation that a leadership that, _ again there is this expectation that a leadership that, let's _ again there is this expectation that a leadership that, let's not- again there is this expectation that a leadership that, let's not forget, | a leadership that, let's not forget, the israeli — a leadership that, let's not forget, the israeli leadership, _ a leadership that, let's not forget, the israeli leadership, this- a leadership that, let's not forget, the israeli leadership, this is- a leadership that, let's not forget, the israeli leadership, this is the l the israeli leadership, this is the most _ the israeli leadership, this is the most extremist _ the israeli leadership, this is the most extremist government - the israeli leadership, this is the most extremist government in l most extremist government in israel's — most extremist government in israel's history. _ most extremist government in israel's history, and _ most extremist government in israel's history, and they- most extremist government in israel's history, and they have| most extremist government in - israel's history, and they have just experienced — israel's history, and they have just experienced a _ israel's history, and they have just experienced a major— israel's history, and they have just experienced a major national- israel's history, and they have just i experienced a major national trauma, and so _ experienced a major national trauma, and so to— experienced a major national trauma, and so to expect _ experienced a major national trauma, and so to expect them _ experienced a major national trauma, and so to expect them to _ experienced a major national trauma, and so to expect them to restrain - and so to expect them to restrain themselves— and so to expect them to restrain themselves on _ and so to expect them to restrain themselves on the _ and so to expect them to restrain themselves on the good - and so to expect them to restrain themselves on the good advice, i and so to expect them to restrain . themselves on the good advice, the well—intentioned _ themselves on the good advice, the well—intentioned advice _ themselves on the good advice, the well—intentioned advice of - themselves on the good advice, the well—intentioned advice of the - well—intentioned advice of the president— well—intentioned advice of the president of— well—intentioned advice of the president of the _ well—intentioned advice of the president of the united - well—intentioned advice of the president of the united states well—intentioned advice of the i president of the united states i think— president of the united states i think is— president of the united states i think is naive, _ president of the united states i think is naive, and _ president of the united states i think is naive, and i— president of the united states i think is naive, and i don't- president of the united states i think is naive, and i don't think| think is naive, and i don't think anyone — think is naive, and i don't think anyone actually— think is naive, and i don't think anyone actually expects - think is naive, and i don't think anyone actually expects that i think is naive, and i don't think. anyone actually expects that they are going — anyone actually expects that they are going to— anyone actually expects that they are going to act_ anyone actually expects that they are going to act on— anyone actually expects that they are going to act on that _ anyone actually expects that they are going to act on that advice. . are going to act on that advice. they— are going to act on that advice. they need _ are going to act on that advice. they need to _ are going to act on that advice. they need to be _ are going to act on that advice. they need to be very— are going to act on that advice. they need to be very clearly. are going to act on that advice. - they need to be very clearly stated explicit _ they need to be very clearly stated explicit red — they need to be very clearly stated explicit red lines _ they need to be very clearly stated explicit red lines by— they need to be very clearly stated explicit red lines by the _ they need to be very clearly stated explicit red lines by the united - explicit red lines by the united states. — explicit red lines by the united states. by— explicit red lines by the united states, by the _ explicit red lines by the united states, by the western - explicit red lines by the unitedi states, by the western powers, explicit red lines by the united i states, by the western powers, if they actually _ states, by the western powers, if they actually care _ states, by the western powers, if they actually care about _ states, by the western powers, if they actually care about the - states, by the western powers, if. they actually care about the damage bein- they actually care about the damage being done — they actually care about the damage being done to — they actually care about the damage being done to civilian _ they actually care about the damage being done to civilian lives. - they actually care about the damage being done to civilian lives. [- being done to civilian lives. definitely hear you at the being done to civilian lives." definitely hear you at the least being done to civilian lives._ definitely hear you at the least you want to comment on that, ijust definitely hear you at the least you want to comment on that, i just want to listen very quickly to a clip we have from what the president is delivered in those remarks. he was talking about hamas's attacks on israel, the she married crisis in israel. —— —— the humanitarian crisis in gaza. i israel. -- -- the humanitarian crisis in gaza.— israel. -- -- the humanitarian crisis in gaza. i also spoke with president _ crisis in gaza. i also spoke with president abbas _ crisis in gaza. i also spoke with president abbas and _ crisis in gaza. i also spoke with president abbas and reiterated i crisis in gaza. i also spoke with - president abbas and reiterated that the united states remains allied to the united states remains allied to the palestinians right to dignity. the actions of hamas do not take that right away, like so many others, i am that right away, like so many others, lam heartbroken that right away, like so many others, i am heartbroken by the tragic loss of palestinian life, including the explosion at the hospital in gaza, which was not done by the israelis. we mourn every innocent life lost. we can't ignore the humanity of innocent palestinians, who only want to live in peace and have an opportunity. so, alys, are you comment on this, because we had the other guest saying what the president had to say was the bare minimum given the tremendous loss of life we are seeing on palestinians in gaza, what did you think of that? it is seeing on palestinians in gaza, what did you think of that?— did you think of that? it is clearly not enough. _ did you think of that? it is clearly not enough, and _ did you think of that? it is clearly not enough, and certainly - did you think of that? it is clearly not enough, and certainly not. did you think of that? it is clearly - not enough, and certainly not enough for the _ not enough, and certainly not enough for the arab _ not enough, and certainly not enough for the arab world and the people that are _ for the arab world and the people that are worried about the palestinians. forthe israelis, i think— palestinians. forthe israelis, i think it— palestinians. forthe israelis, i think it needs to be much tougher. i will say— think it needs to be much tougher. i will say i _ think it needs to be much tougher. i will say i think part of the reason that president biden went there as not that president biden went there as hot to— that president biden went there as not to show support for israel, but again— not to show support for israel, but again to _ not to show support for israel, but again to hug them so close that he has that— again to hug them so close that he has that leverage to say to them as they are _ has that leverage to say to them as they are undertaking this, be careful. — they are undertaking this, be careful, don't act out of rain each. what _ careful, don't act out of rain each. what is _ careful, don't act out of rain each. what is your— careful, don't act out of rain each. what is your strategy? think twice. maybe _ what is your strategy? think twice. maybe you — what is your strategy? think twice. maybe you don't want to go in. and i think— maybe you don't want to go in. and i think that _ maybe you don't want to go in. and i think that does buy him a little bit of credibility. as kyle said, the israetis — of credibility. as kyle said, the israelis are full of sorrow and the rage _ israelis are full of sorrow and the rage right— israelis are full of sorrow and the rage right and so the truth is they are not— rage right and so the truth is they are not going to listen to anybody i’i l ht are not going to listen to anybody right now. — are not going to listen to anybody right now, but i do think you are going _ right now, but i do think you are going to — right now, but i do think you are going to see the language. it is much _ going to see the language. it is much more candid and private, believe — much more candid and private, believe me, from what i've heard from _ believe me, from what i've heard from my— believe me, from what i've heard from my sources, but i do think, you know, _ from my sources, but i do think, you know. i_ from my sources, but i do think, you know. ithink— from my sources, but i do think, you know, i think the president wants to -ive know, i think the president wants to give himself a little bit of room... yes, _ give himself a little bit of room... yes. there — give himself a little bit of room... yes. there is— give himself a little bit of room... yes, there is the argument that you don't _ yes, there is the argument that you don't want — yes, there is the argument that you don't want to have to see him ramp it up. _ don't want to have to see him ramp it up, because that means the situation — it up, because that means the situation on the ground is going to -et situation on the ground is going to get better, but if they are not going — get better, but if they are not going to — get better, but if they are not going to listen to him right now and he is _ going to listen to him right now and he is building up this credibility, there _ he is building up this credibility, there is— he is building up this credibility, there is an — he is building up this credibility, there is an argument to be made by some _ there is an argument to be made by some of— there is an argument to be made by some of his — there is an argument to be made by some of his aides that you want to -ive some of his aides that you want to give him _ some of his aides that you want to give him some room to kind of ramp it upand— give him some room to kind of ramp it up and really, you know, if he sees _ it up and really, you know, if he sees that— it up and really, you know, if he sees that this is going too far, make — sees that this is going too far, make sure _ sees that this is going too far, make sure the aid gets in, make surem _ make sure the aid gets in, make surem and_ make sure the aid gets in, make surem and i_ make sure the aid gets in, make sure... and i mean the president himself— sure... and i mean the president himself is— sure... and i mean the president himself is really kind of evolved on the two—state solution himself, so i think— the two—state solution himself, so i think when— the two—state solution himself, so i think when this is over you really are going — think when this is over you really are going to see the president try and use _ are going to see the president try and use this as an opportunity to -et and use this as an opportunity to get track— and use this as an opportunity to get back to the table and really have _ get back to the table and really have the — get back to the table and really have the negotiations on a two—state solution _ have the negotiations on a two-state solution. . have the negotiations on a two-state solution. , ,, ., ., solution. interesting. so we have been speaking — solution. interesting. so we have been speaking with _ solution. interesting. so we have been speaking with you - solution. interesting. so we have been speaking with you alys - solution. interesting. so we have been speaking with you alys and | solution. interesting. so we have| been speaking with you alys and i want to bring in our third guest, michael sane, who is the managing director at the washington institute, michael, thank you so much forjoining us and jumping into this conversation with us. i will just ask you first of all for your thoughts on the president does make remarks tonight.