Washington journal program, or through our social media feeds. Cspan, created by americas Cable Television companies as a Public Service and brought you today by your television provider. Joining us on the communicators this week is a key member of congress when it comes to telecommunications policy. Mike doyle is a democrat from pennsylvania, chair of the energy and commerce subcommittee on communications and technology. Congressman doyle, the subcommittee is key to telecom policy, isnt it . Representative doyle it sure is. It is the Key Committee in congress that deals with telecommunication policy. A lot of interesting issues come before the committee, and more to come. Pedro we are about to cover those in the next halfhour, but i want to start with news this weik, the fcc declaring hua and the kumble corporation to be National Security threats. Representative doyle that is one of the reasons you saw the bill we passed in the energy committee. Now we are just waiting for appropriators to put money in it. It is going to take 1 million to 2 million to assist Smaller Companies that want that equipment, to make them whole so they can remove the equipment and put other equipment in. We have been generally supportive of that and our hope will be appropriators will put sufficient funds in the bill so that that can happen again. Here to help us explore the issues is chris roderigo. He is with the hill, and covers technology. Chris ask for having me. To know how the coronavirus pandemic has shifted the priorities of you and your subcommittee. Representative doyle it has obviously made it much more difficult to schedule hearings and do our normal course of business. We had a hearing last week on this information. Im sure we will talk about that later. Dont at this time know when our next hearing is going to be. Committees on energy and commerce, all competing for spots. There is also a limited amount theime left as we move into recess, leadership 20 to get certain legislation to the floor, so those will take precedence, depending on the committee or subcommittee, so it has made the normal operations of the committee more difficult. All learning this andnology, zoom, webex other media to conduct our hearings, and have been able to do it without many glitches. Chris do you see the potential for digital hearings moving forward . Representative doyle i am old school. I like that we are in the hearing room with colleagues. It is especially difficult during markups or contentious hearings to make sure we want to be recognized or whether there it giveste going on, us what i think is a healthy it is on zoom with a bunch of frames and you are not sure who is talking. And givenits purpose, the situation right now, it is critical we are able to continue to conduct our business. My staff works remotely from their homes in pittsburgh, and in washington, and we are able to get our work done and respond to our constituents. We have to get our Committee Work done and make sure we are getting product to the floor that is important to the american people. So this tool has been critical. And the other thing this pandemic has illustrated is the importance of broadband. People are really dependent on this, not only for work, how we are educating students, ordering soceries, getting medicines, much of what we depend on for everyday life, we wouldnt be able to do it if we didnt have productivity like this, and a lot of people in the country dont. Challengesone of the we have, making sure we fix that problem with the infrastructure. Congress sometimes moves slower than events happen in real life. To, ase you been able you say, move product to the floor . We wouldative doyle like to do things through regular order. Whenlked about this a lot House Democrats took effect the , and to of the house, the extent the situation allows it, that is how we like to do business, have hearings in a committee, that is subcommittee, especially when we are trying to get work done before the august recess. We still have a number of Appropriations Bills we have to get to the floor in these last weeks of july. We have the heroes act that is still waiting for Mitch Mcconnell to open his mouth and say something, whether he wants to sit down and negotiate. We have received proposals from mr. Waldon and senator wicker on covid, but we dont see numbers, because apparently in the senate and the administration, they are not ready to talk money. My hope is that during this recess, when we are still doing things virtually, and markups, our committee is scheduled to do markups not this week, but next week, that there are some discussions going on that when we get back in the next few weeks, we have something to vote on. Whether it takes the form of what we have in the heroes packager moves in another direction, we need to get something done in the august recess. And whatever bills we need to move to make that happen, those will be expedited. Twitter you hearing from zoom and webex and others on how you can assist them . Representative doyle this has been a primary this has been a valuable tool. I just got through a primary election. Time to a very strange be running, and i had a competitive race. And normally you do a doortodoor campaign, you have debates, rallies. Everything moved to zoom. And you have debate formats like we are doing here with local television stations, that i have done with this format. Fort has become invaluable small businesses, for the conduct of businesses in this country during a pandemic, when so many of us are working from our homes, because it is not safe right now to work in large numbers inside and closed areas inside enclosed areas. So we want the technology to work and wanted to be safe and secure. I know that for official hearings on markups that we use as opposed togy, technicaluse our folks think there is more security cap, but this technology will keep getting use it more,e may not so much in hearings and markups in the congress, but you will see a lot of business continue being conducted this way. Not quite sure a lot of businesses are ever going to go back to the way they used to do things once we get through this pandemic and hopefully have a so we can get back some degree