Page 70 - Affirmative News Today

Depending how much responsibility they give to michael jackson for his own death. jurors do not have to reach a unanimous agreement on each of the 13 questions that they must answer. nine jurors, because it is a civil case in california, have to answer in the affirmative on each of the questions. court is dark on monday. deliberations will resume on tuesday. allison? >> thanks, casey wian. we will be watching. lets bring back our legal guys to talk more about the michael jackson wrongful death t...

>> matthew cordal made gone on plea after posting youtube video admitting that he was driving drunk and killed a man. >> most of the time today was spent in the courtroom with the judge questioning him understanding the rights that he was waving. the right to a trial and the right to an appeal. he answered in the affirmative that he understood. the county prosecutor is now turning to the media. >> i think anything he says from now on about why he did that then is self serving. and i think anythi...

Not clear, the navy, if they had all the information that caused the discharge here. ever went and took steps to -- revoke the security clearance. so when he goes to work for the contractor, the experts, thats the florida it firm. he -- he maintains the security clearance. the experts -- they say, thats the name of the company went to dod twice in june of this, as recently as in june of -- this year. does he still have the security clearance. and was told in the affirmative he does. >> thank you...

He posted a controversial confession on youtube about his actions. mike has a very latest. reporter: most of the time spent in court questioning matthew making sure he understood the rights he was giving up by pleading guilty. the right to a trial, the right to an appeal. he gave short answers, all of them to the affirmative. they only asked for permission to do an interview from jail. >> he promoted his video will reach people around the world, raise awareness of drinking and driving. more impo...

>> affirmative. he said there was a bomb on board. >> by 9:49 a.m. the faa had known for more than 15 minutes that united 93 was a possible hijack. three passenger jets had already crashed into american landmarks. still, no one at the faa requested military assistance for flight 93. >> they know that the trade tower and the pentagon was struck and they dont tell the military command theres a fourth plane hijacked and in the air and at this point turned around and headed toward washington? i mean...

Area b so it could be with the controllers, be with the supervisors and look at the radar display. >> you wanted to see that plane? >> absolutely. walked up to the radar screens right in here, and went back and forth between the radar screens looking at the activity and take appropriate abbings and make the right decisions. >> with flight 11 not responding, controllers turned to other eyes in the sky asking other commercial airline pilots if they could spot the american airlines jet. one of the ...

Call anybody the good guy in there. but if they fall out of the hands of the control of the assad regime. who is going to get them. and he said if we lost control of them, he could not guarantee troops would not be on the ground. he came back and recanted that today. we have a long way to go. but as far as the international community, the fact of this, i dont think there was a question that sarin gas was used. that is going to come out by the u.n. the question is who used that. one of the briefi...

Day, exception of abraham lincoln who is always there, no republican would show up and answer this invitation in the affirmative says a lot more about this party than it does the event itself. i think they have some soul searching to do and reaching out to minorities and those that are peace loving, freedom loving people across this country. >> coming up next, the big threes must reads including why mary cheney says liz cheney is dead wrong. aaaaah! theres a guy on the window! do something, dad!...

When hes obviously making this very inflammatory comparison to what happened a decade ago in the lead-up to the war in iraq, i am compelled by his argument that the u.n. weapons inspectors are there. they have at least limited access to that site. theres no reason not to wait for their definitive proof. if for no other reason that it might bring more international allies onboard, maybe enough to get u.n. authorization for some sort of international reacti authorization. whats your reaction to th...

Theres no reason not to wait for their definitive proof. if for no other reason that it might bring more international allies onboard, maybe enough to get u.n. authorization for some sort of international authorization. whats your reaction to that? >> their specific purpose is to determine whether chemical weapons were used or not. i think evidence is already pretty clear and theyre going to come out with the affirmative. that is that they were used. their purpose is not to identify or determine...