Page 96 - Aiding News Today

>> it s. i think the f.b.i. ought to investigate it and all those people who sent credit card numbers in there to fund this thing ought to understand that they are aiding and abetting a bribery and are subject to penalty under the law. but lets go further. the whole democratic process now has been taken over by soros and company who are funding groups on the edge of politics, a lot of the demonstrators in washington were paid by these groups, were funded by these groups, were coached by these gr...

Aiding and abetting its enemies. and the broad definition is you have to be at war with a company and officially aid them with two witnesses or a confession in open court in order to constitute treason. im pretty confident stating in a bipartisan way that simply criticizing the president doesnt qualify as aiding any of the u.s. enemies, that is foreign enemies, and therefore cannot be treason. >> jeffrey, great to have you. jeffrey rosen is the president and ceo of the national constitution cent...

Get our special tv offer a 4 week trial plus postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/save and never go to the post office again ♪ ♪ >> sean: the president released a video on twitter talking about the murder of mollie tibbetts, about the need for border security. we showed you that earlier and joining us now with reaction, the host of crtvs "michelle malkin investigates," michelle malkin. florida attorney general pam bondi. by the way, filling out on "the five." ." congratulations. >> t...

Shocking -- look, im not surprised, because devin nunes is as intelligent as a warm bucket of spit, but he did nit n a room where there could be a recording device. so he did it where someone is inornd naordinantly corrupt, an aiding and abetting russian attacks on the country. >> and ken, it is really the cabinets job to clear the president? >> not the clear him sh, no. but he is come to the conclusion quite publicly that there wasnt collusion. that is different from the russian attacks on the ...

>> tucker: its fascist. where the hell is the americanha left on this? why are they continuing to defend this company, which is aiding, again, the oppression of its own people in a police state? >> hopefully they will comein around because this one is completely indefensible. even google themselves stood up and said we cant do this. this is too bad. seven years they are coming back and doing it in much larger scale than they were going to dc before. >> tucker: congress should take action against...

Theres nothing neutral about that. theres nothing free, nothing open, nothing good about what they are talking about doing. >> tucker: its fascist. where the hell is the american left on this? why are they continuing to defend this company, which is aiding, again, the oppression of its own people in a police state? >> hopefully they will come around because this one is completely indefensible. even google themselves stood up and said we cant do this. this is too bad. seven years they are coming ...

Is not something that rudy giuliani invented. but i do think this is something that he is trying out now. >> i should also say this, that when kristen welker asked him about the collusions not a crime idea, that he denied it was a new strategy. he said its an old strategy, its in our first letter to the special prosecutor, and then he says collusion is not a crime and theres no evidence the president was involved in any collusion. >> lets focus on that. he is not wrong when he says collusion is ...

That kelly anne conway school. >> i think the better answer for him ought to be him staying silent. if this is the best he can do, he is hurting his client. what he is saying really makes no sense. i read the transcript of that full interview, and its almost impossible to understand what point he was even trying to make. and i think as a prosecutor or as a defense lawyer, you quickly learn that sometimes the facts are just completely against you and youre better off saying nothing. and in this c...

What weve seen from muellers indictments are two different theories of how to charge what we call collusion. so it is not a situation where this has any merit and the only explanation is they are trying to spin as they have done repeatedly in advance some information thats going to come out, whether its from "the new york times" or whether its at this trial, maybe rick gates, theyve learned about what he has told mueller and the prosecutors about collusion, and now all of a sudden they realize w...

And youre better off saying nothing. and in this case, thats what it is. but he also hasnt got the law on his side. when hes yelling that there is no crime, that also isnt true and this argument about whether the word is collusion or conspiracy or aiding or abetting is simply a question of terminology. somehow the american public picked up the word collusion. there is no crime of collusion in the statutes, but there is a crime of conspireing together, of agreeing together, of working together, o...