Memo that i just noticed recently, starting on page 28 from the office of Commission Affairs and whats happening with the records. My overall point is who determines what gets scanned. Is everything going to get scanned . For example, when you go look at the file, sometimes there are three cadexs. One is a docket copy. One is a copy without a date. One is a copy with a date. Sometimes theres a copy because it has been amended. Im talking about when people want to go review the files to understand a project. That is something ive done for the last four years. Other people have done it. And the City Attorney may have to do it at some point and certainly the lawyers who often sit in the back of the room who are downtown or wherever, they may have to do it. The h. R. E. S, sometimes they have notes on them. Its very important to read those notes. I learned a lot of things by reading a planners notes whens the project went a certain way. Is that going to get scanned . I guess what is the criteria for scanning. 437 hoffmann, the files were this big. It started in 2008 because it was a unit merger and then it wasnt a unit merger and then it wasnt an alteration and it was a demolition and alteration. You need to see all that stuff to have context. I could go on and on, but i wont. What do you do if there is a file with a different permit . Are those thing there is . Do you know whats there . What about the emails . Are the emails going to be separate . Now you can get an email on a disc. Are the emails put in with a file. Sometimes planners download a certain email. They make little drawings and things. All that stuff is really important. Sometimes those discs dont work. Ive heard that you are going to do the stuff thats off site. Ive tried to get stuff from 2013 that i assumed was off site and it can only be on a disc because it was digitized. But that seems like that should be there. One more point, when the planner is doing the project, when is that gone from the planners desk . I know i sort of jumbled all this up, but i think, you know, maybe it is because im old or older, but i think there is a lot to be said for paper and i think i would be curious to decide what gets scanned. What will make the sdmition theres one person, one f. T. E. There. I think it is an important decision. Thank you. Thank you. And here, this is the page from the memo. First memo. Its not even necessary as its in front of you. That is citywide planning budget and i think we have a habit of investing a lot of money in our citywide plans and then they take 10 years and by the time they pop out the other end, theyre already out of date and dont really apply to what the Current Situation is and then we take another 10years to debate, whether the plan that we took 10 years to come up with is the plan that we want to implement. And then a crisis. That is my analysis. And im wondering if there is any thought in were spend ago lot of money on our citywide planning and what are we getting for that . And are we talking about the kind of bold planning or responsive planning. Planning that could be potentially based on whats happening in realtime. Talking about doing planning thats based on up zoning when the cost per unit goes too high. If we are at density, we can hold 1. 6 million people. At the paris level of density Everybody Loves paris [laughter] at the paris level of density, we could hold 2. 4 million people. Think about that. Paris dont you want to live in paris . We could live in paris if we just invited 2. 4 million neighbours. That would be human beings who would be making our communities denser and more vibrant. You talked about how our current stores are not able to thrive. Retail can no longer survive without a higher level of density. People are buying things online and our local shops cannot survive if there arent more humans to walk by them and buy things. We need higher density to support our local businesses. Coffee shops are popping up in soma because more people are living there. And we can have that same kind of vibrant, smalltown feel throughout the west side where we are seeing a collapse of Small Businesses because we do nots have enough humans to sustain those wonderful, small businesss that we all love. I love a corner store. You need a lot of people now to support a corner store. You need way more than you did before. Because everyone is buying their tooth brushs and whatnot on amazon. You need more humans to walk by and want to buy a cookie in order to have that corner store survive. Thank you. Merci. [inaudible] shhh. Unfortunately so many people take those commuter shuttle buses out of our city every day. Good afternoon. Commission president hillis and fellow commissioners. Im anastasia, a remember of the Neighbourhood Council and im urging the dmoition go back to the way a standard budget Work Programme hearing was run that they expect in 1996. That means the way it was directed until the current director joined the planning staff. It seems only fair that they consider Work Programme efforts that would include all the things that the department wants to do that are up for funding consideration and right now everything the Commission Wants to do, plus everything the public wants to have included. And then take Public Comments before considering