Recovery Evidence Under Section 27 Of The Evidence Act- Questions & Answers By Justice V Ramkumar [Part-III]

Q.6 Since the words used in Section 27 are “a person accused of an offence” should there not be a formal accusation against the person in the form of registering an FIR against him?. Ans. No....

Related Keywords

Delhi ,India ,State Of Karnataka ,Karnataka ,State Of Orissa ,Orissa ,Kerala ,Himachal Pradesh ,State Of Kerala ,State Of Rajasthan ,Rajasthan ,George Rankin ,S Murtaza Fazl Ali ,Mohd Arif Ashfaq ,Faizan Uddin ,Pakala Narayana Swamy ,Ziyad Rahman ,Ramanand Nandlal Bharti ,K Vinod Chandran ,Bheru Singh ,O Chinnappa Reddy ,Gangulas Murthy ,Vikram Singh ,Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia ,Harjit Singh Bedi ,Bk Subba Rao ,Udayu Lalit ,P Jaganmohan Reddy ,Division Bench Of The High Court ,Division Bench ,Himachal Pradesh Administration ,Supreme Court ,Evidence Act ,Lord Atkin ,Lord Thankerton ,Lord Wright ,Lord Porter ,Sir George Rankin ,Singh Bedi ,Mohd Arif ,Nandlal Bharti ,Vide Subramaniya ,For More ,Some Useful Tips ,High Court ,Bringing On Record ,Jaganmohan Reddy ,Murtaza Fazl Ali ,Recovery Evidence ,Section 27 Of Evidence Act ,Justicev Ramkumar , ,