Page 165 - Accuser News Today

One of the reasons they know it so well is because have you been telling them every night. they appreciate that but it is such a sham. such a sham. >> sean: mark meadows, look, you have been phenomenal in every way, too. i know you work hard behind the scenes on everything thats been happening. how does this continue, based on hearsay, and what do you think of my challenge to the senate that the federal rules should apply as it relates to hearsay evidence?de it should not be admissible and i thi...

Would actually hurt the president if we just dismissed it without having a trial. okay. well agree to disagree on that point. but one thing that every republican, especially in the senate, because the house, there is no hope. its run by a bunch of crazy lunatics that dont believe in the constitution, due process, rule of law at all. but this republican senators better agree on a few basic points here, and that is basic fundamental constitutional rights and due process for all. because that can n...

Evidence. rule 802 to be specific. hearsay is not admissible with limited specific exceptions that we can tell you do not apply to this case. and, we could also tell you pursuant to the constitutional side of the house -- the senate majority leaders statement, the sixth amendment of the constitution, the accused shall enjoy the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him. the first accuser was the fake hearsay whistleblower. that means that person will not be allowed to remain in the s...

Gregg jarrett, and, you know, i want answers from the senate. the federal rules regarding hearsay are clear. i would imagine they should apply in the senate if it ever gets over there. thats number one. number two, i would say that the constitution is pretty clear about facing your accuser, isnt it? >> it absolutely is, sixth amendment. you are absolutely right. the sixth amendment protects against hearsay. if you have a witness who gets up on the stand and is simply repeating what he heard from...

Congressman ratcliffe cross-examined them, they could not say anything the president did that was impeachable. >> sean: david limbaugh, we will lean on your legal experience. i would think that the federal rules regarding hearsay and the constitution, the right and the ability although gregg makes a great point. gregg jarrett, andy mccathy and many people. this is not a real whistleblower according to the statute, they tell me. have you got to imagine the chief justifiable of the u.s. supreme co...

Cross-examined them, they could not say anything the president did that waspr impeachable. >> sean: david limbaugh, we will lean on your legal experience. i would think that the federal rules regarding hearsay and the constitution, the right and the ability, although gregg makes a great point. gregg jarrett, andy mccathy, and many people. this is not a real whistleblower according to the statute, they tell me. youve got to imagine the chief justice of the u.s. supreme court would follow these ru...

Gregg jarrett and, you know, i want answers from the senate. the federal rules, regarding hearsay are clear. i would imagine they should apply in the senate if it ever gets over there. thats number one. number two, i would say that the constitution is pretty clear about facing your accuser, isnt it? >> it absolutely is sixth amendment. you are absolutely right. the sixth amendment protects against hearsay. if you have a witness who gets up on the stand and is simply repeating what he heard from ...

Impeachment trial to continue where the accuser is not by definition -- andy mccarthy, gregg jarrett, many smart lawyers -- doesnt meet the definition of a real whistleblower. number three, are we not setting a precedent where the president of the united states would not have what is a a clear constitutional right to confront their accuser? now, so far, i have got to say i have good news to report. because a bunch of these republican senators have already responded very quickly. senator graham, ...

Evidence. rule 802 to be specific. hearsay is not admissible with limited specific exceptions that we can tell you do not apply to this case. and we could also tell you pursuant to the constitutional side of the house -- the senate majority leaders statement, the sixth amendment of the constitution, the accused shall enjoy the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him. b the first accuser was the fake hearsay whistleblower. that means that person will not be allowed to remain in the ...

>> sean: and my point is, dan bongino, the senate has got to say here, and the chief justice i have got to believe, is going to give the right to confront your accuser and hearsay is not admissible, is it, dan bongino? >> no. but thats all they have. as i said on my show today, hearsay is only better when the person who saw the thing is dead. its kind of hard to get a confession out of a dead guy. so if you have heard hearsay you are better than the dead guy. thats about it. in this case, thankf...