Transcripts For FBC Making Money With Charles Payne 20160401

I think the events in paris and belgium underscore the importance of this conference. Notice how it changed the last four or five years from talking about deescalating the threat of Nuclear Weapons to the issue of loose nukes and terrorist events that use dirty bombs and Nuclear Weapons against the west. Its a complete achange. I think everybody realizes, everybody in the west realized one of isiss principle goals is to score a weapons of mass destruction event in the west. God forbid a Nuclear Weapon. It could be just a dirty bomb in a large western city, and we know from the event of the last two days that no one has completely accounted for the thousands of tons of Nuclear Material thats scattered all over the world. And to bring the nations together to find this stuff and put it under lock and key, keep it out of the hand of isis is job one, charles. Charles you are on Donald Trumps Foreign Policy team, walid. Nuclear weapons with respect to europe and rearming south korea and japan. It seems a lot of his idea go counter to what we are probably going to hear from these World Leaders including president obama. How hard would it be for him to implement some of these idea and why would they have to be so radically different than what we have currently. Some of the ideas go against the common wisdom and some will merge with the conference. Mr. Trump as he discusses in the meeting with the advisors and what was discussed in this conference, there are three red zoins. One is red zones. One is north korea and one is iran. The one where we dont have strategies because we are dealing with a Loose Network of jihadists, its isis. For each of these battlefields you have to respond with a different strategy. The statement he made may have appeared different according to the peninsula when he said that south korea and japan maybe left to build their own counter action to the north. But its only one scenario meaning if russia and china are not going to help us with the north. There are other scenarios. Thats what he meant. Charles president obama said the Nuclear Summit was a substantial success. He also talked positively about the Iranian Nuclear deal as well which a lot of americans thought was a disaster before he signed it and after he signed it. And since then there have been a series of things that have gone wrong. His record on the Nuclear Issue has been bad, even though he got a peace prize for it. He hasnt delivered on that promise. Putin last year saying russia is going to start adding icbms. I know we are talking about terrorism. But in traditional theaters where we are concerned about Nuclear Weapons there has been an aggressive buildup. And you add that to situations like ukraine where we promised them we would protect their territorial integrity if they gave up their Nuclear Weapons. We havent done that. Charles isnt that part of the conundrum we are in. I wonder if america is going to come to my aid. We sort of foisted this on japan because they lost world war ii. But i think they have elected him because its supposed to bring back that samurai spirit in abe. Trust that if north korea were to do something rash and side like fire a Nuclear Weapon at south korea or japan, that it would be the United States that retaliates with Nuclear Weapons. 20 years ago when i served in korea that trust was sacrosanct. Today in dealing with north korea and china and iran, there is a sort of sense of distrust and a sense of discomfort when it comes to trusting the United States that they will retaliate against aggression through the use of Nuclear Weapons and frankly i sort of understand that distrust. Charles tino donald trump doesnt want to give away strategy, but do you believe hes willing to give away weapons even in europe if necessary . Thats a Media Statement about what he has said and could have said otherwise. At this point in time hes in the primaries. Even if he wins the nomination, hes still outside the administration and doesnt have the analysis. But he has the general view not to let go of any option. It does not mean its the only option. Or hes changing options. Hes saying if the terrorist organization would obtain that what he point would change our strategy. So he has to put all these possible scenarios. Charles we are 2 minutes away from president obama. A lot of people saying some of this stuff may be it doesnt matter. The knowledge is out there, some of the materials are floating around. You have our arms race already, pakistan and india, you will have a potential arms race in the South China Sea. Maybe the opposite idea is the more countries that have it perhaps the safer the world will be. I think thats a dangerous scenario. Its scary enough to have a country like pakistan with 100 Nuclear Weapons. With the instability in the world with terrorists doing what they are doing, its pretty risky. I want to get to the point of Donald Trumps socalled strategy. He has this obsession with comiena. By saying we are going to abandon japan and south korea. Its not a consistent policy. Charles china has built man made islands in the South China Sea to put landing strips on them. They are militarizing the South China Sea. China should already been emboldened by the feckless the nature of the obama administration. Obviously the administration stepping back from taking a stands in asia, from claiming our right of navigation in the South China Sea by allowing them to build these islands. I want to that people