the fbi, and that's what opened the investigation. we know that. but they don't like the answer. that's the problem. and so, we've had all of this machinations and, frankly, comments by barr which suggest he thinks there was spying, which there was not, and allegations about the fisa warrant, which was perfectly legal and scrupulously handled, and they just don't want to hear what the answer is. and at some point, you know, we have to stop this. >> so, josh, what does this expansion tell you? are they widening the scope because they found something here or because they didn't find anything? >> it's not clear to me what their rationale is for broadening it, but it does sound now like they're going beyond what was already under review. the things cynthia is talking about are things that were the subject of an office of inspector general report that we're expecting to get in the next few weeks that look at the origins of this investigation and was the fisa court the court that issued some of these surveillance warrants, were they