Your agenda is general Public Comment there are no speaker cards. Does my member of the public wish to speak on a nonagendized item seeing and hearing none, Public Comment is closed. Item one directors announcements. Good afternoon, commissioners tim Frye Department staff the directors report was in your packet should you have any questions. Seeing none, commissioners item 2 review of past events that is Planning Commission staff recorded and amazements important tim Frye Department staff no formal report regarding the Planning Commission, however, one item or two items to share but regarding the events we participated in last night first is the department attended the dog patch Association Meeting and gave on offering of the Millions Program im going to turn it over to mills act applications will be due to the end of this month a number of applications from the dog patch we gave a short presentation to the Neighborhood Association regarding the benefits of the mills program as well as the requirement last night we be participated in a working group regarding the lgbtq Cultural Heritage the lower poublg and upper market poublg invited us we hosted a working group 25 members in attendance and represents supervisor kim and supervisor sheehy that he supervisor Peskin Office it was a great event there was a lot of good feedback and the department has a number of Partnership Webinar that came lower that poublg and thank you for putting on the fefrnlts im going to turn it over to several other events scheduled well be participating. You should be getting the notifications via email about various events within the city or through the department if youre not receiving those let me know i can keep you, you updated on the prior to the board of supervisors towards the end of april that concludes my remarks unless you have questions. Commissioners, if theres nothing further, well move on to item 3 the sifrtsd local government 20152016 annual report. Tim Frye Department staff our annual clg report based on the states fiscal year this is october 1st to september 30th of the prior year was included in our packets we were not anticipating giving you a formal presentation, however, im available to answer any questions as youre a aware a requirement of the clg agreement with the certified local government to produce this report on an annual basis youll see in the goals section towards the end of the report there you are a number of goals that you, you can arguably if meet this year preliminary the projects were in process a lot has happened again with the Cultural HeritageAssets Committee the mills acts and social efforts that participated last year so largely we moved many of the goals to this year as well we actively work on that and that concludes my remarks and on page one providing an electronic link to the program i dont see them. I see that we shall make that added. Okay at the then only on page 3 many yuptsd to the plan we didnt check the answer in the no box there. Oh, thank you yes, this should be noted. Any comments is there anyone from the public that wishes to speak on the sifrtdz Program Annual report seeing none, Public Comment is closed. And looks like a good report to me move on. Xhirsz under president s report and announcement. No formal report. Item 5 adoption of commission minutes. For the march 1, 2017. And draft minutes for hpc march 1, 2017. Any comments before we take Public Comment. Is there anyone from the public that wishes to speak on the draft minutes for arc march 1, 2017. And the draft minutes for hpc march 1, 2017. . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Do i have a motion to adopt the minutes so moved. Thank you commissioners to adopt the minutes for draft minutes for arc march 1, 2017. And other than that, motion commissioner hasz commissioner johnck commissioner johns commissioner matsuda commissioner pearlman commissioner vicepresident hyland and commissioner president wolfram so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places us under item 6 commission comments and questions. Any questions or comments . No. Nope were ready to keep on going. Commissioners regular calendar for 2731 folsom street this is initiate landmark designati designation. Good afternoon janet planning Department Staff the the item before you is the initiate landmark designation of an article 10 landmark designation mraengs for the house on 2731 folsom street the applications was prepared and the final draft by the Property Owner to the the department 2731 folsom street is significant as a master architectural and the fine example of the architectural it is identifiable as the building as a molted balcony adapted by a wrote iron railing used in commercial buildings the other Signature Design a republic indicated ground floor a composition and ornamentation and arts those features are a hallmark of the style, however, the Community Supported application is missing information on the development of the neighborhood the construction and staff recommends that the application includes information from the mission and historic remark and a discussion whether or not up to the time is in the context staff recommends that the application be updated to include from the recent remodel to compare the existing conditions and secondary elevation and regarding the defining features the massing form and style of this horizontal siding on the secondary feature be included and contemporary like the gold leaf be deleted from the features although the subject property didnt meet the pirate for designation it meets the eligibility for article 10 with the architecture building a as a Community Sponsored ive the Historic Preservation commission initiate article 10 and director the project sponsor to include staff recommendations if initiated today, the department that return a subsequent hearings recommending it to the Historic Preservation commission that concludes my presentation. Im available to answer any questions the Property Owner and consultant are here to speak today. Great any kwergz questions for ms. Ferguson. Commissioner vicepresident hyland can you explain a little bit about the future analysis of integrity. The secondary alterations have been