the options that will actually become funded. Im sure the commissioners and members of the public have worthwhile ideas of Work Programme efforts they would like to add and im hoping the process can be opened up to ensure fairness and a good outcome for all of us who live and work here. There must be an effort to protect tenant protections with asking sponsors about unit occupancy when filing for a permit. How about adding staff to knock on doors to verify whether or not a unit is actually vai vacant and tenant occupied instead of relying on unsubstantiated documentation. There must be an effort at taking a comprehensive look at how projects affect tenants and rental housing and then make whatever policy and legislative changes that are necessary. There must be an effort to ensure that our production of housing meets below market rate goals as well as meeting our market rate housing goals. And there must be an effort to give new hires permanent rather than temporary status and to train all staff to ensure a wellqualified workforce. Commissioners, without any changes to the Work Programme, the programme will continue to focus on efforts that will only produce highend housing and without regard to an often causing displacement. Thank you. Good afternoon. My name is jerry accurateler. The Planning Department annual report for 201415 included an excellent onepage schedule which provided a fiveyear summary of the number of cases of permits. The schedule was not in thes 201516 annual report. Will it be in the 201617 annual report . It would be appreciated if that schedule were to reappear. A line item on the fiveyear summit is a member of enforcement cases. The number of enforcement cases in 2012 and 13 increased 64 to 791. Todays budget materials show the number of enforcement cases in 201617 doubled to about 1600. The Planning Departments legislative proposal to allow for enforcement fees to be used other than sign enforcement recognizes the need for additional and general enforcement funds. Budgets funding by programme shows that Zoning Administration and compliance receives about 5. 5 of total departmental funding. The Planning Department receives a vast majority of funding in fees for service. The notice of Enforcement Programme does not assess penalties or fees. With the doubling of the number of enforcement cases over the last four years, a morest more rigorous source of funding appears necessary and an Enforcement Programme that does not assess penalties or fees makes no sense. Also it is logical for violators to fund the cost of enforcement. Does the Planning Department have specific and measurable performance goals for the current fiscal budgets and the process of measuring actual performance against those Department Goals in the budget . And will a formal analysis be prepared and presented in a future Planning Commission meeting showing actual versus budgeted performance. Thank you. Thank you. Good afternoon. Jennifer fever with the San Francisco tenants union. So, in the there is a line item in the budget request that says, as always, the department implements tenant protection regulations within the planning code. The Department Guidelines to protect tenants have not been the case. Im thinking about 1049 Market Street which had been illegally converted to 39 residential units. When the owner wanted to convert it back to commercial, the Planning Department issued permits although there was proof at the rent board that there were now residential tenants living there. This would have been the largest lsac in the city if activists hadnt organized. I want to reiterate that we still need a process to disclose whether existing tenants will be affected as part of a permit planning the permit application process. Planners could require existing estopple forms from new building owners or affidavits which disclose tenancies and refuse to accept application unless this information is provided. We also need inspectors to do site visits and check for tenants when things seem suspicious. The office of Short Term Rentals already does this. I dont understand why the rest of the department cant also follow this. I would like to request that the department has a Work Programme that studies the various types of permits issued and how theyre affecting tenants. The staff can go to the rent board. They can figure out how long theyre being temporarily relocated and whether they get to return. We need more training on the rent ordinance. I admit its really complicated. But our operating budget is 220,000 and we all know it. So, that i can certainly learn this information and use nit their decisions. I know that there are many good planners who care about displacement antenanls themselves. But new planning hires also are atwill and so they cant really express our question Department Policies without losing their jobs so i believe that new hires deserve some job security and should be fully trained on the rent ordinance. We cannot continue thinking of our Housing Stock as empty squares on foreplans. We need think about them as people zones. Thanks. