Page 188 - Arbiter News Today

Chairman gowdy, the senate majority leader wont make that accusation. i think thats really going on here in the state that trey-- statement that trey gowdy made today is they have a dying investigation. the house committee run by republicans already found no wrong doing. theres no wrong doing here. this is an effort to keep it going. i think they want to get into the personal e-mail. they want to embarrass. they want to harass. theyre calling for the server to be turned over or for some independ...

Independent arbiter a federal judge, an archivist an twice -- >> this is a different situation. she chose to merge the two accounts. she chose to use only one e-mail account for business and for personal items. and she chose to take all those e-mails into her possession and never have them on a state.gov server. therefore shes created a situation where these questions now need answering. hopefully they say within the next 48 hours shell try to. although well wait to see in what forum and with wh...

It provided complete production of documents? >> its my understanding that will not be happening. >> joining me now congressman trey gowdy. good to see you tonight sir. they said it right there on camera, theyre not going to go back and look for responsive documents to subpoenas to litigation inquiries to freedom of information act requests. if you asked prior to the date hillarys 55,000 pages were turned over a week ago or two weeks ago, youre out of luck. >> well, the state department is not g...

Resources, we need more time. can you please prioritize what you really need. i mean we even had to have a public hearing with joel rubin because we werent getting anywhere. so the state department had six months to have the conversation you and i are just having. shame on me for taking six months, but really shame on me if i trust the state department to be that neutral detached arbiter of her records because they failed in the past to do so. >> last question, how are you going to up the ante? ...

Resources, we need more time. can you please prioritize what you really need. i mean we even had to have a public hearing with joel rubin because we werent getting anywhere. so the state department had six months to have the conversation you and i are just having. shame on me for taking six months, but really shame on me if i trust the state department to be that neutral detached arbiter of her records because they failed in the past to do so. >> last question, how are you going to up the ante? ...

Have private g-mail on your official government account until 2010 or 2011. she also made a very passionate defense in favor of keeping her personal e-mails private, saying that they are about chelseas wedding in 2010, her mothers funeral in 2011, yoga routines. when it came to questions about why she should be trusted to have been the arbiter of deciding what was personal and what was professional when she handed over these 55,000 pages of e-mails to the government, the ones that were, accordin...

Individual to be their own arbiter and she is in the situation where she cant land saying there is no way to verify it. that is why the controversy doesnt go away with this. >> and casey, we wondered how much questions she would take and we counted maybe ten questions and we wondered if she would be rusty and we wondered if we wouldnt be satisfied and we heard a lot of convenience, and a lot of folks will understand that and folks in the chattering classes will not be satisfied. how are you feel...

I heard just a little while ago the state department announced they would begin to post some of my e-mails, which im very glad to hear because i want it all out there. >> andrea? thank you, andrea. >> thank you. can you explain how you decided which of the personal e-mails to get rid of how you got rid of them and when and how youll respond to questions about you being the arbiter of what you release? and secondly could you answer the questions that have been raised about foreign contributions f...

Months to have the conversation you and i are just having. shame on me for taking six months, but really shame on me if i trust the state department to be that neutral detached arbiter of her records. because they failed in the past to do so. >> some people are saying clinton will finally come clean when she talks,ther truth is she may have a statement. its unlikely shell answer the tough questions at least without not being pressed to do so. >> thanks for the recap at that scandal continues to ...

On the line of whether they are public or private. the questions going to be is hillary clinton the arbiter of which e-mails become public or is it going to be someone else? i think youll see her re repeatedly pressed on that today. >> how much is this e-mail going to draw out other democrats to go up against hillary clinton? >> there are just a handful who are still consideration it, but none of them willing to engage on this controversy or to directly confront her or her record. you have marti...