Out there, we will actually issue an inspection notice. The project would have to go back to planning, and that changes the democounts, and thats a process that we have in place for those types of projects. Were trying to get away from people saying oh, it was rotten. We just took it down and ask for forgiveness. Were actually calling people ahead of time and making sure they dont get into that situation. This sounds like they may, based on some of the comments that ive heard tonight with framing and touch with soil and contact with wood, thats never a good thing. So with that, id say its a good enough permit, as long as they go down the line and follow the process. Commissioner honda so joe, is there no excavation here . I dont know, to be honest. I didnt see the drawings, and commissioner honda and im satisfied that because theyve gone through the process here that the Building Department will follow through because we realize how important it is, especially when youre doing retaining walls, excavation, how important it is to make sure yeah. Its a vertical addition, so theres definitely structural work to be done, whether theyre being made to do a new foundation, i dont know that just yet. I can review the plans and get you a rebuttal on that. Commissioner honda you get a second swing on that, and you have 9 42. Clerk thank you. Is there any Public Comment on this item . Commissioner honda come on up. Good evening and welcome. Thank you. Im glad youre all able to retain your sense of human. My name is amy kyle. I filed a card. I live in between mr. Greeman in between the two houses he constructed, so i know a lot about impacts, not construction. And im going to speak to the flood issue because part of my back yard is the exposed bedrock, and part of my hill is really steep hill. Theres a cluster of houses at the corner, and the hill. And its so steep. Its so steep, they dont mow it. They just send the goats up. You just see the water moving on it all the time, so i have flooding issues. Before they fixed it, the reservoir leaked, and wed see a lot of water. But it kind of comes to the corner. Its a chute sort of down toward our corner, so the hill goes in both directions. The street that goes up past my house goes up the hill, and then gladys goes up this hill, and the water will kind of concentrate that way. So im concerned about that, and im concerned about this project because we keep seeing drawings that maybe arent quite showing everything, you know . This has sort of been happened before, and we raised this issue earlier, and oh, no, thats not a thing. I think it is a thing, and you only have to look at the project to be worried about the condition of that foundation. So, you know, the prior hearing doesnt really make me feel too much better about how everything will be taken care of by the system. Will it . I dont know. I think theres a lot of peril with this project because everythings a zero lot line. This thing is already occupying fully whats supposed to be the set back, and were just hoping thisll get figured out later. You know, im pretty doubtful that thats going to happen, so i hope you take the closest possible look here, you know, and give us some assurance that this isnt going to cause our houses ultimately to fall down if water leaks through or, you know, all these walls that are really not i mean, you can look at it and see it. Theyre not well constructed now or maybe not all going to be replaced or whatever. So im not an engineer, im not an expert, but i am concerned about the way this has all come forward and what the impacts are going to be and whether were going to be back here in five years saying this is a colossal mess that no one can fix. Commissioner honda thank you. Clerk thank you. Is there any other Public Comment . Yes, i have one. Commissioner honda come on up. The price is right. Ill be short and sweet. Commissioner honda its okay. I live next to david, one door up. My issue is about the reservoir because i have problems in my garage with the reservoir. I have a river running through, and im very concerned about my property. I just wish if hes going to build, that they really look into that because im just two doors up. And my second concern is the way he wants to build, i have a living room window. Hell look right in on me, so im concerned with privacy. Im 75 years old, and i live my myself, so think did suggest things for him to make the building a little different, that everyone would be happy, and he refused to do that. And so, you know, those are my concerns as a resident on gladys street. Thats it. Commissioner honda thank you very much. Clerk maam . Maam . Will you please fill out a speaker card . Thank you. Commissioner honda were requesting your auto graph. Clerk is there any other Public Comment on this matter . We just need your name so it reflects accurately in our minutes. Is there any other Public Comment . Okay. Well move on to rebuttal, and well hear from mr. Greeman first. Well, i can see where everyones coming. They keep telling me theyre going to catch it, 16, 16 d. B. I. Theyre going to catch it if the diagrams were accurate, but theyre not. If someone had said can we have this on the screen, please. If that was listed as being a demo, that wouldnt have gone through 1660. Thats a demo, too because its up against soil. Had they accurately depicted, and they should have known an architect whos been working in this city for two decades would know that wood up against soil isnt going to fly. I dont want to use the word lie i guess i just did, but i think its really deceptive to send a plan in with wood up against soil on concrete thats been observed to be repaired and capped in a 1941 building, to add a full load on a floor with a wraparound deck with a life human load and claim to 