— remarks tonight. well, i think the messaues remarks tonight. well, i think the messages were _ remarks tonight. well, i think the messages were quite _ remarks tonight. well, i think the messages were quite similar - remarks tonight. well, i think the messages were quite similar to i remarks tonight. well, i think the l messages were quite similar to the messages were quite similar to the message is the president has been articulating since the october seven attack, and it is very strong support obviously for israel's right to self defence. the idea that the us has israel's back and won't allow it to stand alone against the terrorist attacks perpetrated against it. also a message however for the palestinians, a recognition that palestinians are not hamas, hamas is not palestinians, and the us expects israel to respect the laws of armed conflict, as a response to the hamas terrorist attack, but it seemed to me the purpose of this speech now was actually to appeal to americans, the appealfor actually to appeal to americans, the appeal for continued financial support to both israel and ukraine, as the white house sends forward to caress a bill to do just that, something that has been controversial in the case of ukraine but is far less controversial in the case of israel, sort of laying out why it is in the us interest to do. it is notjust charity, notjust generosity but also in our own interest. . . , generosity but also in our own interest. , . , , , ., ,, interest. yes, he did directly speak to the americans, _ interest. yes, he did directly speak to the americans, he _ interest. yes, he did directly speak to the americans, he said - interest. yes, he did directly speak to the americans, he said this - interest. yes, he did directly speak to the americans, he said this is i to the americans, he said this is why this matters. ijust to the americans, he said this is why this matters. i just want to follow up on that, michael, because we had just a little while ago from other gas that he found this equivalence, this drawing a link between ukraine and israel an inappropriate one. how do you see that and how the president made that link? i that and how the president made that link? ~' that and how the president made that link? ~ , ., ~ that and how the president made that link? ~ , . ~ ., , link? i think it is a link that is powerfully — link? i think it is a link that is powerfully understood - link? i think it is a link that is powerfully understood in - link? i think it is a link that is powerfully understood in the| link? i think it is a link that is - powerfully understood in the united states, that these are two states that find themselves victims of really brutal aggression, unprovoked aggression from the point of view i think of most americans, and the united states really needs to stand with these partners, lest those committing the aggression, hamas backed by iran in one case, russia and the other case, feel emboldened to continue and to target others. but i think there is also a message there forever —— for americans, which i think is important. the idea that these hatreds as they manifest in our own country, anti—semitism, islamophobia, are unacceptable and in fact we are a country of all of our citizens, and jews alike. it in fact we are a country of all of our citizens, and jews alike. it was interesting — our citizens, and jews alike. it was interesting that _ our citizens, and jews alike. it was interesting that he _ our citizens, and jews alike. it was interesting that he netted - our citizens, and jews alike. it was interesting that he netted many i interesting that he netted many muslim americans are perhaps saying, here we go again. he used those words particularly to refer to how muslim americans might be feeling now as they did in the wake of 9/11, as they face islamophobia. we will bring our other guests into discussion but i want to just play one clip that we have right now again of the president does make remarks, where he was trying to sell to the american people by aid to israel and ukraine is so important. i know these conflicts can seem faraway and it is natural to ask why does this matter to america. let me show you why making sure israel and ukraine succeed is vital for american national security. history taught us that when terrorists do not pay a price for their terror, when dictators do not pay a price for their aggression they cause more chaos and death and more destruction. they keep going and the cost and the threat to america and the world keep rising. so if we do not stop putin's appetite for power and control in ukraine he will not limit himself to just the ukraine. so that was the message from the president on why aid to israel and ukraine are so important. i throw that to you now, you are saying you do not think these are similar wars or similar conflict that can be linked together but, still, do you think that message from the president will be a convincing one to americans? i president will be a convincing one to americans?— president will be a convincing one to americans? i think it is less and less convincing _ to americans? i think it is less and less convincing to _ to americans? i think it is less and less convincing to a _ to americans? i think it is less and less convincing to a growing - to americans? i think it is less and i less convincing to a growing number of americans, certainly among democrats and people who identify on the liberal end of the spectrum. i don't think people are quite buying that framing any longer i think the reality is coming through and i will differ with michael here, the notion that this was unprovoked, i think, really needs to be challenged because we are talking, again, israel is not an occupied country by some great big neighbouring power. israel is the occupying power. in the last ten months before this horrific attack by hamas, 330 palestinians had been killed in the last ten months, the first ten months of this year, the first nine months of this year, the first nine months of this year. that is more than the total number of israelis killed in the previous 15 years including both soldiers and civilians. so israeli occupation is violence, it is structural violence and it cannot only be sustained through repression. and the notion that somehow israel is just minding its own business and then it was attacked. let's give michael the chance to respond to that because you were responding to his comments about the unprovoked attack. the roblem about the unprovoked attack. the problem with this narrative which one hears — problem with this narrative which one hears a bit is that israel left the gaza — one hears a bit is that israel left the gaza strip in 2005, something that went — the gaza strip in 2005, something that went prime minister shah on didit it— that went prime minister shah on didit it was controversial. the gaza strip had _ didit it was controversial. the gaza strip had no— didit it was controversial. the gaza strip had no soldiers, no settlers and where — strip had no soldiers, no settlers and where the israeli government of benjamin _ and where the israeli government of benjamin netanyahu was trying to pursue _ benjamin netanyahu was trying to pursue a _ benjamin netanyahu was trying to pursue a policy of pragmatic economic engagement. 17,000 palestinian workers going from gaza to israel— palestinian workers going from gaza to israel every day, there was talk about— to israel every day, there was talk about going onto 30,000 and the idea was that— about going onto 30,000 and the idea was that helping to provide some prosperity for gaza would bring peace — prosperity for gaza would bring peace and i think that is part of what _ peace and i think that is part of what hamas has destroyed here. that idea that _ what hamas has destroyed here. that idea that pragmatic engagement and economic— idea that pragmatic engagement and economic engagement is the right way to go _ economic engagement is the right way to go i'd _ economic engagement is the right way to go. i'd don't think —— i think, is intended _ to go. i'd don't think —— i think, is intended to destroy that because that idea _ is intended to destroy that because that idea of peace and coexistence between _ that idea of peace and coexistence between israel and the palestinians is exactly— between israel and the palestinians is exactly what they are opposed to. the pitch— is exactly what they are opposed to. the pitch to — is exactly what they are opposed to. the pitch to americans, at the ironic— the pitch to americans, at the ironic thing is that even though we are all— ironic thing is that even though we are all focused on the gaza conflict it is the _ are all focused on the gaza conflict it is the ukraine part which is actually— it is the ukraine part which is actually more controversial these days among americans. most americans will listen _ days among americans. most americans will listen and be very supportive of the _ will listen and be very supportive of the idea that we need to stand behind _ of the idea that we need to stand behind israel but the ukraine argument has come much more under fire these _ argument has come much more under fire these days and i think that may be one _ fire these days and i think that may be one reason for the linkage, to show— be one reason for the linkage, to show that— be one reason for the linkage, to show that we cannot pick and choose when _ show that we cannot pick and choose when we _ show that we cannot pick and choose when we stand against this kind of aggression that it is important to do it— aggression that it is important to do it everywhere and we heard that in the _ do it everywhere and we heard that in the president's comments last we involve _ in the president's comments last we involve not — in the president's comments last we involve notjust hamas and putin but others _ involve notjust hamas and putin but others around the world who would engage _ others around the world who would engage in— others around the world who would engage in this kind of aggression. | engage in this kind of aggression. i 'ust engage in this kind of aggression. just want engage in this kind of aggression. i just want to point out, michael, that many palestinian voices we spoke to in the last week of said the sense of peace and coexistence never really existed for them in the last 15 or 16 years but i want to get your thoughts on the ukraine funding, what we just heard from michael there but there has been dwindling support for that. the president is trying to rummage up support once again not only among congress but the american people. you have two conflicts that are very important _ you have two conflicts that are very important to — you have two conflicts that are very important to the _ you have two conflicts that are very important to the us _ you have two conflicts that are very important to the us for _ you have two conflicts that are very important to the us for different. important to the us for different reasons. — important to the us for different reasons. 