And accusing russia the United States and the countries that. Are ignoring facts and common sense the United States will not remain a party to a treaty that is deliberately violated by russia. This hour conservative activists in the United States are celebrating after important to reconsider a censorship case. Such as facebook and. Also in the program a ship captain who faces jail time for saving migrants from the mediterranean has turned down a french Bravery Award accusing the capital of. As european states still wrangle over what to do with those newcomers flooding into their countries. Youre watching R T International bring you your live news update from our studio here in moscow where its just turned 2 pm welcome to the program lot of putin has ordered an analysis of the threat posed by the latest american missile the weapon was recently tested not long after the u. S. Pulled out of an arms control treaty the russian president also ordered asymmetrical response to their wish to use prove it to you instead of fixing an unacceptable situation and returning back to compliance with the treaty the americans have orchestrated a Propaganda Campaign alleging violations by russia both sides its now clear this was just a smokescreen to hide washingtons own breaches of the treaty and its intention to leave it this or leave 0 doubt about americas real intentions having got rid of the existing limits its now free to deploy previously forbid missiles anywhere in the world top american politicians say that you systems could be deployed 1st in the Asia Pacific Region but this affects our interests as well because it is situated near our borders and the situation surrounding the collapse of the i. N. F. Treaty was addressed at the Un Security Council where tensions flared russia and china have called for Global Action to prevent a new arms race and rebel powers blame each other for the ongoing escalation. Do you realize that because of the u. S. Ambitions we are one step away from an arms race that cannot be controlled or regulated in any way the United States will not remain a party to a treaty that is deliberately violated by russia. If this depended only on us we would not reach this dangerous situation the United States is taking the necessary steps to address the threat posed by intermediate range Missile Forces being deployed in ever larger numbers by russia and china but what about you are you going to avoid responsibility for what is happening to future generations forgive you for this russias present actions are in line with a pattern of aggression that represents a clear threat to International Peace and security the Russian Federation as the sole responsibility for the reason demise of the reading. Do you not understand that by your responses to the americans you are returning to historical situation when missiles targeted european cities from different sites. Was a heated debate at the United NationsSecurity Council now the United States has recently withdrawn from the i. N. F. Treaty the intermediate range Nuclear Forces agreement and not only has the usa withdrawn from the treaty but the usa recently tested a missile that would have been a violation of that treaty had it still been in effect many are viewing this as an escalation of a potential new arms race between russia and the United States now when the representative of the United States spoke to the Security Council they accused russia of being responsible for the agreements demise this is the us representative here today because the Russian Federation preferred a world in which the United States continued to fulfill its i. N. F. Treaty obligations while the Russian Federation did not weve heard a narrative today that the United States had itself been in violation of the i. N. F. Treaty because of our recent flight test which used the m k 41 launcher that is also found in our air. Sure Missile Defense system this is categorically false now russia emphasized that its concerns about the m k 41 launcher have been proven to be indeed correct and that this launcher could easily be tested in transformed into the tomahawk missiles that were recently tested by the United States and those missiles do indeed violate the treaty now russia which had been accused of having violated the i. N. F. Treaty had repeatedly requested that inspectors come to russia and see if indeed these allegations from u. S. Leaders were true however the United Nations and the United States ignored their requests to defend themselves against these allegations of violating the i. N. F. Treaty russia asked for dialogue around the issue and this dialogue was ignored heres some of what we heard from the russian representative. In accusing russia the United States and the countries that grunt along with it are ignoring facts and common sense we proposed a closed door meeting to look at time misao of this clone us and give full information to convince them that we did not violate the treaty but they refused we cannot understand the arguments from us but we do want to save the treaty china was also subject to us allegations that the Security CouncilUnited States accused china of boosting its military arsenal as well china responded that it was not correct for the United States to withdraw from the training and blaming china for their decision was not honest or correct either this is the chinese representative addressing the Security Council. The i. N. F. Treaty is of great importance to not only the u. S. And russia but its a global peace and security it is an accent to which use china as an excuse for leaving the treaty china rejects the baseless accusations from the u. S. Now the i. N. F. Treaty was signed in 1987 and it was a key moment in the deescalation and ultimate end of the cold war between the United States and the soviet union and the recent decision of the United States to withdraw from that treaty as many concerned about the potential for a new Nuclear Arms Race now many hope that the meeting could be the opening of dialogue toward restoring some kind of treaty regarding intermediate range Nuclear Forces missiles and such and wherever while a lot of accusations were exchanged no real consensus seems to have existed among the countries represented at the u. N. Security council. Now for more on the latest from the russian president we are joined live by our. You know what else did the russian president have to say today. Jacqueline hey there well all the statements and the developments that we are seeing