1660 thats going to remain. My biggest fear is they go in there, they discover the conditions, and its red tagged during the construction. I live two buildings up from the applicant. I was broken into five times. Insurance is more when youre in construction. Im terrified that youre going to go discover sure enough that it is in fact a demo, because it is. There is no way to support those floors while cutting away 5 feet of floor to put up that wall. When you do put up the wall, i really, really hope you do what your engineer said. A 12inch drain, a stem wall thats ten, 12, 18 feet has to be 12 inches thick with rebar. Must contain a footer thats 18 inches thick. The rebar must extend 12 inches out to connect with the rebar on your rat pad. Its not true theyre only doing certain facade differences. Thats a demo, too, on their diagram, so all this is wrecked. This is a demo, period. Thank you. Clerk thank you. Commissioner honda thank you. Clerk we will now hear from the attorney for mr. Donofrio. Good evening, commissioners. Thank you very much for your patience on what im sure has been a long evening for you. We have an incorrect scope of demolition depicted and an incorrect story count, even an incorrect cost of what this story is going to cost. Most significantly, the concern is that the removal of the eastern wall, which as weve heard from mr. Duffy if its wood against soil could create problems. The removal of that wall raises significant demolition and float stability issues. And yes, these are issues that we have raised in other forums because of the concern about this uphill reservoir, the impact on neighboring properties. And what we were told by planning at the board of supervisors was that, due to the onsite slope, the project is subject to heightened review by d. B. I. s structural advisory committee. Yet now we are hearing from mr. Sanchez that planning didnt guarantee us that were going to go to structural advisory committee. Secondly, a geotechnical report would be required before a Building Permit was issued, yet we havent seen any further geotechnical reports, so these are some real concerns about what has been analyzed for this project, and thats why were asking for the permit to be revoked. However, if the board is not minded to revoke the permit, were ask that it be referred to d. B. I. Structural advisory committee, and if they make a determination regarding the story count, the slope stability issue or the scope of demolition, it should then be referred back to planning. Thank you very much for your time. Commissioner honda thank you. Clerk thank you. We will now hear from the permit holder. You have six minutes. I guess the only thing i want to respond to is the quote from the planner was, i think, an environmental planner who was speaking about his thought about what potentially might be required at d. B. I. Its not a d. B. I. Representative, and it doesnt conflict with what were saying here today, which is that d. B. I. Will require everything to make sure it complies with safety requirements. I think that everything, Building Permits, site permits is used interchangeably, but theyre Different Things if youre filing a full Building Permit versus a site permit with a future agenda. So ill stop there, and the team is here to answer any questions. Commissioner honda thank you. Clerk thank you. Well now hear from the planning department. Commissioner honda come on, move it along. This is the last case. Get it going, skippy. Dont rush me. Scott sanchez, planning department. Whats shown on the plans is not a demolition. The appellant had highlighted something on the plans that he had stated was a demolition. There were separate hashed lines that depict parking space, but thats not shown being demolished on the plans. Anything thats below grade does not count towards section 317 calculations, so even if all those retaining walls need to be replaced, that doesnt count toward 317. I think this board has heard these issues before, and people will come up and claim its a demolition. Commissioner honda first time. If anybody wants to be out in front of that, its the sponsor usually after the department has reviewed conditions generally not very favorably in several cases going back to what was there before or often wanting to go back to what was there when the building was first built. So it was quite a serious matter. And maybe the project sponsor wants to address some of their thoughts and methodology in greater detail, but you know whats shown on the plans as shown to not be a demolition because mr. Buskovic notes, we have a process for this. And we do have a process for this. If there are changes to be made, theres a process for that. If work is done without a permit out in the field, i think that this project will be very well monitored by the neighbors and if there is demolition or if even this is a demolition beyond what was approved, therell probably be complaints about it, and therell be inspections, investigations. Im sure therell be a close eye on it, and if issues are found that it is a demolition, itll go back to the Planning Commission and require a conditional use authorization, and thatll be the process. Commissioner honda thank you. Commissioner tanner one question around the hydrology issues and drainage issues, i imagine there are requirements that properties deal with drain age issues that properties deal with drain age issues that are not on their property . Thats a d. B. I. Issue. Clerk okay. We will now hear from d. B. I. Joe duffy, d. B. I. Asking d. B. I. To do a s. A. C. Review, if it falls under that type of project, our process would catch that, which is good. I cant tell you people what to do, but a s. A. C. Review commissioner honda attorneys do it all the time. Well, when its not required, its a