We had to do a deck for administrators. Lea reps and principals are vital. I say your school will run as well as special ed services. Summary every choired admin training of the required admin training. Service and delivery is required when students are suspended beyond 10 days. The local education administrator must be there, that is the principal. General education and parent or guardian. Service delivery is required despite staff absence. We have trouble filling the gaps when people are absent. The principals need to come up with a creative waited. Educational benefit. The purpose. The streamlining between the goals and must align. People need to be well trained and understand that. In the spring they are coming back and will continue to work with us. The California Department of education will sample in the spring and conduct the educational benefit review to ensure it has evidence. They are looking for the data and growth on our end. Our work is ongoing for many years. We will continue to line up priorities in developing the Strategic Plan given the progress and results of this review. I say our work continues. When will we complete the review. We will exit the process once all corrective actions have been completed by the lea and accepted by the California Department of education. It must no longer meet the criteria for selection for the review process as demonstrated by improvement on state Performance Plan indicator products and the percentage of complaint noncompliance. They look at the cde compliance complaints as well. We have seen a dip in those in the last couple of years. Obviously, you have our contact information. Many of you do contact me. We margaret up there. She is on a first name basesis with the folks conducting the review. They will be in partnership until the end. It will be glorious when we are fully compliant. We provided this for you for your review from the notification letter to the full report and you can look at the discipline and disability numbers from the dashboard. I thank you for your attention this evening. Thank you for the presentation. Susan. Yes, thank you for giving me this opportunity to speak. Susan solo man, usf president. I want to preface by saying these comments are not personal about any individuals. We are talking about a systematic problem. We need to be mindful how we talk about it. We heard some comments about the importance of putting students at the center. That is what we all do. We heard about people popping in and out of iep meetings. We need everybody to be present and we need ways to get substitute teachers into the believe when teachers are absent. Our members were provides special Education Services are drowning, too much work and too little training. This is a national problem. When i go to meetings for unions around the country, we hear this all of the time. One moment of hope today i was on a Conference Call and there is a campaign that people are working on to make sure the federal government provides the fundings at the rate it is supposed to be provided, 45 . It provides 17 to 18 . Thathat is a solution we can wok on. I also as representative of hardworking special education educators, i want you to know, and you have heard other people really hard to get the work done. They cant get it dawn l done. They want to provide the services. There are so many things to be done correctly with too little support. Until we address that we will not see 100 compliance. Thank you. I am here wearing both hats today. My day job special education advocate. Evening job other than parent is to be the chair of the past chair of the Community Advisory community. Special education advocate looks at this to say validation. This is everything we have been screaming about as lock as i have been involved in the district. This cac chair says we look forward to fixing this. I cannot echo the comments enough. We are at a staffing crisis right now. We are doing so much work in so many great areas with big plans and no one to implement be them. This is a perfect example. We are screening kids for dix fe dyslexia. When i write forspire to implement with fidelity in slide six with fidelity, that is this half an hour each day five days a week in some group instruction. At this rate we need to hire a couple more rsps for school sites for dyslexia, not a. D. H. D. Or autism. We need more support to properly educate our children. If we dont deal with students needs in the classroom, that turns into behaviors that go through the entire system and end up in discipline. It starts here. We need to address it. Thank you. Thank you. You mentioned timelines not being met. First of all, thank you for the presentation. It seems like we are perpetually under some review. At least six years ago we were under a mandate to correct. What is the difference between that and this . It took about three years to exit that one. The comprehensive review. In apply scope of new zealanding it, it is different. Would that be fair . This one the comprehensive review, i dont recall what pivoted the verification review. That is when i first came back to special education. Comprehensive was based on . Grid and the different things. There is no time line to exit. We need to meet demand of the review. Right now we have a few timelines. One is to push out the training by november 14, 15. We are meeting our timelines in terms of communications and Due Diligence on corrective actions. Wwe are not perfect. The other ones should be harder. We will be pulling out of the pir, Performance Indicator review and pulling out of disproportionalty. Those are the big challenges that are going to keep us . Our comprehensive review unless we pull factors together. Kids get placed in nonPublic Schools and we have to pay for it. Can we calculate what that cost last year . Can that be done . Folks have been floating the idea of iep case managers. You would have one iep manager for two schoo schools. They would manage timelines to make sure they are met. The money we