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon, commissioners. The neighbourhood hill association. We learned that the Planning Department was working to revise the Historic Preservation guidelines. Liberty hill recently discovered that little progress has been made on the local interpretation revisions to the secretary of the interior standards because no budget had been provided for this work. The current budget provides 100,000 for ceqa review, Historic Preservation review and 125,000 for a Citywide Historic survey. A total of only 225,000. That is not much for a city with so many Old Buildings in need of so Much Research to clarify their importance and designations are historic timeline. Meanwhile, projects are in the pipeline that need clarification. Especially the potentially contributing class b buildings. Without good research, most are at risk of being lost to demolition or alterations that affect evidently erase their original design. Heres an example. Overhead, please. Here is an example of the 1877 black hawk stables turned Auto Repair Shop in 1922 with class b status. Without the necessary research, the proposed project, which is this, the proposed project would completely destroy this historic structure and its contribution to a historic neighbourhood and there is another proposal that goes up two floors. Any revisions to the Historic Preservation guidelines need strengthen preservation and that cant happen without a much larger allocation, especially for the historic surveys. As new guidelines are threatening to intrude on the 13 historic districts, Adequate Funding for historic guidelines is imperative. And that needs to start being reflected in the budget. Next. First of all, i would like to thank ms. Clark for giving us a moment of levity and also a comment. I dont believe that paris is affordable with all those homes. Id like to specifically request for two line items to be added to the bucket that is called project. And under the tenants issued, the department has put down a series of statements regarding the values. And heres overhead, please. Te nanls focused issues. So i would like to bring it to your attention that in the past four or five months and the cases before you, you did side with the tenants and what was impacting their departments. And those were addition of a floor. It required the owner, the landlord to empty the building. We do need some sort of a work project. To study various permits. How far could somebody claim that retrofiting requires emptying the building . What kind of permit would require the residents to leave the building . The impact of the a. D. U. S. So i really would like the request that you specifically add that to the 2018 budget. You will have the case of 505 grandview before you in a couple of weeks. March 1. If there were such khex and balances in the form of a documented processes and procedures of the department. This case did not have to come to you. Secondly, i would like to bring up another thing that we desperately need. This is a followup on what she was bringing to your attention and that is the Historic Preservation guidelines. In the past year, weve been working with the staff on various issues with the u. D. G. S, the urban Design Guidelines. In the process, we realised that there are no historic Design Guidelines, or at least they told us when we said why dont you except historic distribution, there are only 13 districts, 1. 5 of the whole city. They told us that there is no such thing as historic Design Guidelines and we need to have the u. D. G. , although the u. D. G. Has no bent on historic districts. So, instead of having residential Design Guidelines as an item for your revision, why dont you create a set of guidelines for a much needed preservation of our historic districts. We dont need residential Design Guidelines to be revised. They work fine, just fine. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon, commissioners. My name is Kathy Lipscomb and im a member of the nole Valley Council and a active tenant many years. Please find room in your budget for the following important matters state them specifically in this 201819 budget to make sure that they get funded. Developers are constantly finding new ways to evict te thans in San Francisco. It would be a principled decision for the Planning Department to ask for Work Programme to do the impact analyses on the various types of permits that could threaten tenants living spaces. Immediately urgent are the retrofit permits and how they are being misused to evict tenants depending on the scope of the engineering. It is well known that 90 of retrofits should not require tenants to leaves their homes. Another red flag are the a. D. U. Permits that could be used as a twoedge sword when there is an unscrupulous sfwoention evict old tenants while creating new units for richer tenants. These permits are sometimes designed to disturb the living space of existing tenants as you heard and also to infringe on their existing rights such as laundry and parking space. Lastly, we learned that many Planning Department new employees have a threeyear appointment in our Civil Service exam. Meaning they can be fired within that period as a probationary employee. Too often at the experiod of experiod of expire ration of three years, they are given another three year. This leads to low morale, fear of speaking out and application they may find problematic in terms of negative impact on a neighbourhood or tenants. It