little unfair on a permit holder. I would imagine its just trying to put a team together. If it does fall under any category, whether its s. A. C. , when its slope stablity, when you put an address in our section, you click on restrictions, itll show you restrictions and slope stablity, and no doubt what mr. Sanchez said, theres a lot of eyes on this project. I doubt it will be missed. You had a question. Commissioner tanner public drain age, during public testimony time, some folks are concerned with drain age in the area which would be seem to be the permit holders issue other than the fact that they might suffer from it, as well. Can you speak to how we address drain age from one property to the other or what would be required . Yes. Its a very good question. Basically, everyones responsible for their own drainage. As mr. Sanchez said, you cant drain on somebodys property. Unfortunately, its going to drain downhill. There are occasions in this project, for example, if theres drainage, theyre going to have to take care of it, the retaining wall, anything like that, theyre going to have to take care of it. Water cant run from their property on to somebodys property. There may be something just because of the area, and for the lady that got up and said shes got water coming through her garage, shes got a water cable table or something, i would imagine. Theres ways she can address that. It may be coming from a neighbor, and she can file a complaint if she thinks there is. If she has clear indication that water it coming over a Property Line from somebody elses property. Commissioner tanner sounds like it may be coming from p. U. C. Property to other peoples property, so that may be the issue. Clerk thank you. Commissioners, this matters submitted. Commissioner tanner i have not heard any testimony that would lead me to believe this permit was not properly issued. I would move to deny the appeal. Commissioner honda just because i was smiling and making jokes does not mean that im not taking this as a serious matter. This particular project has undergone quite a bit of process and just by the amount of dollars per hour in this room, i think there is going to be a significant amount of eyes watching this project alongside with the departments which whether we like or dont like, we have to have faith in our city departments and their abilities to make things happen, and so i would concur with my fellow commissioner. Vice president lazarus as would i, im content to let the normal processes take their place because i havent heard anywhere here tonight that would encourage me to revoke the site permit. Commissioner tanner and just to the woman, you gave testimony just wondering how things would be caught in light of the previous cases, 20year ongoing permit. I think thats very much on the outside and the outlier of our permit system. What will happen, it will be graded and more studies, as mr. Duffy said, related to the project. When we say well catch things, its not that we hope it, it goes through a much more scrutinous review. Thats why we have faith in it and most of the time, it does work. Clerk okay. So we have a motion from commissioner tanner to deny the appeal and uphold the permit on the basis that it was properly issued. On that motion [roll call] clerk okay. So that motion carries, 30, and this adjourns the meeting. [gavel]. Clerk thank you. It did take a village. I was really lucky when i was 14 years old to get an internship. The difference that it made for me is i had a job, but there were other people who didnt have a job, who, unfortunately, needed money. And they were shown to commit illegal acts to get money. That is what i want to prevent. [ ] today we are here to officially kick off the first class of opportunities for all. [applause]. Opportunities for all is a program that mayor breed launched in october of 2018. It really was a vision of mayor breed to get to all of the young people in San Francisco, but with an intention to focus on young people that have typically not being able to access opportunities such as internships or workbased learning opportunities. Money should never be a barrier to your ability to succeed in life and that is what this program is about. Theres always these conversations about young people not being prepared and not having experience for work and if they dont get an opportunity to work, then they cannot gain the experience that they need. This is really about investing in the future talent pool and getting them the experience that they need. It is good for everyone because down the road we will need future mechanics, future pilots, future bankers, future whatever they may be in any industry. This is the pipe on we need to work with. We need to start developing talent, getting people excited about careers, opening up those pathways and frankly giving opportunities out there that would normally not be presented. [ ] the way that it is organized is there are different points of entry and different ways of engagement for the young person and potential employers. Young people can work in cohorts or in groups and thats really for people that have maybe never had job experience or who are still trying to figure out what they want to do and they can explore. And in the same way, it is open for employers to say, you know what, i dont think we are ready to host an intern yearround are all summer, but that they can open up their doors and do site visits or tours or panels or conversations. And then it runs all the way up to the opportunity for young people to have longterm employment, and work on a project and be part of the employee base. Something new, to get new experience and meet people and then you are getting paid for it you are getting paid for doing that. It is really cool. I starting next week, i