expands yearly on not meeting the timelines if we were able to invest in case managers to red to reduce. Could we do that to save money . We are not meeting timelines. I want to know if that is a costeffective way of dealing with this into the future, hiring the ip case managers and saving money and meeting timelines . What do you think . I am histan hesitant to enga. We need to see what it is driving what we do in closed session in these meetings . What i am concerned about is staffing. If we have schools with openings for teaching positions or paraoweparaparaeducator posit. Who is teaching the kids . We have reps that are doing a thousand things each day. It is a bigger conversation. I am not saying it is bad. I was a resource specialist. That is not new. We somebody drowning for a while. That is why we are taking this time and investment to build a thoughtful five year Strategic Plan. I would love that conversation. It is the panacea that will keep us out of these situations. We can do an audit on last years settlements and everything we paid out and what caused them. If it was the case the timelines werent met and it was costing us 10 million and it costs 3 million to hire the case managers and not be on the hook for the next years. Our staff can do the work. Th is worthwhile to pursue. Some of it is arounds assessment. There is a shortage of psychologists that is part of the whiteboard activity i want to have with you. A lot of our Public School playsments are done at iep meetings because we dont have a appropriate place to serve the child. I think we should start with data to see what it tells us. I also just have a little treppe pedation about your idea. It sounds like it is about checking boxes. At the end of the day meeting the timelines is not supposed to be about the paperwork. It is what do kids need and what is the best way to provide it . We should look at this. It is not a terrible idea. Lets not talk about serving kids. It is not my idea. It is floated many times. That is the first thought i had. Just to go back to some of the Parent Communications training that you did, i mean i will just say one of my longstanding pet peeves is that parents at the iep meeting getting the assessment report. That is one thing that i would love to see us change is to give parents the written assessment reports which they are entitled to so they have time to read and think about them and respond before sitting at the meeting to discuss the report. Can you tell me more. Can you tell me about the parent communication piece of the training you provided . In Parent Communications it was exactly it is at the 400 staff members. It does need to go home. It is that simple and the language. The prior written notice. When the parent brings up the ask, we need to respond to it. This is why we will go forward or not go forward. Parents ask for things. We need to communicate back with the prior written notice. They also have a reason why it is not recommended in writing. Those are the things in the audits. They find the missing pieces of paper that summed up to being the parent communication topic, but you knew from experience. I just think that is an area. You both have heard me say that before. It is an area where i think if we can keep from going on the road of family feeling angry and lied to and that loss of trust. If we can communicate better and serve better upfront before people get mad, then we will be better off because they are less likely to sue if they are not mad or that is the world i live in. The last comment i want to make is just in response to the staffing conversation. I want to relay that i ran into a teacher that had worked with my daughter many years in the School District who was one of the first inclusion specialists in the district and is now because of the way that we are large r largely because of the advo cassie that i did we dont talk about inclusion and resources being separate things. She was talking about the caseload up to 22 students, mild moderate. If she were still an inconclusion support teacher in the old Inclusion Support teacher she would have 10 to 12. That is not what i intended and i hope that is not what any of us intended. What are we doing about that . That is just with our uesf special Education Committee around case loads. So if youre an rsp teacher and you have two students who are fully committed, imagine the level of impact on your daytoday runnings. If you have highly impacted kids. So in the fiveyear Strategic Plan that were working on with our consultant, were going to look at that. Maybe we do need to suss out a new situation on how were going to address kids. Nothing has to change around where they are and how theyre receiving services, but we might need to have a different situation around their case management. Im open to that. I feel like ive been with you all the way. Inclusion became this thing that is interpreted through everybodys lens differently amongst the 120 schools that we have. So i think calibration of our thoughts around this notion of inclusion, thats one of my biggest lists and calibrating and then figuring out i dont even know what to call them. Are they pathways or the little book for multilinguist multilingual, what does a specialist do or a mild moderate teacher we have a multiability class, but then we have autism focus. I think all of that, we have to drill down and define who we are and understand that together. Thats one of the first things that were going to take on in communicating. In a lot of ways im so proud in the progress that the district has made and that we are just more thoughtful about placement and how we make sure that our students are accessing the general curriculum and the general things in the school day. Obviously its not tenable to have its not. A case load of 22 mild moderate kids because theres not enough hours in the day. I think there is just a tremendous amount of stress that im hearing. I think mild became moderate and moderate became severe. Its bumped