Tailor to what we are seeing is going to be decisions made at the California Public utilities commissioner what the rates are for pg es regular power for customers. Yes, there is going to be some guessing involved in that because pg e can change their rates 46 times a year. There is going to be a little bit of guessing and perhaps go below of what the rate is in case they decide its going to be cheap now. So we go out there and start that part of the program and for lack of better terms get it towards launch and as harlin kelly was mentioning the deep green is where we have to figure out how to do that and that might take a little bit more time to figure out. Maybe we do two tracks of setting rights. One for light green. If we wait a month for launching deep green, we cant sign up people at that point. Maybe not the best for marketing purposes. There is nothing to keep us from launching a program as quickly as possible or the best time possible for us over the course of the year. Figur
Financed by their dirty money, like oil and natural gas facilities so siphoning off that they can actually finance taking a loss on Renewable Energy to compete with cleanpowersf . Do you think its possible . The next item we are going to give an update on it. I think well probably address that. I do thing that the reason why i brought that up is if we expect for green tariff to be an option for the summer do we want to set our rates prior to pg e. Maybe im just not getting it right. What we are talking about is setting the initial offering lower than the price that everyone is on right now. The concern is that pg e is doing their green tariff option and we are going in some of, they can use access green power and thats a big advantage because they have used it for their whole rate base. So we are going to be at a disadvantage offering something equivalent to that. Thats why we need to know what the price is, what they are offering and what we can offer to entice people to go to our opt
Going to change. We need to figure out how to do build out as quickly as possible because we would have no customers. It a matter of focusing our attention that would allow us to grow this program and modify it over time. It not going to be the program on day one or year 5, 10 or 20. I think its an important key aspect to keep in mind. Thank you. Thank you. I appreciate the work you have done. When the mayor was making his presentation, i was besides myself. I made comments during introduction about it as well. I spent about maybe 5 minutes talking with reporters afterwards. I was in shock that the reporting didnt even cover this huge discrepancy with what reality is and what was said by the mayor. It shows that we need better journalist in this city among other things. Okay. We can go on to Public Comment on this item, any member of the public when would like to comment, please come forward. Good afternoon, supervisors, good afternoon. Lafco staff. My name is Shawn Marshall with the l
Mayor was making his presentation, i was besides myself. I made comments during introduction about it as well. I spent about maybe 5 minutes talking with reporters afterwards. I was in shock that the reporting didnt even cover this huge discrepancy with what reality is and what was said by the mayor. It shows that we need better journalist in this city among other things. Okay. We can go on to Public Comment on this item, any member of the public when would like to comment, please come forward. Good afternoon, supervisors, good afternoon. Lafco staff. My name is Shawn Marshall with the local agriculturation Network Aggregation network with promoting greater energy. I serve as vicemayor as the city of valley. Im signature sitting here with my lead hat on. I want to commend mayor lee, there is nothing in the california statute that requires the sf puc to be the response offer cca. I do think it would be the most logical choice, but given the political stalemate, i think its smart for you
Than what is transpiring from a bucket two and we are using system power to firm and shape our program. The interesting thing is you heard i bew for a long time when we talked about bucket 2 recs, complaining that it was just dirt power and now they are claiming that bucket 3 is dirty power and now that bucket one, which is probably the best energy. It goes from 10 percent in what was proposed at the time the board approved something to a year later 25 percent by a lot of good work by miss malcolm and the puc staff in creating a program that gets above and beyond anything that pg e meets the, current offering and a build out that is competitive and all the things we want to do. The bucket 3 recs is how we would use it, is okay to use. We are putting Carbon Free Energy into system and recs that are coming out of carbon free sources around it. We are doing more than what you would expect to do. I think a lot of it on to which it would still le behind the be a great program. Just looking