alternated the i feel comfortable simple style is compatible so we believe that retains be integrity and like to see an analysis in the application as well as some of the like i said plans from the recent remodel to compare what is original and what is not. With no further questions. Good afternoon, commissioners im the Property Owner i reside on 2731 folsom street and i have no Technical Details im here to present the reason he want it landmarked i moved to San Francisco about 15 years ago first and foremost it has been done im irish and thats a suspicious reason we want to it move forward the second major reason the neighborhood itself is really proud of that building everyone in the mix loves the fact that we have a building in the neighborhood everyday if you stand close to the house youll see this building from neighborhood perspective anything that will formalize it would be great i would love if we moved with the landmarking so the mission will have Something Like a j f because the mission has gotten negative press this is a positive step for the third reason sometimes id like to move towards this to the millions act to maintain building id like to kate hartley, Deputy DirectorMayors Office of housing and community development. Republican to present the former of the presentation thank you very much thank you im catherine the primary author of the landmark application i will quickly review i have a few photos 2731 folsom street is a 3 story multi Family Residences locked between 23 and 24th street and we saw a new print from the called africanamericans and from that, we know that is designed by jason in 1999 and we found a waterworks record dated 1899 the water was presented it has misrepresent family and it was the building was depicted on the zoning map from 19 hundred it is unchanged from the stair we found do 1976 Planning Survey those photos are in the survey and the survey considered the building architecturely significant and youll see in the field notes the surveyor noted a great appeal to the scale these photos from the Research Survey the photo the building was in decay but given a rating of 3 the property is eligible for the resources these photos were taken last summer of 2016 and similarlyly to the 1976, 2008 found 2731 folsom street to a remarkable retaining a highlevel of integrity it has a high presence within the Mission Neighborhood and found to be architecturely significant for both the design and the notable work of james and based the photo and the permitting the orientation is limited to the primary facade the bill art features youre looking at the replicated and designed ground story the column and the eloquent design and the doom and the institution all the original detailing is retained with the keystone building and the glasses windows and the molted window frames and the cultural foil windows for the grounds youll see that wood stash windows the engaged corinthian column and the it consists of those to resemble leafs and a ribbon of texture with x month testify and of the work by an important acre james was extensively taught and designed commercial buildings in San Francisco from 1897 to 1921 hes a master annex the architect professional journal ran several pieces by him and 2731 folsom street is one of a number of the Apartment Buildings shown here and recognizable as one the designs at the far right the Apartment Building that is a San Francisco landmark so for those reasons we believe that 2731 folsom street is significant so for the Architectural Design and a notable work by the master architect as a youve heard Property Owner shawn is proud to live in this building and the landmarking will be the first step in securing those acts to continue the maintenance of the building so, please let me know if you have questions. Can you respond to the planning Department Staff comments about the additional items in the report. This is the first time we received those comments so i would want to review them in more detail how is it specifically handled. What would be good to get a sense whether i agree or able to do the additional work that is what we do want to know in the process whether so the comments have been schematic versus new schematic thats fine no problem and we did make changes to the interior but compare o we can submit that i have no issue with that. And yeah. I guess more analysis they requested for the exterior secondary evaluation and the relationship to the development in the district. Im sorry if this is requested well go back and add it to the report i have no problem. Commissioners any questions. Thank you very much at this time open up for Public Comment anyone from the public wish to comment if so, please come forward seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Bring it back to the commission. Commissioner johnck. Well, it is wonderful we have to Community Initiative and thank you for that as long as the applicant is comfortable and turnball is inaudibl inaudible . Commissioner pearlman thank you this feels like a through back to what the public thinks are landmarked in San Francisco because it didnt fit the priorities the fact the owner wants to do that makes it more important because this is how you know this is how we celebrate our city i work with a lot of irish guys and honoree irish so laughter they call me go johnny offering mr. Pearlman i appreciate the relationship of you personal and the Irish Community not a lot of landmarks by the amazing irish you can builders who came over in the 19 century so i think that is you know very worthy and that i dont know if this might be another piece to put in the report about the fact there were so many irish this is a significant architect is irish and the builders i dont know month built this but probably richie agree i think with the booefrt of the report. Commissioner vicepresident hyland. It is a great project and landmark i support it im not sure depending on how much effort to make the revisions done relationship quickly that would be great if it is extensive and requires costs to the Property Owner im not sure this is absolutely necessary personally and then lastly is that would it be possible or what is the mills act opportunity