Page 112 - Arbiter News Today

Conversation for experts and lay viewers alike. im wondering if you can walk us through as what you saw as important bottom line coming out of the first part of this hearing. >> well, bottom line, michael horowitz who is a highly respected inspector general, neutral arbiter, if you will, defending his report and conclusions. those conclusions include something for everyone, which is what lindsey graham is seizing on, very clear mistakes made by the fbi in the first approval and subsequent reappr...

Kirstjen nielsen and it happens again when anyone dares to step out of line and not as a president stooge or cronies they were terminated and youre seeing it play out with christopher wray. >> and barr -- the whole point of having an inspector general is to have a neutral arbiter and inspector general horowitz does this and bill barr comes out and said it is wrong. >> right. he issued a very in sendy air yu statement yesterday and then with the "wall street journal" he doubled down on this idea ...

For wrongdoing and issues a subpoena, thats part of the checks and balances that the president, sadly, is ignoring. and thats the crux of the matter. we either are a republic or we are a monarchy. george washington had to respond to congress. abraham lincoln had to respond to congress. >> let me follow up on ethans question because youve called the white houses decision to fight these subpoenas obstruction of justice. they see it as separation of powers. you say youre not going to wait on the co...

When democrats talked about corruption it was specifically recommended to the ukraine issue and i know youve talked about that a lot today. youve clearly stated you think president trump had no corrupt intent on page 39 of your report. you said something else that i think bears repeating today. you were highlighting the fact that the democrats appear to be taking the position that if a president seeks judicial review over executive branch testimony or document subpoenaed by congress rather than ...

Talking about obstruction, it was specifically related to the ukraine issue. i know youve talked about it a lot. youve clearly stated you think president trump had no corrupt intent. page 39 of your report. he said something else i think that bears repeating. you were highlighting the fact that the democrats appear to be taking the position that if it president seeks judicial review over executive branch testimony or documents subpoenaed by congress that rather than letting the courts be the arb...

That when democrats have been talking about obstruction, it was specifically related to the ukraine issue. and i know youve talked about that a lot today. youve clearly stated that you think president trump had no corrupt intent. on page 39 of your report. you said something else i think that bears repeating today. you were highlighting the fact that the democrats appear to be taking the position that if a president seeks judicial review over executive branch testimony or documents subpoenaed by...

Campaign that continued through september when that aid was ultimately release. katy, the committee is set to vote on tomorrow evening and then it heads to the house judiciary committee. >> when do we expect that to happen, geoff? >> reporter: the drawing up of articles of impeachment? its funny, you cant nail down lawmakers on the record. no outside pressure nor the calendar will be the arbiter of where this investigation goes. when they say that, theyre not really just saying that they really ...

Danced with you at trump nightclub in london and went on to have sex with you in a house belonging to your friend. your response? >> i have no recollection of ever meeting this lady. none whatsoever. >> you dont remember meeting her? >> no. >> virginia roberts will respond to prince andrews claim he didnt know her. she will do so in a bbc interview. here is a preview. >> he knows what happened. i know what happened. and there is only one of us telling the truth. >> we spoke to cnn royal commenta...

Or another lawyer boeing in there under oath to say why it is unfair? >> tony sayeg will respond to the letter this evening. i dont want to get ahead of the white house. i want to point out in a regular judicial proceeding, the prosecutor and judge are not the same person. that is what jerry nadler are doing. they are the prosecutor, the judge, or a jury. that is not a separation of powers. that is not a fair and accurate process. if they wanted to seek truth and infairness they would allow impa...

Wrote "the post american". wed have to live in a balanced powered world. im worried about a different post american world. a world where american is no longer the arbiter of truth and trust. basically the world has looked to us as the arbiter of what is right and scientific and just. and at the same time weve always been the generator of trust around the world. building alliances and inclusion, knitting the world together. over the last 70 years, thats worked out well for us. what happens if we ...