To call no more er well, are there discussions or different points of view, including the format of reparations and compensation that russia should er pay to ukraine, thank you mrs. Yevgenia for the conversation. Live on the espresso tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those who are currently watching us live on these platforms, please like this video and subscribe to our pages on social networks and remind you that we today we are conducting a survey on youtube , which sounds like this why is the west delaying the provision of ukraine and longrange weapons, the west is afraid of the defeat of the Russian Federation, the west is afraid of shelling the territory of the Russian Federation, the time has not yet come and your opinion, write your opinion in the comments. Andrii illenko, an officer of the freedom battalion of the fourth brigade of the National Guards operational assignment of the border , andrii, i congratulate you and thank you for joining our conversation. Good evening, president zelensky announced important successes on in the bakhmut direction, he says that there are successes in destroying the occupiers, important successes and thanked those who are currently on the battlefield serhiy cherevaty, the spokesman for the Eastern Group of the armed forces of ukraine ee, says that 508 times during this day, the enemy struck our positions six air raids, 16 skirmishes took place, in which at least 65 occupiers were destroyed, 120 were wounded and three were taken prisoner. And i know that you are also on the eastern front. What is happening in the part of the front where you are now, there is very heavy fighting and uh literally, in the last few days, there were a lot of intense clashes, and the enemy tried to storm our positions, used a lot of tanks, used a lot of artillery fire, other defense equipment, uh, infantry assault units , but the enemy caused heavy losses , several tanks were destroyed, several units of other Armored Vehicles, a large number of enemy infantry was destroyed, and the enemy was unable to complete any of the assigned tasks, we had to retreat, and this is not the first such battle on our in the front area, they happen regularly and i can say that the intensity of yours is very high. How does the front line look today from the side of the occupiers . In a different way, the only technical point is if you can reduce the echo because i hear my own voice a lot and its a bit confusing its difficult to say because i cant know for sure what they look like on each part of the front, i know about other parts of the front, well , General Information from the brothers who are there, eh, on different parts of the front , different operations are taking place, eh, respectively, on some parts of the front, there is an active ukrainian offensive is taking place in other parts of the front, some stabilization actions are taking place to control the front line, and so on. Well, it is difficult to compare it. Well, but the fighting is intense everywhere, that is to say that somewhere it is obvious that somewhere they are more intense, but they are intense everywhere along the entire front line, huge front lines, and heavy fighting is going on. That is, somewhere to say that in some areas of the front they are not there, or they are very little intensity , there is no such thing now, heavy fighting is going on everywhere , the Summer Company is already entering in the culminating phase , serhiy kuzmin, Deputy Commander of the Operational Strategic Group of tavria troops for strategic communications, says that the armed forces of ukraine in the tavria direction entered the first line of defense of the russians, it is very difficult, says kuzmin but our military is pushing forward and we are moving forward, this movement is somewhat slowed down by minefields, and due to our lack of aviation , at the same time, the institute for the study of war of the United States of america says that the Ukrainian Army is methodically cutting off the Russian Group in the south, as a result of such successful actions, significant interruptions should be expected in the logistics of the occupiers and the probability of delays and traffic jams, against this background, information appears that germany is going to provide us with longrange taurus missiles that fly at a distance of 250 km. Well, and the ukrainians are asking the americans to provide attacks with longrange missiles that fly even further, there is 500 km, the flight range of this missile according to yours is the lack of this longrange weapon, how much does it slow down the ukrainian counteroffensive, or these mini fields that are scattered in the southern regions of ukraine, just in in any case, they will not allow the Ukrainian Army to advance as quickly as it would like. Well, of course, it had a very strong effect , because what is happening directly on the front line, on the line of contact, is the result huge processes taking place in the rear and, accordingly, the possibility of striking the enemys rear at a long distance, making this rear dangerous , this is a huge trump card that the Ukrainian Army has been using in principle for a long time. The types of weapons that we currently have are the same highmars and so on, and accordingly , not even the situation itself, but the missiles, because we understand that it is primarily from the type of missile that appeals to us, accordingly, the more we have it will be this, this is the distance at which you can strike, the stronger will be the impact of aa and physical and very important psychological yes on the actual capabilities of the enemy and this is a very serious factor this is one of the key factors because what is happening now what is now finally we can seriously talking about the fact that we will receive exactly such missiles that really already have such a radius of action there