spending. nave got better with two people, claiming the thatcherite mantle. in very different ways. so it is a battle on the right of the tory party. the focus is on tax cuts. when is the debate but not should there be. there is no focus on the role of the state as demands on the role of the state as demands on the role of the state as demands on the state are growing. and so it is a return to that sort of 1980s thatcherism, that very erratically the tory party have been trying to move away from. thatcherism incidentally, absolutely a product of its time. the late 70s and early 80s. not the situation we are in now. but she cast a spell over its membership. at least two candidates. and it is a very narrow contest, in that respect. you were reporting from london when margaret thatcher was prime minister. as steve rightly says, circumstances are different but the debate is over notjust taxation and the fact we ve got the highest tax burdens. therefore that is something that she
owned a shop in grantham never spent more than owned a shop in grantham never spent more than he owned a shop in grantham never spent more than he earned owned a shop in grantham never spent more than he earned and owned a shop in grantham never spent more than he earned and that- owned a shop in grantham never spent more than he earned and that is- more than he earned and that is basicaiiy more than he earned and that is basically what more than he earned and that is basically what you re more than he earned and that is basically what you re saying. - more than he earned and that i5| basically what you re saying. but more than he earned and that is- basically what you re saying. but he is being basically what you re saying. but he is being attacked basically what you re saying. but he is being attacked by basically what you re saying. but he is being attacked by those - basically what you re saying. but he is being attacked by those who - is being attacked by those w