Materiality mostly a glass tower you can see the tower pattern f when you get to the podium portion it is is circumstantial floor we added a footed galleys bring that to the base there is a bar between the massing of the turn over we breakdown the scale 1209 public realm this is a view of the plaza along howard you get an idea of 35 foot space the retail and art exhibit and plaza art will be located in this area thats what were planning for once we get the art introduced into the plaza that will be exist open space weve shown here weve got open space on the site and parcels m1 and 3 location getting to our access to those two parcels m3 and one that is Los Angeles County complicated because of the train expectation weve developed a temporary park for both of those sites and once a final assess for entry the m1 and 3 and those parts with filled with trees and outdoor spaces and seats generally well work with a nice landscaped design to be a variety of options for the users on both the parcels so with that said were very excited where we are on this project and this is an image here that illustrates it, its potential to stand out in a positive way with the San Francisco weve enjoyed the process with planning and thank you for your time. Opening it up for Public Comment comment. Larry juicy edmond as keeping the spirit we the people we do at city hall when people get married that means two People Living in the building today that is showing that Everyone Needs justice and pride and love and housing with e we have to think that Martin Luther king was killed in memphis tennessee when you go downtown people sleepingal along main street im hoping this new building with the electrician building they used to have the womens faces the first black lady on the fox building with the architecture an architect the lady that built in berkley and i medical or heart but keeping up with whats going on in San Francisco it is time that the people you know we never talk about the planning what happened in johnstown too Moscone Center and others were killed we have the kool aid people 48 pages of people that died from housing rights in San Francisco it is time San Francisco is different from san diego and chicago people get to live upstairs and downtown this is something we need look at how getting people a view from the city bridge the big bow area it is used to be the islander line im hoping in keeping the spirit of bringing banking back the transbay terminal that brings people into a connection there will be housing for all habitat for humanity something that jimmy caterer dont know they think youre talking about some overseas you say habitat for immunity but really we look at the Church Buildings all the shootings it is also about property and what a you have doing in this area remember housing is a fundamental right im hoping that we all are on the manhattan size not like lenal hemmingly we know that San Francisco has become manhattan we know that in new york they keep people within the city limits thank you. Any many i is there any additional Public Comment. Hello, im wendy i think i have an innovative thought in terms of that office power and retail space it is not a requirement at this time but theres no incremental rental in this city and i would challenge the developer to set aside a portion of the retail as well as office for nonprofits or social impacts organizations as well as retail Small Business owners okay just a thought thank you. Is there any additional Public Comment okay. Seeing none Public Comment is closed. Commissioner moore. I only want to ask the City Attorney what the ceqa finding have to be at and restated in the motion is it traditional for all morgsz. Kate stacey from the City Attorneys Office Project is an ocii project because u but because the Planning Commission has a roll in the Decision Making body ceqa really does include requirements for all bodies of youre not the primary Decision Making body to consider the inadvertent effects and adopt the ceqa measures the commission will do it by cross referencing what ocii has done and the commission has reviewed the eir and e i s in prior action about but it is important to be specific about the ceqa finding in the decisions the commission makes as a project approval and commissioner antonini. Thank you. I think this is an excellent project from the project sponsor were ready to go as soon as it is approved and the timing cant be better it adds to the business nature and commercial nature extending to Howard Street with the building implemented on the other hand on second reading and howard and make sense with the Transbay Tower being there we want to concentrate the office space and another thing a remarkable amount is paid for the transbay terminal it needs as much money to make sure it is finished and get the caltrain extension so it becomes everything it can be i will move to approve with as part of my motions i acknowledge the ceqa vrngd that that were read into the record by the City Attorney kate stacey. Second. Commissioner johnson. Thank you very much just making a quick acknowledgment for the developer coming not a lot of cross over from my previous roll in occ and the Planning Commission i really liked the work but i remember putting out the rfp for this project and remember looking at want dismissing when we came in i think this was a good cholesterols and a good project im happy about the privately prayed pubically accepted open space right across the street from the transbay well cross our fingers for more funding this is a great streetscaping so thank you very much. Commissioners there is a motion and a second to approve with continues as amended by the City Attorney both a motion and staff