of washington, d. C. For hosting us and for putting up with more than 50 motor kids. I make a promise to the people of this city. I will not hold another one of these summits in another six years. I want to thank everyone tomorrow participated in our meetings. As at our previous summits, we didnt just come here to talk, we came here to act. I know the technical nature of Nuclear Security doesnt always make for flashy headlines. But the past six years we have made significant meaningful progress in securing the worlds Nuclear Materials so it never falls into the hands of terrorists. I want to lay out what we have accomplished. Together we have removed the worlds most deadly materials from Nuclear Facilities around the world. With gentleman panels announcement we removed or secured all the highly enriched our iranian and plutonium from 50 facilities in 30 countries. 3. 8 tons which is more than enough to create 150 Nuclear Weapons. Thats material that will never fall into the hands of terrorists. 14 nations and taiwan, countries as diverse as argentina, libya, serbia and vietnam have rid themselves entirely of plutonium. Successfully removing all of ukraines highly enriched uranium four years ago amendments the difficult situation in sue crane the past two years was not made even more dangerous by the presence of these materials. As of today, south america, an entire continent, is completely free of these dangerous materials. When poland completes its removal, Central Europe will be fry of them as well. When indonesia complets its work this year, so will all of southeast asia. In other words, if terrorist and criminal games and arms merchants look our for deadly ingredients for a nuclear device, those regions of the world are off limits. We made important progress in the United States as well. In addition to new steps i announced this morning. We improved training, consolidated materials, eliminated 138 torns of our surplus highly enriched uranium which would be enough for 5,500 Nuclear Weapons. Working with russia we are on track to eliminate enough russian highly enriched uranium for 20,000 Nuclear Weapons which we are converting to electricity here in the United States. Every single one of the more than 50 nations represented here have taken concrete steps to enhance security at their Nuclear Facilities and storage sites. Stronger regulations, abiding by International Guidelines and International Peer reviews. 15 new centers have been created to pro note Nuclear Training and share best practices. We plan to continue to strengthen our nuclear defenses against cyber attacks. The Security Initiative has grown to 100 nations including regular exersizes improving our ability to interdict shipments. Radar detection equipment has been installed at 300 International Border crossings and ports and we are developing mobile detection systems as well. Finally as i noted this morning, we strengthened the treaties and International Partnerships that are a foundation for so many of our efforts. We made significant progress and everyone involved in this work, especially our teams that worked tirelessly for years can take enormous pride in our achievements. But our work is by no means finished. There is still a great deal of Nuclear Material around the world that needs to be secured. Nuclear arsenals are expanding in some one trirs with small tactical new jar weapons which could be at greater risk of theft. And as a consequence, one of the central goals of this summit is how do we build on the work that has been done so we have an International Architecture that can continue the efforts even though this is the last formal leaders summit. So even as this is the last of those leaderlevel such its, today we agreed to maintain a strong architecture including through the united nations, the International Atomic Energy Agency and provide the resources and Technical Support thats needed to continue this mission. And we are creating a new Nuclear Security contact group, senior level experts for more than 30 of our countries who will meet regularly to preserve the networks of cooperation we built and to keep driving progress for years to come. At our session on isil this afternoon there was widespread agreement that defeating terrorist groups like isil requires more information sharing. Everyone understands the urgency in the wake of what has happened in brings, pair is, turkey and pakistan. I invited all the nations represented at this summit to join a broader discussion among our intelligence and Security Services on how we can improve information sharing within an among our nations to prevent all manner of terrorist attacks, especially those that might involve weapons of mass destruction. In closing. I just want to say that preventing Nuclear Terrorism is one part of the broader agenda that i outlined 7 years ago. Stopping the spread of Nuclear Weapons and seeking a World Without them. In recent days there has been no shortage of analysis on whether we achieved our vision, and im the first to acrossen the great deal of work that remains from negotiating further reductions with russia to dealing with north Koreas Nuclear program. As i indicated in prague, realizing our vaition will not happen quickly and perhaps not in my lifetime. You are about we have begun. The United States and Russian Nuclear arsenals are on track to be the lowest they have been in six decade. I reduced the number of Nuclear Weapons in our Nuclear Security strategy. We prevented the spread of Nuclear Weapons to