Page 189 - Arbiter News Today

Independent arbiter a federal judge, an archivist an twice -- >> this is a different situation. she chose to merge the two accounts. she chose to use only one e-mail account for business and for personal items. and she chose to take all those e-mails into her possession and never have them on a state.gov server. therefore shes created a situation where these questions now need answering. hopefully they say within the next 48 hours shell try to. although well wait to see in what forum and with wh...

Account? and what lengths are you willing to go to to prove you didnt? some people including supporters of yours, have suggested having an independent arbiter look at your server for instance. >> we did not. in fact my direction to conduct the thorough investigation was to air on the side of providing anything that could be possibly viewed as work related. that doesnt mean they will be by the state department once the state department goes through them. but out of abundance of caution and care w...

Today? >> not as -- as a practical matter it probably started the day after president obama was inaugurated. but im sort of kidding but serious. we thought of her as someone running for president as a long time. but this is the first time shes been doing a public event where she is taking questions and people are watching her and there is an nbc news special, being shown on every network very aggressively and she would prefer that to be a moment where she talks about, im running, i could be the ...

Why they are not the third party arbiter i would recommend the secretary turn her server over to so you can analyze it for forensics to see whether or not theres been any hacking or tampering. secondarily, i have no interest in e-mails about bridesmaids dresses or wedding cakes. its none of my business and i dont want them. but public records are all of our business and that subsequent benghazi is particularly our committees business. >> how did you find out? i know youve been trying to get docu...

Why they are not the third party arbiter i would recommend the secretary turn her server over to so you can analyze it for forensics to see whether or not theres been any hacking or tampering. secondarily, i have no interest in e-mails about bridesmaids dresses or wedding cakes. its none of my business and i dont want them. but public records are all of our business and that subsequent benghazi is particularly our committees business. >> how did you find out? i know youve been trying to get docu...

Independent arbiter a federal judge, an archivist an twice -- >> this is a different situation. she chose to merge the two accounts. she chose to use only one e-mail account for business and for personal items. and she chose to take all those e-mails into her possession and never have them on a state.gov server. therefore shes created a situation where these questions now need answering. hopefully they say within the next 48 hours shell try to. although well wait to see in what forum and with wh...

I delete personal e-mails after i get them very often. i think the questions that we really didnt get an answer to is why the server and how were these decisions made about which were personal and which were actually state department. she did say that she had counsel helping her decide which i dont think is something weve heard before helping her decide which things went to the state department and which didnt. but in terms of whether she was going to hand this over to a third party, to the arch...

It provided complete production of documents? >> its my understanding that will not be happening. >> joining me now congressman trey gowdy. good to see you tonight sir. they said it right there on camera, theyre not going to go back and look for responsive documents to subpoenas to litigation inquiries to freedom of information act requests. if you asked prior to the date hillarys 55,000 pages were turned over a week ago or two weeks ago, youre out of luck. >> well, the state department is not g...

Private. so that means as a practical matter, some of the e-mails that are gone can never be appraised for whether they might, under federal law, be properly the property of u.s. government and potentially subject to public oversight. >> and that is also the political problem for her, ari, and that is she couldnt come clean and say ill have the national archives or some independent arbiter and back up what i said and say these are private and these are public. so this is going to launch all kind...

They correspond to that. they cover all the time in between -- >> [ inaudible question ]. >> theres not like two months missing. >> help us clarify here. weve heard that secretary clinton turned over 55,000 e-mails. does the state department have every e-mail from secretary clintons server or are there potentially thousands still solely in her possession? >> reporter: right. thats the core issue here. we just dont know how many e-mails there were on her private server. and it was her staff worki...