report. Commissioner antonini. Commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu commissioner president fong snauchld unanimously 6 to zero commissioners that places you in your discretionary review calendar on mammals after a discretionary review. Commissioners are you okay motoring through here okay were all slipping. Good afternoon good evening Planning Commission washington the south west team leader the subject property is on mammals avenue it was a 5 feet by 31 that is extending beyond the first floor and adds one thousand 2 hundred and 9 secret it is located in the rh1 Zoning District it is located on the north side just north of silver avenue in the Outer Mission neighborhood south of Golden Gate Park glerp it has a wide construction and the early to 20 century and to the north rare Property Lines had has a total line and the existing residence is 9 hundred and 61 square feet footprint and was constructed in 1914 the primary dr filer is east of the subject property the filers Southern Side aprils that is the north Property Line of the project manager two additional neighbors others malgz avenue dr requesters it not be impacted to the mid blockopen space they feel is it so not compliant with the guidelines they prefer it toward the east rather than the north and focus on just the ground floor addition the project manager feels the response to the request by the Planning Department regarding the design is in compliance they feel any potential impacts of the open space are minimal and dont feel the proposed all of the elements presented by the dr requesters is presentable it cuts off the rear yard of the subject property by the east that possibly notes a variance and negatively impact the neighbors on mandiblesgles this is close to their property Residential Design Team found the overall addition is in character with the neighboring buildings with the scale and massing additional it is a foot in front of the building and no deeper than the grabber to the east the recommendations were made in approving the side of the facade that we are reflected in the revised plans with the attachment as it turns the project did not create new exceptional or extraordinary circumstances the Department Recommendations to take the dr dated june 30th the committee is asked to take discretionary review and approve that project that was continued because of the concerns concerns with the original plans and just clarification for improvements were made on those plans from a standpoint of presentation to the commission that concludes my presentation. Thank you dr requester. Thank you, commissioners all commissioner president fong im steward the cofounder im here to represent our filing it was jointly with the concerns none of us has issues with the Square Footage and happy for the sponsors to build something were here because of the many ways to use their space theyve selected angle option the worse for us were ready to compose but not offered any ill highlight 3 facts first their advised design didnt second the structure will shape the residents to the north and west and third part of the structure will infringe on the block open space regarding the sergeants it is 16 and a half feet in the notice now 15, 10 it doesnt sound big but quakes our shade and privacy we felt 16 and a half was small and given the errors in the plan with the makeshift during the cooperation the side 2nd district is not meant and has a bearing on the construction 311 notice said it is zero feet and wouldnt change the house is 4 foot 8 from the Property Line and the establishes or stairs woentd wouldntfit it will shade the rear yard for almost half the year and the houses themselves this has been down played by hadnt been contradicted by another other evidence our shadow studies agree with they are but shows the sustainability shading throughout the winter we ask they have way uphill and have foliage i want to note that most of our rear yards 3 adjacent properties are nearly at the same level as mangles and only have 50 feet towards our structures the trees lose loaves when the sun is low and this is precisely when were to be shaded finally concerning the mid block open space the dr c stated that mangles is a shallow lot address wouldnt infringe the rear yard mangles need to be the condos lot and an overhang structure in addition to shadowing will cut off the property to the east our line of sight be seen by all of us the dr c study located a garage but didnt note that is a one story shed so we feel the offer hanging part of the structure will diminish the open space such the situations the guidelines suggest the incidentally pinking structure be placed lower to the ground in summary placing a large box allows the project sponsors to checkuply double the size of their yards but this winwin win for them comes by ininflicting harm on adjacent neighbors and changes the look and feels of our property we suggested they build up over the current fooptd and over the rear yard with an just way on the further east not impacting other neighbors and in line with the residential guidelines in the very at least well having ask the city to require the offer hanging part of the structure to be shortened or to decrease none of those all of the elements is good for us we accept the prospect of recurred alternating is part of city living we ask the sponsors to have some designing inconvenience their response our concerns are not liability is why were here before you as expert judges reflected by the guidelines and the Building Code thank you. Okay. Are there speakers in support of dr requester. Youre not quick enough. As you see larry juicy edmond we do believe that with marries rights passed out of destruct just the