and hearing right now are part of this new reality in a World Without the intermediate range Nuclear Forces treaty as you said once hammered out by washington and moscow at the very end of the cold war but then eventually torn apart after an announcement by the american president at the end of last year so earlier this week the state department announced that the u. S. Military successfully tested a Cruise Missile that was previously outlawed by the terms of the i. N. F. Treaty and that now as a result of this the russian president got together with the most senior russian officials in charge of security in this country and after this the russian president is saying that these kind of tests by the americans are a clear indication that the reason why america pulled out wasnt because russia violated something but rather moscow believes that this was a well calculated planned to get their hands on tied now throughout the last few months we kept hearing with warnings from moscow that if the russians see that the u. S. Is starting or rushing to develop new weapons that were previously bad moscow will somehow respond by doing exactly the same thing and this is what Vladimir Putin reiterated when he spoke as the result of that Security Council meeting im talking about the russian Security Council. Theres a new book and i mean. As you know weve never wanted and still dont want to get into an arms race which is expensive and destructive for the countrys economy is weapons that weve been developing where response to americas unilateral pullout from the 2003 antiBallistic Missile treaty we wish to maintain the security of our people and our country we are doing the same now and will keep on doing this in the future. So once again the message from the russian officials is that moscow is being forced to respond to these very swift actions taken by the u. S. Administration as a result of their own decision to pull out of the intermediate range Nuclear Forces treaty are taking the potential of staying across the latest for us thank you now for it live comment were joined by journalist neil clark now president putin wants to see a symmetrical response then of course the u. S. Will likely implement their own reciprocal measure and so on and so forth is a new arms race underway. Well it could still be avoided i think i dont think we want to get are we going to come in our Talk Straight away you know whats happened here has i think you can see it as part of a process really that began in 2002 when the us walked away vocal way from the 1st of the cold war me Socrates YanceyBallistic Missile treaty that was the neo cons in the Bush Administration doing that president putin did say a few years after that that was concerning and russia would within the i and i and he was quite critical of him in the sense that russias security had to come 1st and its interesting isnt it that you now we have under a new neo con of ministration in america we have in the us pulling away from the i. M. F. So you can see this is a kind of continue if you link up with a Republican Administration under bush with a Republican Administration under trump but you know the neo cons in america have restricted by these treaties that were signed between reagan who were trouble all those years ago and as well your comment as you said in your report just then you know theyve been looking for a pretext really to untie their hands and of course donald trump and you know we know that the whole russia great thing was a nothing burger that would have been people in russia quite understandably would have thought that on top would have been preferable than Hillary Clinton given her resume a given her track record but i think its pretty clear now to be body that donald trump is no friend of russia hes in his administration hes got the secretary of state on peo and hes got the National Security adviser these are both hard core neo cons is the new york art of ministration that has liked and never liked arms limitation treaties now the u. S. Defense secretary said on thursday that the test that they conducted was a message to china how alarmed do you think the Asia Pacific Region will be by these developments i think quite a long look at the global picture we had. A. Ratcheting up the rhetoric against china under the trump of ministration of course we had you know increased ratcheting up of tensions with russia as well so i think theres a lot of reasons to be alarmed with this trump president s in the end the trip and the direction its heading in as i said even back to the 1980 s. Jackal in 2 the hard core neocons were even pretty critical of reagan time or grades were actually agreeing to arms limitation the treaties with then song union they never really liked this they really wanted to be free to develop as many missiles as they want to threaten people as much as they want so i think we got to look at it in that sort of broader longer perspective really and of course china we know has i mean every reason not to be concerned. Its interesting isnt it with on kong situation thinking of this near they will see that again. They will have seen that as american meddling in what they regard as an internal affair so the whole things going to quite boring and of course because going to mention the Iranian Nuclear deal which the trumpet ministration made it pretty clear what it thinks about that so yeah these are dangerous times but again its too early to say whether the latest news will the to answer is lets hope it doesnt and saner heads say no minds will prevail while of course but realistically how dangerous is this situation who is the most at risk and who will feel most vulnerable and all of this its fascinating is it because the United States seems to be threatening a number of countries the same time again this is the neo cons neocons in power menacing menacing threatening china iran of course very. Last week would have magically when the u. S. Was was very disappointed chairing all forit is allowed the iranian all time to go they really wanted that to be so. Hes the game and what would that have done so weve got tensions with iran tensions with this chinese situation tensions and as well and of course now as well. As tensions with russia so it would be wrong of me to come here and say this is a very dont just position were in the moment and of course its all happening under the watch of donald trump many people thought would be a president who would you know move away from a neo cons and actually