Page 321 - Arguing News Today

Of workers work full-time, but dont earn enough to live on, and so their salaries are propped up by the taxpayers and thats what bernie is arguing is an outrage. his solution is, well take the amount of the top up, the subsidy to amazon and other companies and tax them that amount, raising taxes on business. i think theres another way of doing it, finally one that i recommend in my book, more right of center if you like, say to amazon and these companies may your workers enough to live on so we ...

Going to get a yes, in which case we can probably move forward with written questions see if that doesnt satisfy them and satisfy us. brian: is that a good move judge napolitano. easy stuff. open book test. do it, right? >> except there is going to be follow-up questions. >> thats their request. >> i have been arguing that they shouldnt and obviously rudy giuliani knows the case better than i do and even though we all know the president. he knows the client better than i do. i have been arguing ...

Appoint by president obama. >> i think youve written on this topic as well. >> ive not win on the constitutionality. >> talking about whether it would be wise to do this? >> ive made my thoughts known for congress to examine in the wake of september 11, i thought one of things congress would look at is how to make the presidency more effective. >> i just want my democratic colleagues to remind you that when president clinton was being investigated you took the position that hes not above the law...

The views of the nominee on racial issues, racial profiling, he claimed. in response attorney general from texas read the riot act to him and every other democrat on the committee said im with booker and if youre going to expel him, expel all of us. it was quite a moment and a lot of arguing. >> its been hard to tell -- go ahead. >> pete go ahead and then neil. >> its been hard to tell whether this a confirmation hearing for brett kavanaugh or about documents. the democrats are saying by hiding ...

Question, i dont view the issue in the independent counsel statute and the morrison v. olson as dealing with a long passed statue and a an obscure not relevant issue. the reason you reached out and volunteered that you loved to overturn morrison v. olson isnt because scalia wrote a powerful and moving dissent. its because of a view of the executive branch having all of the power of the executive branch in the presidents hands that you have articulated across speeches, interviews, writings and op...

Or arguing nor the unitary executive theory that scalia and his dissenters argued. ill give you another point. you said justice scalia never had better quote than in morrison v. olson. you go on to say you believe his views will one day be the law of the land. i assume here youre talking about the constitutional analysis in scalias dissent and you express a hope and expectation that it will be the law of the land. you sit before me to be a nominee that is a seat within your reach. >> again, sena...

96% of his record is missing. it is reasonable -- this is reasonable that we should want to review his entire record and then we can debate among us the relevance of what is in his record to his nomination. but it should not be the ability of this -- the leadership of this committee to unilaterally make decisions about what we will and will not see in terms of its admissibility, instead of arguing about the weight of whatever is made admissible. the late senator kennedy of massachusetts called t...

Disney fired him last weekend, found tweets from seven to 10 years ago, made fun of child rape, pedoph ilia, awful stuff, but instantly fired him. the hollywood reporter wrote about this. in fires james bernstein, disney hurts all of hollywood. but so long as there is no actual criminal activity, there has to be a difference between who a person was and who a person is and we have to allow for the fact that people can change. now the stars of guardians of the galaxy surrounded him, arguing -- >>...

It is reasonable, it is reasonable that we should want to review his entire record. and then we can debate among us the relevance of what is in his record. to his nomination. but it should not be the ability of this, the leadership of this committee, to unilaterally make decisions about what we will and will not see. in terms of itsed a missibility, instead of arguing about the weight of whatever is made admissible. the late senator kennedy of massachusetts called these hearings a supreme court ...

Specificity if that what the d.o.e. might be arguing, and what has been on the books is too vague is, and there needs to be morelanguage, and does it make matters better or worse in your view? >> what we have here is that the department rescinded old guidance from 2014 and 2015 and put in interim guidance that left questions unanswered and going through a long process to provide guidance that has not been done in thoroughly engaging the stakeholders. i was in a meeting with secretary devos where...