would be a very healthy move on your part to push for more permanent Civil Service planners. Thank you very much. Thank you. Next speaker, please, ms. Hester. Sue hester. I would like to record these speeches about Civil Service for the employees. Going from paper records to nonpaper records is a big thing. Ive gone through a lot of the paper records in my time and people dont go through them anymore because theyre passe. But the old records have really Important Information for current projects as well. The whole thing about scanning documents into the p. I. M. Is crucial. Because the p. I. M. Is only as good as the information is put in and sometimes the p. I. M. Doesnt work at all. Doesnt have adequate information. And the staff doesnt know it. I found out a lot of people go, just go on to the p. I. M. And they feel threatened business asking for access to paper records. Some people dont understand at the planning domestic, theyre putting things on discs and giving them to people that are unreadable. There needs to be some inhouse training about giving documents to the public and making them readable. But the most important thing in my mind is having an adequate housing person in the Planning Department who doesnt do any cases because they will set up a conflict themselves. There needs to be training about how to read plans to understand when a 311 notice is basically removal of 10 units of tenants. And other people have found them and filed d. R. S on them. Its really a waste of everyones energy and time. Most cases will be sprawled out for months coming to the Planning Commission for d. R. Hearing you get upset. We got this upset. And the planner didnt even figure out that there would be tenants dispersed. I know you are going to be shocked that some people who apply for permits are not honest. And the Planning Department treats them as, oh, theyre honest. They should be using their eyes to say how how is this not affecting existing tenants . Until they do that, until theyre trained to do that, you will have an abundance of d. R. S that deal with displaced tenants. That is a waste of time. Lastly, 75 howard was in the Business Times two days ago. The units there are on the waterfront. 4,000 a square foot. The most expensive housing in the city. And the Business Times is calling this a good thing. I dont think it is a good thing. Thank you, ms. Hester. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon. Tree sa flander, senior and disabilities action. Im actually here to talk about preserving housing rather than building. In terms of i wish there could be better communication between d. B. I. And planning so that someone is going out and actually inspecting sites to know what is there and what might be lost. At a minimum also to have a basic understanding of what rent control is, how that functions and what impact that has actually on our housing. In terms of the housing loss and housing balance report, when we are building two units and losing one for each two, that is also very concerning when you see that the merging of twobedroom flats, two twobedroom flats are allowed as long as an a. D. U. Is built and that could be an inlaw. [please stand by] [please stand by] that has meant the merging of two units where in the threeunit building they are now essentially just two units. With a stairway that you go through someones living room. It is also very discouraging to see units that had been allowed to merge are now doing shortterm rentals in the inlaw and the entire house. I just wish that all of our departments could work more closely together to ensure that were not losing almost the same amount that were building. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please . Tony robles, senior disappoint action. I want to echo what preceding folks have said. For too long, landlords have been finding loopholes and circumventing things and using the system to extricate tenants from their homes. Again, like people have said, if departments worked better in more cohesively and had a better understanding of some of the issues with rent control, might alleviate some of the problems. Again, overall loss of housing is a serious issue and its a highly critical issue as it pertains to the people that we serve at the senior and disability action, our organization, s. T. A. Thank you. Thank you, mr. Robles. Any additional Public Comments . Seeing none, well close Public Comment. Vice president richards please dont fire me. Theres a lot of requests and its overwhelming the amount of things that we need to do, so bear with us. We get a lot of the stuff that you are saying. I think the first question i have for mr. Cider. We have the process improvement person put into the mix a few months ago and working on the mayors former mayor lees directive. What do you anticipate in terms of gains that we can make through that type of a position i know its only a few months, but maybe we can talk in concepts. In testimonies of being able to Fund Additional things through additional efficiency and shorten backlogs, things like that. Commissioner richards, thanks for the question. As you suggested, we have jacob bentlis opening board this year. Hes a process improvement specialist. His work is focusing on the mayors directive to streamline and