anand what thehey're relyiyg on a are abstracactions. there's s a big difffference ben "r"row your boboat" and "r"row, row yourur boat". those are e different t thing. "p"players, ththey're gon'n' to" and "b"because thehe players e gogoing to plalay, play, p play" are cocompletely d different us of publilic domain m materia. this is s exactly ththe corere of creatitivity. intervieiewer 2: if f i record a song t today that t began "of coururse, the plplayers gog to p play, play,y, play, pla, and the hahaters goingng to hatete, hate, hahate, hate", woululd ms. swifift have a copyrighght claim agagainst m? peter ananderson: ifif you're talking g about idenentically cocopying a seseries ofof words, wewe would hahave a fightht with the e or side over r whether itit's sho- intervrviewer 2: w well-- soso tell-- yoyou just saia, "player, t they gon' t to pla, and hateters, they g gon' to h" are nonot long enonough phrass to g get copyrigight protectc. are your c client's phrases s long enougugh to g get copyrigight protectc? marina v v. bogorad:d: reall, if somebebody just t took the sasame chorus s that taylr swifift did in " "shake it o " and used i it in theirir own chororus, i'm