Here is more on what is heyed. We begin with the impending election in afghanistan to choose a new president who may well decide the fate of the u. S. Presence there. Thousands of ballot boxes have been distributed to some 7,000 polling places across afghanistan. Election authorities have warned that only about half of those Polling Centers are safe from taliban attacks. But nicklas says the country is ready. Everything has been delivered according to time line, both in regard to brood legislative and other provisions, but also the delivery ballot papers. The Afghan Security forces are in the lead country wide. The leaders and staff of the electoral institutions are all afghan. And the Campaign Period was full of open and responsible debate among the candidates, but it will be up to the Afghan People to choose the future direction of their country. Whether that direction will be determined by violence was underlined friday when an Afghan Police commandinger fired on two vettal journ aileses. One was killed in the attack. For more im joined by ambassador peter galbrath. He uncovered massive voting fraud in the countrys 2009 election. Good to see you again. A recent poll by an Afghan Foundation claims three out of four afghans want to vote, have registered to vote despite the talibans threats. But we just showed a documentary of taliban operations, do you think there will be a good turnout . First, let me come comend you on that documentary. It underscores the lack of security in large parts of the country, and so in areas like what was shown in your documentary, i suspect there is going to be a negligible turnout, which unfortunately doesnt mine that there wont be very significant results reported from those places. And even if they want to report, a recent gallup poll showed that 70 of afghans done believe the system is fair, and while it is estimated to have 10 to 12 million reporters, there are reports that some 21 million official Voter Registration cards have been handed out. Do you think this will be a Fair Election . Well, the system isnt fair, and when the White House Press spokesman said it was afghan owned, well that is a part of the problem. In 2009 President Hamid karzai was a candidate for reelection, and he was the one who appointed the independent election commission. And they were the people who either committed the fraud or collaborated with those who committed with the fraud, massive fraud, a third of karzais votes were bogus, but at that time there was an independent body, which could then investigate the fraud and thats one of the ways it was documented. This time, karzai has not only appointed the independent election commission. He has also appointed the electoral complaints commission. And its not as many he is neutral in this race. He definitely doesnt want one of the front runners to win. And he has a preference for the former foreign minister. Lets talk about the con tenders. This man polled second in the 2009 election, at another former former minister, and a form afghan finance minister. And you spoke to him today. What did he tell you about the run up to the election and whether he expects the election to come off successfully . He actually was very optimistic. He said there had been very large crowds; that the debates had been robust, and he put a certainly put a brave face on the fraud. He agreed all problems were still there, but he said the Afghan People wouldnt tolerate the fraud. Im not so optimistic with that assessment, but it certainly was encouraging to hear a degree of optimism from him. The question is whether americans should be optimistic, because relations with karzai have been strained to say the least. Once the election is over, do you think the winner will sign the bilateral Security Agreement that would remain forces in afghan that karzai so far has refused to sign . Clearly from an American Point of view, any of the three leading candidates will be far superior to hamid karzai and the u. S. Government knows and has good relations with all three. All three have said they will sign the bilateral Security Agreement. So i do expect that it will be signed, but the larger problems in afghanistan remain, and they could be very significantly made worse by if there is the kind of fraud that took place in 2009, and unfortunately i think thats quite likely. So you dont think that these elections in any case with so many people registering despite the violence and threats against them, just the fact that there is an attempt at democracy is a good thing . Democracy is obviously a good thing, but if you have an election in which people do not have confidence in the electoral system, then how how can anybody have confidence that the person who is announced to have the most votes actually does . And i think the problem will be particularly acute if abbul la, abbulla doesnt end up winning. Because he was the under up last time he comes from the north so he represents the two larger minority groups in afghanistan, and they are also the best organized, best armed groups, so last time they reluctantly accepted the result, even though they knew it wasnt fair. Will they accept it this time . And if they dont, the danger in afghanistan is that what has so far been a war between among the poshtunes, the taliban are all poshtune, karzai and the people around him are the poshtunes, but what could happen is the conflict between the poshtunes and those on the other side if there is a fraudulent election. You know canthy personally and the shooting and of her and killing of ania neederhouse are sad reminders of the situation there. Sure. When you are in public life sometimes when you deal with washington journalists who are safely at home, they overwrite the story, and you can see it is not reliable. But the war reports they dont have