iran. An International Fuel bang is being built to promote Civil Nuclear cooperation. So im extremely proud of our record across the board. Well keep pushing forward wherever we can as i hope future administrations do to bring us closer to the day when the Nuclear Dangers no longer hang over the head our children and grandchildren. With that let me take a few questions. I will start with roberta ramtin of reuters. Three weeks ago the Iran Supreme Leader said his country has not been getting actual business deals since the nuclear agreement. Nine u. S. Companies are saying its difficult if not impossible to do business with iran without accessing the u. S. Financial system. Are you considering allowing such transactions and if show, is that not a betrayal of your assurances that most u. S. Sanctions would stay in place . Thats not actually the approach we are taking. Let me say broadly, that so long as iran is carrying out its end of the bargain, we think it important for the World Community to carry out our end of the bargain. They have in fact based on the presentations that were made by the iaea this morning have in fact followed the implementation steps that were laid out. As a consequence, sanctions related to their Nuclear Program have been brought down. Part of the challenge that they face is that company havent been doing business there for a long time, and he need to get comfortable with the prospects of this deal holding. One of the things that secretary lu and his counterpart in the p5 plus 1 elsewhere will be providing clarity about what transactions are allowed. And it will take time over the next self months for companies and their legal departments to feel confident that in fact there mayor not be be risks of lie bit if they do business with iran. So some of the concerns that iran expressed we are going to work with them to address. Its not necessary that we take the approach of them going through dollar denomination transactions. Its possible for them to work through european Financial Institutions as well. But there is going to need to be continued clarification provided to businesses in order for deal flows to begin. What i would says also important is irans own behavior in generating confidence that iran i a safe play to do business. In a deal like this, my fir priority. My first concern was making sure we got their Nuclear Program stopped and material that they already had that would give them a short break of capacity. That has happened. I always said i could not promise that iran would take advantage of this opportunity inning this window to reenter the international community. Iran so far has followed the letter of the agreement. But the spirit of the agreement involves iran also sending signals to the World Community and businesses that its not going to be engage in a range of provocative across that might scare business off. When they launch Ballistic Missiles with slogans call for the destruction of israel. That makes businesses nervous. There is some geopolitical risk that is heightened when they see that taking place. If iran continues to ship missiles to hezbollah, that get businesses nervous. So part of what i hope happens is we have a responsibility to provide clarity about the rules that govern so that iran can in fact benefit, the iranian people can benefit from an improved economic situation. Iran has to understand what he country in the world has tounde. Businesses want to go where they feel safe, where they dont see massive controversy, where they can be confident that transactions are going to operate normally. And thats an adjustment that iran is going to have to make as well. Within iran i suspect there are different views in the same way there are hardliners in the youth who even after we certify this deal is working, even after our intelligence teams, Israeli Intelligence teams say this has been a game changer, are city opposed to the deal on principle. There are hardliners inside of iran who dont want to see iran open itself up to the broader World Community and are doing thing to potentially undermine the deal. So those forces that seek the benefits the deal not just in their own term, but more broadly. We want to make sure over time they are in a position to realize those benefits. David nakamura. As you mentioned at the beginning of your remarks. You just finished a working session with 50 World Leaders about battling terrorism and the islamic state. In the past self weeks your administration killed well over 200 people in airstrike in somalia and libya and yemen according to the department of defense. How can you be certain all the People Killed posed an imminent threat to the youth, and why is the youth killing scores of people at a time rather than limited individual in targeted strike. We have constructed a fairly rim id and vigorous set criteria for you evaluating the intelligence we receive about is i will where it might be operating, where al qaeda is operating. These guidelines involve a whole range of agencies, koon consg extensively. And are then checked, doublechecked, triple checked before ke net i can actions are taken. For the most part. Our actions are high value targets i just described. In some cases what we are seeing are camps that after long period of monitoring become clear are involved in and directing plots that could do the United States harm or are supporting is i will activity or al qaeda activity elsewhere in the world. If after a long period of observation we are seeing in fact explosive materials