0k? _ important to the us for different reasons, 0k? the _ important to the us for different reasons, 0k? the united - important to the us for different reasons, 0k? the united states| important to the us for different - reasons, 0k? the united states wants a stable _ reasons, 0k? the united states wants a stable middle — reasons, 0k? the united states wants a stable middle east _ reasons, 0k? the united states wants a stable middle east and _ reasons, ok? the united states wants a stable middle east and then- reasons, 0k? the united states wants a stable middle east and then there i a stable middle east and then there is a lot— a stable middle east and then there is a lot of— a stable middle east and then there is a lot of that — a stable middle east and then there is a lot of that of _ a stable middle east and then there is a lot of that of why— a stable middle east and then there is a lot of that of why the _ is a lot of that of why the president _ is a lot of that of why the president is _ is a lot of that of why the president is standing - is a lot of that of why the president is standing byi is a lot of that of why the - president is standing by israel but it is also— president is standing by israel but it is also a — president is standing by israel but it is also a long—standing - it is also a long—standing connection— it is also a long—standing connection between- it is also a long—standing connection between the i it is also a long—standing . connection between the us it is also a long—standing - connection between the us and it is also a long—standing _ connection between the us and israel and we _ connection between the us and israel and we can— connection between the us and israel and we can get— connection between the us and israel and we can get more _ connection between the us and israel and we can get more into _ connection between the us and israel and we can get more into that- connection between the us and israel and we can get more into that but- and we can get more into that but with ukraine — and we can get more into that but with ukraine i_ and we can get more into that but with ukraine i think— and we can get more into that but with ukraine i think he _ and we can get more into that but with ukraine i think he is- and we can get more into that but with ukraine i think he is trying i and we can get more into that but with ukraine i think he is trying to make _ with ukraine i think he is trying to make the — with ukraine i think he is trying to make the argument— with ukraine i think he is trying to make the argument that - with ukraine i think he is trying to make the argument that this - with ukraine i think he is trying to make the argument that this is i with ukraine i think he is trying to . make the argument that this is about the free _ make the argument that this is about the free world — make the argument that this is about the free world. this _ make the argument that this is about the free world. this is _ make the argument that this is about the free world. this is not _ make the argument that this is about the free world. this is notjust- the free world. this is notjust about— the free world. this is notjust about a — the free world. this is notjust about a country— the free world. this is notjust about a country occupying - the free world. this is notjust- about a country occupying another country _ about a country occupying another country and — about a country occupying another country and terrorist _ about a country occupying another country and terrorist attacks. - about a country occupying anotherj country and terrorist attacks. yes, it has _ country and terrorist attacks. yes, it has to _ country and terrorist attacks. yes, it has to do — country and terrorist attacks. yes, it has to do and _ country and terrorist attacks. yes, it has to do and everyone - country and terrorist attacks. yes, it has to do and everyone is- country and terrorist attacks. yes, it has to do and everyone is very l it has to do and everyone is very worried — it has to do and everyone is very worried about _ it has to do and everyone is very worried about the _ it has to do and everyone is very worried about the region - it has to do and everyone is very worried about the region and - it has to do and everyone is very| worried about the region and the it has to do and everyone is very - worried about the region and the war spreading _ worried about the region and the war spreading in— worried about the region and the war spreading in the _ worried about the region and the war spreading in the middle _ worried about the region and the war spreading in the middle east - spreading in the middle east becoming _ spreading in the middle east becoming unstable. - spreading in the middle east becoming unstable. that- spreading in the middle east becoming unstable. that is. spreading in the middle east. becoming unstable. that is not spreading in the middle east - becoming unstable. that is not the only reason— becoming unstable. that is not the only reason that _ becoming unstable. that is not the only reason that the _ becoming unstable. that is not the only reason that the us _ becoming unstable. that is not the only reason that the us is - becoming unstable. that is not the only reason that the us is getting i only reason that the us is getting involved — only reason that the us is getting involved in— only reason that the us is getting involved in the _ only reason that the us is getting involved in the conflict. _ only reason that the us is getting involved in the conflict. there - only reason that the us is getting involved in the conflict. there is. only reason that the us is getting j involved in the conflict. there is a very— involved in the conflict. there is a very tight — involved in the conflict. there is a very tight connection _ involved in the conflict. there is a very tight connection with - involved in the conflict. there is a very tight connection with the - involved in the conflict. there is a very tight connection with the us| very tight connection with the us and israel — very tight connection with the us and israel in— very tight connection with the us and israel. in ukraine, _ very tight connection with the us and israel. in ukraine, the- and israel. in ukraine, the ukrainians, _ and israel. in ukraine, the ukrainians, and— and israel. in ukraine, the ukrainians, and we- and israel. in ukraine, the ukrainians, and we have l and israel. in ukraine, the- ukrainians, and we have spoken and israel. in ukraine, the— ukrainians, and we have spoken about this over— ukrainians, and we have spoken about this over the _ ukrainians, and we have spoken about this over the last— ukrainians, and we have spoken about this over the last year— ukrainians, and we have spoken about this over the last year is _ ukrainians, and we have spoken about this over the last year is that - ukrainians, and we have spoken about this over the last year is that the - this over the last year is that the ukrainians— this over the last year is that the ukrainians are _ this over the last year is that the ukrainians are on _ this over the last year is that the ukrainians are on the _ this over the last year is that the ukrainians are on the frontline . this over the last year is that the | ukrainians are on the frontline of democracy— ukrainians are on the frontline of democracy for— ukrainians are on the frontline of democracy for all— ukrainians are on the frontline of democracy for all of— ukrainians are on the frontline of democracy for all of europe - ukrainians are on the frontline of democracy for all of europe and, | democracy for all of europe and, really. _ democracy for all of europe and, really. for— democracy for all of europe and, really. for the _ democracy for all of europe and, really, for the west. _ democracy for all of europe and, really, for the west. and - democracy for all of europe and, really, for the west. and they i democracy for all of europe and, i really, for the west. and they are getting _ really, for the west. and they are getting weapons _ really, for the west. and they are getting weapons but _ really, for the west. and they are getting weapons but they - really, for the west. and they are getting weapons but they are - really, for the west. and they are getting weapons but they are not| getting weapons but they are not asking _ getting weapons but they are not asking for— getting weapons but they are not asking for anybody _ getting weapons but they are not asking for anybody to _ getting weapons but they are not asking for anybody to fight - getting weapons but they are not asking for anybody to fight with i asking for anybody to fight with them _ asking for anybody to fight with them and — asking for anybody to fight with them and so. _ asking for anybody to fight with them and so, basically, - asking for anybody to fight with them and so, basically, what i them and so, basically, what president _ them and so, basically, what president biden— them and so, basically, what president biden is— them and so, basically, what president biden is saying - them and so, basically, what president biden is saying is i them and so, basically, what i president biden is saying is that this is— president biden is saying is that this is a — president biden is saying is that this is a fight— president biden is saying is that this is a fight for— president biden is saying is that this is a fight for the _ president biden is saying is that this is a fight for the west, - president biden is saying is that this is a fight for the west, a i this is a fight for the west, a fight — this is a fight for the west, a fight for— this is a fight for the west, a fight for democracy- this is a fight for the west, a fight for democracy and - this is a fight for the west, a i fight for democracy and russia this is a fight for the west, a - fight for democracy and russia is a much _ fight for democracy and russia is a much threat~ — fight for democracy and russia is a much threat. that is why there - fight for democracy and russia is a much threat. that is why there is i fight for democracy and russia is aj much threat. that is why there is a $60 billion— much threat. that is why there is a $60 billion request _ much threat. that is why there is a $60 billion request whereas - much threat. that is why there is a $60 billion request whereas there i much threat. that is why there is a i $60 billion request whereas there is only a _ $60 billion request whereas there is only a $10 _ $60 billion request whereas there is only a $10 billion _ $60 billion request whereas there is only a $10 billion request. _ $60 billion request whereas there is only a $10 billion request. the - only a $10 billion request. the ukrainians— only a $10 billion request. the ukrainians are _ only a $10 billion request. the ukrainians are fighting - only a $10 billion request. the ukrainians are fighting the - only a $10 billion request. the - ukrainians are fighting the russians which _ ukrainians are fighting the russians which is _ ukrainians are fighting the russians which is one — ukrainians are fighting the russians which is one of— ukrainians are fighting the russians which is one of the _ ukrainians are fighting the russians which is one of the biggest- ukrainians are fighting the russians which is one of the biggest and - ukrainians are fighting the russiansi which is one of the biggest and most powerful— which is one of the biggest and most powerful armies— which is one of the biggest and most powerful armies in— which is one of the biggest and most powerful armies in the _ which is one of the biggest and most powerful armies in the world. - which is one of the biggest and most powerful armies in the world. i- powerful armies in the world. i think powerful armies in the world. think it is interesting, the powerful armies in the world]. think it is interesting, the points you made that his squarely puts the us back in the middle of all that saying the us is the beacon of democracy that can serve as a player and michael i want to put this question to you because we heard him say he is working to build a more stable middle east and at the moment, as it looks, it seems that the us was unable to secure a summit with the palestinian authority, jordan and the president of egypt so does the us still have a role to play in the region? i does the us still have a role to play in the region?