up. I just also have to recognize the best intentions of so many people in the field that are trying with our limited resources. In the more allocations that we put out there, there are no positions. Even though we need support, its time to think differently. Maybe case managers would be part of the solution. I dont know. Im trying to think creatively and it sounds like uesf is trying to think differently. I know you are devoted to this work and want youve been wanting to do this for a long time. Sort of. Its the dream job i was always afraid to think about. I appreciate your willingness to try to take it on and be wholehearted about it. Obviously we have a lot of work today. We do. Our work continues. Commissioner carles. Thank you for this presentation. I do want to recognize that this is a challenge that goes beyond our district, and i very much appreciate the work that you and your district are doing with very limited resources. I also want to go i looked at the report and thank you for making that available. I would love it if it could be at the top level of our board docs. I do think this is a helpful document for the community. Even though its not positive, it does validate the experience of a lot of educators and parents. One thing it does state is that school sites were visited and service logs were reviewed. 11 of the records tested were found to be compliant and nine of the records tested were found to be noncompliant for the provision of services written in the i. E. P. I did the math and if im right, that means 45 were noncompliant. One of the questions i have is are we doing this type of sampling. Is this something that we do as a district with our i mean, i would hope that we were doing this without the c. B. E. Checking our own selves. Do we have any protocols in place to do this kind of checking . I would say no, and im speaking honestly. Thank you so much for just answering that. I really appreciate it. It feels like gaslighting when we hear parents and teachers saying things are not happening and to know this is the first step of figuring this out together. I dont believe we have the capacity right now as a district to do this. I think ultimately we want the l. A. E. Reps to keep the teachers compliant. But i know how i rolled for 18 years and i didnt do that. I mean, i did a lot, but i didnt go through brown folders with my staff. I think about my staff on this level and did they have the capacity to do that. At this point, no, they dont. Should we . Yes. This is the kind of document that is going to drive some of our restructuring and how we do things because clearly 45 is not okay, its not okay with me. I appreciate that. My dad was a researcher, and i dont know what the term is, but he said there is a term that talks about when you look at something, you actually change it approximate. When you research something, when you Pay Attention to something, you actually become a part of changing it. I used that, when i was a teacher i said i am going to be grading students on helpful behaviors, and all of a sudden kids started doing them so they could get stickers or points and it was a joke and intentional, but when we do show our attention to something we show that with testing on assessment results and things like that, so we have a lot of activities that we do in schools and things that focus around that kind of data. Im really interested in implementation data. I also want to recognize, i really appreciate susan solomans comments, we have so many hardworking education workers, but my heart goes out to the para educators. I had positive experience with para educators. I cotaught a class with a para educator. That wouldnt be been possible without our relationship and that we worked as a team. I wanted to pull out from this report it states that some interviews indicated that regularly teachers are being pulled from their regular duties to act as substitute teachers. Thats heartbreaking to me. They should be there for those with the most need and not the general ed teams. Those are the teachers that are kind of the most overloaded are pinchhitting for other educators. Then it said several and then also we see a shortage of para educators. It States Administration at sites that had had less para educator turnover increased their retention rate. There i see an opportunity, because as i mentioned i had a really great rapport with my para educator. I shared my lesson plans with her and she told me and we worked professionally as a team and we had a mutual respect. I believe it made it fun for us to work together. I think in many cases, depending on psych culture, i think that there are some schools that do a very good job of including para educators adds part of this team, and there are some schools where para educators are pinchhitting here and there, or theyre not included or treated as professionals or theyre not trained to properly support students. That can definitely lead to overload and feelings of burnout in general. I also wanted to thank commissioner norton for bringing this up. Even if youre totally committed and loving your kids, theres only so much. I think in some cases what we see is a Tipping Point where people max out and we just burn people out. I guess im wondering which site are there certain sites were seeing this more than others, do they send to have certain characters . Which sites are doing well . Maybe we can learn from that and we can beef up supports from schools that have these turnover issues. Finally i also wanted to thank commissioner norton for bringing up education. Ive been pushing our district to educate families. Im a 20year educator in this district, and i still dont understand all the ins and outs of education law and the process and i was talking about a principle today and she was explaining the difference between an io4 and the other document. In my heart there is a lot of issues and its like going to the doctor and getting a diagnosis that youre uncomfortable with. I want to urge our legal