President Trump And Vicepresident Kamala Harris. The only debate that both candidates have agreed to participate in so far. Trump set to campaign in Battle Ground Wisconsin Today as harris spends the weekend in pennsylvania with no Campaign Events scheduled today. Welcome to Fox News live. Im alicia acuna. Hey, griff. Griff hey, alicia. Im griff jenkins. Well take you live to the Campaign Trial in just a minute. First, a pakistani man was arrested in canada, and allegedly planning a Mass Shooting for the anniversary the October 7th attacks in israel. Cb cotton. Whats the latest. A pakistani citizen living in canada told undercover agents he want Today Kill as many jews as possible accord to go a criminal complaint. Which says beginning in november 2023, khan was sharing these pictures on an encrypted Messaging App and on the app, he told he was trying to create an offline cell of fellow isis supporters who would carry out the attacks on ar15 rifles, and they sorried in, telling New Yor
Donald trump set to campaign in wisconsin where recent polling shows a tight race two months from today. This after a new York City judge agreed to postpone his sentencing and Hush Money Criminal Trial until after election day. Here we go. Allysia Trump Will Face Harris in philadelphia. Senior national Correspondent Richardson live with a preview of todays rally. Wisconsin will see an awful lot of these candidates the next couple months. Donald trump is scheduled to be here in an hour speaking at this airport, a conservative district in a more rural part of the state, trump is trying to turn out voters to counter Democrat Support in milwaukee and madison. Polls are close in the Blue Wall that will likely decide this election. Trump and Vice President harris have been rolling out their economic plan, trump is calling for lower taxes, lower spending and fewer regulations. You wants to boost Energy Production in Government Efficiency. Pollster republicans have the edge on the economy. The
Paul welcome to the journal editorial report, im paul gigot. The Supreme Court on wednesday agreed to decide whether former President Donald Trump should be immune from prosecution in his federal election interference case. Dealing a blow to special counsel jack smiths effort to try the former president and likely 2024 republican nominee before with no. Oral arguments are now set for late april with a decision expected by late june. A timetable that could push the trial originally set to begin this monday close to election day and possibly beyond. For more on the political and legal implications of the justices decision to take the case, im join ised by Wall Street Journal columnists Dan Henninger, kim strassel and bill mcif gun. So, bill, the bill mcgurn. If Supreme Court didnt have to take this case the Supreme Court didnt have to take this case, and theres an argument for dodging it because they could have let a d. C. Circuit opinion that denied immunity stand. Now they take this, t
Irs Whistle Blowers saying something coming to government treat the bidens different and informant claiming the biden family had been bribed. Should you ignore that or investigate that. Only way to investigate is impeach inquiry and the committee has the power to get all the documents they need. Paul lets bring in Wall Street Journal columnist kim sto is, sle and strossle and brian mcgun. They didnt seem to agree on the terms of the agreement. Its a first for me. What why did they not think on the same page here . Yeah, i mean, its absolutely mind boggling, paul. But, look, the central issue seems to be whether or not there was a Wink Nod Deal between the two the judge exposed specifically over the question of whether or not hunter biden was getting an Immunity Agreement related to other charges in the investigation. There was a paragraph in the Diversion Deal laying that out. Hunters team clearly viewed as completely making him immune from future charges and the problem that the prose
widespread doubt and uncertainty, the united states government seems to have assumed a role similar to an orwellian ministry of truth. white house from press secretary karine jean-pierre responded on wednesday. we certainly disagree with this decision. we re going to continue to promote responsible actions to protect public health, safety and security when confronted by challenges like a deadly pandemic. our view remains that social media platforms have a critical responsibility to take action or to take account of the effects of their platforms are having to the american people. paul: let s bring in our panel, wall street journal columnists dan henninger, kim strassel and iowaly shah finley. alicia, tell us who sued the government and what they re alleging. louisiana and missouri joined by scientists and conservative activists sued the government for infringing on their free speech rights. they claim that they put pressure and coerced the platforms such as youtubing