— does the us still have a role to play in the region? i think the us does have a _ play in the region? i think the us does have a role _ play in the region? i think the us does have a role to _ play in the region? i think the us does have a role to play. - play in the region? i think the us does have a role to play. it - play in the region? i think the us does have a role to play. it is - does have a role to play. it is unfortunate that the summit got cancelled, in part because of what were ultimately erroneous reports about what happened to a hospital in the gaza strip. but ultimately the countries in the region are going to turn to the united states, not only the united states, necessarily, but they will turn to the united states because the united states adds influence with israel, the united states is willing to bear costs to bring peace and stability to the region and very few outside powers are willing to provide those things. so with the present biden's relationships and willingness to advance peace and stability, yes i think we will still pay that role and there will be hope in the us that when the dust settles from this conflict and no—one knows when that is going to be, some of the things that we have been working on, for example, israel— saudi normalisation, they will be able to pick up backup and will be an important part of dealing a defeat to hamas and iran in this case, not allowing those things to be derailed. . ., , , ., allowing those things to be derailed. . ., , , , derailed. khaled, what is your sense ofthe derailed. khaled, what is your sense of the role the _ derailed. khaled, what is your sense of the role the us _ derailed. khaled, what is your sense of the role the us could _ derailed. khaled, what is your sense of the role the us could still - derailed. khaled, what is your sense of the role the us could still play - of the role the us could still play in the region looking towards some sort of negotiation down the line? h sort of negotiation down the line? i think what we are seeing is the biden— think what we are seeing is the biden approach to the middle east unravelling. the notion that the palestinian issue was a thing of the past and _ palestinian issue was a thing of the past and it— palestinian issue was a thing of the past and it did not matter anymore, it could _ past and it did not matter anymore, it could be — past and it did not matter anymore, it could be ignored as long as the cost of— it could be ignored as long as the cost of the — it could be ignored as long as the cost of the status quo were borne mainly— cost of the status quo were borne mainly by— cost of the status quo were borne mainly by palestinians and then it was ok— mainly by palestinians and then it was ok to — mainly by palestinians and then it was ok tojust mainly by palestinians and then it was ok to just sort of sustain that indefinitely. the big priority, you know. _ indefinitely. the big priority, you know. the — indefinitely. the big priority, you know, the new shiny toy that everyone _ know, the new shiny toy that everyone is chasing was saudi israel normalisation and that would bring stability— normalisation and that would bring stability if— normalisation and that would bring stability if we bypass the palestinian issue. i think that is now— palestinian issue. i think that is now clearly been laid to rest, what i now clearly been laid to rest, what i call _ now clearly been laid to rest, what i call a _ now clearly been laid to rest, what i call a strategic neglect of the palestinian issue is actually quite costly— palestinian issue is actually quite costly for— palestinian issue is actually quite costly for everyone and most of all the palestinians but now, also, israelis — the palestinians but now, also, israelis and others. so i think there — israelis and others. so i think there needs to be a departure from there needs to be a departure from the past _ there needs to be a departure from the past approach otherwise if we are going — the past approach otherwise if we are going to double down on what has been a _ are going to double down on what has been a failed approach for three years— been a failed approach for three years then we are just inviting more tragedy _ years then we are 'ust inviting more traced . . years then we are 'ust inviting more traced . , ., tragedy. 0k. elise, do you agree? this is a turning _ tragedy. 0k. elise, do you agree? this is a turning point? _ tragedy. ok. elise, do you agree? this is a turning point? i - tragedy. 0k. elise, do you agree? this is a turning point? ithink- tragedy. 0k. elise, do you agree? this is a turning point? i think it i this is a turning point? i think it is true that _ this is a turning point? i think it is true that the _ this is a turning point? i think it is true that the biden _ is true that the biden administration - is true that the biden administration camel is true that the bideni administration came in is true that the biden - administration came in and was is true that the biden _ administration came in and was ready and put _ administration came in and was ready and put it— administration came in and was ready and put it on— administration came in and was ready and put it on the _ administration came in and was ready and put it on the back— administration came in and was ready and put it on the back burner. - administration came in and was ready and put it on the back burner. for- and put it on the back burner. for all the _ and put it on the back burner. for all the criticism _ and put it on the back burner. for all the criticism of— and put it on the back burner. for all the criticism of the _ and put it on the back burner. for all the criticism of the trump - all the criticism of the trump administration, _ all the criticism of the trump administration, this- all the criticism of the trump administration, this was - all the criticism of the trump administration, this was the| all the criticism of the trump . administration, this was the one thing _ administration, this was the one thing that— administration, this was the one thing that they _ administration, this was the one thing that they picked _ administration, this was the one thing that they picked up - administration, this was the one thing that they picked up from . administration, this was the one i thing that they picked up from the trump _ thing that they picked up from the trump administration _ thing that they picked up from the trump administration and - thing that they picked up from the trump administration and tried . thing that they picked up from the trump administration and tried to| trump administration and tried to build _ trump administration and tried to build on _ trump administration and tried to build on which _ trump administration and tried to build on which was _ trump administration and tried to build on which was the _ trump administration and tried to| build on which was the abramovich accords. _ build on which was the abramovich accords. the — build on which was the abramovich accords, the peace _ build on which was the abramovich accords, the peace accords- build on which was the abramovichi accords, the peace accords between some _ accords, the peace accords between some of— accords, the peace accords between some of the — accords, the peace accords between some of the arab _ accords, the peace accords between some of the arab states, _ accords, the peace accords between some of the arab states, the - accords, the peace accords between some of the arab states, the uae, i some of the arab states, the uae, bahrain. _ some of the arab states, the uae, bahrain, morocco _ some of the arab states, the uae, bahrain, morocco and _ some of the arab states, the uae, bahrain, morocco and saddam - some of the arab states, the uae, bahrain, morocco and saddam andj some of the arab states, the uae, - bahrain, morocco and saddam and they had been _ bahrain, morocco and saddam and they had been working — bahrain, morocco and saddam and they had been working on _ bahrain, morocco and saddam and they had been working on this _ bahrain, morocco and saddam and they had been working on this saudi - had been working on this saudi normalisation. _ had been working on this saudi normalisation. the _ had been working on this saudi normalisation. the big - had been working on this saudi normalisation. the big mistake had been working on this saudi - normalisation. the big mistake here and there _ normalisation. the big mistake here and there were _ normalisation. the big mistake here and there were some _ normalisation. the big mistake here and there were some lip— normalisation. the big mistake here and there were some lip service - normalisation. the big mistake here| and there were some lip service paid to it. _ and there were some lip service paid to it. but _ and there were some lip service paid to it. but that— and there were some lip service paid to it, but that they— and there were some lip service paid to it, but that they did _ and there were some lip service paid to it, but that they did not _ and there were some lip service paid to it, but that they did not use - to it, but that they did not use that— to it, but that they did not use that as — to it, but that they did not use that as a — to it, but that they did not use that as a real— to it, but that they did not use that as a real way— to it, but that they did not use that as a real way to _ to it, but that they did not use that as a real way to solve - to it, but that they did not use that as a real way to solve the | that as a real way to solve the palestinian _ that as a real way to solve the palestinian conflict. _ that as a real way to solve the palestinian conflict. i- that as a real way to solve the palestinian conflict. i mean, l that as a real way to solve the palestinian conflict. i mean, i| that as a real way to solve the - palestinian conflict. i mean, i kind of reject— palestinian conflict. i mean, i kind of reject the — palestinian conflict. i mean, i kind of reject the idea, _ palestinian conflict. i mean, i kind of reject the idea, not _ palestinian conflict. i mean, i kind of reject the idea, not kind - palestinian conflict. i mean, i kind of reject the idea, not kind of, - palestinian conflict. i mean, i kind of reject the idea, not kind of, i. of reject the idea, not kind of, i emphatically— of reject the idea, not kind of, i emphatically reject _ of reject the idea, not kind of, i emphatically reject the - of reject the idea, not kind of, i emphatically reject the idea - of reject the idea, not kind of, i- emphatically reject the idea nothing michael— emphatically reject the idea nothing michael wood — emphatically reject the idea nothing michael wood as— emphatically reject the idea nothing michael wood as well, _ emphatically reject the idea nothing michael wood as well, that - emphatically reject the idea nothingi michael wood as well, that somehow the israeli _ michael wood as well, that somehow the israeli citizens, _ michael wood as well, that somehow the israeli citizens, you _ michael wood as well, that somehow the israeli citizens, you know, - michael wood as well, that somehow the israeli citizens, you know, this. the israeli citizens, you know, this was an— the israeli citizens, you know, this was an eye — the israeli citizens, you know, this was an eye for _ the israeli citizens, you know, this was an eye for an— the israeli citizens, you know, this was an eye for an eye, _ the israeli citizens, you know, this was an eye for an eye, just- the israeli citizens, you know, this was an eye for an