team, communications team, and those that work with family liaisons, i dont know know of ways that were educating people on their rights. Parents can request assessments and its confusing how do we do that. I dont think its Common Knowledge that a parent can say theyre concerned about their comments and they want them assessed. If your child is assessed and you want them to go through the process, im not aware of any protocol for educating families on their rights. Maybe we have that, but its not visible on the website. If i dont know it, im assuming im one of those pretty involved parents. I look for those handouts and things to help families. I dont even know where to look. So i think we really cant partner with families and we need our families because theyre the capacity that we dont have. They increase our capacity to serve students when we work in partnership with them. Were less likely to get in lawsuits and less contentious relationships with them when we feel welcomed. If you can speak to anything around the Parent Education around rights, that would be great. Thank you for that. When you were asking i know youre doing the rights and i appreciate that, and i reflect a lot, did i do that or that. In special education, every time we communicate with the parent via any kind of a document, we give them how many pages . I hate anything that has too many pages because i run fast. I have a lot to do all day. I want the cliff notes version. We have to give a short version. They go home with any document, i believe that its one of those things that its very heavy. When i was a resource specialist back in the 1990s, there was a book, i think a 20page book, and it had a lot of white space and it was perfect. When i joined this position and started working with my partners, that was one of the first things i said and it was in three languages. After that another book that came out by Charles Schwabb and our ombudsperson just found a copy. Were looking at the simple pieces we can get out there before we do our whole fiveyear mapping plan. That is something we are working on to get a parent friendly sort of thing. When i was a first year r. S. P. , that was my plan book to help me navigate all of the timelines to navigate. This is something that we could work on. Thank you. If we could make it available on the website in our language. It is on the landing page of education for families. It linguist to the content developed by the special education folks in the past, but there is a link there. So it can be updated when ready. Did you want to add to that . We have a memorandum of understanding with the parent facility in San Francisco. There is a conference that is coordinated that is all about Family Engagement. There are workshops in english, spanish, chinese once a month that support families and parent workshops all the time. There is a huge amount of Family Engagement that is done and the process is overwhelming, but the work is still done and we still try. Thank you for your patience. Just in hearing the discussion tonight and the fact that we are all at capacity and this is work being done by the department of education, what are they doing to support us reaching this . Is there is that yeah, im just wondering . Its frustrating. I think what susan said about the ieda moneys not coming. We stomped in washington in may to get better funding for all of us so we can do this good work. The c. D. E. So our partners statewide are unified. This is not unique to San Francisco. These issues are happening across the nation. So the Technical Assistance stuff is interesting. They monitor us and tell us what we have to do, but dont tell us here, this is what you have to do. They will steer us to some resources on the web and we can pull from each other. We also have a very active sort of engagement with each other as the selfa directors. We share ideas and best practices that way as well. We helped our partners out as well. They liked our presentation so well that some of our partners will be using the template for their presentation to do their report, but no one is coming to us with the package and say were going to give you this, and, and this. This is engaging your community, think out of the box, silo the issue, prioritize, and get to work. I think were at a critical point to start thinking different. Its not to say the demands arent valid, but the reality is why we have what we have. So i wanted to focus on any advocacy or to push to get any resources. We need to put our reform hats on right now and started thinking differently. Picking up on what commissioner lopez raised, because were on the policies committee. What im curious about is taking your recommendation and looking at reform and things differently, if there can be some sort of Business Analysis around what would it take to quote all districts and not just ourselves, if were part of the a bigger network, what would it take to address the corrective actions. From there, we should raise that to the state of california. The governor has put forward his education agenda and there were some bills that went through the Legislature Last year that were funding potential education and looking at some structural opportunities and they did not make it through. So i think this would be a prime opportunity for the district to also take some leadership and to leverage that into Something Like you said, its beyond ourselves and were at a crisis moment. We have been for a very long time. That would be my request. Maybe when Capital Advisers comes back to our next rules committee, i like to start asking what the budget process is going to look like and how we can work with our sacramento partners. Thank you. I appreciate that feedback. Thats making me think that we need a revolution, and we can start it. I think again we can address this. Legislators are thinking about the california budget process. I think we should look to that as an opportunity. We have been looking at the multiyear plan and how that measures up