Bailey v Antrim County MI update May 8, 2021 “New discoveries and filings”, 1061 phantom ballots discovered in Antrim, “fraud vitiates everything”
“practice of assigning names and numbers” to non-eligible voters who did not appear in either the poll book or the supplement poll book. “
…Poll worker Zachary Larsen, former MI Asst. AG
“The only reason to change software after the election would be to obfuscate
evidence of fraud and/or to correct program errors that would de-certify the
election. Our findings show that the Central Lake Township tabulator tape totals
were significantly altered by utilizing two different program versions (10/23/2020 and 11/05/2020), both of which were software changes during an election which violates election law, and not just human error associated with the Dominion Election Management System. This is clear evidence of software generated movement of votes. The claims made on the Office of the Secretary of State website are false.
Bailey v Antrim County MI update May 8, 2021 “New discoveries and filings”, 1061 phantom ballots discovered in Antrim, “fraud vitiates everything”
“practice of assigning names and numbers” to non-eligible voters who did not appear in either the poll book or the supplement poll book. “
…Poll worker Zachary Larsen, former MI Asst. AG
“The only reason to change software after the election would be to obfuscate
evidence of fraud and/or to correct program errors that would de-certify the
election. Our findings show that the Central Lake Township tabulator tape totals
were significantly altered by utilizing two different program versions (10/23/2020 and 11/05/2020), both of which were software changes during an election which violates election law, and not just human error associated with the Dominion Election Management System. This is clear evidence of software generated movement of votes. The claims made on the Office of the Secretary of State website are false.
Top 50 in the 2018-2020 ISS Securities Class Action Services Report and headquartered at the Empire State Building in New York City, is investigating
Juniper Industrial Holdings, Inc. ( JIH or the Company ) (JIH) relating to its proposed merger with Janus Midco, LLC. Under the terms of the agreement, JIH will acquire Janus through a reverse merger, with Janus emerging as a publicly traded company.
The investigation focuses on whether Juniper Industrial Holdings, Inc. and its Board of Directors violated securities laws and/or breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by 1) failing to conduct a fair process, and 2) whether the transaction is properly valued.
NEW YORK, May 7, 2021 /PRNewswire/ Juan Monteverde, founder and managing partner at Monteverde & Associates PC, a national securities firm ratedÂ
Top 50 in the 2018-2020 ISS Securities Class Action Services Report and headquartered at the Empire State Building in New York City, is investigating
 Century Bancorp, Inc. ( CNBKA or the Company ) (CNBKA) relating to its proposed acquisition by Eastern Bankshares, Inc. Under the terms of the agreement, CNBKA shareholders will receive $115.28 in cash per share they own.
The investigation focuses on whether Century Bancorp, Inc. and its Board of Directors violated securities laws and/or breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by 1) failing to conduct a fair process, and 2) whether the transaction is properly valued.
Share this article
Share this article
NEW YORK, May 8, 2021 /PRNewswire/ Juan Monteverde, founder and managing partner at Monteverde & Associates PC, a national securities firm rated
Top 50 in the 2018-2020 ISS Securities Class Action Services Report and headquartered at the Empire State Building in New York City, is investigating
MSG Networks, Inc. ( MSGN or the Company ) (MSGN) relating to its proposed acquisition by Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE), Under the terms of the agreement, MSGN shareholders will receive 0.172 shares of MSGE per share they own.
The investigation focuses on whether MSG Networks, Inc. and its Board of Directors violated securities laws and/or breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by 1) failing to conduct a fair process, and 2) whether the transaction is properly valued.