eye, just like . the israeli citizens, you know, this| was an eye for an eye, just like the palestinians— was an eye for an eye, just like the palestinians we _ was an eye for an eye, just like the palestinians we should _ was an eye for an eye, just like the palestinians we should not - was an eye for an eye, just like the palestinians we should not look - was an eye for an eye, just like the palestinians we should not look at| palestinians we should not look at that. _ palestinians we should not look at that. that — palestinians we should not look at that. that it— palestinians we should not look at that. that it is— palestinians we should not look at that, that it is a _ palestinians we should not look at that, that it is a collective - that, that it is a collective punishment _ that, that it is a collective punishment. however- that, that it is a collective punishment. however it l that, that it is a collective| punishment. however it is that, that it is a collective - punishment. however it is clear that, that it is a collective _ punishment. however it is clear that the lack— punishment. however it is clear that the lack of— punishment. however it is clear that the lack of a — punishment. however it is clear that the lack of a resolution _ punishment. however it is clear that the lack of a resolution to _ punishment. however it is clear that the lack of a resolution to the - the lack of a resolution to the israeli—palestinian _ the lack of a resolution to the israeli—palestinian conflict - israeli—palestinian conflict continues— israeli—palestinian conflict continues to _ israeli—palestinian conflict continues to give - israeli—palestinian conflict continues to give oxygen i israeli—palestinian conflicti continues to give oxygen to israeli—palestinian conflict - continues to give oxygen to groups like hamas— continues to give oxygen to groups like hamas and— continues to give oxygen to groups like hamas and palestinian- continues to give oxygen to groups like hamas and palestinian islamic| like hamas and palestinian islamic jihad. _ like hamas and palestinian islamic jihad. has— like hamas and palestinian islamic jihad. has polar— like hamas and palestinian islamic jihad, has polar and _ like hamas and palestinian islamic jihad, has polar and so— like hamas and palestinian islamic jihad, has polar and so —— - like hamas and palestinian islamic jihad, has polar and so —— hats- jihad, has polar and so —— hats below — jihad, has polar and so —— hats below -- _ jihad, has polar and so —— hats below -- has— jihad, has polar and so —— hats below. —— has below. - — — hezbollah. —— hezbollah. so then it is time for the state _ —— hezbollah. so then it is time for the state to— —— hezbollah. so then it is time for the state to sign _ —— hezbollah. so then it is time for the state to sign peace _ —— hezbollah. so then it is time for the state to sign peace deals- —— hezbollah. so then it is time for the state to sign peace deals with. the state to sign peace deals with israel— the state to sign peace deals with israel it— the state to sign peace deals with israel it is— the state to sign peace deals with israel it is not— the state to sign peace deals with israel it is notjust _ the state to sign peace deals with israel it is not just about - the state to sign peace deals with israel it is notjust about kosher. israel it is notjust about kosher hotels _ israel it is notjust about kosher hotels and _ israel it is notjust about kosher hotels and israeli _ israel it is notjust about kosher hotels and israeli tourists - israel it is notjust about kosher hotels and israeli tourists and l hotels and israeli tourists and getting — hotels and israeli tourists and getting economic— hotels and israeli tourists and getting economic and - hotels and israeli tourists and - getting economic and commercial benefits— getting economic and commercial benefits from _ getting economic and commercial benefits from that _ getting economic and commercial benefits from that or— getting economic and commercial benefits from that or the - benefits from that or the intelligence _ benefits from that or the intelligence benefits. - benefits from that or the i intelligence benefits. these benefits from that or the - intelligence benefits. these states really— intelligence benefits. these states really need — intelligence benefits. these states really need to _ intelligence benefits. these states really need to step _ intelligence benefits. these states really need to step up _ intelligence benefits. these states really need to step up to _ intelligence benefits. these states really need to step up to play- intelligence benefits. these states really need to step up to play a - really need to step up to play a greater— really need to step up to play a greater role _ really need to step up to play a greater role. right _ really need to step up to play a greater role. right now- really need to step up to play a greater role. right now they i really need to step up to play al greater role. right now they are going _ greater role. right now they are going back— greater role. right now they are going back to— greater role. right now they are going back to their _ greater role. right now they are going back to their status - greater role. right now they are going back to their status quo . going back to their status quo position— going back to their status quo position of— going back to their status quo position of legitimately- going back to their status quoi position of legitimately looking going back to their status quo - position of legitimately looking at what is _ position of legitimately looking at what is happening _ position of legitimately looking at what is happening with— position of legitimately looking at what is happening with the - what is happening with the palestinians— what is happening with the palestinians and _ what is happening with the palestinians and saying - what is happening with the palestinians and saying we what is happening with the - palestinians and saying we need a cease _ palestinians and saying we need a cease polar— palestinians and saying we need a cease polar -- _ palestinians and saying we need a cease polar —— ceasefire, - palestinians and saying we need a cease polar —— ceasefire, this - palestinians and saying we need a cease polar —— ceasefire, this is l cease polar —— ceasefire, this is israel's — cease polar —— ceasefire, this is israel's fault. _ cease polar —— ceasefire, this is israel's fault. instead _ cease polar —— ceasefire, this is israel's fault. instead of- cease polar —— ceasefire, this is israel's fault. instead of trying i cease polar —— ceasefire, this is. israel's fault. instead of trying to dive in _ israel's fault. instead of trying to dive in and — israel's fault. instead of trying to dive in and use _ israel's fault. instead of trying to dive in and use their— israel's fault. instead of trying to dive in and use their influence i israel's fault. instead of trying to i dive in and use their influence with israel _ dive in and use their influence with israel how— dive in and use their influence with israel. how about _ dive in and use their influence with israel. how about we _ dive in and use their influence with israel. how about we sign - dive in and use their influence with israel. how about we sign a - dive in and use their influence with israel. how about we sign a deal . israel. how about we sign a deal with you — israel. how about we sign a deal with you we _ israel. how about we sign a deal with you. we made _ israel. how about we sign a deal with you. we made peace, - israel. how about we sign a deal with you. we made peace, theyi israel. how about we sign a deal - with you. we made peace, they have leveraged _ with you. we made peace, they have leveraged that — with you. we made peace, they have leveraged that they _ with you. we made peace, they have leveraged that they can _ with you. we made peace, they have leveraged that they can use. - with you. we made peace, they have leveraged that they can use. i- with you. we made peace, they have leveraged that they can use. i don't i leveraged that they can use. idon't think— leveraged that they can use. i don't think the _ leveraged that they can use. i don't think the us — leveraged that they can use. i don't think the us has — leveraged that they can use. i don't think the us has the _ leveraged that they can use. idon't think the us has the only— leveraged that they can use. i don't think the us has the only leveraged and i think the us has the only leveraged and ijust_ think the us has the only leveraged and ijust wrote _ think the us has the only leveraged and ijust wrote an _ think the us has the only leveraged and ijust wrote an article _ think the us has the only leveraged and ijust wrote an article for- think the us has the only leveraged and ijust wrote an article for a - and ijust wrote an article for a political— and ijust wrote an article for a political magazine _ and ijust wrote an article for a political magazine that - and ijust wrote an article for al political magazine that basically says you — political magazine that basically says you cannot, _ political magazine that basically says you cannot, you _ political magazine that basically says you cannot, you cannot - political magazine that basically- says you cannot, you cannot sideline the israeli—palestinian _ says you cannot, you cannot sideline the israeli—palestinian conflict - says you cannot, you cannot sideline the israeli—palestinian conflict but i the israeli—palestinian conflict but the israeli—palestinian conflict but the us— the israeli—palestinian conflict but the us does— the israeli—palestinian conflict but the us does not— the israeli—palestinian conflict but the us does not have _ the israeli—palestinian conflict but the us does not have to— the israeli—palestinian conflict but the us does not have to be - the israeli—palestinian conflict but the us does not have to be the i the israeli—palestinian conflict but i the us does not have to be the sole broker~ _ the us does not have to be the sole broker~ you — the us does not have to be the sole broker. you have _ the us does not have to be the sole broker. you have many— the us does not have to be the sole broker. you have many other- the us does not have to be the sole broker. you have many other arab i broker. you have many other arab states— broker. you have many other arab states could play _ broker. you have many other arab states could play a _ broker. you have many other arab states could play a greater- broker. you have many other arab states could play a greater role. . states could play a greater role. michael. — states could play a greater role. michael, what _ states could play a greater role. michael, what is _ states could play a greater role. michael, what is your— states could play a greater role. michael, what is your thought . states could play a greater role. i michael, what is your thought on that? i michael, what is your thought on that? ., �* ., ., ., that? i wouldn't rule out that that could still happen _ that? i wouldn't rule out that that could still happen and, _ that? i wouldn't rule out that that could still happen and, frankly, i could still happen and, frankly, those states that have normalised with israel like the uae and bahrain or saudi arabia which was in the process of normalising with israel perhaps may have a greater role in the ending of this than those states have had in the past. on the israeli—palestinian conflict i will say that one thing to remember is that the george w bush administration and the obama administration, it is not as though there was a lack of desire to advance this. but if you look at the support for the two state solution within the region itself among israelis and palestinians alike, they had grown disillusioned. you have a departure of the palestinian prime minister who the us worked closely within 2013 so some us policy