Page 166 - Accuser News Today

World works everywhere. its unspoken. im not surprised these people are screwing up, the same jerks in the media who are enamored by the dossier, enamored by collusion, enamored by kavanaugh, the cabin the accusers, lazy forward, coming to they got every single new story wrong. theyve got to get a focus group to save them. >> jesse: explain how this is bribery. >> juan: first of all -- you know how many focus groups are done in politics? its endless. >> greg: should you be a focus grouping for i...

Is not by definition andy mccarthy, gregg jarrett, many smart lawyers, doesnt meet the definition of a real whistleblower. number three, are we not setting a precedent where the president of the united states would not have what is a clear constitutional right to confront their accuser? now, so far, i have got to say i have good news to report. because a bunch of these republican senators have already responded very quickly. senator graham, hawley, wicker, tillis, ben sasse who i have been fight...

>> and my point is, dan bongino, the senate has got to say here and the chief justice i have got to believe, is going to give the right to confront your accuser and hearsay is not admissible is it, dan bongino? >> no. but thats awful they have. as i said on my show today, hearsay is only better when the person who saw the thing is dead. its kind of hard to get a confession out of a dead guy. so if you have heard hearsay you are better than the dead guy. thats about it. in this case, thankfully, ...

Behalf except donald trump. no american is accused of wrongdoing anonymously except donald trump. what they are doing in the house is a danger to the presidency itself. so any trial in the senate needs to make sure that you you cant impeach a president based on hearsay because that is a danger to the presidency itself. secondly, any trial in the senate must expose the whistle-blower so the president can confront his accuser. i will not accept a trial in the senate until i know who the whistle-bl...

At least two months. do you believe based on the back and forth that the whistle-blower in some capacity will maybe not go public but faced lawmakers behind closed doors? will that happen? >> it doesnt appear so. at this point what we have at the whistle-blower is the complaint the cavemen, democrats voted on party line vote to table the motion to subpoena the whistle-blower so at least in the house it looked like that wont happen. behind closed doors of her denial. i do think theres an argument...

Quid pro quo. president zelensky, there was zero pressure. three meetings with these guys and the president of ukraine, president zelensky, he never did anything, and he still got that aid. im like, so where is the quid and the pro and the quo? help me out.d >> they got the money and nobody investigated joe biden in the ukrainian government. so there is no there there. but lets go back to the idea of what kind of trail would you conduct? if you excluded hearsay, like every other court in the lan...

We know volker testified he did not receive indication of any quid pro quo. president zelensky, there was zero pressure. three meetings with these guys and the president of ukraine, president zelensky, he never did anything, and he still got that aid. im like, so where is the squid and the pro and the quote. help me out. >> they got the money and nobody investigated joe biden and the ukrainian government. so there is no there there. but lets go back to the idea what kind of trail would you condu...

Well see how that holds up this time. >> sarah, thank you very much. nancy pelosi is speaking right now. lets listen in. >> the process, political process, depositions, subpoenas, perjury and so forth. this was made starting clear by chairman schiff it seemed to me, when he said he would do everything necessary to ensure the legal rights of the whistle-blower. >> thats right. >> to preserve anonymity. >> right. >> in this political setting. i wonder if you can explain to the american people wh...

The same doj family. a very experienced former prosecutor. he was very smooth today and i thought did a very effective job. i know steve castor from my time at the fbi when he was can the committee and we had some dealings together. professional, competent guy. lets face it, castor doesnt have a case. right? hes trying to defend the indefensible in many respects so he doesnt have much to work with. i think that came through today. >> hmm. so, abby, some republicans were not happy with castors pe...

Hand, third hand, fourth hand these career bureaucrats who im sure they have studied ukraine policy for decades but the bottom line is there is only one person that sets foreign policy for the united states of america and thats our commander-in-chief, donald trump. steve: thats right. you know, and it was early on that mike council away thconawaythe republican from tes moved to subpoena the whistleblower. adam schiff said we would vote on it later. they did. the democrats said we absolutely dont...