to overwrite anything. They tell it as it is. They are giving you the ground truth. So it is an incredibly valuable service that they were providing, bringing the war home to people all over the world, and very dangerous, and this situation just underscored how dangerous the work of the war reporters is. And lets hope kathy recovers well. Three women are running for office, including the office of the vice president. Thank you for being with us. Turning now to the collapsing peace talks between israelis and palestinians. Kerry expressed his frustrations at a meeting in morocco. He said the u. S. Effort was not open ended. There are limits to the amount of time and effort that the United States can spend if the parties themselves are unwilling to take constructive steps to move forward. So its reality check time, and we intend to evaluate precisely what the next steps will be. For more im joined from washington, d. C. By the International Editor for National Public radio, and form former jerusalem correspondent. I want to start by listening to what james baker had to say back in 1990. Everybody over there should know that the telephone number is 12024561414. When you are serious about peace, call us. Greg as he heard secretary kerry was a little bit more gentle, but is history repeating itself once again . Yes, you do get that feeling. John kerry has made a dozen or trips to the region. He has very little to show from it, and as you heard yourself, he he is feeling a little bit frustrated i think. Lets hear more of what he had to say. This is secretary kerry friday. This agreement between them is not over the fundamental substance of a final status agreement, its over the process that would get you there and what you need to do in order to be able to continue to negotiate. So what he is saying is that they have only be negotiating on a framework to negotiate the substance of the issues. If they cant even agreement on a framework what hope is there . I agree. And they set a deadline for the end of this month to reach this framework, and even that doesnt look like it will happen. You do get the sense the wheels are startling to come off now and the friction is starting to bubble to the surface again. Yeah, they are even struggling to keep the discussions about the framework going beyond the month of april. We see russia rising, egypt in turmoil, the brutal civil war in syria, should these peace talks even be a priority for secretary kerry or the u. S. . Well, thats certainly a good question. As you mentioned you have several pots boiling in the region. Those have not been resolved. There is clearly not any near Term Solution to those things, so i think secretary kerry is going to have to weigh how much time and money he wants to invest. Jim baker who you cited earlier, he also said famously that the u. S. Cannot want peace more than the two sides want it. And we seem to be in that situation with secretary kerry doing all of this pushing and not getting a lot of help from either side. And not only as the israelis and palestinians deeply divided as they have always been, they are deeply divided within themselves. The president does event represent all of them. Because hamas controls gaza. And israel keeps building settlements, and there is a powerful party that wants to keep israels hold on the west bank and even possibly annex it. So is the timing just not right for the u. S. To be pushing the Peace Process now . Well, there is never going to be a perfect time. I wouldnt say now is a particularly terrible tile. The two sides have not been actively fighting for several years. They have relatively stable leaderships, but i i just dont see the the initiative coming from the israeli side. You have Prime Minister netenyahu who has been in office knife years now, and three years in the late 90s, he has never made a big push on the peace front. As you mentioned the twoheaded palestinian leadership in the west bank in gaza there needs to be some united palestinian front before you can do a big deal. Doing the big full settlement, i think will require unified palestinian front as well. Now is there any interest on both of israelis and palestinian part to push this off . Do they both benefit in some ways stringing the u. S. Along . I think the scat us the quo works pretty well. The economy is going well, israel has not suffered any major attacks or major violence in recent years. Life is not not so bad and i think that sort of status quo works pretty well for many israelis. The palestinians i think are very frustrated. We are seeing the leader feeling pressure. He has taken a move to sign up or to push for palestinian membership in 15 international organizations. And so i think theres a real divide there in terms of a sense of urgency on the palestinian side and much less that sense on the israeli side. What if the u. S. Did what james baker suggested in saying here is the white houses phone number call us when you are willing to negotiate . Well, it may come to that fairly soon, and im not sure that is always a bad side. Sometimes when the two sides are left on their own, they may come to their own decisions about where they want to go. I think the process has to be driven by the israelis and palestinian, and i dont think the u. S. Can force an agreement on either side. So that may not be the preferred option when you have had some serious talking going on for a matter of months, you hate to lose that, but the u. S. May have to cut its losses and say we cant keep investing. We have other fires and were going to focus on those issues for a while. Sad to see this possibly failing once again. Greg thank you. Coming up was it hypocritical to force the resignation of this ceo in the name of diversity for his personal beliefs. Also were hear from an american who has