motivated by opportunity. the trump administration and the biden administration were taking the opportunities that were in front of them and sometimes even for a country like the united states which is very powerful, you cannot necessarily create opportunities which are not there. sol necessarily create opportunities which are not there. so i think you can be critical and say we could have pushed for it more here and there but so much a foreign policy is taking advantage or taking up the opportunities which are there rather than creating them out of whole cloth. it than creating them out of whole cloth. . . . than creating them out of whole cloth. , . , ,., cloth. it is an interesting point and i cloth. it is an interesting point and i want _ cloth. it is an interesting point and i want to _ cloth. it is an interesting point and i want to bring _ cloth. it is an interesting point and i want to bring another- cloth. it is an interesting point i and i want to bring another guest into our discussion now, the former congresswoman stephanie murphy, a democrat from the state of florida who isjoining us. congresswoman it is great to have you back here on bbc news. we have been discussing and following the president's remarks tonight on asking for more aid for israel and ukraine and for taiwan on the border. so could i get your thoughts on what you had the president say. i your thoughts on what you had the president say-— president say. i thought he was t in: to president say. i thought he was trying to make _ president say. i thought he was trying to make the _ president say. i thought he was trying to make the case - president say. i thought he was trying to make the case to - president say. i thought he was trying to make the case to the l trying to make the case to the american _ trying to make the case to the american people for why we should be concerned _ american people for why we should be concerned about these conflicts and why we _ concerned about these conflicts and why we need to spend us taxpayer dollars— why we need to spend us taxpayer dollars on— why we need to spend us taxpayer dollars on it and he spoke about it in the _ dollars on it and he spoke about it in the broader context of defending democracy. he said while hamas and russia _ democracy. he said while hamas and russia are _ democracy. he said while hamas and russia are very different, what is a terrorist _ russia are very different, what is a terrorist organisation one as a nationstate, they are both entities who were — nationstate, they are both entities who were trying to destroy democracy. he couched the national funding _ democracy. he couched the national funding in— democracy. he couched the national funding in the context of making america — funding in the context of making america safer. trying to really help people _ america safer. trying to really help people at _ america safer. trying to really help people at home understand why this is important. these places feel and disconnected to american life and so he is really— disconnected to american life and so he is really trying to make that case _ he is really trying to make that case he — he is really trying to make that case. he also mentioned that the money— case. he also mentioned that the money that goes to, say, ukraine funding _ money that goes to, say, ukraine funding is— money that goes to, say, ukraine funding is actually backfilling us military— funding is actually backfilling us military capabilities. and so what he should — military capabilities. and so what he should have put a final point on is that— he should have put a final point on is that most— he should have put a final point on is that most of that is actually spent — is that most of that is actually spent in — is that most of that is actually spent in the united states. we send them _ spent in the united states. we send them our— spent in the united states. we send them our existing military equipment and we _ them our existing military equipment and we backfilling it with the money that congress appropriates. and that congress appropriates. sixth. congresswoman i that congress appropriates. fific congresswoman ijust want that congress appropriates. e"ic congresswoman ijust want to congresswoman i just want to follow—up and ask about democrats in here because they have, within congress and outside congress, been split over the israel hamas war. how do you think they will view these remarks from the president? these slit is remarks from the president? these split is less — remarks from the president? these split is less pervasive _ remarks from the president? these split is less pervasive than - remarks from the president? these split is less pervasive than what - remarks from the president? these split is less pervasive than what is i split is less pervasive than what is often reported. i think the split is less than reported. it has 99% of the senators backing _ reported. it has 99% of the senators backing it~ _ reported. it has 99% of the senators backing it. the reported. it has 99% of the senators backin: it. ,., ., backing it. the resolution in the house that _ backing it. the resolution in the house that supports _ backing it. the resolution in the house that supports israel - backing it. the resolution in the house that supports israel has i backing it. the resolution in the - house that supports israel has 9096 house that supports israel has 90% of the house supporting it. and so, yes, there are some divisions within the democratic party but they are not nearly as large as they are being portrayed, and i think the president tried to address that, and said, you know, of course we want all innocent lives that are lost —— we mourn all innocent lives lost but we mourn all innocent lives lost but we must stand by our israeli allies. and do you think that is a message thatis and do you think that is a message that is well received there in florida for example among your former constituents? i florida for example among your former constituents?— former constituents? i think in florida for _ former constituents? i think in florida for the _ former constituents? i think in florida for the broad _ former constituents? i think in florida for the broad swathe i former constituents? i think in j florida for the broad swathe of florida for the broad swathe of florida it is well received. thank ou for florida it is well received. thank you for those — florida it is well received. thank you for those comments. - florida it is well received. thank you for those comments. i - florida it is well received. thank you for those comments. i just i florida it is well received. thank- you for those comments. i just want you for those comments. ijust want to bring alys into the discussion and to comment on what we heard from the congresswoman, these were points that the president was making particularly to address the people like the people in florida, do you have the sense that this is a message that will be well received? i don't think, my personal opinion is idon't think, my personal opinion is that— i don't think, my personal opinion is that a _ i don't think, my personal opinion is that a lot — i don't think, my personal opinion is that a lot of these narratives, especially— is that a lot of these narratives, especially in this country, a lot of narratives— especially in this country, a lot of narratives are really dug in, just like the — narratives are really dug in, just like the narratives on israel are really— like the narratives on israel are really dug — like the narratives on israel are really dug in. we have seen over the last couple _ really dug in. we have seen over the last couple of days for that horrible _ last couple of days for that horrible bombing at the hospital in gaza. _ horrible bombing at the hospital in gaza. and — horrible bombing at the hospital in gaza, and then the israelis came out _ gaza, and then the israelis came out first— gaza, and then the israelis came out. first everybody was blaming the israelis. _ out. first everybody was blaming the israelis, then the israelis came out and said _ israelis, then the israelis came out and said it — israelis, then the israelis came out and said it wasn't us, it was a palestinian _ and said it wasn't us, it was a palestinianjihad. the die was cast. almost— palestinianjihad. the die was cast. almost the — palestinianjihad. the die was cast. almost the perception is the reality. _ almost the perception is the reality, and so i think that people's— reality, and so i think that people's opinions are so dug in, and that is— people's opinions are so dug in, and that is why— people's opinions are so dug in, and that is why i — people's opinions are so dug in, and that is why i go back to what president biden said. we can't let petty— president biden said. we can't let petty partisan politics get in the way of _ petty partisan politics get in the way of the responsibilities of a great — way of the responsibilities of a great nation. i don't think anyone has my— great nation. i don't think anyone has my mind will be changed on ukraine — has my mind will be changed on ukraine. unfortunately i think it would _ ukraine. unfortunately i think it would take a horrible attack on ukraine — would take a horrible attack on ukraine or— would take a horrible attack on ukraine or something really bad to happen— ukraine or something really bad to happen for— ukraine or something really bad to happen for the american public, the people _ happen for the american public, the people that are against the aide to turn around and now say oh, i really change _ turn around and now say oh, i really change my— turn around and now say oh, i really change my mind, we need to get ukraine — change my mind, we need to get ukraine that aid. i think the majority— ukraine that aid. i think the majority of people in this country do support ukraine. i think there is a little _ do support ukraine. i think there is a little bit — do support ukraine. i think there is a little bit of a kind of war fatigue. _ a little bit of a kind of war fatigue, and now again and a lot of anxiety— fatigue, and now again and a lot of anxiety in — fatigue, and now again and a lot of anxiety in this country, especially after— anxiety in this country, especially after what — anxiety in this country, especially after what happened with israel. you have two _ after what happened with israel. you have two wars that are threatening to expand — have two wars that are threatening to expand across the region, oil prices. — to expand across the region, oil prices, food prices, economy is bad. now there _ prices, food prices, economy is bad. now there is — prices, food prices, economy is bad. now there is the threat, today the us issued — now there is the threat, today the us issued a worldwide caution for americans— us issued a worldwide caution for americans with what is going on in israel _ americans with what is going on in israel they— americans with what is going on in israel. they are pulling their people — israel. they are pulling their people out of embassies. there is a lot of— people out of embassies. there is a lot of anxiety in this country. now americans— lot of anxiety in this country. now americans are fighting one another based _ americans are fighting one another based on _ americans are fighting one another based on ideology, and so i don't think— based on ideology, and so i don't think he — based on ideology, and so i don't think he will change any minds. maybe — think he will change any minds. maybe he — think he will change any minds. maybe he changed a few congressmen's mines. _ maybe he changed a few congressmen's mines. and _ maybe he changed a few congressmen's mines, and they need to get this aid to israel— mines, and they need to get this aid to israel and — mines, and they need to get this aid to israel and the kind of blunt it altogether, so i think that aid will probably— altogether, so i