will be a freshman. [cheers and applause] two of the things i appreciate about this program was the amazing mentorship in the job experience that i had. I am grateful for this opportunity. Thank you. Something i learned at airbnb is how to network and how important it is to network because it is not only what you know, but also who you know to get far in life. During this program, i learned basic coding languages, had a had to identify the main components and how to network on a corporate level. It is also helping me accumulate my skills all be going towards my College Tuition where i will pursue a major in computer science. For myself, being that i am an actual residential realtor, it was great. If anybody wants to buy a house, let me know. Whenever. [applause] it is good. I got you. It was really cool to see the commercial side and think about the process of developing property and Different Things that i can explore. Opportunities for all was a great opportunity for all. We were aiming to have 1,000 young people register and we had over 2,000 people register and we were able to place about between 50 and did. We are still getting the final numbers of that. Over several weeks, we were able to have students participate in Investment Banking they were able to work with our team, or technology team, our engineering 20 we also gave them lessons around the industry, around financial literacy. There are 32,000 young people ages 16 and 24 living in San Francisco. And imagine if we can create an opera skin it just opportunity for all program for every young person that lives in public housing, Affordable Housing, low income communities. It is all up to you to make that happen. We have had really great response from employers and they have been talking about it with other employers, so we have had a lot of interest for next year to have people sign on. We are starting to figure out how to stay connected to those young people and to get prepared to make sure we can get all 2400 or so that registered. We want to give them placement and what it looks like if they get more. Lets be honest, there is always a shortage of good talent in any industry, and so this is a real great career path. For potential sponsors who might be interested in supporting opportunities for all , there is an opportunity to make a difference in our city. This is a really thriving, booming economy, but not for everyone. This is a way to make sure that everyone gets to benefit from the great place that San Francisco is and that we are building pathways for folks to be able to stay here and that they feel like they will belong. Just do it. Sign up for it. [ ] [ ] [gave [gavel]. Chair peskin good afternoon. Welcome to the land use and Transportation Committee of the of the board of supervisors for today, monday, october 28, 2019. I am the chair, aaron peskin, joined to my right by vice chair supervisor ahsha safai and to my left supervisor mat haney. Miss clerk, do you have any announcements . Clerk yes. Please be sure to silence any phones or electronic devices. Items acted on today will appear on the november 5 board of supervisors calendar against otherwise stated. Chair peskin miss clerk, could you read items 1 through 5 together. Clerk yes. [agenda items read] chair peskin thank you, ms. Major. This is our triannual update to the aforementioned codes which requires their appeal and enactment of new 2019 editions. Here on behalf of the department of building inspection, we have bill stron and michelle yu if you would like to present on items 1 through 6, none of which seem to be very substantive in nature, but the floor is yours. Miss yu . Good afternoon, chair peskin and committee members. I am michelle yu, and with the help of d. B. I. Staff, i am responsible for helping customers with code questions, interpretation to the code as well as lead the code advisory committees. Agenda items 1 through 6 are six proposed amendments to adopt the code of the California Building standard commission. The codes include the building code, residential building, existing building, electrical code, mechanical, plumbing, and Green Building code. San francisco is proposing these ordinances to repeal the six current 2016 codes and to adopt the new 2019 California Building standards and San Francisco amendments. The San Francisco amendments to the current 2016 california codes will be carried forward as a 2019 San Francisco amendments with no or little technical changes, to be consistent with the changes made by the state and to have the new codes take legal effect on january 1, 2020. The changes before you today in the San Francisco amendments include mainly chapter number changes to be consistent with chapter number changes made by the state. Another change that we have made is to remove language in the current code amendments that has now been captured in the 2019 california codes, which just means nationally and statewide, they are catching up with San Francisco standards. Other than that, you are not to expect any substantial changes, and those ordinances for the Carry Forward and enactment of the 2014 amendments. Im happy for your continued support and happy to answer any questions that you may have. Thank you. Chair peskin thank you, miss yu. Are there any questions for d. B. I. Staff . Seeing none, is there any Public Comment on items 1 through 6 . Seeing none, well close Public Comment. [gavel]. Chair peskin and i would move that we send items 1 through 5 to the board of supervisors with recommendation, and we will do that without objection and send item 6 with recommendation as a Committee Report, and we will do that without objection. [gavel]. Chair peskin thank you, ms. Yu. Madam clerk, we are waiting on the fire clerk for item 7 and i do not see him in the audience, so would