for getting credit for the restoration . Retroactive yeah and commissioners ms. Ferguson can answer that question. The millions act allows work that has been completed and last one to two years in the rehabilitation of the plan that would be the requirement. Approve it . As amended by staff or . I would motion if it is not too much of a burden or effort i dont know that is amended this is not easemently were we voting of initiating it. Were voting on initiating that but direct staff to have the sponsor make changes were what youre saying a remeinitia and workout the provisions whether or not it is burdensome. It sound the information is in the reports that are done not sounding burdensome at all. Do i hear a second and commissioner pearlman seconded it. On that a motion to initiate landmark designation commissioner hasz commissioner johnck commissioner johns commissioner matsuda commissioner pearlman commissioner vicepresident hyland and commissioner president wolfram so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and commissioners, that places you under item 8 Washington Square certificate of occupancy good afternoon, commissioners francis planning Department Staff before you a request for the certificate of occupancy to make the alterations to Washington Square founded by columbia and stockton and uncle and peel street the repair and replacement of parklands features the subject property is to the certificate of occupancy replacing the playground commit and repairing the walkways and planting something and reform of the staircase in conducting of 1982 they corner of fillmore better is in con for purposes of secretary of interior standard and comparable with the character of the landscape the altercations dont remove the fabric and none of the materials will be affected by the proposed project staff finds that consistent with the Washington Square character and un the features including the wood beverages and did childrens go be playground and pathways will remain in the historic location the historic design and configuration of the playground will be retained and the new materials with the texture of the playground wall and the borders and walkways about match the hard escape the playground and staircase on the corners are not landscape features and will not all of the character of Washington Square staff says it is approve with conditions staff recommends the approval that prior to the ordinance of Building Permit with the materials including the fencing and paving and stones at board and the finish for the perimeter walls will be forwarded by the preservation staff no Public Comment has been received since submitted that concludes my presentation. Unless questions the project sponsor has a brief presentation of the project. Thank you any questions for staff. Take up the project sponsors presentation now. Okay. Good afternoon im a porridge manager and director of the Capital Planning at the rec and Park Department were thrilled to be here to present the childrens play area at Washington Square i want to speak why Washington Square is important Washington Square is the first of 13 playground for the department that is renovating and it is used to be called the Playground Initiative what the parks bond a Citywide Program the goal to provide clean and imaginative playground for all children and families of San Francisco we began in 2014 with the rec and park commissions pointed out a Citizens Advisory Committee to determine the playgrounds across the city were in need of renovation the park professional and stakeholders and childrens advocacy and parented organizations and Child Development experts the task force settled on four factors for the playground for renovation the 4 factors in order priority number one, presence of proper q and a pressure treated wood within the playground and second the low Household Income and, of course, with the Parks Alliance playground report card grades the task force recommended 13 playground for renovation that the rec and Park Department adopted unanimously as you can see on this map that locates all 13 playgrounds it is wide geographically exists throughout the city and wheel were planning the department partnered with the alliance to initiate a if you have any questions, well be happy to answer theming campaign to insure that all 13 sites will be renovated in the program were now in the process of implementing all 13 playgrounds as i mentioned Washington Square it the first of those playgrounds to be renovated to today, we went through Community Engagement for about 9 months now that articulated the Overall Community members and Key Stakeholders through the participatory design process we worked with the community to understand the need of kite and take those plans and create a final preferred alternative plan Washington Square has 3 Large Community and overwhelmingly you Community Support youll see with that, im going to turn it over to our architect to explain the plans im available to answer any questions at the end of her presentation. Good afternoon, commissioners thank you for listening in oh here we go. Before i start, i should get a feeling who has been to Washington Square park has everyone . So i dont think i have to explain Washington Square park to everyone what i want to share perhaps you never paid attention to the childrens playground that is completely in the northwest corner indicated in the orange so it is basically a 13 site it is very much tucked in one of the small programs it is really the only Program Element within this part so zooming in the thing about Washington Square park which is important to know is that it is sort of the intersection between the two neighborhood russian hill and Telegraph Hill and just the green square for the community to really gather now the playground its the reason were here it is landmarked in 1995 and are the the 1957 plan so basically this is the third iteration of the playground since the inception and when we run to the Community Process there was a shift part and because the uses and regulations change over time and so because the nearby fairly significant playground joe dimaggio got we done the focus has changed it really towards Young