up to 500 km, well, this will greatly simplify the life of the Ukrainian Army , it will greatly facilitate the situation at the front , this will not mean that the next day after the implementation of this weapon, all problems will immediately disappear, but it is very strong. It will help and i really want it to happen as soon as possible so that there are no long bureaucratic expectations, and yet these processes go faster because life because it is an opportunity to save the lives of our brothers and sisters who are today they are fighting in your west with longrange weapons, so that russia does not lose this war completely, because the ukrainians , using these weapons, can simply destroy the entire rear the structure of the Russian Occupation forces, including those on the crimean peninsula, not to mention these ships that threaten our infrastructure and civilian infrastructure from which the hummingbird is launched in the black sea that the west does not deliberately torpedo these events because they understand that ukrainians learn very quickly in the hands of ukrainians this weapon will turn into a weapon for the destruction of putin s regime. I think that it is still a little different from the center or to bet on the fact that they are very afraid of the defeat of russia here, rather that they consider the defeat of russia, that is, what they want actually imagine as the defeat of russia how it should look er because actually er what is very important at the very beginning of this fullscale invasion er among western countries there is a certain consensus that ukraine should not lose no it is very good that this the consensus of pigs because, for example, in the 14th year, it did not arise in the 14th year, no one supplied us with any weapons, and it was necessary to prove to many western politicians that the invasion of russia is taking place in ukraine, and not the civil war or the civil conflict, as told russian propaganda in the 22nd year, of course, such questions did not arise, and there was a certain consensus from that moment, starting from february 24, well, or even rather a little later, when they saw that the plan did not work in three days, and then actually this consensus arose regarding that ukraine should not lose, and it was under this strategy, under this philosophy, that we were left with weapons, but we can hardly say today that there was a consensus, actually, regarding what well, i mean , among western countries, regarding ukraine, it is clear that in it is an internal consensus but if we are talking about western countries, today there is no consensus exactly in what form russia should lose. It seems that this is not even a question. Why were they so worried about the fact that russia would lose . I dont think that this is exactly the problem. I think that the problem is simply that europe after 1945 after that had a nightmare in the second world war. Well, it got in fact, well, there are 8 er decades, well, i mean, first of all, western europe, yes , the countries of europe received very large cut off the time, so that life is absolutely a rash, without major wars, without er, wars at all in the territory of western central europe, which once was an absolutely ordinary thing and actually this territory was the scene of both the first and second world wars and so on and they simply got used to this wellfed calm peaceful comfortable life and they simply do not want to accept the reality that this life is over and that todays war in ukraine has much more meaning and much more consequences than just the conflict between ukraine and russia, that in the context of the war it is global and the challenges that are facing them are also global and that actually today is already over, that time is starting a completely different time and how quickly these countries they will react so much dnipro will be their help and support so quickly they will overcome these threats and crises and start a new phase of a good life , well actually they have it and now in principle it is good, they have no global problems in addition to potential threats, but actually they should understand that if russia is killed and continues to pursue an aggressive policy, then it will all be over for them, and therefore helping ukraine is in their interest. It does not happen at one moment and, unfortunately, we really have a situation where every decision on the provision of some new types of weapons takes place. First, there is a very long stage of political maturation of the fact that they agree to it ask how it was with those pants and with the same leopards, when at first they said categorically no, we cant talk about it, but after some time, uh, these tanks already started to be delivered. I m sure that it will be the same with everything else. Its just really for us ukrainians it is very unpleasant, it is very difficult for us to accept this reality that today ukrainians are paying the price with their own blood. And at that time, other people who live in a peaceful , completely civilized life, they take this decision for so long. Well, i think that , after all, they europe is changing and the west is changing. I think that uh, no matter how strange it sounds, but ukraine is an example of this boundless heroism, this kind of uh, well , faith in goodness. It is always necessary to fight and not bow down. Ukraine today is to a certain extent a factor in a certain moral regeneration of europe itself. I would really like to believe this, maybe it sounds very idealistic and pathetic, but i really wanted to believe that there are, after all, a lot of processes which are in the same group took place there in the last years of the decade. I consider destructive processes from the point of view of disarmament, such an internal demobilization. The feeling that there are no threats to the dominance of this entire leftwing agenda. It