think that aid will probably get through, mostly because it is tied _ probably get through, mostly because it is tied to— probably get through, mostly because it is tied to the israel aid though. do you _ it is tied to the israel aid though. do you agree there is a sense of anxiety among the american public and people are really dug in? yes. and people are really dug in? yes, obviously the _ and people are really dug in? yes, obviously the country _ and people are really dug in? yes, obviously the country is _ and people are really dug in? fee: obviously the country is polarised, and in particular the two parties are polarised on this issue. israel and palestine have become, for better or worse, and palestine have become, for better orworse, part and palestine have become, for better or worse, part of the culture wars, but if a kurd, there are a couple of things i want to respond to on this question of the hospital. everyone, the president of course mentioned, that israel didn't do it, he felt confident in that. 2a hours earlier he had said we are going to look into it. it is highly unlikely that his intelligence people have decided who is responsible for that attack in any conclusive way. i and probably many other people here i'm sure have looked at the footage and the various evidence presented by both sides, as it were, and it is by no means conclusive. i think, if anything, thejury is no means conclusive. i think, if anything, the jury is still out, but i think we can't rule out the possibility that this was in fact an israeli air strike. it wouldn't be the first time that israeli have hit hospitals. we've seen that in for example. so i think everyonejust sort of... you know, we can't take any side's word at face value. we have to be very, very sceptical, particularly in moments of war. but if i could also just comment on this question of the tying that hamas and russia, what they have in common is this trying to destroy democracy. the president talked about learning the lessons from 9/11, and i think like that is an example of not learning the lessons, because that mantra sounds a lot like they hate us because we are free. i think there is a real danger of deluding ourselves into thinking that this is really about democracy, that hamas is attacking democracy, and that's what the israeli—palestinian conflict is all about. we need to be able to distinguish spin from reality michael, what is your thought on that? do you think we are wrong and how we've been characterising, rather the president has been characterising this conflict? no, idon't has been characterising this conflict? no, i don't think so, i think the president's characterisation was excellent except you can go much further with hamas. i think they do hate democracy for sure. they through their political rivals off of roofs in 2007, those were fellow palestinians, in order to enact their violent coup in gaza. hamas hates democracy, hamas hates israel. there is a lot of things hamas finds hateful, frankly, and democracy is just one of many. so i think it is an absolutely fair characterisation, and the president's point is that if you fail to stand up to this kind of absolutely naked brutal aggression, you can only expect more of it, and i think that is absolutely a common—sense, correct point. qk. i think that is absolutely a common-sense, correct point. ok. i want to pick— common-sense, correct point. ok. i want to pick up — common-sense, correct point. ok. i want to pick up on— common-sense, correct point. ok. i want to pick up on that _ common-sense, correct point. ok. i want to pick up on that point - common-sense, correct point. ok. i want to pick up on that point in - want to pick up on that point in just a moment, but i think we have another guest with so i to bring into the conversation, aaron david miller, a seniorfellow into the conversation, aaron david miller, a senior fellow for international peace who has worked in the middle east for many years, at the state department as well. if you can hear me, i saw that you tweeted earlier today, i hope the president's message tonight is a strong condemnation of hate speech and attacks on muslims and jews and and attacks on muslims and jews and a call for mutual respect and understanding here at home. did you hear that from him? understanding here at home. did you hearthat from him? i understanding here at home. did you hear that from him?— hear that from him? i did, and i'm lad he hear that from him? i did, and i'm glad he included _ hear that from him? i did, and i'm glad he included it _ hear that from him? i did, and i'm glad he included it in _ hear that from him? i did, and i'm glad he included it in his _ hear that from him? i did, and i'm glad he included it in his address. | glad he included it in his address. the reality, i think it was george will who said when it comes to foreign policy, americans want as little of it as possible. i think this speech tonight, there was nothing wrong with it, but presidential rhetoric rarely persuades. ask bill clinton and ronald reagan, two great presidential persuaders, certainly when it comes to legislation. i think the speech will impress israelis and ukrainians and if he mentioned taiwan it would impress the taiwanese. i'm not sure it would impress many americans. the focus is not on russia and ukraine, certainly not on russia and ukraine, certainly not on russia and ukraine, certainly not on israel and palestine, it is on our own personal security when it comes to inflation. that is what is going to determine, it seems to me, the architecture of the trajectory as we look forward to the 2024 presidential elections. but i think it was important since our own house is badly broken that he spent some time talking about the importance of mutual respect and understanding and condemnation of islamophobia, of anyone who hates palestinians, muslims and of course anti—semitism. we also heard the president talk about the two—state solution. his administration have said they still firmly believe that if not at this very moment, that is at least long—term still the aim. is that still in your view possible, given what we are seeing on the ground right now? what we are seeing on the ground riaht now? ., ~ ., .,, what we are seeing on the ground right now?— right now? you know, i was in jerusalem _ right now? you know, i was in jerusalem october _ right now? you know, i was in jerusalem october six, - right now? you know, i was in jerusalem october six, 1973 i right now? you know, i was in - jerusalem october six, 1973 during the october war, and i saw a nation that was traumatised and vulnerable, the greatest strategic failure in israel until a couple of weeks ago, and yet within six years, all of that trauma turned to a measure of hope with the egyptian israeli peace treaty. so 20 years later i'm sitting on the white house lawn, part of the american delegation, negotiators, watching clinton and arafat signed the accord, convinced that the conflict had reached a point that we were going to try to resolve it. and yet here we are in trauma. so the first step is trauma to hope, the second is hope to trauma. i've given up frankly saying never. i've given up convincing myself this will never happen, this can't possibly, right? so do i think there is a chance for the two—state solution right now, absolutely not. it is a talking point, it is an aspiration. do i think if you add the right kind of leaders who own the right kind of leaders who own the negotiations and are effective at mediation, do i think it's possible? yes, ithink at mediation, do i think it's possible? yes, i think it's possible, and frankly i'm not sure there's an alternative, other than despair, hopelessness and a continuation of this ghastly conflict between israelis and palestinians. 50 conflict between israelis and palestinians.— conflict between israelis and palestinians. ., , ., palestinians. so aaron, in the short term, palestinians. so aaron, in the short term. what — palestinians. so aaron, in the short term. what do _ palestinians. so aaron, in the short term, what do you _ palestinians. so aaron, in the short term, what do you think— palestinians. so aaron, in the short term, what do you think president i term, what do you think president biden should do to calm tensions in the region and to ensure the conflict doesn't spread? ihe the region and to ensure the conflict doesn't spread? he is -aushin conflict doesn't spread? he is pushing for — conflict doesn't spread? he is pushing for humanitarian - conflict doesn't spread? he is pushing for humanitarian aid. j conflict doesn't spread? he is| pushing for humanitarian aid. i think we will ameliorate some of the tragedy, the catastrophe that has occurred in gaza but it is a problem time and space, and i don't think there is a fixed rate now to the humanitarian issue. deterrence, we deploy two carrier strike groups to the med. may be hamas, if they are prepared to fight israel to the last palestinian, i don't think they want to compromise their own assets by triggering a major conflict with israel and i think that's true of iran. frankly, events control us. we are on the cusp of a major israeli ground campaign, which is going to be qualitatively and quantitatively different than anything we've ever seen. it is a long, dark tunnel and i'm not even going to predict where it's going to come out, but the situation is going to get worse before it gets worse, on that i am absolutely persuaded. d0 before it gets worse, on that i am absolutely persuaded.— before it gets worse, on that i am absolutely persuaded. do you have a sense, absolutely persuaded. do you have a sense. aaron. _ absolutely persuaded. do you have a sense, aaron, what _ absolutely persuaded. do you have a sense, aaron, what you _ absolutely persuaded. do you have a sense, aaron, what you think - sense, aaron, what you think israel's strategy is? that is a question we have been putting too many of our israeli analysts who have been speaking to the bbc, what the plan is, if the aim is to eradicate hamas, what that looks like for gaza after that goal is presumably reached? no, i think the israelis firmly believe it is within their capacity. they may be a player in a post—hamas gaza, maybe even aspire to such a thing. hamas is a movement, it's not like a rotary organisation where you attend meetings and you get a card, it is deeply ensconced in the social, economic and religious fabric of gaza. maybe they can eliminate the gaza. maybe they can eliminate t"ie: administrative gaza. maybe they can eliminate it ie administrative capacity, maybe they can fundamentally erode haouas's capacity to govern, its sovereignty in gaza, and maybe they can destroy its military capacity. the real question as you point out is what comes next. without a combination of external players, including the united nations, certainly it was true of kosovo, with the multinational security force in kosovo, with saudi money, with israeli and egyptian bayern, with the palestinian authority is dysfunctional and broken as it is, maybe you could cobble something together —— egyptian buy in. the son and the stars will have to align precisely the right moment, the international communities will have to stand up and own this and do it with well and skill. it is hard to imagine that that sort of bright futures where we're headed, i'm sorry to drone on but it's an important point. {lil sorry to drone on but it's an important point.