Children and so that means for a number of reasons that was to bring the lower profiles to the site itself and light it up it is a dark corner the structure today is kind of dark and there is issues in the park one of the challenges were trying to lighten it up so just this these two pictures youre seeing up here is really right at the northwest corner looking up to the mraurlgd and then the other one from the east looking over the green court you can basically, not tell it is a playground so this is looking at right into the playgrounds about 3000 and what the two discriminated one is the existing on top and the proposed as you can see that we have retained everything that is critical to the overall circulations of the park and the features that we are outlined in the beverages the trees and the pathways situation this it is the general scope well be removing paving and refurnishing the benches and shifting them taking out the 1982 stairwell is a safety issue for parents and completely redoing the inside of playground so and this is the proposed lens whoops as you can see that we virtual retained using perimeter calls walls it is the boundary and bringing in the notation of the Telegraph Hill and russian hill sort of the hills and letting this playground sort of work within those playful hills and give it place making in terms of where those hills came from and weve play equipment with could he typical swings considered critical and really just an exploratory playground those images now below is the actual types of play equipment, however, the colors are not what well, selecting so, please use our imagination on the colors as you can see there is very few vertical elements were looking to use neutral colors and some green to connect to the green of the lawn are another view you probably not see actually that is really kind of would be possibly from the street and here were going through some of the key components material features that is the concrete wall that actually will weve from the site creating continuous edge that is currently used will match the color of the current restrooms that were rebuilt well tie that into that heres many more features some elements of either concrete or rock were still in the exploratory and a few accent features what the acorn or a touchstone playground and heres some of the overall materials now i brought a material board if you like to pa is that around with so the key sort of materials within the park already the park is in terms of of the paving it is encouraging asphalt but one of the actual desires for the rec and Park Department to shift from asphalt to concrete for environmental reasons as well as long term maintenance were going to the dark concrete with could be he will edging that is started to be used throughout the park that developed through maintenance needs and a percentage of the everybody elses so people dont walk into the planting beds and additionally were adding these simple black post chain fences we started to us in delores park thats been successful in protecting the plant theres a lot of issues about the maintenance that has driven some of the decisions but we feel like were using the element as a test case in the corner that eventually will be for the entire park i think ill let you ask questions at this point. Great commissioners any questions. Commissioner pearlman. No, no questions. No, i think we dont have any questions a clear presentation is there anyone from the public that wishes to speak to this matter please forward seeing none, Public Comment is closed. And bring it back to the Commission Commissioners commissioner johnck well, ive been there recently a merger with four of my grandchildren that is fantastic and we just approved the restrooms a while back yeah. So beautiful job ill make a motion to approve it. Good. That would be great. Second the motion. Its all good a motion and second commissioners, if theres nothing further, well move on to to approve commissioner hasz commissioner johnck commissioner johns commissioner matsuda commissioner pearlman commissioner vicepresident hyland. Yes. Good job and commissioner president wolfram. So moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and xhrsz on items 9 ab for pier 43 1 2 Fishermans Wharf and 1129 folsom street or not those are legacy business applications. Excuse me commissioners i must recuse myself from pier 43 1 2 Fishermans Wharf im under contractor with pier 43 a motion to recuse commissioner johnck. Moving. Thank you, commissioners to recuse commissioner johnck from item 9 a well be hearing those together so if you want to take them separately. I think thats okay. On that motion to commissioners to recuse commissioner johnck commissioner matsuda is commissioner pearlman and commissioner vicepresident hyland and schof so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and commissioner johnck your hereby recused. Okay. Good afternoon, commissioners desiree planning Department Staff in a nut shell are two legacy business nominations and applications which were submitted to the Planning Department on february 13th and ready for recommendation those mrashtsdz were reviewed by the office of the Small BusinessCommission Prior to transmittal to the department these all the physical features and tradition for those first application for red and white fleet found in 1892 the operator of the San Francisco by the way, a maritime worlds fair the business offered it services in the by the way, the barkers ways launched in the golden state on Treasure Island today red and white fleet is operated by hi grandson and launches if pier 43 the second application is 1995 who own and operate joshua began the sail boat the first one to have a coast guard on the bay since 1981 offers the services and for thirty years has offered services on 1129 folsom street founds theyve met the criteria and qualifies for the legacy business registry that concludes my presentation. Im available to answer any questions and some representatives of the businesses that would like to speak on their applications. Thank you any questions. No at this time well take Public Comment on this item including sponsors that wish to speak and 3 minutes a warning