are being load on to trucks, and individual are engaging in training and small training in small arm. And there are some of those individual horriddified as couriers for isil or al qaeda. Then based on those he val racials a based on those evaluations, a strike will be taken. But what we have been cautious about is making sure we are not taking strikes in situations where, for example, we think there is the presence of women or chirp, or if it is in a normally populated area. And, you know, recently we laid out the criteria by which we are making these decisions. We declassified many elements of this. Well be putting forward and try to institutionalize on a regular basis how we made these evaluation and analyses. In terms of the broader debate thats taken place, david. I any there has been in the past legitimate criticism that the architecture, the legal architecture around the use drone strike or other sk or other sk kinetic strikes, over e last several years we have worked very hard to avoid and prevent those kind of tragedies from taking place. In situations of war, we have to take responsibility when we are not acting appropriately. Or where we just made mistakes, even with the best of intentions. Thats what we are going to continue to try to do. What i can say with great confidence is our operating procedures are as rigorous as they have ever been. And there is a constant evaluation of precisely what we do. You said in your opening remark you hope in the future administration will do the same and make it a priority. The republican front runner to replace you said that perhaps south korea and japan should have Nuclear Weapons. And wouldnt rule out using Nuclear Weapons in europe. Did that couple at this summit and generally what mess and does it send when a major Party Candidate is articulating such a reversal in u. S. Foreign policy and who did you vote for in the democratic primary. First all, its a secret balance will the. Im not going to tell you now. The statement you mention tell us that the person who made the statement dont know much about Foreign Policy or Nuclear Policy or the Korean Peninsula or the world generally. It came up on the sidelines. I said before, people Pay Attention to american elections. What we do i really important to the rest of the world. Even in those countries that are used to a carnival atmosphere in their own politics, want so so sobriety in american. Elections because the president of the youth has to know what going on around the world and has to put in place policies that lead to our security and prosperity and will impact everyone elses security and prosperity. Our alliance with japan and the republic of korea is one of the foundations, one of the cornerstones of our presence in the Asia Pacific Region its underwritten. The peace of and prosperity of that regional. It has been an enormous boon to american commerce and american influence. And it has prevented the possibilities of a Nuclear Escalation and conflict between countries in the past and throughout history have been engaged in hugely destructive conflicts and controversies. So you dont mess with that. It is an investment that rests on the sacrifices that our men and women made back in world war ii when they were fighting throughout the pacific. It is because of their sacrifices and the wisdom that american Foreign Policy makers showed after world war ii that we have been able to avoid today tras row fir in those regions. And we dont want somebody in the oval office who doesnt rick noors how important who who doesnt recognize how important that is. Andrew b. Do you consider him an authoritarian . Turkey is a their to ally, it is an extraordinarily important partner in our fight against isil. It is a country with whom we have a long and strategic relationship with. And president erdogan is someone i have dealt with since i came into office, in a whole range of areas we had a productive partnership. Ways also true and i expressed this to him directly, so its no secret that there are some trend in turkey that i have been troubled with. I am a strong believer in freedom of the press and freedom of religion. Im a strong believer in rule of law. And democracy. And there i no doubt that president erdogan has repeatedly been elected through a democratic process. I think the aproper they have been taking toward the press is one that could lead turkey down a path that would be very troubling. And we are going to continue to advise them, and i said to president erdogan, remind him, he came into office with a promise of democracy, and turkey has historically been a country in which deep islamic faith has lifted side by side with modernity, and increasing openness, and thats the legacy that he should pursue rather than the strategy that involves repression of information and shutting down democratic debate. Having said that, i want to emphasize the degree to which their cooperation has been critical on a whole range of international and regional issues. And will continue to be. So as is true with a lot of our friends and partners, we work with them, we cooperate with them, we are appreciative of their efforts, and there are going to be some differences. Where there are differences well say so. And thats what i tried to do here. Ill take one last question. This young lady right there. Thank you, mr. President. What do you think where are you from . Im from azerbaijan. How can azerbaijan support in the Nuclear Security issue . Azerbaijan like many countries who participated have