helped rwanda rebuild. And her are pictures taken by our fallen colleague. She was killed on the job friday while covering preparations for the elections in afghanistan. She was 48 years old. [ male announcer ] its here Xfinity Watchathon week, your chance to watch full seasons of tvs hottest shows for free with xfinity on demand. Theres romance, face slaps, whatever that is, pirates, helicopters, piratecopters. Argh hmm. Its so huge, its being broadcast on mars. Heroes. Bad guys. Asteroids. Available only on mars. Theres watching. Then theres watchathoning. Your chance to watch full seasons of tvs hottest shows for free with xfinity on demand. Theres romance, face slaps, whatever that is, pirates, helicopters, piratecopters. Argh hmm. Its so huge, its being broadcast on mars. Heroes. Bad guys. Asteroids. Available only on mars. Theres watching. Then theres watchathoning. Outcry from gay rights advocates has forced the ceo of a major california tech company to step down. But is it a case of Political Correctness gone too far . He stepped down as ceo on thursday over a backlash of a donation he made for prop 8 six years ago. Should someones personal political beliefs matter when it comes to running a company . Joining us from atlanta is Jason Johnson an al jazeera contributor and professor of political science, and a progressive talk show radio host. It is good to see you both again. Wayne ill start with you brendan ike created the widely used java script programming language. He hadnt discriminated against lgbt employees, and the pressure for ike to resign disgusted him as it should disgust anyone interested in a tolerant and diverse society. Does he have a point . Oh i dont think so at all. The foundation for any ceo is confidence and respect. When people found out that he gave a thousand dollars to ban lgbt people from getting married, they lost their respect for him. There was a vote of a sense of no confidence. Board members were resigning, and Software Developers did not want to work for him. This was a Silicon Valley mutiny so to speak. He could not operate in such an atmosphere, and so it was the right thing to do to resign. Jason ike has been serving as the chief Technology Officer until he wassel indicated to the ceo position. As wayne is saying, is being a ceo different because he is the public face of the company. Should he be held to a different standard . Of course not. And this is unfair and intolerant. And the company is more than welcome to fire brendan ike and i hope he sues their pants off, because none of this had to do with whether or not he was doing his job. The fact that a number of people foukd out about his personal private politics its not like he was giving speeches across the country or hanging out with klan members, this should havent been a role in him having to resign. Wayne where do we draw the line when it comes to the consequences of personal beliefs . How about if it was a religiousbased belief . Look, this is a little different. First of all he not only gave to proposition 8, he also gave to pat bu buchanan. And in defending himself he said that his position against gay rights might help the company in places like indonesia. So he was saying it was a bonus in places that arent as progressive as we are. That was offensive as all be. People didnt want to be around somebody like this, particularly in Silicon Valley where over 80 of donations were against proposition 8. Ceos are different. This was the face of the company. And people didnt like the face they were looking at. And he wasnt fired, so he didnt sue. He resigned. Jason arent there personal positions that are too odious to be acceptable . Let me put this in a general sense, as an African American male i dont have the privilege to work at places with people who dont have to be racist. I dont care. Ultimately, are you doing your job . All of these behaviors he had not done any of those things or speaking any of those things since he came to that particular pox, so it is a problem, and when you have been forced out of a position, forced into a resignation because you have political beliefs that certain people in your company dont like, yes, you can sue. Yes, that is an eeoc violation, and that is a horrible precedent for how this country would operate. If someone were being removed from their position because they happened to be pro gay marriage at chickfila, people would be cream screaming. Thats a false equivalency, though. There is a difference between an opinion and a person. Race is not an opinion, racism is. Massageny is an opinion. Being a woman is not. Its the same with being gay its not an opinion, its a person no, he has an opinion against gay marriage and he has that right. And you point out as an African American you dont have that luxury but a lot of people have lost their job when they made racist comes, im thinking about Rush Limbaugh onning monday night football. That is completely different. Being against gay rights is offensive but to the point that society saying that is ugly. Its wrong. And people who hold those positions arent necessarily great as the face of organizations and ceos, and were going only to see more of this, because more people are going to be disgusted by trying to strip marriage rights let me make a point wayne, let me make a point. You brought up the Silicon Valley donations. And nate silver on his blog broke down those donations and found that 83 of those who donated to the gay marriage fight back in 2008, 83 in Silicon Valley voted, and the main 11 companies donated in favor of gay rights, 17 do nated to proprop 8 folks. So again, another question about where do we draw the line . Should those 17 be pushed out . Of course they shouldnt be. I dont think that should be pushed out, but they shouldnt certainly be ceos. There are laws in place right now that make it illegal to discriminate against someone, and Rush Limbaughsy saving something about Donovan Mcnabb was messed up monday night football, but unless we have evidence that brendan ike was discriminating against people in the workplace, this is pure speculation. You are forcing somebody to resign because of what you think they might do one day well, according to the board he messed up because he had a series of beliefs saying that his [overlapping speakers] its an important discussion thats evidence that guys its an important discussion and im glad you both joined us today to do it. We appreciate you being here. Thank you. Thank you. More than 800,000 people were massacres in the rwandan genocide that began 20 years ago this weekend. For 100 days the world witnessed the most horrific concentrated massacre of modern times. 