AG Ferguson: Some cases against federal government will continue despite President Biden taking office FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Jan 21 2021
Attorney General’s Office has filed 97 lawsuits against the federal government since January of 2017
OLYMPIA Attorney General Bob Ferguson today offered an update on his lawsuits against the federal government in the wake of President Joe Biden’s inauguration on Wednesday.
Washington was the first state to challenge President Trump in court. Beginning with his successful lawsuit challenging President Trump’s first travel ban filed just 10 days after Trump took office, Ferguson filed 97 cases against the federal government during President Trump’s term in office. To date, he scored 39 legal victories in those cases, including multiple victories at the United States Supreme Court. He experienced only two legal defeats.
Donor Privacy Goes Before the Supreme Court, Just in Time
Thursday, January 21 2021
The aim of this legislation is obvious. It seeks to identify and expose private citizens to public and governmental harassment on the basis of causes they happen to support.
That tawdry episode almost seems quaint in retrospect.
At least back then, Obama and leftists feigned remorse and attempted to deny material wrongdoing.
Today, in contrast, the left openly advocates targeting and persecuting conservatives and conservative organizations. Many people – including very powerful people and government officials – hope to destroy lives and livelihoods for no other reason than their distaste toward those people’s political, religious or social beliefs. They’d love nothing more than to harass people, frighten them, silence them, make them unemployable, socially shame them and even destroy their lives. They want to silence unfashionable organizations and the citizens who support
Amtseinführung von Biden im Live-Ticker: Trump hinterließ Biden Notiz im Oval Office gmx.at - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from gmx.at Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
On January 13, 2021, the United States Supreme Court heard an oral argument in a pivotal challenge to the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) historic practice of obtaining monetary damages under a statutory provision that, on its face, allows for only injunctive relief. Read More >New Frontiers for the FTC in Healthcare Following the Consolidated Appropriations Act
On December 27, 2020, the Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA) became law, garnering attention nationwide for the economic stimulus components necessitated by the ongoing pandemic. Less publicized, however, were the provisions of the over 2,000-page bill that contained a new mission and some new muscle for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Read More >
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the climate change lawsuit filed by the City of Baltimore in 2018 against energy companies. This case is one of a number of cases brought by states, cities, and other municipalities against energy companies alleging that the companies contributed to climate change. By granting certiorari and hearing oral arguments, the Supreme Court has agreed to review the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision remanding the suit to state court after rejecting the energy companies’ contention that they were acting as federal officers pursuant to historical contracts with the federal government. Thus, the principle issue being reviewed centers on an appellate court’s scope of review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d). The Fourth Circuit, agreeing with the City of Baltimore, previously held that Section 1447(d) limits an appellate court’s review of a district cour