much more of a program on a ministration amir barlev administration was we got to ask yourself the question how would you Louis Clinton in terms of russia and its Global Global position have been any worse than what donald trump scrutiny. Now these accusations are over the i. M. F. Have gone back and forth for a while now and the russian president claims the u. S. Orchestrated a Propaganda Campaign against russia by accusing moscow of violating the treaty why would washington do that how likely do you think that is well of course washington needs a pretext to walk away from a treaty which as i said to keep the key to all of this is that the neo cons faction in washington have never in what these treaties in the 1st place and always sought to have their hands untied so how can they do that its better p. R. Isnt it if you want to get out of the treaty to accuse the other side or breaching it but as i said this really all goes back to 2002 when the Bush Administration walked away from the the antiBallistic Missile treaty its a policy it is the policy to to break away from these in the nation of attention treaties to actually. Support develop missiles neocon policies aggressive its about threatening countries and that means lots of missiles and that means testing and frightening other countries so i think thats thats a key point to make here they could just come out and say look. Were going to break this treaty we have to accuse the other side of breaking as in fact exactly whats happened with the iranian. Nation and irans been the party has reached even though theres been no no independent observer although different experts actually agree with that line was claiming the other side is standard fare in this as you mentioned these accusations have been going on for quite a while but the official withdraw are only happen on august the 2nd were you surprised the pentagon conducted this test so soon after axing the treaty officially just a matter of weeks later not really not when you think you know whos calling the shots at the moment youve got secretary of state pompei oh. Youve got john bolton new york on steroids youve got some pretty hard right neo con figures in the u. S. Administration at the moment and this is a provocative move of course its a very provocative just 3 weeks after you pull out of the i. M. F. To test these new missiles what on earth was washington to do they would have knowing that russia and president putin would come out and state the kind of things that he has said today its purely a lot of predictable so you can only assume that the neo cons exactly are happy with whats happening they want they dont want were across more russia they dont want better they dont want a new period of detente with russia remember when trump was elected a lot so that there would be a period of time whats happened over the last month he introduced even tougher sanctions on russia we go in your opposite direction but we always go away from detente whenever neo cons are in power the us where we have a move towards the talk when theres a shift and what other people up. In power in the u. S. Thats when we get dialogue thats when we get talk about arms imitation im afraid were going in the other opposite direction at the moment and try whether or not he was really supporting his policies from the beginning or whether hes been coerced into or whether hes pressurized whatever the reason. Doing this now weve got to acknowledge that and all those people who thought hed be very different. From obama hes actually worse in terms of Foreign Policy in the current the situation and the global picture and the world is really watching or listening clarke thank you for your time and your comments thanks to. Conservative activists in the u. S. Are celebrating after a court agreed to reconsider a censorship case against Facebook Google twitter and apple is bringing the lawsuit accuse the tech giants of biased and of suppressing content from the conservative end of the political spectrum controversal right wing activist laura limor is leading the case with a group called freedom watch shes known as someone whos been banned from all kinds of Online Platforms from twitter and facebook to pay pal and over a lawsuit also allege the 4 tech giants have violated the 1st amendment and us antimonopoly laws there have been a growing number of leaks and testimonies from those who work for big tech alleging an anticonservative bias. Even out blacklist where is someone thats right it does show that there are conservative theyll be blacklisted between Different Companies and different teams. That really need to change i see google executives go to congress and say that its not going to be that it is not political and im just so sure thats not true theyre telling people that oh they dont they dont have any blacklist this is all you know they dont have any political ideology they dont have any political bias but its really clear that they do now the current legal consensus is that tech giants are allowed to moderate the content that appears on their sites or through their apps though they have denied any censorship. Do you discriminate more on philosophy like anti conservative versus pro liberal you know our policies and our rooms dont take a look consideration any affiliation philosophy were viewpoint there is absolutely no directive in any of the changes that we make to have a bias in anything that we do we use a robust methodology to reflect what is being said about any given topic at any particular time and we try to do it objective lee using a set of rubrics certainly if this happened to her this is happened to a lot of people and its high time that the big tech giants were challenge to hunt this theres a confusion i think because americans love free speech and we love private property so we love for example when its a company and we say well that company has a right to do anything it wants to but there comes a point where its almost like a public utility because they have such a monopoly on communication in general especially in terms of social media so some of these giants that really do have control. Theyve changed the game you can only come to one conclusion when it seems to only happen against conservatives in general and and i think that this flies in the face of of our free speech and you know that for most of us in america we could agree that our 1st amendment speech right is critical to everything that is freedom and most of us would wish that some of these