11,000 people were slaughtered in a single day, mostly by machetes. A day later 10,000 more were killed in a soccer stadium. The horror continued for 98 days more. The Clinton Administration and the International Community were condemned for failing to act. If we had gone in sooner, i think i believe we could have saved at least a third of the lives that were lost. We probably could have saved 300,000 of those peoples lives. It had an enduring impact on me. For me we will joined by the executive director of Health Builders a nonprofit that builds and supports Health Centers around from the world. And he is the author of a memoir of his familys move to rwanda where he opened a restaurant. You moved from the u. S. With your then fiance to a destitute community to a home where you had to big human bones out of your backyard, why would you do that . Well, the major reason why was back in the late 1990s, i had been doing some work with the government of rwanda, and heard their vision of the nation. That they wanted to be the singapore of africa. And i thought that is real ambition. So after my wife and i got married, we had the opportunity to move to rwanda and work on poverty reduction. As you did all of that, you say in your book that you still see how genocide casts a shadow over everything but that it is a fading shadow . When we first moved there, which was just ten years after the genocide, certainly on a lot of peoples faces you could see literally the scars of the genocide, but since that time, we have actually seen a country reborn. That was one of the reasons my wife decided to build and open heaven restaurant. She saw that the orphans of the genocide and those who were born afterwards didnt have access to hospitality jobs, and she thought it was a perfect opportunity to create those opportunities and training programs. But what about the shadow that is still cast. A third of adult rwandans still exhibit symptoms of ptsd, how serious is that shadow . What remains today of what happened so horribly 20 years ago . Nearly half if not more of all rwandans today were born after the genocide, and a good portion of the population has no recollection of the genocide. So i see it as a new country. A country that is growing on the move. His Economic Growth rate has been nearly two times that of the us. And its a country where the government cares about its people and cares about the publics health. So i dont see daytoday the scars of the genocide. What i see is a country that has really moved against all odds in the right direction and lifted over a Million People in the past several years out of poverty. So on a daytoday basis, we do not feel or see the scars of genocide. What we see are streetlights and sidewalks and new infrastructure and wireless on the public buses. We see a very optimistic country that is safe, secure, great place to visit. How much of that has been the result of forgiveness . Because some estimates say there were as many as 150,000 perpetrators of that massacre, but very, very few have been punished for it . Well, many many people spent time of the genocide for acts of genocide, and many of the most Senior Leaders have still gone unpunished unfortunately. Thats in great result due to the lack of responsibility of the International Community, but i think if you take a look at todays rwanda, there are sort of two categories of people. There are incredible people who have actually forgiven the perpetrators of the genocide. They tell me that the hatred just weighed too heavenly in their hearts, and they literally in many cases live right next door to the killers of their siblings or parents. And then there are thoses who tell me they have moved on and they are too busy working, studying, too busy taking care of family tasks to dwell on the hatred of the past. They are focused on the future of the nation. And as you said the economy has gotten better. You mentioned the great growth rate there. How optimistic are you about the future . Because you still have you know the Life Expectancy is only 55. About two thirds still live under the poverty line . Well, actually in terms of the poverty line those statistics are improved. And im willing to bet that life expect expectancy is over 55. And Maternal Mortality has dropped more than half and infact mortality as dropped as well. You dont see kids or anyone dying of malaria. Family planning is free for all who want it. So really if you take a look at the last decade or two, in termsover the Public Health, the government has achieved some of the greatest achievements in the history of Public Health in terms of dropping fertility and mortality rates. Certainly incredible Progress Given the magnitude of that horror 20 years ago, and lets hope it does become africas singapore. Again the book is a Thousand Hills to heaven. There are many events taking place around the world to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the genocide, and some