seems to me that now, after all, this situation is not a little bit. Values that actually made europe europe, and i think this is also happening in our affairs, that today the same germany, yes, which was always very close to russia, what did with it strategic projects such as the same nord stream and the like, today germany has given up russian gas and is supplying ukraine with tanks and now it is even ready to supply longrange missiles that we really need, this is of course tectonic shifts. If someone had said there two years ago that this is possible, i i think no one would believe it, but thanks to the heroism of ukrainians and simply the boundless criminality and stupidity of muscovites, this is a reality against this background, we have 15 years since the moment when russia started a war with georgia it happened on august 8, 2008, and even today Dmitry Medvedev , putins henchman, says that russia is now at war with nato for a reason, and it was very challenging for russia. But as he said then, russia will win and there will be peace on terms of the Russian Federation, but in the context of these negotiations that are currently being conducted in the world, saudi arabia, copenhagen, before that, the peace formula is being discussed, that is, according to you , are peace negotiations possible at all without the participation of those who cause damage and aggression to another state, and then should we not talk about peace formula a it is necessary to talk about the formula of the capitulation of the Russian Federation before the world, well, capitulation and the result of the military paraska, and we must ensure that this capitulation is carried out, but we must absolutely understand that the capitulation of an unceremonious defeat over such a thing does not happen. A final military defeat of russia and then there will be capitulation, it is obvious that this issue cannot be resolved at some diplomatic forum, it can only be resolved on the battlefield if we are talking about those diplomatic the negotiations that take place in the classical sense are not peace talks in the classical sense, because you correctly say that peace talks are when negotiations are held between the warring parties , in this case it is more like an International Forum for consultations , agreeing to certain positions, expressing certain positions. I believe that this is correct because in fact, uh, well, these countries that took part in this event represent a very large percentage of the population of the planet earth, a very large part of, lets say, Political Economic influence in the world, and you have to deal with them talk and you dont have to automatically hand them over to some indifferent observers or even our cheap ones, you have to communicate with them, you have to talk to them, you have to convey our point of view, because if we dont do it, it will russia will be and it is doing it and it is conveying its position, its propaganda and therefore its influence and so on , the fact that it is being done is definitely positive and it must be done and this is exactly what our diplomacy should be doing today, but to expect from this that this will give us some kind of solution to the situation. Well, i dont think so. In principle, no one counted on this, i think it was about really convincing even if we convinced at least one country on our side as a result of this forum they moved, or at least those who today take this indifferent position, at least a little to their side, at least by some percentage , and still made them a little further from the muscovites, this is definitely a result, and it was worth it. Against this background of both the peace negotiations and our counteroffensive, information appeared that more than 40 of the old tanks and battleships from the vagzhanovo base in buryat, visible from space, were removed from storage. Before the invasion of ukraine , about 3,840 units of Armored Vehicles were stored in this russian warehouse in the open air journalists calculated that they had 2,271 vehicles left, most of the equipment was taken away. After the announcement of mobilization, however, new equipment appears, tank 80, which leaves the omsktransmash plant, and despite the sanctions, they restored it export of electronicoptical devices, russia has probably eliminated the deficit in the production of optics for these tanks, lets eat a small video of ukraine, well, ukraine with great resources, and with former soviet military resources , what do you think, mr. Andriy, the world should do in order to strangle this monster, give ukraine the maximum amount of weapons that only maybe i think that at this stage the most important thing is that, of course, it is still far from the maximum and economic sanctions, but still, this is not even the main thing, the main thing is the weapon for ukraine, that is, all possible weapons that can be all must be carried out and this is the only single way the only method thank you mr. Andriy and thank you for defending us from the russian invaders this was Andriy Illenko , an officer of the freedom battalion of the fourth brigade of the operational assignment of the National Guard , my friends i would like to remind you that we work live on the espresso tv channel, as well as on our social networks and on the youtube platform, for those who are currently watching us on youtube and on social networks, please click like and subscribe to our social Networks Network well take part in our survey today we ask you about the following why is the west delaying the provision of longrange weapons to ukraine options for answers the west is afraid of the defeat of the Russian Federation the west is afraid of shelling the territory of the Russian Federation the time has not yet come and your opinion you can leave your opinion in the comments below this video, we are in touch with oleksandr