already taken a number of steps. And each country has put forward a National Action plan. There are some countries that had stock piles of highly enriched uranium that they agreed to get rid of. Other countries have civilian Nuclear Facilities but dont have the best security practices. So they adopted better security practices. There are countries that could be transit points for the smuggling of Nuclear Materials, so they worked with us on border controls and detection. And because of azerbaijans location, its the critical partner in this process. I should point out, by the way, that although the focus of the summit has been on securing Nuclear Materials and making sure they dont fall into the hand of terrorists, the relationships, the information sharing, the stitching together of domestic law enforcement, International Law enforcement, intelligence, military agencies, both within countries and between countries, this set of relationships internationally will be useful not just for Nuclear Material. But it is useful in preventing terrorism generally. Its useful in identifying threats of chemical weapons or biological weapons. One of the clear messages coming out of this summit and our experiences over the last 7 years is an increasing awareness that some of the most important threats that wee face are transnational threats. So we are slowly developing a web of relationships around the world that allow us to match and keep up with the transnational organizations that all too often are involved in terrorist activity. Criminal activity. Human trafficking. A whole range of issues that can ultimately do our citizens harm. And seeing the strengthening of these institutions will be one of the most important legacies of this entire process. Mark . Ill call on you for one last question. I wanted to ask a question about Nuclear Policy. Through the past 7 years when you pushed to rid the world of Nuclear Materials, the u. S. Nuclear industry has actually worked to improve miniaturization of warheads, and while the am not developed new classes of cruise missiles and warheads, by the moved to improve the technology. And russia and china are saying we should work to keep up. Do you think the advances in the United States have under mind some of the progress you made on the prevention side . I think its a legitimate question. Here is the balance we had to strike. We have a Nuclear Stockpile that we have to make sure is safe and make sure is reliable. And after the stark 2 treaty we entered into with russia, we brought down significantly the number of weapons that are active. But we also have to make sure that they are up to date, that their command and control systems that might have been developed a while ago are up to snuff given all the technology that has changed since that time. And we have to make sure that our deterrents continue to work. So even as we brought down the number of weapons that we have, i have wanted to make sure that what we do retain functions. That is, its not subject to a cyber intrusion. This sufficient confidence in the system that we dont create destabilizing activity. My preference would be to bring down further our nuclear arsenal. And after we completed stark 2, i approached the russians, our Team Approached the russians in terms of look at a next phase forearms reductions. Because mr. Putin came into power, or returned to his office as president , and because of the vision that hes been pursuing of emphasizing military might over Development Inside of russia, and diversifying the economy, we have not seen the kind of progress i would have hoped for with russia. The good news is that the possibilities of progress remain. We are abiding by stark 2. We are seeing implementations. And though we are not likely to see further reductions during moore presidency. Ply hope is we have built the mechanisms and systems of verfication and so forth that will allow us to do so in the future. We have to guard against in the interim ramping up new and more deadly and more effective systems that end up leading to a whole new escalation of the arms race. And i tried to strike the proper balance making sure that the triad and our systems work properly, they are effective, and to make sure we are leaving the door open to further reductions in the future. But one of the challenges that we are going to have here is that it is very difficult to see huge reductions in our nuclear arsenal. Unless the United States and russia has the two largest possessors of Nuclear Weapons are repaired to lead the way. Other area where we need to see progressers pakistan and india, that subcontinent, making sure that as they develop military doctrines, that they are not continually moving in the wrong direction. And we have to take a look at Korean Peninsula because the north korea is in a whole different category and poses the most immediate set of concerns for all of us, one that we are working internationally to focus on and thats one of the reasons why we had the trilateral meeting with japan and south korea. And it was a topic of conversation with president xi as well. Have a good weekend. Charles president obama wrapping up the Nuclear Summit conference. He said they have removed most of the worlds terms 50 sites, 3 some countries that would equate to 150 bombs. The goal is that Nuclear Weapons never get into the hands of terrorists. He talked about new steps, training facilities, and getting rid of materials that could equate to 5,500 nuclear bombs. Along with new detection systems