you take items 8 and 9 together . Clerk item 8 is the intention of the board of supervisors to order vacation in the streets of india basin street. Item number 9 is an ordering of the vacation in the streets of india basin streets, authorizing the city to quitclaim its interest, affirming appropriate findings, and authorizing official acts in connection with the ordinance. Chair peskin mr. Chury on behalf of the department of economic and workforce development, if you would like to tell us about the vacation and the exchange and the conveyance, the floor is yours. Thank you, chair peskin. My name is jonathan cherry, and im with the office of economic and workforce development. Im here to describe these two pieces of legislation. Ill start by providing just a brief background and then i can explain how todays legislation fits into the india basin project. The board of supervisors approved the india basin project just over a year ago on october 23, 2018. The approved project includes two components, both of which are to be delivered by the developer build. First, the mixeduse Development Including almost 1600 new housing units, of which 300 new units, 25 of the total, will be below marketrate units, and improvements to the existing rec front open space along the waterfront, and the big green, which will be a new addition to the citys Southeast Network of public parks. Quickly, a number of other Public Benefits are included in the approved development agreement, including new city streets and utilities, a new bike network, including a class one bikeway through the project and a bay way trail. The project will provide space for several uses important to the community that are listed here on slide three and includes a workforce agreement with requirements during both constructions and operations of the development. The india basin project is development with a longterm use towards sustainability and resilience including onsite treatment of wastewater and stormwater, reduce waste emissions through 100 clean energy and the formation of a Community Facilities district that will provide facilities for Sea Level Rise mitigation on the future. We have items 7, 8, and 9 on the agenda and the boards approval of the project last year included the initiation of the street vacation process and also authorized the agreement of some of the right ofway t the developer. It authorizes the city to enter into a public trust Exchange Agreement with the state of california and the developer in order to clarify the existence of the public trust status on the park area closer to the shoreline and remove the public trust designation from the private parcels on the uphill portion of the site. Through the development of the approved projects, the city, through the addition of new open space and new streets, will acquire more private land than it conveys. So the next few slide, ill quickly walkthrough the street vacation and how the configuration and the ownership of the parcels will change which will be implemented in parallel to the street vacation. So you see here, this is the existing site, also referred to as 700 innes. You can see innes at the bottom of the slide, and this extends to the bay between griffin street on the left of the slide to earl street on the right of the slide. The other street parcels being vacated are mostly unimproved and unaccepted rightofway which you will see on the next slide. Here on slide six, you see the existing ownership of the site. In red are the portions of the site privately owned by build. The solid green areas near the shoreline are the park areas under the jurisdiction of rec park. The remaining areas shown in hatched green and blue are the areas to be vacated and this consists of rightofway under the jurisdiction of public works in the green hatch and the area under the jurisdiction of the port in blue. The next slide, slide seven, focuses just on the streets to be vacated. Of the 7. 5 acres to be vacated, roughly half, 3. 7 acres of parse street parcels, lie within the future park area, which is the green dashed outline here, and these will remain owned by the city, to be vacated and maintained by the park and rec park. The remaining 3. 8 acres of vacated streets will be conveyed to build at the time of the public trust exchange as contemplated in the development agreement. The city will temporarily reserve rightofway easements over 1. 5 acres of these street parcels to ensure theres no net loss of acreage as part of the development. Slide eight illustrates the 6. 4 acres of currently privately owned land that will become public land as part of the public trust exchange and the citys acceptance of new streets. This consists of 2. 6 acres shown in the lighter shades of green added to the existing park area and 3. 8 acres of new city streets which are shown in dark green. On slide nine, you can see the final ownership configuration of the site after the public trust Exchange Agreement and after the development. The areas in light green will be owned by the city as park, with a public trust designation over them, and the areas in red are owned by build. Finally, on slide ten, you can see the approved projects, both the mixeduse developments and the newly expanded and redesigned public parks. So on slide 11, we are requesting minor amendments that have been drafted by City Attorney. Committee members should have copies of this for reference. The first is on the second page and simply adds the date of the committee of the whole date. The second is on the same page, and the amendment provides the city to convey the parcels through the state at the time of the trust exchange directly from the city to build. Also, we would note in the ordinance on page 2, line 16, that the designation would be heard at the full board next week if