You can see it weeknights 6 25 p. M. Eastern at facebook. Com Anderson Cooper full circle. Right now the news continues. I want to hand it over to chris cuomo for cuomo prime time. Chris . All right. Thank you, anderson. I am chris cuomo. Plm to prime time. We have new information about what may be next for Michael Cohen. If hes going to deal with any more authorities. And the president s latest legal misstep. Trump has twisted his story once again about the payments made by his lawyer to help his campaign. And this latest one has him tied up in knots. We have trumps former lawyer, whom he called for advice about how to handle the cohen situation. What he thought then and now. And you know the president is on his heels with what just happened because he whipped out his what about defense. What about obama . He did it too. No, he didnt. We have the facts ahead. And a convicted felon gets some
very high praise from the president , raising a question. Will Paul Manafort soon be getting a
Chris Cuomo asks the tough questions to newsmakers in Washington and around the world. Thats something that i think is very foreign. I guarantee it, chris, even though he koops, hes smart enough, Michael Cohen, not to say he was present at any meeting in which the president said i have an arrangement with the russians. Witnesses dont do that. Why not . If the question of collusion is on a scale one to ten, hell move it up to seven. Hell say, well, the president says he has a good arrangement with the russians but hell never say that the president said that he had a Collusive Arrangement with the russians. But thats t not the standard. What if he were present for a meeting where somebody gave the president information about something the that was going to happen that was a 23u7ks of the hacking and the president therefore knew about it at a time when he said he did not know about it . What if the president that would be punishable. Meetings that he said he doesnt know about and Michael
he s lying to your face when he says he didn t know until after. so now he s saying you know what, forget about what i said about what i knew or what i didn t know and when, i paid all of it back. so first of all, we don t know that for a fact. but let s assume it. let s give the president the benefit of the doubt. i paid all of it back, so no one contributed anything for me. i call this going the full buckley versus vallejo, for you scotus scholars. that s a case that says you can spend as much of your own money as you want on your own campaign. money is seen as political speech. but even if that were true, the president still didn t report it. anywhere. and that alone would trigger the statute and put him in violation of the law. so then he says, please, no one gets prosecuted for that. tell john edwards. his hush money scheme was handled in similar fashion and he was tried. he was prosecuted. he was acquitted but after a
entrance is bogus. it is a flawed premise, and it is an ugly premise. why? there is no good data that shows illegal entrants are more of a threat to hurt you. in fact, the data shows they are less of one. now, trump pilled a number out. 63,000 victims since 9/11. a lot of you echo it to me. it is bs, it is as exaggerated as the larger point that he and his folks want to make. demonizing people because of their decision to take a shortcut and get here the easy way. and that is what causes illegal entrants most of the time. i wonder if these sympathizers would be as full throated about these tragedies if the killers were white citizens, if the victims were not young white women. if that were the case, would we see a video like this from trump today?