answer other things. I want to bring back the panel here. And just i have got general robert scales, walid phares. Carl higby wants to jump in here and talk about this. This. Lisa booth as well. Walid, you and i discussed leading up to this summit, mentioning some of the idea of donald trump and sure enough president obama said its been mentioned in the halls, if you will. But his comments are interesting. He said donald trump with whom you are on his Foreign Policy team, doesnt know much about Foreign Policy, Nuclear Policy, the Korean Peninsula or the world in general. It sounded like he would be an absolute catastrophe for all the goodwill built up around the world. I will reverse the statement and say what did senator obama know about world conflicts in 2008. And then i will enter the politics. Way understood from his state of the nukes. Hes talking about the management of what has been agreed upon by people who had the intention. 90 of the planet. And they have executed it. The problem is not that. The new emergent crisis india and pakistan are still and control but the conflict may reverse this. North korea, iran and the uncontrollable situation with isis. That is the real challenge, not the agreements mentioned here. Charles i was shocked, one of the questions was about the Iran Supreme Leader complaining about a lack of business coming into his country after signing this nuclear deal, and even more shocked when president obama seemed to go to bat for him. He said they were carrying out their end of the bargain, carrying out the letter of the agreement when everyone else is saying its obvious why business isnt going there. These guys have been nut before and after the signing. The iranians are continuing to test an intermediate range police particular missile, about a 5060kilaton Nuclear Weapons. The distance to tel aviv is 980 miles. What iran is doing is a blatant program with the intention of dominating militarily in the middle east, facing down israel and attempting to strike israel with Nuclear Weapons. Business doesnt count in this. The ayatollah doesnt care about business. What he cares about is his religion and passion with controlling the middle east. Charles president obama finishing up his comment on the Nuclear Security summit. Foreign policy, one of the key issues in this election, keeping us safe and keeping nukes from isis. Well be right back. Im only in my 60s. Ive got a nice long life ahead. Big plans. So when i found out medicare doesnt pay all my medical expenses, i looked at my options. Then i got a Medicare Supplement insurance plan. [ male announcer ] if youre eligible for medicare, you may know it only covers about 80 of your part b medical expenses. The rest is up to you. Call now and find out about an aarp Medicare Supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. Like all standardized Medicare Supplement insurance plans, it helps pick up some of what medicare doesnt pay. And could save you in outofpocket medical costs. To me, relationships matter. Ive been with my doctor for 12 years. Now i know ill be able to stick with him. [ male aouncer ] with these types of plans, youll be able to visit any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients. Plus, there are no networks, and virtually no referrals needed. So dont wait. Call now and request this free decision guide to help you better understand medicare. And which aarp Medicare Supplement plan might be best for you. Theres a wide range to choose from. We love to travel and theres so much more to see. So we found a plan that can travel with us. Anywhere in the country. [ male announcer ] join the millions of people who have already enrolled in the only Medicare Supplement insurance plans endorsed by aarp, an Organization Serving the needs of people 50 and over for generations. Remember, all Medicare Supplement insurance plans help cover what medicare doesnt pay. And could save you in outofpocket medical costs. Call now to request your free decision guide. And learn more about the kinds of plans that will be here for you now and down the road. I have a lifetime of experience. So i know how important that is. Charles we just saw president obama wrapping up his Nuclear Security summit. One of the things that stuck out is when he was talking about donald trump and his frustration with donald trump and the way he presence and how important americas image is, our image. Lisa booth, you took exception to that. I did. Im tired of this righteous indignation from president obama. Hes talking about how the world perceives america on the heels of the belgium attacks. Our president proceeded to go to a country a president hadnt been in 90 years, a country people have been fleeing under the castro regime and attended a basketball game and do the wave with a dictator and danced the tango. Or cutting a deal with iran to give them 100 billion to continue to Fund Terrorism around the world. Charles he said even though they were following the letter of the agreement, the spirit of it. I am shocked by this. He criticized Donald Trumps Foreign Policy knowledge. This is a guy who started a war with the Syrian Rebels who turned into isis. The republic of iran has been at war with us since the 1970s. They have paid for, funded, supplies. Most of the materials that killed u. S. Troops in iraq. This guy had no idea about Foreign Policy what so. The fact that you just gave them 150 billion just send me off. Thats 30 minute of my life ill never get back, that speech. Charles does it move