For covering todays meeting madam clerk, any announcements . Electronic devices. Completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. Okay. Thank you very much madam clerk with that, item one. Ordinance appropriate 4 hundred and thirty theories four this administrative costs forever is business legacy register and Historical Preservation fund in the Small Business commission in the moechlz in 20162017. Okay. Thank you very much were joined by supervisor tang you are Committee Vice chair colleagues he called this last week, a discussion on this item and debating whether to continue to the call of the chair or put on Budget Committee reserve at the request of the sponsoring sponsor well put it on Budget Committee reserve and handle that that way moving forward colleagues, any questions or comments happy to entertain them but first Public Comment on this item weve heard after all to the your budget analysts if you want to add something. To the call of the chair through the Budget Committee deborah from the budget and legislative in fact, office based on the testimony by the director of the Small Business commission that she had sufficient salary in her current year budget to fund the one new position that actually was heard yes at the full board and will be subject so one more meeting we are recommending that those funds which is 37, one and 9 be deducted from the supplemental appropriation and the total will be instead of 343,000 plus it would be whoops three hundred and 6 thousands plus then our recommendations is approval of the supplemental appropriation as amended with the policy decision of the board. Thank you for grabbing any attention colleagues quickly before we act on the amendment hell move on to Public Comment anyone wish to comment seeing none, Public Comment is closed so colleagues an amendment in front of us as well as the underlying stem my apprehensive to entertain to approve that item and put those funds on Budget Committee reserve. Oh. Is there a motion . Ill make that motion a motion to amend. To reduce this according to the analyst and hopeful e move this to the Budget Committee reserve. Is where clear well take that without objection. Okay madam clerk, is there any additional business to come before this body . Would you like to excuse supervisor kim if attending todays meeting. Motion to excuse objection. Madam clerk, is there any additional business to come before this body . No, mr. Chair. Thanks everybody were good morning, everyone. In is the Transportation Authority finance commission of San Francisco county meeting of thursday, march 17, 2016, my name is eric mar the chair and our clerk steve stamos. You roll call commissioner campos absent commissioner cohen commissioner kim absent supervisor mar commissioner yee we have quorum thank you. I wanted to thank from sfgovtv for televising us for every meeting leo davis and nona nicoles from sfgovtv item 2 the minutes of the april 2016 meeting. No questions open up for Public Comment anyone wish to comment seeing none, Public Comment is closed can we approve the minutes well take that without objection. Or roll call. On minutes commissioner campos absent commissioner cohen commissioner kim absent supervisor mar commissioner yee the minutes are approved. Thank you next item please item 3. State and federal update an action item. A presentation. Yeah. Good morning mark presents sends his regrets hes in sacramento ill step up if you have additional questions thankfully not too much to report a shorter magical than in the past few months as far as the positions two new positions were recommend in page 5 seek amendment on the Assembly Bill 1841 a bill related to cleaning our vehicles so on the wooden resupport the measures to increase the pointofsale on the other hand, it also included roving a cap that increases the amount of decals in the h m v lane weve approved those that effectiveness particularly in the bayer were seeing extra congestion because of that thats why were not opposing but seeking the amendment get that portion of the bill amended out the second position it operationally is the posted position on senate bill 885 public agencies to accept liability and financial repercussions in defense of Design Professionals and their work so it is a bill that puts burden on public aand opposed by other coalitions of public segment agencies another quick update on the ab 2374 the construction manager general contractor bill we are supported by assemblyman chiu heard at the transportation it passed out of committee eric of our staff and soould presented it and others were in support so i think youre working with the coalitions and interests that have been expressed concern over similar bills their satisfied that is a narrow scope of application of the delivery mechanism their satisfied that theyre not going to approve it so hopefully that move forward and finally just you know weve been present on what was going on in the measure for the state level the 3 proposals that are on the table in the assembly the senate discretion on transportation and the governors proposal nothing has happened but we expect activities in general there are on the one hand it will be a challenge to there the revenue to require 3 4ths so the real battle over the cap trade fund that are left at the discretion of the legislator and the governor with that, ill be happy to answer any questions you may have. Or ask mark to get back with you. I want to ask about the ab 2292 on the watch list the summary defining what a Disadvantaged Community it is that more in line with being broader on the definition versus what the state requires could you go a little bit detail. So to moves in the right direction a little bit youve been concerned about the definition is didnt address most of larger concerns eve it moves in the in the right direction is will not effect the needle well monitor and hopefully increase the effective in essenceness of the definition. Any other questions opening up for Public Comment minute from the public anyone wish to comment two recommendations on the summary sheet and a number of watches and this is an action item can we take this recommendation same house, same call . The house has changed with supervisor kim so a roll call. On item 3 commissioner campos absent commissioner cohen commissioner kim commissioner mar commissioner yee the item is approved. Thank you please call item 4 item 4 recommending wandering 3 contacts for two additional rackets to american and nelson consulting and staten Consulting Services and w s2 not to exceed 2 million for on Call Transportation Planning Services and authorize the executive director for contract terms this is an action item. Ranch a transportation planner those on call support a wide range of planning in the ta the item in the memo starting other than page 49 describes the range of services were seeking an call support for everything from supporting our longrange transportations at sfmta to the neighborhood Transportation Planning studies that really lead to the corridor supporting the vision zero ramps, safety analysis to the Treasure Island planning work that we do we are recommending an award of 5 contracts to 5 teams who capture the breathe of skills were looking for and those skill sets are described on imagine 41 of your packet everything from project management skills basic transportation and Community Planning to spfld skills in the area of jerry and cost estimating modeling and simulation to expertise in technology and transportation and Transportation Systems engineering which is to some of the Software Needs that support things like our park incentives project ill be happy to answer any questions you may have. I also have to share a summary of how our existing seem to expire on call planning contract has been used the current on call contract tree team 3 contract with 3 different teams the total contact capabilities or authorized is one . 8 million a little bit of contract capacity but pending things in need for some of that remaining capacity so the range of studies and Planning Efforts this supported and shown here. Commissioner cohen has a question. I understand there were a total of 37 responses to the rfp we selected 5. There were 6 responses lets see that may have encompassed 37 individuals wheres the 37. The preproposed. Oh, thats the number that attended on the okay okay yes 37 firms attempt the preproposals conference so the our process goes like this we hold the issues rfp and have a database of firms that are registered with us to receive the notifications of our contract analysis our rfp and rfp qs we invite any interested firms we answer questions about the scope of work and it is an opportunity for potential vendors to network with each other in the team. Is it mandatory. I know you continue