of normalcy. Issue you policy hinted at his broadband taking on more importance with people relying on the internet. Earlier this week, the accessible portable internet for all act move forward, investing 100 billion to build up broadband in certain areas as well as affordable broadband offerings for anyone who receives the funding. Do you perceive that being independent legislation from the moving forward act, given opposition from the president and the Senate Majority leader to the move forward act . Representative doyle there is going to be negotiation. There was a lot of comment on the floor by republicans about, what is a broadband package doing in a transportation bill . Largehis city to move a infrastructure bill in the when we talk about infrastructure, we are not just talking about roads and ridges. Broadband is the infrastructure of the future. This is going to be the basis of how the 21st century economy works. So it is critical we not just put money in to get broadband in certain areas, we are talking about upgrading the entire system to increase speed and efficiency. We are talking about using it to close the homework gap. We dont know if kids are going back to school in fall. We hope they do, and i have a lot of parents kids at home that hope they are going back to school, but we dont know that. Distance learning is still going to be a real thing and we still have people in this country that dont have access to broadband, and we have to close that homework gap. Part of what we did in this packages to do that too. 911we want to update our package, that is important. So much of what congress is doing is digital now in the United States should be at the thefront, so we think investment in broadband is important. Jim clyburn ordinarily doesnt work in this space, and has stepped forward, he has worked very closely with myself and mr. Allone on this package. Whether it moves forward as part of the infrastructure package we just voted on, we dont know. We know that we still have to negotiate with our senate counterparts, still have to. Money, there has got to be agreement about how much money to enable broadband, and then work with Senate Republicans on how we get legislation passed. But we cant work when the over there cant work on the other side doesnt open their mouth and say something. We are anxious to work with Mitch Mcconnell and the president. Said there is has no money attached to these things, so my hope is that during the next two weeks we are at home, there will be hearings and negotiations so that we can in the next few weeks to get something on the table. It is very important. Two particular areas of come out of the broadbent discussion, telehealth and closing the homework gap. Actelehealth, the cares passed by congress appropriated 200 billion. You and the energy and commerce chair, representative allobne representative sent a letter to the fcc chair. Representative doyle we want to get more information about the program. Grants are being sent out to various organizations and we want more transparency on how that process works and who is getting these grants. That thent sent concern has been, to date there hasnt been transparency. We have written chairman pai, asking him to make sure that this is a program not only run efficiently, but transparently, questedave a information on what organizations have received funding, and the criteria being used to judge who gets an award in 2000. We are still waiting to get that information. Chris are there further steps you are considering to put capital oversight over that fcc process . Representative doyle if we arent getting cooperation and dont think the process is transparent, it will come under scrutiny of the committee. That is part of our oversight responsibilities and something we will look into. Our hope is that we get answers from the chairman and make sure the program is running a way that is transparent. Chris there is also other legislation proposed on in thelth, including one senate that would make changes in the cares act permanent, allowing the Health Department to waive geographical look waive geographical locations for medicare recipients on telehealth. Representative doyle i cant give you a definite answer on the. Want to expand telehealth answer on that. Telehealthexpand across the country and i just have to take a closer look at the Senate Language before i answer that. Beyond the reduction in using telehealth three coronavirus, what are the other advantages for telehealth . Representative doyle i live in pittsburgh. A lot of people think of pennsylvania as philadelphia and pittsburgh, and in between is a whole bunch of farmland and dairy farms. It is a very rural state if you know it well, and a lot of time these folks find themselves hundreds of miles from certain types of health care. Pittsburgh has the largest Academic Medical Center in so we have many, many things available at our fingertips in pittsburgh, but if you live in central, those facilities arent available, especially Specialty Health care. Lsis is where telehealth fil the gap. The brightest surgeons work in our hospitals in pittsburgh and philadelphia and they can issult, look at xrays, it almost like bringing that talent right into those areas without people getting into a car and driving 200 miles for an appoint meant with someone for an appointment with someone. So it is very important. Chris speaking of rural areas, the rural Digital Opportunity fund, 20 billion Funding Amount fcc has to distribute to Rural Communities for broadband, have there been discussions in your committee about possibly moving the october date, as democratic members of the agency have mentioned they might need more Data Collection first . Representative doyle yeah, we want to have good data if we want to good result. Sensesnt make it lot of it doesnt make a lot of sense to me. We know the mapping is horrendous, so why do we want to spend all this money before we have good maps and good data . Many of us on the committee and some members of the fcc have expressed the desire, lets not put the cart ahead of the horse, lets get this mapping issue solved first and then make sure that money gets spent in the most efficient way, that