deliver housing projects faster. I think that has implicit benefits and savings. Vice president richards i think we asked for a Quarterly Report or something on, hey, this is what it used to be and now this is what it is. I think it will be more efficient. I dont know if its next year or five years or whatever. But i think its one thing that we could look at in the future for we always called it funding through process improvements, so wanted to bring it up and let the public know that we do have that person on staff and we should be expecting some of those things. One commenter indicated something in the annual report we had specific number of permits and 13 14 and not going to be in 16 17. Can you comment on that . Im not familiar with that graph. I will follow up. Vice president richards another issue that came up is violations in the fact that fines dont fund enforcement. We have a deterrent issue and we have the need for enforcement. So for sign enforcement to general enforcement is a good way to go. What is your thought on the ability on fines to fund enforcement . Theres a quirk in the planning code that weve tried to correct, which requires all enforcement fines to only go to sign enforcement, which we dont need it for that. Its a quirky thing in the planning code that has some history i dont fully understand, so were trying to remove that word. Theres no reason why logistically that didnt happen. Would have to go through the legislative process. Thats one of the two pieces of information that deborah mentioned that were trying to change this year. Vice president richards great. The other one, people got up and Historic Preservation has become an issue and the potential demolitions through statemandated things, etc. And i know were not the hpc, but we do have the survey blush in there and we have survey staff in the budget. How much of the city, round number, percentwise, is surveyed . I wish mr. Frye were here to answer that question. We survey the plan areas, and then there are specific neighbors that have been surveyed. My guess is, 1 3 of the city. And were in the process of doing a survey for everywhere else. Vice president richards the budget had like 150,000 for survey. Is that one person . We have a fulltime person on survey already and that money was for consultants. Vice president richards at that level and im not questioning the amount of work they do, but at that level, the rate of survey, how much more could get done . I dont have those numbers with me. Im sorry. We can get you that. Vice president richards we heard todd david get up and talk about soma and adding litigation and timeline and weve had this conversation. What would it take to have somebody look and say, it would take x number more years in terms of e. I. R. Work to add 25,000 more units. Is there something we could get to sink our teeth in on that . The short answer is there is 1,000 units of a cushion. To get a meaningful number beyond that would mean reopening the e. I. R. And going through a draft again and taking Public Comment and going through a final again. So my guess is at least a couple of years. Vice president richards a couple of years, okay, wow. Weve been talking and i guess the suggestion that i will make and we heard from the public about displacement through renovation and a. D. U. S and some bad actors in the community are using. Would love to get your thought on focusing on that. Im impressed with the level of interest with our budget this year. I dont think ive seen this before. [laughter] the short answer is, the community is right. We try to do it on a projectbyproject basis and the planner is trying to figure that out. We do site visits and try to look at whether units are truly vacant or not when the claims are made. Theres interest, it sounds like, in having a position that is more just focused on that issue generically. Vice president richards right. And not necessarily working on projects, but delving into those issues. It would either require requesting that the mayor add a position through general fund or reassigning some positions within this current program. The mayors directive to us in december to all departments that we add no new positions. Were proposing one for a. D. U. Because were getting such an influx that that position can pay for itself through new fees. To do it in the confines, within this budget, would mean reassigning staff thats doing something else. Or it would mean going to the mayor and asking for additional gem fund. Vice president richards i will wait to hear what other commission comments are, but i appreciate that. Lastly, we heard and i have no idea what this is all about. Tree threeyear probation period . Yes. There is misunderstanding about that. Some of our staff are temporary exempt positions for up to three years the vast majority i think 12 people in the department are that status. And its not most new staff. When weve done this in the past, those staff have been converted to permanent positions within the three years. So its not been frankly, that big of an issue in the department. Vice president richards i really want to say that i appreciate and applaud that you have taken feedback from the commission, the public and we may augment it with a person and im delighted that were looking