approved as november 5. And on page 3, line 24 of the ordinance, the committee of the whole date of december 10. And on that topic, slide 12, heres the anticipated schedule for future hearings on both the resolution and the ordinance. This schedule results in an effective street vacation in late january. We would ask that the city forward the intention with amendment and positive recommendation to the full Board Hearing on november 5, and we request that the ordinance with amendments be forwarded to a committee of the whole hearing on december 10. That concludes my presentation. Thank you for your time, and i will be available for your questions along with public works staff. Chair peskin thank you, mr. Cherry. Are there any questions for oewd . Seeing none, are there any Public Comment on items 8 or 9 . Seeing no Public Comment, do we have a motion supervisor safai . I just want to make sure, the streets will be accepted back and theyll be fullyaccepted streets by the city . I understand the city will own those streets, but theyll be fullyaccepted streets . Yes. All of the streets that you saw in dark green, all of the streets will be fullyaccepted, fullyowned streets. Chair peskin thank you, supervisor safai. So on item 8, i would like to insert the date being december 10. On item number theres a blank. So thats the apologize, chair. For the date, that would be the november 5 resolution. Chair peskin no, i think thats december 10. If were talking about file 150969, this is the resolve that says notice is here by given on blank date, 2019 i believe was the november 5 date . Okay. We will take that and fill that in and forward that to the full board with a positive recommendation. And then on item 9, on page 2, we will insert the date of november 5, and the City Attorney will fill out the resolution or the clerk resolution number and file number. And then on page 3, as line 24, we will insert the december 10 date. And on page 8 at line 17, well insert the language of either directly or indirectly through the state right before sub2. And if theres knox, well take those amendments without objection. [gavel]. Chair peskin and then, we will forward agenda item number 9 to the full board for december 10 at amended without objection. Mr. Givner deputy City Attorney jon givner. The committee made the motion to forward it without recommendation on december 15 . Chair peskin thats true. Without recommendation, as amended, without recommendation on hearing december 10, 2019. Well take that without objection. [gavel]. Chair peskin madam clerk, could you please read item number seven. [agenda item read] chair peskin and here to present on behalf of our Fire Department is fire marshal decosio. Good afternoon, commissioners. Dan decosio here to speak to the 2019 amendments to the fire code. There are a handful of changes. I will highlight those changes and answer any questions that you may have. Chair peskin please proceed. Okay. Number one, many of the sections were renumbered, so its just a matter of renumbering sections. The fees live in a different section. The fees have already been aof proed by the board of supervisors. The have already been approved by the board of supervisors. The fees are subject to the administrative proposal that we have in place, and that was a process we started about two years ago and it deals with violations that are ongoing that are not abated, and we have a hearing process in place to address those. So our attempt here is to recoup our costs of the administrative hearings. In addition, we now have specifically identify or spell out the requirements for who we considered what kind of credentials you need to perform work on fire alarm systems, sprinkler systems, and maintain systems. Were being explicit about that and entering that into the code. Also fire escapes. With regard to access to require escapes, what is an obstruction . Were clarifying that, as well, to include locked doors and roomed fire escapes to include locked doors and rooms behind a fire escapes. And then lastly, fire escapes, we require documentation that their fire escape has been certified and inspected within the last five years and ill answer any questions that you may have at this time. Chair peskin colleagues, any questions for the fire marshal . Seeing none, is there any Public Comment on item number seven . Seeing no Public Comment, thank you, mr. Decosio, and we will send this to the full board with a recommendation as a Committee Report for hearing tomorrow, the 29 of october without objection. Very good. Thank you. [gavel]. Chair peskin madam clerk, could you please read item ten. Clerk item ten is a measure urging Treasure Island benefit authority for post disposition agreement. Chair peskin supervisor haney . Supervisor haney thank you, chair peskin. And i know that chair peskin and supervisor safai, youre very familiar with the Treasure Island development. This is a development that will transform the island with 8,000 units of housing. It broke ground this year, and it has been in the works for decades. In 2011, a development and disposition agreement or d. D. A. Was signed outlining the Development Work and transition for leaseholders. And one of the things that it laid out was a process for us to make sure that the residents of the island, nearly 2,000, have access to the development and have a plan for relocation. During the course of the development, all of the residents will need to be relocated in some way. One of the things that came to my attention in the first few months of time as supervisor in meeting with people on the island and serving on tida and representing the island is a lot of concern and anxiety and questions about what would happen both for people who were pred. D. A. Who moved there before 2011 and after d. D. A. , who