Page 210 - 14th Amendment News Today

Forget about the Fulton County case, we dont have a trial date, what happened for the election, november 5, were not going to have a trial in october november, thats too close, the Republican Convention is July 15 and the day after Jack Smiths Case is supposed to start on super tuesday, Donald Trump has to be physically in the courtroom for these cases, he can pick and choose on the civil cases but he will be off the Campaign Trail for two months or so for these. Are already giving the id. Me an...

Selfevident you saw it all. But the 14th Amendment applies a lot of the court make that decision but he certainly supported insurrection. There is no question about it nine, zero. He just communicated to the department of justice, to the special prosecutor, to the judges from all Democrats Tailoring the case in washington. Julie would be a Jury Pool he has poison and tainted. Yes he is an do everything possible to keep out of the white house. And then he gives speeches like he did on january 5, ...

Self-evident you saw it all. but the 14th amendment applies a lot of the court make that decision but he certainly supported insurrection. there is no question about it nine, zero. he just communicated to the department of justice, to the special prosecutor, to the judges from all democrats tailoring the case in washington. julie would be a jury pool he has poison and tainted. yes he is an do everything possible to keep out of the white house. and then he gives speeches like he did on january 5,...

On a technicality. then he said, well let the courts deal with it. there can be criminal prosecution later. i think some people in the supreme court might be thinking, lets kick this back over to congress, or the people. well let them deal with it. the 14th amendment says that nobody who swears an oath to support the constitution of the united states, that violates that oath by engaging an insurrection or rebellion, shall never be allowed to hold federal or state office again. unless the congres...

Self-evident you saw it all. but the 14th amendment applies a lot of the court make that decision but he certainly supported insurrection. there is no question about it nine, zero. he just communicated to the department of justice, to the special prosecutor, to the judges from all democrats tailoring the case in washington. julie would be a jury pool he has poison and tainted. yes he is an do everything possible to keep out of the white house. and then he gives speeches like he did on january 5,...

That didnt sound like a winning argument. >> no, i dont think it was. but i also think that, you know, getting into the areas of hypotheticals around, you know, what a president could or couldnt do is a pretty dangerous path toward the interpretation if of the actual law in these cases. you have, i think, a verier respond approach to the conversation around this -- very very irresponsible approach, because a lot of people are trying to find a path to get where they want to go as opposed to looki...

The case, or some of the case, and i read justice john paul stevenss is incredible and unforgettable descent, where he predicted that the greatest winner of that case would be cynicism in the american people, and not trusting judges in the future. i hope that -- john paul stevenss dissent, in bush v. gore. >> andrew weissmann, what was judge luttig talking about their, when he said the supreme court will find, try to find a way to somehow dispose of this case, without ruling on these central mea...

Missouri Republicans work to challenge Biden on primary ballots

Run the freedom caucus in the house and was his former chief of staff, as the chief witness in the insurrection case. so, what -- well have to see what happens. obviously you have the supreme court case related to whether or not he can be on or off the ballot as a result of the 14th amendment. i think thats going to be a mission-critical case as well. but, you know, hell pull any stunt. hell do anything. and obviously the intention is very, very important to mr. trump. so, stuff like that gets h...

And two segments of history. eric just pointed us to one of them. they need to really read those debates in 1866, over the creation of the 14th amendment. but i would guess they are also going to be looking, if not explicitly, implicitly, at bush v. gore. i mean to me, this colorado decision, it seems to me is going to depend on whether there are five justices who will be good textualists, and do as -- said, read carefully and do what it says. but whether they are truly going to be -- by bush v....