at doing the preservation element or Cultural Heritage element. To that point, on page 20, if we can remove the preservation element its a typo, where it will not be deferred. It will be looked at, i believe, in this budget. It calls out the preservation element as deferred project. Restorative city assessment, what is that . Could you refer me to Vice President richards page 20. It looks like it was a prior version. Looks like well put money in for the environmental on that, which im happy with. Restorative city assessment. Can you can Somebody Just im curious what that is. Of the original memo . Vice president richards january 18 memo. Third line from the bottom. Vice president richards its the first ive heard of oh, okay. I might get the technicalities of this wrong. What were trying to do is, there is Software Available now that will allow us to do a better job in datagathering. And this this is under the section the recessing . Vice president richards restoring and scaling back. I may have a different version of that memo. Vice president richards paragraph before that. Im sorry. I apologize. I think thats related to work with the port on the waterfront, but i will get it to you. Vice president richards one last thing. There were members of the public that talked about records and data. Is there a standard Data Retention . Yes. As the memo notes, were in the process of scanning all of our files and were scanning every piece of paper and every file. It would have been virtually impossible for us to go through every file and weed out the data so weve erred on the side of scanning everything. Vice president richards thank you. Commissioner melger thank you. And to ms. Landis, thank you. I looked at the budget and the work plan. I think that the buckets are in the general place they should be. You have taken direction from the commission. Im not someone who believes in micro managing you from up here in terms of what f. T. E. Belongs where because i i dont think its appropriate. Ive been in your shoes as a manager in the city and i just i think you know best how to allocate your resources with staffing. Thats your biggest, you know, cost. That said, there are priorities that we have seen and youve sitting here, youve seen us struggle with. And tenant protections are a big one. With all due respect, i dont think it should be one position. My expectation is that every single planner will be trained on the rent board ordinance and will look out for those things. And i think its related to what were talking about in terms of, you know, our desire that planners are invested in, that theres capacitybuilding. That there is professional development. We have a healthy line item for that in the budget. And we need to use it. And so i think its important for planners to understand the dynamics of the social dynamics of the city, that they read the paper, that they read the blogs, that they look at emission, local, and understand the nuances of the political and the physical in building our city. Whenever weve run into issues in using the work of planners to make our decisions, what i can remember in the year and three months ive been here is when nuances have been missed or pieces of information dont get to, you know, the planning memo that us here living in the city and going we put 2 and 2 together. Thats our role. Were the public face. But i would say that i, you know, feel uncomfortable telling you, put another position here and another position there. But i would ask that you prioritize the training and professional development of all staff to deal with the issues that we have encountered the most, that is, tenant rights, demolition, d. B. I. Interaction, all of those things that were struggling with. With that being said, you are doing a great job. I like the work plan. And i think that we will continue to talk about a lot of issues that youve already identified. Thank you. President hillis following up on that discussion of knowledge of rent control rules and protection. We face this at times here where weve had questions and theres somewhat uncertainty and someone from the rent ordinance is complicated and i think often weve asked the folks at the rent board for answers and sometimes cant get straight, clear guidance on this. I agree, whether its a position or funding for training, i think we just want to make sure you have the capacity or the resources and the benefit of whatever knowledge we can get from the rent board and others to understand these issues. Its been a little bit of a gap sometimes on some of these or we punt to the rent board and theyre not the clearest in giving us guidance. So, you know, i will put that back to you. In this discussion were having, does this budget give us enough leeway in knowing its a priority of the commission and kind of a big topic to get that knowledge to staff and people that need it . I think i think the points are very well taken. I do think we could beefing up the training is possible within this budget certainly. We have a pretty Robust Training Program and a fulltime trainer in the department and we can shift some resources. As you also probably know, carly grobe is the specialist dealing with all staff and shes getting more up to speed. That does not suggest, however, that we could use