Apportionment Clause News Today

On December 5, 2023, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Moore v. United States, addressing the constitutionality of the section 965 transition tax, which was enacted in the...

In this case the anti-tax argument requires them to make light of a Supreme Court decision that came down when the ink was barely dry on the Constitution.

President Joe Biden, in his State of the Union address before Congress on February 7, 2023, proposed a wealth tax on "billionaires." The lead editorial of The Wall Street Journal for February 11-12, 2023...

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) was hastily enacted and ushered in a sea change to how the U.S. imposes tax on international operations; it was inevitable that litigation...

The Supreme Court has not yet issued a decision on hearing the 5th Circuit case, which Republican state attorneys general say should be affirmed, while Democrats say it should be reviewed and reversed.

In Moore v. United States, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently rejected arguments that the mandatory repatriation tax imposed under section 965 of the Internal Revenue Code...

In Moore v. United States, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently rejected arguments that the mandatory repatriation tax imposed under section 965 of the Internal Revenue Code violated the...

Final report, do you agree this investigation is just too far along to be stopped. >> yes, i think its doo far along and i dont think whitaker is going to take the stance that hell stop the investigation. teechb even if he did, theres so many checks and balances that he can subpoena the report, subpoena him to come testify. i think the truth will come out. but, again, weve got whitakers appointment at question. whether or not its legal or not. >> the husband of -- kellyanne conway wrote an op-ed...

Number of legislatures -- >> the constitution says that. felons cant vote. they have to be counted. >> laura: right, so you are saying illegal immigrants are citizens when it comes to the apportionment clause. there is a debate about that in legal circles. >> the constitution says that. the supreme court says that. the avid case reached that conclusion. and if you want to reverse that, fine. try to pass a constitutional amendment. try to reverse the decision. dont pollute the census in an effort...