moved there after 2011. If you had only lived on the island a year or two, you would not have benefits. But now, its been eight years, and the development is not slated to be done until after 2030. So this offer that has come out of conversations with tida and mohcd applies to more residents. Some folks could have lived on the island for 20 years while the development is taking place until its completed, and i think we have a duty to take care of the residents of Treasure Island who are being asked through no fault of their own. I want to appreciate tida director bob beck whos been a supporter and partner in coming up with some new options for what those transition housing benefits will be, and i think director beck is going to present on some of those. Chair peskin bob, the floor is yours. Thank you, chair peskin, members of the committee. Bob beckwi with the Treasure IslandDevelopment Authority. Supervisor haney did a good job of presenting the framework for the Treasure IslandDevelopment Network and so ill go into a little more detail on that and talk about what we currently propose to the measures that are currently proposed to address the intention of the resolution. Just as backdrop for our discussion, neither state or federal relocation law required the residents of the island to be provided with relocation benefits, but the board of supervisors and the mayor, when they endorsed the 2006 Development Plan for the island directed tida and the developer to come back with a proposal with plans to provide residents at the time of entitlement with transition housing benefits. And those are the benefits that we have in plan today. In 2011, when the Disposition Development agreement and related documents were adopted, the housing and transition plans kind of captured the framework for both the Residential Development program on the island and also the transition benefit programs. The housing plan itself is the guiding document for the development of market rate and Affordable Housing. For our Affordable Housing, the average affordability for the 2,173 units that well be developing is below 50 of a. M. I. Or area median income, and 5 of those units are to be developed by the developer as inclusionary units within the market rate with the balance being developed by Treasure IslandDevelopment Authority and mohcd and affordable providers on 20 parcels located throughout the development. The 1 Treasure IslandDevelopment Transition housing plan provides for the future transition of our current Affordable Housing residents on the island. And the second document was the transitional housing rules and regulations for residents of the villages at Treasure Island, those being our property rate management of rental units on the island. Under the transition housing rules and regulation, benefits were extended, as supervisor haney mentioned, and i previously mentioned, to the residents that were living on the island at the time the entitlement documents were approved in 2011 and only provided to those residents that came to the island in the future to receive advisory services. So to kind of graphically i illustrate what that means for our population, first, in the yellow circle, we have the residents of the one Treasure IslandProgram Member agencies. That includes Catholic Charities, Community Housing partnership, swords to plow shares and housing 360. All of those are governed by the one Treasure Island transition housing plan. And then, we have on the left, we have pred. D. A. Households. Those are households where all members of the household were residing on the island in 2011. We have postd. D. A. Households, which are households where everybody on the lease currently has came to the island after 2011, and we have some mixed households where that were originally pred. D. A. Households and some household members moved out and other household members moved in. So it includes both people who were a resident in 2011 and those who came since 2011. For the one Treasure Island residents and the one Treasure Island transition plan, it requires that tida will develop in partnership with one Treasure Island agencies not less than 435 units, and in fact our first four projects that were planning to construct will be in partnership with these first housing providers. Swords to plow shares is expected to break ground this spring and Catholic Charities roughly nine months later. Were not limited to developing 435 units. After weve divided these first four projects, well develop future projects through an r. F. P. Process, and we we will partner with those agencies in the future. The one Treasure Island transition housing plan provides all households in Good Standing will be offered replacement units in a member agencys building when its completed. So all of our current 36 swords to plow shares households are expected to transition to the swords to plow shares building when it is completed. For the villages at Treasure Islands, the benefits included when required to make a longterm move, a longterm move to be to a new unit, to take a new rental unit on the island at a rent controlled relative to their current rent with some adjustments, and in lieu of if they chose to leave the island or if they were interested in pursuing a market rate unit either for rent or purchase in the new development, they would have a premarketing opportunity and could receive downtown payment assistance towards either a for sale market rate unit or a for sail affordable unit from from tida through the transitional housing rules and regulations. The replacement units to be provided under the housing rules and regulations are to be provided in the buildings developed by tida and the city within 100 affordable, otherwise 100 affordable buildings. Because the initial occupants, ifom