bell of 30 seconds left. Good afternoon my name is tom im one of the owners look with the bank owning the red and white fleet no point i dont think in me going through the history of red and white fleets we tried to look at the environment because when the grandfather started the business one person roe and boat and gotten diesel boats their dirty as an industry were trying to clean it up and for the globe one of the projects were working on hygiene fuel boat were looking for the future where we that is one project and another project we are doing which puts San Francisco at the forefront we or the a 6 hundred passenger hybrid electric with likt yum batters that boat will be here in a year were continuing the operation of the working with the community and working with the unions and working with giving a decent wage to our employees we want to also besides building now boats and looking for the future were in the process of doing additional work at pier 43 1 2 Fishermans Wharf arranging of the facilities we can have take advantage of the zero pollution boats with using solar and electric so we help the environment one of the things is that we were looking for the support for our legacy business status because one of the things you youll be recognizing i think this historic significance as a maritime is a city and the labor aspects that built the city thats why were excited about it so one the things that came out of this whole event for us is the Additional Information that we have the additional interest in the history of company that came out of this we have files and files of documents were looking for someone to come through and organ those for us we can tie the red and white fleet back 1892 so im asking if you have suggestions we, get ahold of me taking our history and getting that better organized i apologize were not more inclusive what we prop and put together something and get something in a form that anyone what enjoy and the children what learn so when were dead and gone people can look at the record electronically how can i do that it is awfully hard any suggestions ill appreciate it. Is there any additional Public Comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Oh, im sorry. Im here because captain joshua was not able to be here its his grandmothers 97 birthday im elizabeth i have permission to interrupt his lunch thats the only reason im happy to do my best to answer back. Thank you very much any other member of the public wish to speak seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Bring it back to the commission mr. Freeing. Commissioners preemptly well put the project sponsor in contact with the city architect with the information and had a meeting with a couple of local universities their public history programs and maybe students projects to help to facilitated facilitate organizing that. Thank you just a note the agenda said red and white was funded in 1982 not 18. Oh, on the agenda no. A minor correction the case report i think. Yeah. Yeah. Great. Thank you for that correction commissioner pearlman. I want to say that each one as a piece that the discussion of linking the past with the future with hybrid boats and hygiene boats is krish8 if 1892 liaison red and white exists that a legacy is in the future so each one of the stories how rich of a story thank you. Other commissioners any comments. Move to approve second. Very good, commissioners. On that motion to approve items 9 ab commissioner hasz commissioner johns commissioner matsuda commissioner pearlman commissioner vicepresident hyland and commissioner president wolfram so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and thank you. Congratulations on our first step in our legacy business that adjourns our hearing the hearing is adjournedagain. clapping. good afternoon, Everyone Welcome to to city hall so i want to thank everyone for being here on this lovely valentines day and we really have an Important Message we want to share with everyone and that is that on the valentines day we want to make sure that everyone feels loved and included here in San Francisco and by that we need to make sure we provide housing for everyone that want to live and work here for generations to come. clapping. so today, were joined by people my colleague ahsha safai will acknowledge but bring up our mayor of the city that has been working to make sure our housing policies enable future generations to live in San Francisco with that, mayor ed lee. Thank you. clapping. katie and supervisor safai joining on that valentines day rally for housing yeah. Got a lot of love in the house and a lot of the labor leaders theyre showing their love they love building they love living in the city, too, we have all the residents who is to us we need more restrictive housing for everyone and so this is a time to make bold announcements with the board of supervisors and the Mayors Office get together we do bold things we are in agreement we do things like from the city college we dont mess around why not more middleIncome Housing for First Responder and working class folks all of the Different Levels of people need more housing in the city we can build rehab and one thing in 2014 i said we needed a housing plan i know said that to john rahaim his staff was going nuts not getting all the permits out get them out faster at the knew and the public knew we announced thirty thousand rehab housing by 2020 well, today, because everyone is middleclass and working together 17 thousand one hundred of units have been completed clapping. 