justice pride and love people need more space they will have more children and the children are not going to be going to prison thanks to president obama letting out thirty thousand people and this is less prisoners and love american style. Sir, im sorry to interrupt you this is about a dr. Im talking about people that want to aid to their i read it sir, i know what im talking about that 3 people are adding to their 1, 2, 3 bedroom addition it means they need more space somebody is coming just like we live in sros we see sf. Org this is the person i was graduating with youre going to find out that People Living in their homes in sro that is if have a lot of space across San Francisco people need more space for their future family so our city seize humanity for housing when you allow people that less like inlaw units like noah valley we allow people to live here california is now second to new mexico as latinos is number one raced white race is second and 3 states new mexico california and hawaii have white populations less than those 3 states so we were saying is people this culture is growing and people are having families we are a christian supposed to be out of edward so italians and irish was brought here and chinese railroads the japanese and the concentration camps we were already here this is amazing that we should always accept building more in this country for housing what i see today it is about less guns and more houses and someone to create to be family and today it is like good things happen in the city today you pet a trigger with someone to be killed us or staff on those 3 so have them in safe hours a lot of countries and cities know that this is not the answer i hope this is a good habitat for america and the Planning Commission because you have the right to do that you know as a city by the bay and we know those europe and planning money to push people out thank you. Are there any other speakers in support of dr requester. So i apologize my voice im here today speaking on above of lauer who was at the last meeting she is in texas im going to read them members of the Planning Commission thank you for taking my comments i recounted when i spoke to you on mangles in 1971 i commend in this corner lots 20 20 i own lot 51 and 52 pr the initial review has lots next to mabels is 50 with the celebrate on mangle i can only hope theyll not be disappointed and they no longer are a view on the other side of the house a entryway with the fractured this is a window looking at out it is a closed offside yard my first thought no architect will design this im sure their priority is to house their family but to xhoosh the exterior is an insult to the neighborhood not to mention the mandatory ability from what i seen and heard about the reconfiguration the garage in order to make it more assessable it is questionable considering it may not be assessable and no entry from the front that makes room for the family with this structure on a single post board a ridiculous it begs for a structure underneath those concern me although leaving the roof so flat is a little bit shocking to me only hope the exterior materials will be modern this is costing ply neighbors knowing though how to i believe the proposed plans to one 80 mangles the framing existing than any regard i repeat my hope the building inspection further refine this development respectfully submitted laura lee brown. Any other speakers in support of dr requester project sponsor. Good evening commissioner president fong and commissioners im josh korean of one 80 mangles and were available for questions along with the Structural Engineer later as we sat through two hearings we recognized were a privileged condition compared to be able to discuss it remodel with the issues we acknowledge our hard work and thank you for that and your patience most we weve seen the inspection of the property in terms of the substance and major discussions we have 3 things that are different than in the doctor the entrance if the east to the west and the design that fits into the neighborhood and the back extension other mitigation factors our goals were to allow us to have our two children in an upgraded house we acknowledge this is a smallish house with a largeish lot is funky a sidewalk thats flat and not like the other situations in the block you see slopes in nord off and well stipulate the dr requester asked the backyard is flat well show pictures later. In terms of the celebrate were compliant with the different needs around the variance and the proposed investment of pittsburgh or pistiling as well as significantly impact one of 2 mangles a long term neighborhood residents in terms of other support we have letters of support from neighbors we realized early on in our Community Hearing that reasonable people can disagree around the value pieces this is particular true with the valued living space with the generated space being a map of 514 connecticut go in terms of our 1998, 92 no objections for future plans we support her and wish her well here fears are speculation and her opinions of our design and the ability of them to upgrade have not but interesting we believe the recommends are up to the Planning Department in terms of where the backward space and open block pattern we have several buildings in the area that is kind of bare it depends on our prospective in the mid block the southern block as well as the eastern side of the block are looking at garages and hours that are visibly impacted at this point in the interest of time ill actually stop and allow people to continue with their discussions calling for p in support of project sponsor. Okay. Not seeing any dr requester you have a 2 minute rebuttal. All right. Im going to