Page 544 - ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

NJBIA Files Amicus Brief Concerning Constitutionality of Pennsylvania s Business Closure Order

NJBIA Files Amicus Brief Concerning Constitutionality of Pennsylvania’s Business Closure Order January 13, 2021, 9:53 am | in NJBIA Files Amicus Brief Concerning Constitutionality of Pennsylvania’s Business Closure Order The New Jersey Business & Industry Association has filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in support of a recent lower court decision addressing the constitutionality of key aspects of Pennsylvania’s COVID-19 emergency orders. In its filing, NJBIA argues that, while a state’s chief executive should have broad powers to act to protect public health during an emergency, those powers are not unlimited and must be subject to constitutional limitations.

United statesMichele siekerkaDavidr kottSamuela jamesRyan savercoolUnited states supreme courtSupreme courtMccarter englishUs courtUs district courtJersey business industry associationAmicus brief concerning constitutionalityBusiness closure orderNew jersey businessIndustry associationThird circuit

Supreme Court orders Nevada gov to address worship restrictions

Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley in Dayton, Nevada. | Alliance Defending Freedom The United States Supreme Court has ordered the governor of Nevada to respond to a lawsuit from a church alleging that the state’s restrictions on in-person worship services violate their constitutional rights. According to the court’s order, one of many handed down on Monday, “The respondents are directed to file a response to the petition on or before noon, Tuesday, January 19, 2021. Petitioner may file a reply brief on or before noon, Thursday January 21, 2021.” The Lyon County-based Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley has been engaged in a lengthy legal battle with Gov. Steve Sisolak, D-Nev., Attorney General Aaron Ford, and Lyon County Sheriff Frank Hunewill over worship restrictions imposed in the state as a result of the novel coronavirus pandemic.

New yorkUnited statesNew jerseyLyon countyCalvary chapelSean feuchtFrank hunewillAmy coney barrettAaron fordRuth bader ginsburgRyan foleySteve sisolakUnited states supreme courtHarvest rock churchSupreme courtRoman catholic diocese of brooklyn

Supremely Protected

Why the Agudah took Cuomo to court: The story behind the scenes Photos: Itzik Roytman, Mishpacha archives Amid all the personal tragedy and economic hardship the coronavirus pandemic has wrought, it has been difficult to discern points of light and hope in the communal darkness. But they’re there: The emergence with unprecedented speed of several effective vaccines was one such ray of light. And another light has recently shone forth, this time not from laboratories but from the highest courts in the land, lifting the spirits of frum Jews throughout America. Two legal rulings first by the United States Supreme Court and a month later, by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, the New York region’s top federal court resoundingly affirmed the rights of Americans of faith to practice their religions free of severe, ostensibly health-related restrictions targeting them, even amid the pandemic.

United statesNew yorkNew jerseyState of new yorkShlomo werdigerWerdiger agudahSimchas torahStephen vladeckShemini atzeresRav elya brudnyItzik roytmanYom tovYisroel reismanJustice amy coney barrettChol hamoedAndrew cuomo

A Deeper Look at the Law: Are Conversion Therapy Bans Constitutional? Courts Are Divided | The Jewish Press - JewishPress com | Joey Aron, Esq | 29 Tevet 5781 – January 13, 2021

A Deeper Look at the Law: Are Conversion Therapy Bans Constitutional? Courts Are Divided | The Jewish Press - JewishPress com | Joey Aron, Esq | 29 Tevet 5781 – January 13, 2021
jewishpress.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from jewishpress.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

New yorkUnited statesNew jerseyBoca ratonPalm beach countyCarolm highsmithCircuit courtThird circuit courtYork city councilEleventh circuit courtCity councilUnited states supreme courtSupreme courtUs supreme courtAlliance for freedomPhoto credit

SCOTUS shirks its responsibility when needed most

On that date the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) refused to hear:Â The case challenged the 2020 Presidential election results an election whose legitimacy was being questioned by President Trump and the 74 million people who voted for him but was also being affirmed by President-elect Joe Biden and the 85 million people who voted for him. The Supreme Court’s running sheet for the case (see image below) belies what was happening. 23 Motions supporting either the Plaintiff or Defendants or neither had been filed by: DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES,Â STATE OF MISSOURI AND 16 OTHER STATES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia

United statesWest virginiaSouth carolinaNorth carolinaRhode islandSouth dakotaNorth dakotaSteve bullockDavid singerMike johnsonJoe bidenUnited states supreme courtSupreme courtPresidential coalitionGeorgia state senateVoters group