36 affordable inform middleincome and low income we have to keep it going working very hard and build and when we Work Together we can get stuff done today we are announcing something i really am excited about supervisor katie tang is reinching home sf home sf is a working with our Developer Community with the neighborhood with our labor leaders we can do more than that zoning if we provide more incentives this is what working with the board will be helpful in doing so with the home sf program over 6 to 8 hundred more restrictive units can be built in the city for middleincome and families throughout the city im excited with the supervisors come up with Creative Ideas im sorry 6 thousand did i say 6 thousand units im getting excited when we are initiative at the same time our residents say we have to be practical whether we Work Together both can be accomplished with quality housing that all of our units represent and our nonprofits help to manage and the you city we are refugesized your Public Housing portfolio not see combe e delipidated housing youll see housing that mixed use and the residents are the same people but with a lot more restrictive hope excited about working with the board lets get more housing for everyone lets have a great valentines day. Thank you, mayor ed lee and were announcing a renewed effort around a program designs for middleincome and workingclass families guaranteeing new projects thirty percent for workingclass families and a requirement that over 40 percent of units are at least two bedrooms or grooemz e three bedrooms to serve our families that want to have children. clapping. so we will be bringing forgot legislation in the board of supervisors in the coming months and hope youll join you theres a lot of things happening this in the federal government there might be people that dont want to include us in the country in San Francisco we embarrass diversities we really need to walk the talk and build the housing that is inclusive and not begun that for generations i hope youll join me and the people that working hard in our city we want to make sure they remained housed in San Francisco with that, im going to turn it over to my partner on this valentines day my work partner supervisor safai. That was great, thank you katie im your partner for today happy valentines day im supervisor ahsha safai and first want to acknowledge the men and women in labor plumbers local 38 and local 261 exaggerates 22, and the janitors local 87. clapping. the peoples are here unfortunately in the city weve gone to the extreme and becoming a city of the 88 we have to make drastic steps in the housing policy the only way to house people to make a bold step so were here to say that is time to step forward for working people and step up for working families and need to begin to make them a priority in my district prior to the Great Recession you could find an Affordable Housing but now homes are north of one Million Dollars in the sunset homes well noting of one Million Dollars in the bloifts approaching one Million Dollars not for workingclass and the market took care of of itself but our chances and opportunity to make a bold move and steps towards working families over the decades produced 23 thousands of low Income Housing when a Redevelopment Agency we produced housing for workingclass but no consistent funding stream for working families ill repeat no consistent funding stream for working families so if youre a janitors if youre a laborer if youre a pledgeer or carpenter and a hotel working or noose no housing designed for you, we dont have the funding we need to make bold steps in the coming weeks well talk about inclusionary but i stand here today in full support of everyone that supervisor katie tang we need to step up for working class families. clapping. when the teachers are trying to get housing and have the lands for free theyve come across the reality money streams there is funding for the paraprofessionals but not funding streams for teachers when we cant fill the positions were in a entries around housing for working people an important aspect of what makes our city strong the next person i want to bring up local local 261 speak from their appreciative mr. Josh. clapping. thank you supervisor safai and thank you, of course, to supervisor tang for bringing in forward and to the mayor and all of us we at local 261 join the others members of the building and Construction Trade to do Something Special over the past several years thats the most successful hiring program in the country. clapping. a wouldnt have been possible without the leaders from government and lavish and housing advocates but that breaks down it all breaks down having a chance for local resident to get a job working with the trades from the community and breaks down when they seek to support their families and started a family and be a local hire in San Francisco it breaks down when you dont have housing so this is a follow proposal here to talk about working families and middleIncome Housing generated and Building Trades everybody coming together like i said local hiring works when we have what . Housing what do we forbode to build. Housing Human Resources all right. Lets pass this law. Thank you next ill have to say we cant do this would you the Planning Department were trying to solve the challenges we need smart people on the ground firsting the out the details ill bring up director rahaim but the team hope sf and calling names thank you all so much clapping. thank you xrifr and good morning and happy valentines day im proud to be here to work on this gram as the mayor said he gave us a charge to say lets if you get a way for more restrictive moderate and housing we developed a basis and proud to be here i think we agree that families with children are the integral part of the intent for the middle and moderate housing meets the citys goals to solve the housing crisis will have housing for workingclass and thirty percent of all new housing will be permanently affordable and 40 percent are required to include two bedrooms or more restrictive and challenging in San Francisco are here weve got a lot more work to do this is an sdwralg part and the most Significant Program we can put together weve working on in a very long time but part of a multi faceted program for an Important Role in keeping families in the city i really look forward and want to acknowledge the mayors leadership and supervisor tangs leadership were looking forward to working with that to move forward and get housing built thank you very much. clapping. so thank you for being here and again everyone that as a partner so many advocates if you can raise your hand if you support more restrictive housing in San Francisco. So amazing to see all the grassroots support for more restrictive housing and, of course, we know yes, their our neighbors that