we are putting it where it really needs to go. Iter congressman doyle, seems that for years people have complained about the mapping. Why is this such an issue . Representative doyle as long as i have been on the committee, quite some time, we have had this discussion. That,just mindboggling given the technology and abilities we have today, that we cant get accurate mapping so we are making sure that, as we spend these precious dollars that art growing on trees, that we are getting deployment where we need deployment. Thee frankly, a lot of carriers, for whatever reasons, there maps claim they have service where they dont have service. And we know that has been going on for years. We talkedst hearing about this in the legislation, there was almost unanimous, bipartisan consent that this was a problem in the system and needs to be fixed. Democrats and republicans on the committee both agreed on this. Why in the world would the fcc push forward on this before we get this problem fixed . That is basically what we said to the chairman, that we really need to get this done right, and it seems to me we would be throwing 20 million out the window if we did this without the updated maps. Initiativeher major is closing the homework gap, something you have been working on even before coronavirus came. Is there more energy and congress to move the legislation, given the pandemic . Representative doyle i hope so. And any legislation that moves out of the house will include this. This is very important to House Democrats. And i believe there are many republicans that also support closing the homework gap. Thingsagree on a lot of in congress, democrats and republicans, until it gets to how we pay for it. That is world the talks seem to always break down. More aggressive figure, 9 billion out of 100 billion into closing the homework gap. We think it is very important to the future of the country, people getting educated, especially in times this were schools are being shut down times like this when schools are eeing shut down, and we hav basically two societies, the connected society and the unconnected society, where some have to drive up to a mcdonalds just to get a connection to do their homework thats not fair. We have those kinds of disparities. This is important to us, and we are going to push for maximum levels of funding in any negotiation. Is using broadband as an infrastructure tool, is there bipartisan support for that . Representative doyle people are starting to understand how important it is. The pandemic has brought a lot of this to light, that people see the importance of broadband a lot more in their everyday lives that maybe they did prior to the pandemic. I said at the beginning that rod band is the infrastructure of broadband is the infrastructure of the future, when we talk about the investments we are going to make to ensure our place in the world. It should be painfully obvious to people at this point that having the best connectivity, best networks, is critical to our success in a Global Economy and critical to the success of our students who are trying to learn, it is critical for our health care industry. About everything you can think of is touched by broadband. Think of our political discourse the role ittry, plays in our democracy, and the iteat many of us feel currently poses to our democracy if something doesnt change that are bent on giving people what they want to hear, that causes so Much Division in this country. And i hope the people that run these platforms can see the country they have created, and step up and something about it. Thats why our last hearing had a big focus on disinformation. Peter is there a fear that Net Neutrality and regulating broadband and the internet is a utility could be part of this package . Representative doyle i am a big. Upporter of Net Neutrality it is important to have a cop on the beat. Isps say theys wont do anymore, they were doing at one point, which rot the regulation upon them which brought the regulation upon them. There was always something new that happens in technology, and while we dont specifically say, we know we arent going to do butain things anymore, there are other things that can pop up. Frankly, the federal trade commission doesnt have the manpower or expertise or authority to do much about this, unless there is a [indiscernible] is the agency that can be the cop on the beat. What we are saying, if we catch isp acting in a competitive nature, then the fcc should have the authority to do something about that. So if Internet Companies arent to anything art doing anything, that if the Internet Companies so if the internet policies arent doing anything in terms of anticompetitive policies, the fcc should have the ability to step in if they see something those based on definitions we have already agreed to. The American Public gets that. Records number record numbers of people talked to the fcc about this. It is really not a democratic or republican issue, except in washington, d. C. You get outside of the capital, there is pretty much basic agreement this is a good idea. The chances of getting a Net Neutrality bill as part of the package probably not good. But we need to get some things done. So we need to find out what we can agree on and what we can fund and what we can pass, and then november brings us new faces, lots of new faces, hopefully, in my opinion. And then we can go from there based on what the white house looks like after november. Host three minutes left. Sounds good. Last issue i wanted to touch on came up in your hearing last week. Thatow controversial law gives Online Platforms legal liability for content posted by thirdparty users and allows them to do content moderation. What proposals have you seen or are you considering for reforming the law . Is a very this complex issue and a very difficult issue to navigate. Iously, you do not want to i mean, abolishing section 230 would basically crash the platforms. Time, there is a provision that says, we give you this shield in return for you making a goodfaith effort to police your sites. Both parties, democrats and with the are way they are doing their jobs upset with the way they are doing their jobs. Democrats are