are getting a lot of attention on social media. Hermela aregawi has more. There is a Photo Exhibit on display in the hague that speak speaks of the issue of forgiveness. In each picture a victim poses with their perpetrator who they have forgiven. This woman stands with the man who burned her house down and tried to kill her children. Dominique says i have lost my humanity because of the crime i committed but now im like any human being. This woman standings arms crossed next to the man who killed her children. She said in the end we realize we are all rwandans and it was due to bad government. A lot of you were moved by these photos. These photos were commissioned by creative courts a nonprofit in the netherlands that is exploring the theme of forgiveness. Back to you. Straight ahead whaling wars on the open seas come to a conclusion in the courts. Also why some discounts at the supermarket could be a bad sign. And later why are antti social apps getting so popular . The stream is uniquely interactive television. In fact, we depend on you, your ideas, your concerns. All these folks are making a whole lot of money. You are one of the voices of this show. I think youve offended everyone with that kathy. Hold on, theres some room to offend people, im here. We have a right to know whats in our food and monsanto do not have the right to hide it from us. So join the conversation and make it your own. Watch the stream. And join the conversation online ajamstream. A huge victory in the war against whaling. A landmark ruling by the International Court of justice has put a temporary stop on japans annual slaughter of whales in the antarctic. They have long battled what japan was doing, arguing that japan was killing whales ille l illegally. It has been a long battle for the whale wars reality tv star whos controversial tactics has earned him an International Arrest warrant that forced him and his crew to give on his ship for 15 months. Japan has fired their first shot. They got the ninth District Court in the United States to issue an injunction against us. For more were joined by captain paul watson who has been battling japanese whaling and their industry for years. Its good to have you with us, captain. You basically were at war with japan saying they were killing hundreds of whales for a nonexistent research program. Tokyo say they will honor the ruling, but are not excluding future whaling programs. What does this mean . Well, since 2002 we have been accused of being outlaws and terrorists, and pirates, and the court has vindicated us. So that gives us a lot moral authority when we return if they should return at the end of this year. But it is specific to antarctic can they use it elsewhere. The sort said they cannot use science as a mask for the activities. But the japanese whaling industry has a long history of saying one thing and doing another. So were going to have our ships ready to return at the end of the year. And if they return well redirect to the north atlantic against norwegian and icelandic whaling. What do you say to your critics that say that your tactics are a little too aggressive and even violent . Were not violent. We have never caused an injury in over 40 years of our operations. We operate within the boundaries of the law. We only intervene against illegal activities, but were an anti poaching group. One of the reasons you are so passionate about this is its not just that some of the whales are endangers its that these whales die terrible deaths. Whales are very socially complex and highly intelligent creatures. And you dont kill whales inside a sanctuary. So that was our primary reason we had to protect the integrity of that sanctuary. Why are they fighting so hard to eat while. 95 of the people say they have never eaten or rarely eat whale meat. So why is this still raising such passions . There are 6,000 tons of whale meat in storage they cant even sell. What it is is that the japanese Fishing Ministry will not give an inch on anything. They think if they give an inch on whales they will have to do it with other species they are overexploiting. But i think the primary reason for it is that there is a lot of expoliticians who are hired as bureaucrats, and they will simply lose their jobs, and they get high salaries. So this is an important victory, but as you mentioned, norway kills hundreds of whales a year, you have iceland, and parts of denmark. There is whaling in a lot of places around the world. Yes, and this summer ill have 500 volunteers landing in the peril islands to block the killing of whales there. But if japan does end whaling, then well be able to move to the north atlantic. And what about indigenous populations in place like ala a alaska. Do you have a problem with their killing whales . Personally i do, but they are not in violation of regulations. The hunths in greenland and the United States fall within the regulations. And we have been very cautious to make sure that our organization oppose illegal activities. Good luck with your efforts. Good of you to join us. Thank you. Up next, bring on the antisocial apps. A new movement to help you avoid other people but first why some discounts at supermarkets may come with down sides. Real reporting that brings you the world. Giving you a real global perspective like no other can. Real reporting from around the world. This is what we do. Al jazeera america. Todays data dive holds out for a lower price. You may have been seeing discounts on many staples, but that may not be a good thing. The highest level have been discounted since the recession hit years ago. For example, razor blade sales are down because more men are shaving less. The popularity of pressured laundry soap cap kuls, and soda and potato chip sales have dropped as people try to get healthier. Analysts say americans have gotten board with cereals. About 10. 