through this conflict, the russians warning about nuclear use, chemical weapons, biological, this is the latest stage of that.— weapons, biological, this is the latest stage of that. what do you think about: 's _ latest stage of that. what do you think about: 's : _ latest stage of that. what do you think about:'s : 's _ latest stage of that. what do you think about:'s : 's prime - latest stage of that. what do you think about:'s : 's prime minister think about:'s : �*s prime minister saying if there was the use of chemical weapons, saying if there was the use of chemicalweapons, it saying if there was the use of chemical weapons, it would be a direct attack on poland? what chemicalweapons, it would be a direct attack on poland? what he said is that _ direct attack on poland? what he said is that it _ direct attack on poland? what he said is that it would _ direct attack on poland? what he said is that it would be _ direct attack on poland? what he said is that it would be a - direct attack on poland? what he said is that it would be a game i said is that it would be a game changer. if russia were to use chemical weapons in ukraine, as theirforces did in chemical weapons in ukraine, as their forces did in syria, chemical weapons in ukraine, as theirforces did in syria, how chemical weapons in ukraine, as their forces did in syria, how does their forces did in syria, how does the west respond to that? does it consider that, the west respond to that? does it considerthat, it the west respond to that? does it consider that, it cannot consider that to be an attack on nato because ukraine is not a member of nato. what it would have to be, does the west therefore have a responsibility to intervene at that point to protect civilians and others who are subject to these attacks? that is a very, very difficult question for policymakers in the west to grapple