— sorry to drone on but it's an imortant oint. u. , a, ., important point. of course, aaron david miller. _ important point. of course, aaron david miller, thank— important point. of course, aaron david miller, thank you _ important point. of course, aaron david miller, thank you so - important point. of course, aaron david miller, thank you so much i important point. of course, aaron i david miller, thank you so much for joining us with those thoughts. pleasure. �* . joining us with those thoughts. pleasure. �* , ., ., , pleasure. and i 'ust want to bring back khaled, _ pleasure. and i just want to bring back khaled, because _ pleasure. and i just want to bring back khaled, because i _ pleasure. and i just want to bring back khaled, because i know - pleasure. and i just want to bring i back khaled, because i know you've got to go and we've just got a minute with your left. any thoughts you want to share after what we just heard? you want to share after what we 'ust heard? . ., you want to share after what we 'ust heard? , . ~ ., ., you want to share after what we 'ust heard? , . �* . ., . heard? yes, i agree with aaron, that israel heard? yes, i agree with aaron, that israel doesn't _ heard? yes, i agree with aaron, that israel doesn't have _ heard? yes, i agree with aaron, that israel doesn't have any _ heard? yes, i agree with aaron, that israel doesn't have any clear - israel doesn't have any clear endgame, and i think that is one of the major danger is that we now face, and one of the dangers of giving an enraged and mostly emotional israeli government a free rein to do as it pleases. i don't think that the most sober, rational people are at the wheel, and they are thinking about inflicting punishment, and not about what comes later. in large part i think because there is a sense of what has always happened after a major bombing campaign is someone else will pick up campaign is someone else will pick up the pieces, right? it will be the international community who comes in with aid, to reconstruction, and some sort of ceasefire of course, but in this case, israel is going to have to own it, because they are clearly have broken it. ok. really interesting _ clearly have broken it. ok. really interesting to _ clearly have broken it. ok. really interesting to get _ clearly have broken it. ok. really interesting to get your _ clearly have broken it. ok. really interesting to get your thoughts, | interesting to get your thoughts, khaled, i know we have to let you go but thank you so much forjoining us in sharing your insights with us in the programme. a really interesting perspective. of course, we are going to continue with this coverage, a really interesting discussion we have had with our guests, just as we have had with our guests, just as we have had with our guests, just as we have had the president to deliver his address in the oval office, asking for more aid for israel and ukraine, taiwan and also the us mexico border.— ukraine, taiwan and also the us mexico border. �* e, ., , , mexico border. american leadership is what holds _ mexico border. american leadership is what holds the _ mexico border. american leadership is what holds the world _ mexico border. american leadership is what holds the world together. i is what holds the world together. american alliances are what keep us, america, say. american values are what make us a partner that other nations want to work with. to put all that at risk if we walk away from ukraine, we turn our backs on israel, isjust not from ukraine, we turn our backs on israel, is just not worth it. from ukraine, we turn our backs on israel, isjust not worth it. that's why tomorrow i'm going to send to congress and urgent budget request to fund america's national security needs to support our critical partners, including israel and ukraine. ., partners, including israel and ukraine. . , , ., ukraine. there are signs that israel is read in: ukraine. there are signs that israel is readying itself _ ukraine. there are signs that israel is readying itself for _ ukraine. there are signs that israel is readying itself for a _ ukraine. there are signs that israel is readying itself for a possible - is readying itself for a possible ground offensive in the gaza strip. israel's defence minister told troops that they will soon see the on play from inside. the israeli ministry has been readying itself for an expected ground incursion into the territory while the israeli prime minister told other troops we will win. jordan has said that it fears the worst from what is to come. the united nations and aid agencies say a lack of water food, medicine and other essentials is making the situation for displaced people in gaza increasingly desperate. egyptian state media say the ravioli crossing into gaza will be open for several hours later today to allow the delivery of supplies. lorries are at the border although aid agencies for the first consignments will not merely be enough. the un says designated shelters are overcrowded and water cannot be pumped or

Related Keywords

Biden , Speech , Us , Visit , Breast Cancer Awareness , Middle East , Oval Office , Sumi Somaskanda In Washington , On Israel , Defence Funding , Request , 00 Billion , 60 Billion , 10 Billion , 100 Billion , 0 Billion , Ukraine , Course , Senate , Situation , Democratic , Led , Latest , Speaker , Funding Measure , House Mac , Republican , The Rafah Crossing Into Gaza , Aid , Deal , Trucks , State Media , Delivery , Aid Agencies , Warnings , Egyptian , 20 , Sides , Israeli , We Palestinians , Troops , Defence Minister , Fire , Brink , Fun , 100 , Two Million , Missiles , Hostages , From The Inside , Ship , Us Navy , Pentagon , 203 , Chaos , Capitol Hill , Houthi Rebels In Yemen , Leader , Drones , Iran , House Of Representatives , Two , Case , Matter , Republicanjim , Gavel , Vote , Jordan , Support , Address , War , Guests , Volodymyr Zelensky , Needs , Khaled Elgindy , Palestinian Israeli , Elise Labott , Palestine , Sabrina Siddiqui , Program , Director , Wall Streetjournal , White House , Affairs , Middle East Institute , Zivvy Media , Trip , Seech , Aid Package , Congress , Number , Administration , Conflicts , Foreign Policy , Eyes , Most , Challenges , Something , Border , Public , Piece , Mexico , Country , Security , Involvement , Interests , Lot , Elise , Response , Crisis , Death Toll , Didn T , Tel Aviv , Didn Tjust Travel To Tel , Israel Clear , Civilians , Parties , Lawmakers , Evening , Constituencies , Talk , Bunch , Arab World , Pictures , Casualties , Wars , Arab , Growing , American Public , Green Light , Progressive Wing , Pro Palestinian , Ceasefire , Role , Republicans , Chief , Comforter , Comforter On De Bod , Rallies , Nation , Jewish Americans , Muslim Americans , Attacks , Anxiety , Jewish , Sol , Landlord , Stuff , Muslim American Boy , Tv , Murder , Islamophobia , Muslim , Stuft , Six , Shock , Dust , Yes , 9 11 , Democracy , Cornerstone , Autocracy , Russia , Russia Hut , Terrorists , United States , Stay , It S Good , Narratives , Democracy Versus Autocracy , President , One , Economy , Work , Voices , Congress An Urgent Budget It , Guest , Pro Hamas , Somethingl , Fori , Statement , Solidarity , Protests , It Country , Think Country , Countryl Out , Pundits , Palestinians , Some , Charge , It Pundits , Less War , Lines , Haven T , Don T , Arab World Don T , Arab Don T , Red , World , Cheque , Everyone , Way , Flight , Extent , Cutting , Blank Cheque , It , Green Light Israet , Blank Light , Ithink World , Wav Blank Cheque , Green , Greenj , People , Context , Medicine , Food , Fact , Population , Water , Fuel , Russian , Contextl , Population Food , Entire , Toi , Fuelto , 2 , 2 Million , Sense , War Crime , Group , Human Beings , Mpathise , Toj , Human Heings Empathise , Human Empathise , Alsol Empathise , Wall , Suffering , Comments , Group Of , Chance , America , Left , Corners , Notjust , Concern , Cause , Saying , Good , Civilian Casualties , School , Thing , Logo , Paragliders , Flyer , Ithinkjewish Americans , Ithink , Israelis , Children , Orthe Panel , Air Strikes , Anti Semitism , Eye For An , Victims , The Panel , Life , Hatred , Loss , Carnage , In Gaza , Mother , Problem , Characterisation , Social Media , Humanity , Media , Side , Characterisation Media , Uuite A Joint Humanity , Joint , Social , Wouldn T , Rally , Issue , Egregious , Want Tojumpi About , Excuse , About Liust , Discussion , Forecast , Ijust , Tojump , Question , Effort , Need , Weather , Respect , Question See , Funding , Topic , Analyses , Funding Piece , Degree , Terms , Politics , Consensus , Bit , Call , Progressives , Arab Americans , Israel War On Civilians , Muslims , Disappointment , Writing , Line , Balancing Act , Balancingj Act , 5 , Conflict , Time , Blame , Rage , Words , Room , Restraint , Reaction , Evenif , Overreact , Thousands , Remarks , Homes , 1000 , 600000 , Electricity , Siege , Groups , Supplies , Ground , Bombardment , Bulk , Cut Off , Government , Expectation , Health Care System , Collapse , Emphasis , Thread , Frustration , Challenge , Tissue , Ground Invasion , Revenge , Is , Vengeance , War Of Out Rage , War Out , Island , Blank Island , Government Island , Turning Gaza , Deserted Island , Horrifying , Trauma , Combination , Humiliation , Operating , Desire , Revenue , Hold On , Ijustjump , B Revenge , Desire Combination , Revenge Trauma , Ump , Nonsense , Punishment , Results , Collective , Case Ofj , Hospitals , Attack Saw , Ruestion Human Beings , More , Mac , Four , Many , War Crimes , Blanket Punishment , Obvious , Atrocity , Options , Sl , 7th , October The 7th , 7 , I Scale , Release , Language , Ust Scale , You , Feeling Dehumanised , Dehumanised , Citizens , Infants , Games , Grandparents , Scores , American Citizens , Scores Of , 1300 , 32 , Home , Avenue , Terrorist , Loved Ones , Hostages I Israelis , No Limit , Anyone , Spain , Others , Depravity , Evil , Terrorist Group , Unleashed Pure Unadulterated , Terrorist Group Hamas , Unleashed Pure Unadulterated Evil , Unleashed , Authority , Of The Palestinian Authority , Want , I Strong , Palestinian Authority , Actions , Hospital , Explosion , Dignity , Tragic Loss Of Palestinian Life Including , Self Determination , Right , Peace , Opportunity , Life Loss , Innocent , We Hospital In Gaza , By Hospital In Gaza , Livei , Innocent Life Loss , Done , Innocent Patestinians , We Mournl , Putin , Bodies , Brutality , Wallet , Vision , Tragedy , Graves , Brutaiity , Hurt , Signs , Torture , Thousandsi , Bearing , Mass Graves , Parents , Stolen , Threats , Neighbouring , Common , Annihilate A Neighbouring Democracy , Hunmuss Democracy , Sick , Denrocracy , Conrnron , Destruction , Existence , Purpose , Hummus , Human , Israei , Destruction Of , Human Shields , Human Shietds , Paiestinian , Statehood , Meanwhile , Atties , Soviet , Atties Witi , Allies , Confiicts , Ntatter , Dictators , Price , Ally Security , Death , History , Threat , Power , Appetite , Control , Cost , Cost Chaos , He Appetite , Rising , The , Land , Quote , Advisers , Pressure , Gift , Provinces , Poland , Latvia , Topi , Remind Potand , Alreadyl , Lithuanian , 0 , American Security , Europe , American , Nato , Atiy We Security , We Witt Security , Tater , Baltic 475 , Baltic , Atiy , 475 , Europe We Fighting , Russia Beyond Fighting , Edo , Calls , It Calls , Fighting , Troops Fighting , Make Calls , Let , Fighting Against , Iet S , Same , Risk , Independence , Aggressors , Competitors , Areas , Risk Aggressors , Region , Parts , Terrorist Groups , Supports , Indo , Otheri , Supports Hamas , Indo Pacific , Partners , Stable , Ini Countable , Neighbours , Where , Build A , Rail Corridor , Grievances , Projects , Biggesti Economies , Summit , Employment , Summit Of The World , Employment Summit Of The World , Rail , Biggest , Tess Economies , Alliances , Leadership , Values , Peopte , Economies , American Values , Hotds , Israel Isjust , Congress An Urgent Budget Request To Fund America S National , Dbacks , I Backs , Congress An Urgent Budget Requestj , Israel Isjust , Walk Away , Israet Walk Away , Investment , Israeland , Smart Investment , Fund America , Support Fund America , National Security , Radical Partnersi , Seven , 9 11 We , 12 , Ten , 250 , 0k , 330 , Nine , 15 , 2005 , 17000 , 30000 , 16 , 0k , 10 , Three , 2013 , 90 , 99 , 9096 , 2007 , 2024 , 1973 , 50 ,

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.