8 of americans personal spending is on packaged goods. Lots of factors are in play. Among them better deals for Household Items on the internet. And americans are getting older. By 2030, 19 of the population will be over 65. Older people tend to be more frugal and often have different tastes than when they were younger. Maybe its time to invest in pet food. Thats one market that has shown growth. Coming up going antisocial on social networks. Well go inside the move to get away from people you know. Has a backlash begun against social media and on all of the online sharing people do. A slew of antisocial apps has sprung up recently to help you avoid your friends. Molly mchugh covered the subject as an editor of the daily dot. Good to see you molly. People cant seem to buy a sandwich or see a movie without posting it online. People are leaving a very public trail. Have we reached a Tipping Point . There is definitely a little bit of that going on. You cant log on without seeing everything that people are doing, just like you said or where they are checking in, going and where they spend. And thats where these things are coming in, and theres also a little bit of the fact that we want to doing these things without participating but still have accounts. Your piece on the daily dot was titled request we need antisocial apps to save us from ourselves. Break down these antisocial apps. What are they specifically designed to do . We have one called cloak, and theres a new one called split that recently launched. And the idea is that these networks are looking at where you are checking in and what your gps is telling your other social media groups. And it lets you know that hey this person is here maybe you dont want to go there. Or these people checked in at these events, maybe you dont want to go. Theres another one called hell is other people, but that one is little bit more of a project. Yeah, that is a lot more intense at least in its title. Right. We have social networks with friends on them, and then we get an app to hide from them . And you wrote specifically, you said the idea that we need apps to avoid the work of other apps is on one level lunasy and on the other makes all too much sense. First ill let you talk about the lou nancy. Its crazy that someone had to create a thing to help me another thing that is all too similar to what they are making. And its even crazier when you are using these apps to log in to facebook to avoid people who are on facebook. But there is an app for everything now, and so were going to have to have apps for those apps, and it is insane it really is crazy, but its just going to be how the future works and how he solve problems. How have we gotten to the point where Something Like this as you say, makes too much sense . Billions of people having accounts on these social networks is how we have gotten to this place. I think instagram Just Announced they have 200 million monthly active users. Thats an insane number. So its just kind of the natural course that people have taken. So much of this is a grasp for privacy . Lets talk you know, in larger terms after seeing everything that has happened in the past year with Edward Snowden and all of this government surveillance and all of this, do you think there is a privacy backlash . If somebody is using these apps in order to avoid the nsa or anything like that, they are sorely mistaken. This will not make it better. Your only option if you are got to get off line you have to defeat your Facebook Instagram or whatever. Its a quiet hidden way to ignore people that are your friends on facebook. You grew up in theage of the internet do you feel yourself and your friends becoming less social . My real friends, my friends that i hang out with in real life, i see them more in real life than i interact with them on social media. Thats not to say i dont have Rewarding Relationships with people on the internet. Thats another level of friendship, but i totally understand pulling back from our social networks when it comes to the relationships that matter the most. And you also write about the more serious reasons from taking a break from social media, because you say college kids suffer from anxiety. There is a lot of research that points out the generation that has grown up online. It is really different for them in becoming anxious or depressed or far too tuned in and longed on all the time. There are a lot of adverse side effects. These apps arent necessarily going to solve that, but they are reactionary to what is happening. And people are always talking about how overwhelmed they are. So there is definitely something that is happening, and the generation that grew up with facebook account is only going to experience those problems to a degree that we dont understand. Thats true. But on the other hand doesnt some of this feel like it is just cro cowardly and immatur . Totally. Thats a good point. We also should havent to post 18 pictures of our dogs, or every sandwich that we eat. So, you know, its hard to say how we should act online. But i do think that the apps the people that these types of antisocial apps will be truly popular with are maybe a little bit younger. And for the rest of us there might just be a novelty that we look to and check in on. Interesting. Molly great to have you back on the show. The conversation continues on our website. Well see you next time. Hello and welcome to al jazeera america. Im Richelle Carey in new york. John siegenthaler has the night off. Polls open, afghans vote in an historic election under threats from the taliban. Healing hands after the fort hood rampage. The unseen advantage americans surgeons have. Aiming high. A champion with the bow and arrow who has no arms. Well talk to him. So i