some additional help from someone who is like carly who is not doing projects. The problem with staff doing the projects is theyre caught up with other aspects of the projects and it could be helpful. If its okay with you. If you would like to take an action that directs us to beef up resources on that topic and give me a little bit of flexibility to either reassign some existing staff or seek an additional position, that would be, at this point in the process, the budget is due to the mayor in less than two weeks, thats the way i recommend you go. President hillis okay. Thats helpful. On the discussion of a. D. U. S, because i know weve had a couple of case wheres a. D. U. S and someone was going to add one that wasnt a good landlord and was taking comments away. Ultimately, i think, theres some level of comment and space in parking that would need to be used. But besides those cases that ive seen, ive seen a lot of good, you know, results of a. D. U. S where just in my neighborhood, i know there are two projects within blocks of me that are keeping the tenants and converting excess space into nice, livable units. I would like your opinion if you have seen widespread abuse of the a. D. U. Weve seen an abuse or two of it and want to make sure that we get aught at that. Most of the cases are going quite smoothly. Unfortunately, what you see here are the problem childs, right . So thats one of the issues that come up. Were getting 10 to 12 a. D. U. Applications a week in the department. And its staff thinks it will probably level out at 500 a year total. So its a pretty substantial number. Most of the cases are quite legitimate and theyre not evicting tenants. The challenging fact is often on the building side and the Fire Department side and making sure its livable spaces. President hillis i dont know what building does to inform tenants. It could lead to permanent displacement. Ive seen them done where nobody is displaced for any amount of time, which would be the preference. If theres a way to beef up noticing of tenants and their rights when an a. D. U. Is added, that may be a way it go about this also. In the past year, weve seen a lot of legislative initiatives, both in the department or a. D. U. Or others initiated like the flat policy, r. E. T. , that i think it still is good to have and theres elements like an r. E. T. , we would want to bring back 317 changes. Do you have the capacity in the budget . Are you doing that ad hoc that staff that exists . Are you confident we can still address demolition rules . So weve formed a Housing Policy Team of four people, watch is the most weve ever had in miss topic and they work with carly on the current planning side. And so that team is working on all of those issues and housing policy issues and new forms of legislation. So im pretty confident that we have the right number in terms of staff. President hillis okay. And i think we should revisit. I know weve given up on the iteration, but i think theres with a lot of good to get at building to the maximum density, instead of large, monster homes in places. So i know well have more discussion about this, but i think it would be good to pick that back up. We havent seen a lot of projects and were hearing from the Development Community and others, maybe its not the incentives are not aligned right to make it work, so making sure what we have past works and its got to be tweaked to tweak it. Its good to know you have the capacity to do those things. Commissioner moore . Commissioner moore to follow up with your comment, director williams. I would strongly weigh towards adding additionally one person with a more technical inclination for the a. D. U. Seismic retrofitted. And i believe that many a. D. U. S are coming forward in a manner that raises serious questions. Im thinking about grandview. Im thinking about 1444 clay. Im thinking about a project on leavenworth and a few others and ive seen projects that immediately raise red flags for me that i would strongly support, just like commissioner richards did, adding one more technically inclined person. Many things come forward and do not have the scrutiny by which a. D. U. S are possible but they need to be more challenged. So im in full support. You are acknowledging the training, ongoing education is part of what we need to do in order to meet the everarising level of challenges that includes Commission Training and legislative and technical issues. I think we would all benefit from that to counter balance what the department is doing in a constructive way. Overall, im comfortable with where the budget is and i do listen very carefully what the liberty hill people were saying about their concerns regarding Historic Preservation guidelines. A. D. U. S and how permits are processed. It rings true to me that while were doing budget and performance goals that one does reflect on actual performance of the Previous Year and does that, again, as were creating the next layer. I think its hard to speak about how you perform when in certain areas you have not reached what you were trying to do and there are circumstances that is understandable. We all succeed. We all fail. I think it would have a layer of transparency, including appreciation from the public and ourselves and would encourage move