upset that they are not doing enough and republicans are upset that they think they are doing too much and stifling conservative viewpoints. It is a very tricky equation. And then you have the first amendment, free speech. Even some hate speech, unfortunately, is protected under the first amendment. The question becomes, how do we stop the flow of misinformation . We think about it in three buckets. How it has affected our democracy, how we know without any question this is a matter for debate is not a matter for debate that several foreign governments have tried to influence the last president ial election. That has to stop. The platforms have a responsibility. At therun a commercial, end of the commercial, it says paid for by doyle for congress. People know who it is that is making that statement to them. If i am saying something about myself or my opponent. These platforms, especially with regards to political speech, there need to be there needs to be some transparency there. We need to know who these folks are that are posting before they get to post. There has to be a responsibility to verify that if somebody says they are a concerned Citizen Group in the United States, that they are not coming from russia or china. So i think that is one thing we are looking at and how it affects democracy. We have watched the president just basically abuses office on social media abuse his office on social media. His claim that voting by mail is fraudulent, now, we know that is not true. Twitter called him on it. Companies like facebook have basically rewritten the rules to accommodate this present so as not to have a fight this president so as not to have a fight with him. There has to be some sort of cop check beat, like a fact type of thing on political speech. Same with covid19. There is so much misinformation being disseminated over the internet. These platforms have a responsibility, i believe, to do that policing. We had a hearing last year and we had all the Big Companies here. I basically told them if they did not want to do their job, that congress was going to do it for them and they would not like it. I think we are reaching a point where a lot of members of congress in the house and senate are taking a look at section 230 and seeing what reforms can be made to that section to make sure that they are doing a better job doing the things that we gave them a shield for. This was like a quid pro quo. , butet a liability shield you have a responsibility in order to get that liability shield. We do not think they are meeting that responsibility. I havesaid all that, seen some proposals in the senate that are certainly not proposals that i think are that merit consideration. You know, i think it is senator josh hartley is one of them. We notore about how do let people moderate conservative views on that . This is a complex issue and we need to look at it in a complex way. Senator graham had recently proposed some changes to his bill. We have not had a chance to see that new language it. We are taking a look at it. He takes away any liability shield on child pornography. Host thats right, yeah. Rep. Doyle there is also some concerns that he has been impairing the department of justice. That part, i have some row concerns about. And will not be an easy fix it is not an easy solution. It is very complex and very tricky. How do you how you navigate the first amendment, how you navigate these other things and not stifle innovation and crash this system. I just have to say, when people who run these platforms take a look at the country they have created, because they have changed culture in this country. The divisionsee that exists in our country right that is cheaply being done by social media. I mean, it is just crazy to me how you can identify peoples political affiliation just based on certain actions every day on the internet. If you do not wear a mask, that says something. Or if you are wearing a mask. It goes on and on. I just think there is a responsibility on the part of these platforms to understand the division they are causing in the country by telling people what they want to hear, even though it is not necessarily true. Somenk there has to be filters on that and some transparency on it. We should at least know the source of who is giving them this information so that they can at least make the judgment now. Host we are going to have to leave it there, unfortunately. Chairman mike doyle of the subcommittee on communications and technology. Chris mills roderigo of the hill. Thank you both for being on the communicators. Thank you. Cspan has unfiltered coverage of congress, the white house, the supreme court, and Public Policy events. You can watch all of cspans Public Affairs programming on television, online, or listen on our free radio app and be part of the National Conversation through cspans daily washington journal programs or through social media feeds. Cspan, created by americas Cable Television companies as a Public Service and brought to you today by your television provider. American history tv on cspan3, exploring the people and events that tell the american story every weekend. Coming up this weekend, saturday at 2 00 p. M. Eastern on oral histories, an interview with civil rights activist courtland at howardng his time university, his involvement in the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee and serving the secretarygeneral of the 1970 4 6 pan african congress. Theunday on real america, 1963 news report the American News revolution of 1963. Protest from albany, georgia, birmingham, alabama, cambridge, maryland and in the northern cities of englewood, new jersey, chicago, and brooklyn. A discussion on congress, Political Parties and polarization with historians. At 8 00 p. M. On the presidency, author andrew cohen talks about his book. June 10 and 11th, 1963 defined jfks response to the nuclear arms race. Watch American History tv this weekend on cspan3. A house subcommittee looks at the health and equity disparities in minority communities that have contributed to high Coronavirus Infection in and mortality rates , including lack of testing and higher amounts of the essential workforce populations in these areas. Du