tech giants would go along with that. The german captain of a migrant rescue boat operating in the mediterranean has snob a Bravery Award from france she accuses paris apocryphally it given its treatment of migrants and refugees we do not need authorities deciding about who is a hero and who is illegal at the same time your police is stealing blankets from people that you forced to live in the streets while you read protests and criminal ice people that are standing up for rights of migrants and asylum seekers. In 2017 pierre claims boat was seized by italian authorities in the port of lampedusa with rescued migrants on board she was charged with assisting illegal immigration and could face up to 20 years in jail the paris Mayors Office has reacted to her criticisms of the french authorities inviting her to the city to see how migrants are actually treated there. We are waiting for you in paris to show you the different ways we are ensuring a dignified reception for migrants despite the tensions that exist on the subject with the state youll find is ours all the french capital is at odds with the federal government over migrants france is also wrangling over the issue with fellow e. U. Bloc members. Deeper into the story. Parish has consistently lobbied for better or worse and consent is for migrants while the city was actually the 1st to open a temporary Reception Center which some 13000 migrants said to have passed through and its invested 40000 viewers in a restaurant to feed my kids if the paris mess says they would have done more but for the french government i do not understand why the government is allowing indignity and kiryas on the capitals doorstep between 700 and the 1200 migrants are sleeping rough in the streets in makeshift camps under bridges on roadsides where theyre forced to leave inhumane conditions and does she have a point that the french state has repeatedly cleared migrant camps in paris but when one is dismantled sure enough another soon replaces it mccools government has also been criticised for a controversial asylum and immigration bill in a bid to limit new arrivals that law double to 90 days the time in which Illegal Immigrants could be detained it shortened deadlines for asylum applications and made illegal crossing of borders as an offense with a jail time of up to a year but is false really in a position to sort out the problem itself its been trying with germany to find consensus across the entire 8 you for a solution to the crisis on that level brussels is slamming italy and Eastern European countries for shutting their doors tom migrants very people critical male focus is doing i dont know what went into the mind. Of mine because you see of course they dont welcome you. Here and you can see the people sleeping in just. To go with respect to eat today because he did these good. Most of the 900. 00 fans isnt big them in such large numbers so they blame the town and for another opening their bulldozer to the fans dont do that either so this can be deeper critical the thousands of those in the media and maybe because exactly because of the socalled humanitarian probably see which gives them the illusion that they would be. And they wont be i mean they wont all be from migrants in not happy at the way that they treated the activists not happy at the way the government to helping the local governments not being happy with the federal governments and those federal governments not happy with brussels brussels it seems is not happy either its one that huge circle going around and around but its actually not getting anywhere. R. T. Paris thats a global news wrap up for now but ill be back at the top of the hour with the latest thanks for tuning in. So what weve got to do is identify the threats that we have its crazy confrontation let it be an arms race is often spearing dramatic to follow only closely im going to exist i dont see how that strategy will be successful very critical of time to sit down and talk. Give me too much as it would get to them we said. Just that. Theres an awful lot in common im old but im also the most companies you know ive been a kid who says did. Not emotional when i began. This company she most people almost become pianist even though he goes from didnt you know to speak to c. B. C. As pro you know i called. Someone dumbly enough to let me see him in the little. I dont like kind of this. Little kid is he. Think they. Come to you in the studio. You know men because he. Hes challenging donald trump in the g. O. P. Primaries the former 2 term republican governor best and chooses bill weld on this edition of politicking. Politicking on larry king one certainty in the often erratic and unconventional presidency of donald trump is that the base of the reporter who Republican Party loves this man and this policies thus far that base has never wavered in this support forum so why was so many stand up and challenge the president and want to see argument to switch candidates midstream lets find out as that man former 2 term republican governor of massachusetts bill weld joins us from bush. Good to see a bill thinks great are great to be with you as always you know you know when i as dad allays seems oh i like to name drop when i asked them how is stevenson when he was appointed ambassador to the u. N. Can i call you mr ambassador he says no called me governor close or was one the title of government to you i feel i feel the same way they all are family what is it about being governor of and that was closed for citizens like you and mrs stevenson to do the same thing you run your own show and youre very close to the people much closer than you are in washington so if you mess up you hear about it right away up close and personal from people you talk to every day and that really makes it more rewarding because you can sort of get feedback right away you have slim or furthermore go ahead was going to say also you can really have an impact on your state by god. Cut taxes 21. 00 times because i want to get rid of the label tax that juice its which the state used to have and that worked and Business Confidence returned so employment went up and the Unemployment Rate went down and i cut spending because i hate deficit spending and that also helped get confidence from the employers and as we say the government level the best social program anybody ever invented is a job and so thats very rewarding bill you know youre up against. The jews well i know that im up against a president whos very poppy