Administration in may 2014 you may recall this Committee Approved the staff reorientation for the staff capability with the existing workload issues and the session planning will at the time, we added 8 new position for the Transportation Authority from 4 three to four 1 hired 7 of the 8 positions weve been monitoring importantly the workload management for the practices that have viewed since the implementation of the enterprise system back in september 2015 that was system has been simplified a number of procedures in the agency would those two items in mind well seeing seeking to reclarify the Transportation AuthorityOrganization Chart two Senior Engineer one in the policy and programming that is a Senior Engineer well to reclarify to a Program Analyst and a position within the senior position within the Capital Project to the program and reclarify that we have a Job Description on the attachment one for the Program Analyst and this Program Analyst will be working to support the analyticalic work and monitor and assist with Data Management and program managing we have a Job Description on the troichlt of the principle planner and we have a proposed Organization Chart well be reclarify the two senior to one Program Analyst and one in the program and policy decision and one principle planner in that position in terms in terms of cca this didnt go before them in terms of the the reclassification the engineer clarification to a Program Analyst will save 49 thousands 20 and the reclassification from the engineer to a transportation planner will have no cost savings no additional cost because the exact same similarly position with that, ill be happy to answer any questions great. Thank you very much colleagues, any questions or comments on item 3 seeing none, any Public Comment on item 3 seeing none, Public Comment is closed. And okay a motion to approve a second and ca colleagues, can we take that same house, same call . Well take that without objection. That will be the order. For the selection job clarifications an action item. On to item 4 what i have before you is a rough Salary Survey by the cove and associates in december 2014 the commissioner avalos asked for a salary for the executive director that is in align with the salaries so for the entire agency so weve had a Salary Survey in f 2012, 2013 the last for the executive director was in fiscal year 2006 now koffman and associates we used for the last survey in 2013 they kept to the same medicine metrological to scare survey the positions and asked them to look at 15 positions because the other 9 portions were within the series of the 15 from that point the results indicate that from that point we identified which agencies to a compare the agencies to the alameda the contra costa Transportation Authority, the San FranciscoMunicipal Transportation Agency and the metropolitan and the Santa Clara Valley and the san mateo Transportation Authority those are the 6 agencies we compared in terms of results 87 positions were blow the market medium, however, we are seeking a salary range income not the actual compensation increase for the position those will be provided at the time of the evaluation but seek an increase in 3 position those positions that are 9 percent below the market medium the executive director position or the Senior Engineer position and senior planner position i would like to and take our attention to attachment number one which has 3 different pages it is the Salary Survey data from cove and associates that indicates the 6 compare active agencies the different positions their compared to in the monthly salaries and the Effective Date of those increases the next promoted increase the next percentage of increase and were the Transportation Authority is grant number 5 for the executive director out of the various agencies and the bottom ranging for the Senior Engineer and senior planner position. The next item id like to show you is a comparative agency table you have a document on at our desks if we can put that on the screen for additional reference for this item a table put together listing 3 agencies and indicates the number of Board Members and staff the sales tax whether or not those agencies have a c m a a transit operators how much Sales Revenue for 20142015 and in addition how much expenditures for 20132014 and fiscal year 20132014 was the common data for all the agencies more so this item was put before you a frame of reference of agencies were comparing them two. Continuing on within the memo there is table one as i indicated were only looking at increasing the sailors for positions blow the 9 percent of the market medium that those 3 positions we were walk through and one this is translating into 6 different positions at the Transportation Authority because of the series we have an engineering series a principle engineer and Senior Engineer a planner transportation planner that starts off with a principle and a Senior Transportation planner and senior planner and then in terms of the cca the item didnt go before the cca in terms of fiscal impact those are only the salary and the increases are made at the staff preference performances evaluation with that, he shouldnt this is a lot of data to absorb were looking to propose the increases in table one table with an the proposed increases for the position that the Transportation Authority this represents 6 positions out of 024. Okay thank you very much. Colleagues questions or comments okay. Seeing none well move to Public Comment any Public Comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is clos closed. Motion to approve second and colleagues, can we take that same house, same call . Well take that without objection. That will be the order. Well move to item 5 introduction of new items any items introduced colleagues . Seeing none, is any Public Comment on item 5 seeing none, Public Comment is closed. And that is an informational item any general Public Comment seeing none, Public Comment is closed. And then item 7 is adjournment so were adjourned thank you