of congress charge is the least. of their worries. there is certainly no guarante el that hunter will ever comply with the house subpoena anyway. and todah y i think that law professor jonathan turley nailed ie t and. pi put out a piece of advice to republican lawmakers. this is whatece he said. the response to hunter by the house should be short. it should be simple. toying with congress may have had recreational and political appeal, but it appe legal costs. hunter may be the president's son, but he does not get a mulligan on contempt. in a joint statement, house chairman colmer and judiciary committee chairman jordat was n said they will allow hunter to comply with the original subpoena. but in the meantime, the housepr will proceed with their contempt resolutiooceen. now, of course, for mostle americans, there are no legal mulligangal mu s. if you try to defraud the federal government for years and noegovernmet pay youru guess what? you don't get a do over whent g you get caught. if you lie in a gun applicationp