musienko, head of the center for military and legal research, oleksandr. I congratulate you for the sake of seeing you on our air. I congratulate you after the meeting in saudi arabia at geely and the ministry of Foreign Affairs china voiced its laureate position on ukraine after participating in a meeting in saudi arabia, the beijing representatives trip there was positively perceived by all parties, meaning the americans and the british, by the ukrainian side. The minister of Foreign Affairs of china spoke with lavrov again from official reports to you, he said that china and russia should coordinate actions and promote multipolar peace and democratization of International Relations , at the same time, top officials and top diplomats taiu said that beijing will maintain an independent and impartial position and plans to actively advocate for peace negotiations and a political solution. Lavrov said that moscow agrees with chinas position on the political settlement of the ukrainian crisis and vita s constructive role of china. Is it facetoface on the phone . Can it be considered that china brought something new to the peace talks regarding ukraine . Is moscow not coordinating its actions after all, and the conclusions were too optimistic . What, then, the chinese finally broke away from russia and are already going to peace talks and are articulating their position, well, this is simply, for today, evidence that official beijing wants to conduct diplomacy. Actually, probably from the word diplomacy, because they are actually trying not to break ties with the west and with light because these are economic ties and it is important to read if there were not at the same time we perfectly understand that it is not worth expecting any kind of breakthrough from china from the point of view of changing the cardinal position either because the matter is because it seems to me that china continues to take a waitandsee position and until the war has a strategically extremely negative impact on their interests. They will not take any radical drastic actions along with this. They will not manage relations with measures finally and the possibility is is to be present at various events and try to demonstrate oneself as a Serious International player who takes a responsible attitude to International World politics. The calculation is that now china will radically change its position very quickly and start putting pressure on the kremlin so that russia stops the aggressive war against ukraine. A position that gives them latitude for maneuver, and at a certain time they may still find themselves in the camp of those who are ready to put more pressure on russia, but so far there is no such interest in oleksandr, another person who can influence putin and his position, or at least not about articulating putins future, which can await him, this is the president of turkey , rzepta and perdogan, in august, the planned meeting of putin and jordan in turkey, in addition to the grain corridor and the grain agreement, it is obvious that reject and pardagan will speak and about the ending of the war in ukraine, or at least some change in putins position on this matter, the rda is probably the only person among the leaders of nato countries who communicates with putin and shakes his hand which is ready to accept him, in your opinion, to what extent can the turks now play and are playing a role in the finalization of the russianukrainian war, and to what extent can erdogan be persuasive for putin in order for him to withdraw his troops from the territory of ukraine and not withdraw them the turkish president will not convince putin, then it must be understood that the cells will not voluntarily withdraw the troops, the position remains the same in russia, it does not change that they are ready for any negotiations if new territorial realities are recognized, as russia says, that is, if there will be annexation of these territories, which they currently control, is recognized as their occupation, and even more so because they included in the constitution even those territories which they de facto do not control now and i think they will not control, so today i see no reason to change that in order to point out that someone can influence putin and he has changed his position dramatically, to date there are two scenarios in general, actually three. Volodymyr zelenskyi, what is actually being gathered and discussed at the conference, the second is a plan, what is now being actively written about in the western media, various he fresh ee number of hvoynepress, he published a bunch of articles about how to achieve a koreanstyle truce according to any and so on, this is what is written. Now, before this, new york , there, from washington, various posts there hinted about uh , such a development of events is possible, that is , the second this is a truce, uh, signed by someone , obviously not the president and thats for sure. Actually, the third is just a continuation the war as long as it can last, that is, today it is not clear that russia will be willing to withdraw troops voluntarily without pressure, what pressure is turkey capable of exerting , i do not think that they have such arguments today to put pressure on putin so that putin makes a decision to slowly use the troops well, then the peace formula articulated by zelensky should be called the formula for the defeat of russia, because in principle, in principle, when we talk about the fact that we can talk about peace only after russia withdraws its troops from the territory of ukraine this means the defeat of russia, because for putin, the withdrawal of ukrainian troops from the ukrainian territory will simply mean the end of his political career and, in general, the collapse of the world leader. Considering this , can we say that ukraine will never negotiate with the Russian Federation . Even after