forward to add that particular page in looking into the Rearview Mirror as well as making it Standard Practice in the future. Very good. Thank you. Commissioner moore thank you for the clear presentation and hope that as you move forward some of the things that all ring true to me and find room for little, subtle tuning on some of the specifics. President hillis commissioner richards . Vice president richards before i make a motion, one thing i thought of. When we have our meeting with the building inspection commission, i applied for an address change. And the address change application, it is, is this rentcontrolled . I dont know what they do with that information. Sometimes displacement occurs because of a project that needs an entitlement. I think there is something that we can leverage with each other. To that effect, i move to approve the budget with giving the director the latitude he needs to focus on the issues outlined here around displacement and through renevictions. Second. President hillis would it help you to specify a dollar amount . I think it would be the equivalent of one f. T. E. Is what you are talking about, so probably a planner 3, which is in that range, 180,000 fully loaded. President hillis i think were leaving it to your discretion or combination of training or i think the issue doesnt just come up with a. D. U. S, but also demo of singlefamily homes, and the unit in the back thats illegal, condo conversions. Weve seen it come up in a host of areas that we face this. Fair enough. Vice president richards and working with building on what they do. Very good. We have received a motion and a second, with a note about giving latitude to the director regarding the issues discussed by the commission. President hillis aye. Commissioner koppel aye. Commissioner moore aye. Commissioner melger aye. President hillis aye. Motion passes. Thank you, commissioners. That brings us to item 12. So there are several items under this calendar and well call them collectively. 2015012994 for 200214 van ness avenue. There will be a general plan amend and the and planning code and zoning map. Downtown project authorization and conditional use authorization. Good afternoon, commissioners. Claudia asbagh. The item before you is a mixeduse building sponsored by the San Francisco conservatory of music. 420 Student Housing beds, 30 dwelling units as well as educational and performance space, broadcasting studio space and ground floor restaurant and retail space. Three are invented for conservatory factory and other 27 replacement units and subject to a Development Agreement. The project was last heard january 11 as an informational item and general plan amendment initiation. You will hear further information on the Development Agreement, susan brown, who will provide an overview, and mark cavenero that will speak to the buildings design. The items before you today include plan amendment, planning code, Development Agreement, downtown project authorization, with respect for exceptions, and conditional use authorization. On january 11, the Commission Adopted 200089 to initiate the general plan amendment. It would revise map 5 of the downtown area plan to increase the height proposed that revises the height limit of a site from 96 to 120 feet. The amendment would allow exception for ground floor requirements, open space and Group Housing exposure through the 309 process and create a height limit exemption for an additional building envelope for screening and increased roof height for performance and common space. The project has requested exceptions from planning code requirements for rear yard, Group Housing exposure, ground floor design requirements, groundlevel wind currents and offstreet freight loading. We support the exceptions as deviations are minor in nature and would enable site responses. The ground floor design requirements, Group Housing and open space are addressed in the afore mentioned amendment. The project seeks conditional use to demolish and replace the 27 existing units. In order for the project to move forward, the commission will need to adopt the general plan amendment, approve the planning code map and text amendment. Approve the Development Agreement to be forwarded to the board of supervisors with the recommendation of adoption. Approve the downtown project authorization. And approve the conditional use authorization. I am available for questions. Good afternoon, president hillis, and members of the commission. Thank you for your time and consideration. It will provide all benefits, fees and requirements in the code. In addition to the key provision of this development, which is the one for one replacement of the 27 existing rentcontrolled units that occupy the site. The 27 new replacement units will be modern apartments, six studio and 21 onebedroom residences with a separate, secure entrance and elevator. Existing tenants can return to the units at current rents. And this will be recorded in a notice of restrictions that will be exhibit g in the document the project sponsor has worked closely with the tenants and city to develop the relocation plan and replacement housing. The plan that appears as exhibit c establishes the following terms for temporary and permanent relocation of existing tenants. Prior to and a