for our own planning process. Thats another presentation, and im happy to take some time to go to the rules committee. We did go to the rules committee and we will be responding to you, but we are twothirds of the way through the planning process. Our consultant is out in the field. We have a consultation tomorrow. We have a lot to share about what weve engaged, but were not done yet. There are Many Community partners that we need to engage with. I know there was some oneonone time with some of the commissioners. Then were going to put meat on the bones and look at order of operations for our priorities. We do have some of our priorities popped out. We need to look at the case loads and our sore program. There is just a litany. So you will be apprised of that throughout the rest of this school year. Then we will be ready to literally hit the ground running. Weve already started some pieces in play. I cant wait for that to start, but i hope that answers your question. Its an ongoing process. Were about twothirds two. Shes about to start in january, but theres a whole plan for it to continue into the spring. Prior to that operationalized plan, im assuming well have budget implications . Yes. Budget is always a part of it, but yes. Huge budget implications. Thank you for the presentation. Section k, introduction of proposals and assignment to committee. Number 1, board and comment proposals. We have a First Reading to the board policies 0460, accountability plan. 0520, intervention for underperforming schools. 0520. 1, comprehensive and targeted support and improvement. Also to number 3, board policies 1431, waivers, number 4, 3553, reduced lunches. And to number 5, resolution 1911112a1, the Affordable Housing policies. Can i have a motion to second First Reading of the board policies 191112a1. Seconded. So moved. I see we do have Public Comment on the new resolution. Thank you. Ill be brief. I want to thank commissioner moligo for putting together the resolution on having a housing policy. Now that the voters of San Francisco passed proposition e with 75 of the vote and prop a with twothirds of the vote, we now have material to work with. So its we talk so much about housing because we have to, that this i think having a policy in place will really help us get on the road to realizing what we need, so thank you. Thank you. Any board comments on the First Reading . Im going to refer the policy to the rules committee and the resolution of the building and Grounds Committee and Ad Hoc Committee on personnel, labor, and affordability. Section l proposals for immediate action and special rules, theres none. Section m, Board Members reports. Before we begin, i would like to announce that i am last time commissioner moliga is switching with me. I remain as a member of the committee that this change is effective as of today. Report from recent Committee Meetings. Vice president sanchez has reported out. Is anyone ready to report out before i start calling on people . We met at the budget and Services Commission meeting. It was a packed agenda. A lot of it was updates on some of the Business Service items that have been coming up. Those continue to happen. Im very excited about that as a means for us to communicate with families. I want to state that a lot of families who have i. U. P. S are supporting their students. I encourage folks to look at the board docs because our budget team created a comprehensive overview of our budgeting process. I encourage all commissioners to look at that as well. It is a nicely done document because it shows at what point in time throughout the year we have very budgeting items that come up and with our budgeting and different points that come before the Budgeting Committee and the full board. I think thats a great way of getting the longterm plan. We spent most of the time discussing the latin x resolution which im excited about. And i want to thank commissioners lopez and sanchez were introducing it. I wanted to just inform other Board Members that while there was i think expressed support for this muchneeded resolution and i think folks echoed that as an initiative we supported these students, we dont have any currently that call out the needs of the Latin X Community and students. Many of the supports that were provided are kind of directed as supporting students with language needs, but we dont kind of address the cultural and just specific needs of the Latin X Community. I do appreciate the resolution. At the same time, the Budget Office has difficulty quanti quantifying how we would potentially fund the initiative because we hadnt had a conversation with Curriculum Committee to outline the staffing and resources needed. I think the Budget Office did a wonderful job of presenting a potential model and they based it on the ali initiative, we agreed that wasnt necessarily an appropriate model to use and further discussion was needed. We decided because we felt it was needed and this was a conversation we want to move forward and we do support it, we decided to move it forward with a positive recommendation with the understanding that we needed to flesh out the specifics of what types of staffing and supports we needed to implement it. We wanted to make sure this discussion process is an iterative process and doesnt prevent us from putting it in in a timely way. Its going to come back before the Curriculum Committee meeting, but then were going to have one day and its going to come back before the full board. Commissioner lopez is going to meet with commission and Community Members to get a clear idea of the actual implementation so we can have a richer conversation at the Committee Meeting because were going to have a shorter amount of time. I encourage you to engage with staff if you have questions on that or commissioner lopez. Thank you. It was actually my first budget meeting and it opened me up to a process that is trying to be highlighted. There is already policy and plans in place so what were really trying to