anything forward . Or is it a highprofile summit where World Leaders get together and talk about thing that never come to fruition. What struck me is not what the president said, but we did not say. He talked about Nuclear Materials. What he didnt talk about was the neck us between russian islam was the nexus between russian islamists and the republics and the possibility Nuclear Weapons may have been overlooked in the early ninth when the russians exported their Nuclear Weapons. Can you imagine what a suitcase bomb stolen by the chechens, passed to isis, put into a ship container and taken to all of s. Harbor, what that might portend . He talked about material, but he never talked about the awful prospect of a real Nuclear Weapon being shipped to isis. Charles for a brief moment he talked about the small tactical weapons which we know are beginning to proliferate the world. Police claim 50 isis supporters were working as bag pang handlers in the Brussels Airport. Talk about sleeping with the enemy. When you think about success, what does it look like . Is it becoming a better professor by being a more adventurous student . Is it one day giving your daughter the opportunity she deserves . Is it finally witnessing all the artistic wonders of the Natural World . Whatever your definition of success is, helping you pursue it, is ours. Tiaa. Put under a microscope, we can see all the bacteria that still exists. Polidents unique micro clean formula works in just 3 minutes, killing 99. 99 of odor causing bacteria. For a cleaner, fresher, brighter denture every day. all of them were already built in to the low price. I know that i got a better deal than i would have on my own. Usaa car buying service, powered by truecar. I built my business with passion. But i keep it growing by making every dollar count. Thats why i have the spark cash card from capital one. I earn unlimited 2 cash back on everything i buy for my studio. And that unlimited 2 cash back from spark means thousands of dollars each year going back into my business. Thats huge for my bottom line. Whats in your wallet . Charles in a letter to the government, the Belgian Police warned as many as 50 isis supporters infiltrated the same Brussels Airport that isis terrorists attacked late last month. Isis sympathizers are working as cleaners, caterers, baggage handlers and positioning themselves for a new attack. Joining me robert scales, Jillian Melchior and lisa boothe. We have the same problem in america . The union warned f before the terrorism attack. That was a red flag. We also had a red flag raised. Last summer they conducted an audit and found the tsa failed to catch links between airport workers, cleaners, concessions people and isis, terrorism. 73 people with links to terrorism were working and there were thousands of people vetted where the applications did not have all of the information. So i think brussels certainly shows what the possibility is. The United States has its problem as well, and we need to get on that. Charles waleed, i was saying during the break here, i read a report from italy, no italians make pizzas because its a low paying job, everyone from north africa and the middle east that come, theyre so engrained in the european culture, a lot more so than america. If they are caterers, cleaners, its hard to identify them and certainly harder maybe to jettison them out of the system. Look, ten years ago, i published my book future jihad that projected exactly that. That the jihadists are going to mutate and adapt to the place of immigration or the place of work. Its not about what is the profession, its about whats in their head. If they have been indoctrinated. They could be hired normally. You cannot detect them. We need to do it before anything else. Charles general scales, how do we combat this, in your opinion . Put the same attention on the lower level workers. By the way, charles, many of whom dont belong to the airlines and the airport. Many of these are contracted out from small businesses, and just like the Syrian Refugees dont have an audit trail from past, so too do many of the employees not have a traceable past. And finally heres the thing, whats to say that these lower level employees arent being intimidated by isis because theyre threatening their families overseas . No. My sources tell me this is the greatest Single Source of potential danger, airports both in europe and in the United States. Charles how do we get around it . The vetting process, if its leaky, how do we fix it . This raisesroader concerns about terrorism in europe as well. Look at the culmination between the immigration policies, porous borders and the lack of assimilation and saw that with the terrorists housed in the molenbeek area for months, and they werent able to find him. Charles keep it there. Fantastic show. Hope you have a great weekend. Appreciate you watching every night at 6 00 p. M. Weve been doing really well. Its the man after us. Tom sullivan, in for lou dobbs. Good evening, im tom sullivan in for lou dobbs. Four days to go until a critical primary in wisconsin, but donald trump will not be heading back there until tomorrow. The real clear politics polling average shows trump could be in trouble in wisconsin, four points behind ted cruz, but trump is banking on the fact that independents can vote in wisconsin and could complicate things for senator ted cruz. The new fox business poll out shows trump is leading among independents in wisconsin, 37 to cruzs 26. Among independents. Governor john