touch on is pulling from what were using and utilizing what we have, not necessarily starting up something new but having the conversation of whats in place now is not effective and being able to participate in that with the lens of funding was really enlightening. Unfortunately the committee was canceled because of an abrupt shift that came last minute, but Many Community members planned to be there. Were hosting something informally tomorrow to share where we are in the process in preparation of the december 9 meeting. We meet every month. Im very dedicated to hosting these meetings. Were meeting tomorrow and then hopefully having enough conversations in between so that when we vote on december 10, we will have all the information ready. Thank you. Number 2. Any other reports from Board Members . Commission commissioner, congratulations. Calendar of Committee Meetings. Lets see, the standing ad h ad hoc okay, budget of Business Services is disease, december 4, at 6 p. M. Rules, policy, and administration is monday, december 2, at 5 p. M. Curriculum and program. Its monday, not wednesday. Its monday its monday, december 9, but it says wednesday. Monday, december thank you. Building grounds and services is monday is that the week of thanksgiving . Yes. Monday as of now, its monday, november 25, at 6 p. M. , the Ad Hoc Committee on personn personnel. The committee on Student Assignment is monday november 18 at 6 p. M. The joint city School District is friday, december 13, at 10 a. M. That meeting will be held at city hall in the legislative chambers. Any other members posted in the agenda or the following staff reports. Number 1, the Quarterly Report on williams uniform complaints for august through october 2019. And an annual report on williams uniform complaints for 2018 19 school year. The Vice President and then commissioner collins. So the williams report tend to be pretty pro forma, but i do have a question. I dont know if anybody on staff is here to answer. If not, we can get back to this later. If you look at the document, there is 11 facility complaints, and nine were resolved and two unresolved. So i want to know first of all, i would like to know what the facilities and the complaints are, because there is no supporting documentation around that and what the timeline is to resolve the issues. I dont know, dawn i can follow up on that and get you a response, commissioner. But an even bigger issue, and ive been bringing this up in different matters or forms, the first item is textbooks and instructional materials. I would contend that part of our instructional materials at the elementary level is having a robust Classroom Library and we dont have that. So i feel like were violating the williams laws or rules that are set in place by williams, which actually was part of my first time on the board. Because the textbooks are not really being used in elementary schools. If they are, shame on us. So i want us to really look at this. How can we put robust, meaningful, culturally relevant books in our classrooms so that teachers can do the work that theyre supposed to do and theyre trained to do the in classrooms. Can we put that in click cim aluminium . We are going to address that in the december 9th meeting. You read my mind. I was concerned about that as well, but i want to highlight this textbook that i keep bringing is the social studies textbook, im hearing that its racist and teachers dont want to use it, but they dont have materials to supplement it. I dont think teachers should use this textbook, but this is considered as compliant and that is a concern for me. Additionally, my daughters english teacher has a place in the school and she is being asked to bring these back in. If i personally walked into schools and asked, do you have enough books for reading, if were just counting textbooks, were not counting enough this says instructional materials, this is more expansive in this thing in what im reading here. So im not seeing that. Additionally, i received an email from a room parent saying that its freezing cold in one of the rooms and they didnt know that was a potential complaint nor did the teachers. So one of the things that comes up for me is that parents and educators dont even know what williams complaints are for. We could go to the educators and ask if the room is too hot or cold. In a lot of times they dont even know they could be filing williams complaints. How are we educating families on the williams complaints. It says we are supposed to post information in every classroom. When i met with the student advisory committee, they have a whole list of high schools that they say the trash cans are overflowing, the trash cans dont have toilet paper, thats a williams complaint and they didnt know that and theyre student leaders. So we cant doing our job in educating Community Leaders about what williams complaints are for. So i want to work with the Parent Education and whoevers in charge of that to educate families, students, and staff about williams complaints because they shouldnt have to organize and advocate to get toilet paper. I want them organizing for social justice. So i dont know what the venue is for having that conversation. Like, is there a committee or how do we talk about that . I dont know if that could be put on there to be able to report things that arent happening in our schools. Section o. At this time well take Public Comment for those who have submitted cards for closed session items. Seeing none, the board will now go into closed session. Thus, i call a recess of the pled guilty meeting. Resuming the regular meeting. Number one, student expulsion matters, i move approval of the stipulated expulsion agreement of one agreement on 2020. Number 3 for the remainder of the fall semester, can i have a second. [roll call vote]. I move for movement of the expulsion of this student for the remainder of this semester. [roll call vote]. The contract of one principal in the case number 2019100237. The board by a vote of